Ireland: end medieval abortion ban

Late last month a woman died in an Irish hospital after being refused an abortion, even when she told the doctors she was miscarrying. The case has immediately re-opened the debate about the right to abortion not only when the mother’s life is in danger but as her right to choose.

The 31-year-old woman, Savita Halappanavar, was 17 weeks’ pregnant with her first child when she started to experience back pain. When the pain continued she asked the consultant if she could be induced and their response was “unfortunately you can’t because it’s a Catholic country.” When Savita said she is not Catholic, she is Hindu so why should the law be imposed on her the response was “I’m sorry, unfortunately it’s a Catholic country and it’s the law that they can’t abort when the foetus is live.”

The baby’s heartbeat stopped 3 days later and Savita died just 4 days after that from septicaemia.

Ireland’s position on abortion is that “it is lawful to terminate a pregnancy in Ireland if it is established as a matter of probability that there is a real and substantial risk to the life, as distinct from the health, of the mother, which can only be avoided by a termination of the pregnancy”.

However it is clear that this law isn’t followed through as Savita and her husband requested a termination several times but were told while there was still a foetal heartbeat one would not be carried out even though the couple were told the baby wouldn’t survive. Doctors are left to decide on a case-by-case basis as to whether to allow terminations to take place.

Irish anti-abortion groups continue to insist that the Republic’s laws were not responsible for Halappanavar’s death.

Niamh Uí Bhriain, of the Life Institute, said: “It is very sad to see abortion campaigners rush to exploit this case to further their own agenda. The tragic loss of Savita Halappanavar’s life was not caused by Ireland’s ban on abortion. We need to ensure that mothers and babies are best protected; and abortion is not part of best medical practise. It is medieval medicine.”

Before a women’s right to choose even comes into it there are many medically valid reasons for performing abortions ranging from physiological ones such as severe depression leading to suicidal thoughts to physical conditions such as pre-eclampsia. It is clear that it was solely Ireland’s ban on abortion which caused this woman to die as if she had been allowed a termination before she became ill it’s unlikely she would have contracted blood poisoning.

 Even if there is no medical condition associated with the pregnancy then it should be a woman’s right to choose whether she wants an abortion. Over 4000 women leave Ireland each year in search of abortions each year, which is far safer than taking the risk of a back street abortion.

We say: fighting society’s right to tell a women what to do with her body is the first step in fighting the social oppression of women, which is expressed in lower wages, higher unemployment, sexual assault and misogynist ideas in the mainstream media.  

We stand for:

A woman’s right to choose – free abortion on demand

Scrap all anti-abortion laws and the two-doctor rule

A working-class women’s movement to defend the rights of women

Stop the English Baccalaureate

 “Time to tackle the dumbing down” is the new slogan promoting the Tories’ latest attack on education. The introduction of the English Baccalaureate to replace GCSEs will drag education back to a two-tier system – dividing students by class and ‘intelligence’.

Gove claims a new system is needed because currently too many students are getting too high grades and achievement levels are increasing each year. He blames exam boards competing and giving schools too much information about what will be on exam papers and students not completing their own coursework.

If that’s true, why not nationalise the exam boards into one single board under the control of students and education workers – those best placed to measure educational achievement.

And if competition amongst exam boards has been such a disaster how is allowing competition amongst schools going to solve the problem?

The reality is that the Tories have a plan for education – and it doesn’t have students’ best interests at heart. The scrapping of EMA, the reform of teachers’ pensions and the introduction of private schools funded by the taxpayer (academies, free schools) all serve to increase the control of British bosses over our education.

They want to choose what we learn, how we learn, and indoctrinate us with the attitudes and values that suit them. They are making education for profit, not knowledge.

The Tories have already shown their contempt for young people, when they decided to fail tens of thousands of GCSE students this summer so they could look tough on ‘grade inflation’.

Rather  than the current module-based exams with some being taken at the end of year 10 and some at the end of year 11, all exams would be taken at the end of the final year.

This prevents students from being able to take resits and also massively increases the pressure during exams season at the end of year 11. Not only will all the exams been taken at once but unlike in GCSES where in some subjects a percentage of the final grade is from coursework, particularly in more vocational subjects such as health and social care, the EBC will be 100% exams.

One key area the EBC will affect is those with dyslexia or other learning difficulties. The British Dyslexia Association said an emphasis on exams rather than coursework and the breaking of two-year studies into smaller units and the extra stress associated with once-and-for-all exams could disadvantage candidates with some learning difficulties. The changes would also damage their chances of going on to higher education.

With all this change going to happen you’d assume the English Baccalaureate would go through some serious piloting before being introduced into schools permanently, but oh no it is likely to go ahead initially in English, Maths and Science from 2015 without any conventional pre-trials. It seems that, Ofqual, the exams regulator, has quietly abandoned a promise to ensure that all major exam reforms are piloted in advance. A spokesman simply says:  ”Due to concerns that pilots can stifle innovation and the length of time required for meaningful pilots to be undertaken, [the piloting principles] were not taken forward.”

It seems that young people’s education simply isn’t important enough to spend time getting right before they’re just thrown in at the deep end.

Schools for students – not for profit

Education is one of the last areas of the economy not run in the interest of private profit. Part of the bosses’ solution to the crisis is to open up new markets to invest in. This is why the Tories are desperately rushing through new laws which give businesses the right to run schools, hospitals and public services.

But the biggest barrier to education marketisation is the students and staff themselves – those who will be funnelled through a superficial, stripped-back education industry and those who are expected to work in it.

This explains the attempt to reform pensions and break the monopoly of state education. The new pensions will make workers work longer and receive less. The introduction of academies and free schools gives bosses the ‘right’ and incentive to profit from providing education.

Privatisation, new exams, higher fees; all have the aim of gradually eroding the ability of state schools to function outside of the market. Directly by buying schools, or indirectly by influencing government policy in smoky backrooms, employers will gain extensive powers to dictate the kind of education they want working people to have.

Reform of education is a permanent task of any society. But we think if ‘reform’ means ‘improvement’ then that can only come with greater investment. This investment should be under the control of education workers and communities – those who know best what their educational needs are.

We have to be clear that these reforms are not about providing real apprenticeships, giving young people secure futures, but transforming the school system into another tool to discipline the working class. The bosses’ vision for education is one which imposes flexibility, insecurity and division as facts of life, which future generations will learn from their first day in school.

We oppose the English Baccalaureate. Exams and education should be managed by teachers, education workers and students themselves.

We are fighting for free and equal access to education for all who want it.

The November 21 demonstration and Global Education Strike give students a great opportunity to re-kindle the flames of revolt.

Our education is not for sale!

Hungry Britain: austerity drives millions to foodbanks

At least 13 million people in the UK live below the poverty line and every day people in the UK go hungry for reasons ranging from unemployment to having to pay off debts to doorstop lenders. In 2011-12 food banks fed 128,687 people nationwide which was 100% more than the previous year.

The busiest food bank in Britain is in Coventry, it is run by the Trussell Trust and it can provide people three days of good quality food such as rice, sugar, tinned meat/fish and cereals. However you can’t just turn up their and get some grub, the only people who can receive food are those that have been referred by social services, youth offending teams or the citizen’s advice bureau.

Once they’ve been referred they can only go once or twice before they are put onto programmes to address the root cause of their poverty.

43% of people who attend the food bank do so because they are on benefits but they have been cut, delayed or the money they are getting simply isn’t enough to feed them. In the first 3 months of 2012, 167,000 people had their job seekers allowance stopped for no apparent reason. When this is what they’re surviving off and it is taken away from them they have little other choice but to go to food banks and take out a crisis loan.

The other 57% are people who have jobs but still cannot afford to feed themselves. A lot of the time it is because they have borrowed money in order to pay for bills and they have to pay it back out of money they would buy food with. Most people borrow off door stop lenders who befriend them and then guilt trip them into paying the money back with a massive interest rate. It can be very difficult and embarrassing to admit you can’t afford to feed yourself and you need help, but these people have no other choice.

There are no 250 food banks with 3 more opening each week. While our welfare system is suppose to support those who can’t support themselves it is in fact making life more difficult. With benefits not paying a living wage and with the government cutting thousands of peoples everyday for no reason except to make figures go down it is no wonder that people are beginning to starve.

We say

• Jobs for all and a living wage to be paid
• Benefits to be paid at a living wage for those who are unable to work

Has Pussy Riot fucked Putin?

Photo: Alessandro Della Bella

Three members of the band Pussy Riot have been sentenced to two years in prison after being found guilty of “hooliganism motivated by religious hatred”. The punishment has been denounced across the world, but Putin has launched a witch-hunt to round up remaining members of the group.

The question now is what does this latest crackdown on the right to protest mean for Russian society and will it re-ignite the pro-democracy campaigns?

The trial and sentence were used to make an example to other activists who have been making public criticisms of Putin’s undemocratic and corrupt government. It also served to boost support among his conservative base.

But even some of Putin’s close supporters have called the verdict a mistake. The Russian Orthodox Church, which pushed for prosecution in the first place, called for ‘forgiveness’. Others might be waking up to the scale of the PR disaster facing the regime, already under fire for it’s support for Syrian dictator Bashar Al-Assad.

International protests have spread rapidly – helped by the media-friendly image of Pussy Riot protesters dressed in bright colours with balaclavas.

Although the support of celebrities can sometimes be welcome – the range of US stars defending freedom of speech in Russia are less keen to defend it in their own country. Bradley Manning, the soldier who leaked the Wikileaks cables has spent a year in solitary confinement.

Nevertheless, the strength of international support will no doubt boost the confidence of those within Russia struggling against the all-powerful oligarchy, protected by the power of the Russian state.

While some criticism of officialdom is permitted, Putin and his circle have cracked down on attacks aimed at him directly or over allegations of corruption and criminality among those close to him.

Journalists, too, have been threatened, dismissed from their jobs and sometimes killed. Many high-profile opposition figures are in prison on trumped-up charges. (Though they may also well be guilty of the same kind of fraud and corruption that Putin’s gang are).

Harsh as the sentence for Pussy Riot is, it’s certainly convenient for Putin. Pundits arguing that he has scored a massive own goal, are missing a bigger issue. The focus on Russia and Pussy Riot deflects attention from Syria, giving Putin much needed breathing room to arrange Russian interests there while the attention of the world’s media is distracted.

A serious escalation of the witch-hunt will start to antagonise the youth of Russia, who will feel collectively threatened by the punishment. We support the demonstrations in solidarity with Pussy Riot, and appeal to the radical youth of Russia to embarass Putin and his gang in the church and government at every possible chance.

Pussy Riot could be one escalation too many for Putin – but that all depends on whether the Russian pro-democracy movement can overcome it’s internal divisions and unite behind a credible strategy for overthrowing Putin and the powerful capitalists who are the real rulers of Russia in the 21st century.

 

 Free Pussy Riot – Solidarity with Russian pro-democracy struggles – Kick out Putin’s gang!

Pussy Riot fuck with Putin

Feminist punk band Pussy Riot face three years in jail under tough russian anti-blashphemy laws.

The verdict, due on 17 August, hangs in the balance after a provocative performance on the alter of a Moscow Cathedral denounced President Putin’s crackdown on pro-democracy protesters earlier this year.

The performance was designed to raise attention to the politicisation of the Orthodox Church, whose chief god botherer publicly backed authoritarian president Vladimir Putin during the rigged elections in March.

The three are charged with hooliganism motivated by religious hatred. The federal prosecutor Alexei Nikiforov claims “The actions of the accomplices clearly show religious hatred and enmity,” and said “They must be isolated from society.”

Against claims that the protest had no political motive, defence lawyers argued that the women’s performance was an obviously act of opposition against Putin, the name of the song was “Virgin Mary, Chase Putin Out” and it was clearly not motivated by religious hatred.

The case has reawakened anti-government anger that first emerged when Putin announced last autumn that he was returning to the presidency. The huge protests were met with vicious police repression; now the government is determined to reassert control.

One of the lawyers representing the women said they were being treated horrifically and being tortured – denied food and adequate sleep. Opposition activists have called for protests to be held on 19 August against the treatment of the women.

Another lawyer for the women gave an impassioned speech warning of the consequences of a conviction. “Russia has no rule of law. Russia has no justice system,” he said. “Nothing has changed from Soviet times.” He warned that a guilty verdict would “definitely tear up relations between society and government”.

The trial has been widely publicised, with support coming in from across the world.

A guilty verdict and harsh sentence could backfire, and worries over repercussions seem to be behind the decision to delay the verdict.

 Solidarity flashmob protests are being organised in the UK in Leeds and London  for Sunday 12th August

Solidarity with Pussy Riot – release them now

 

Scrap blasphemy laws

 

Down with Putin and his gang!

Young people don’t need jobs or housing say Tory millionaires

Cameron’s £750,000 pile – got a spare bed?

The government is determined to boost tax revenues. But instead of collecting some of the £70million+ illegally dodged in taxes by the super rich every year, Cameron says young people must pay – by being denied access to jobs and houses. Of course, a government whose ministers are almost all millionaires isn’t likely to demand their rich mates pay their share.

Amid a recession and huge youth unemployment, in a speech on welfare he said that people under the age of 25 should be stripped of their housing benefits and made to remain at home until they can afford to move out with no government support.

With youth unemployment hitting 1 million, minimum wage being frozen, EMA being cut and tuition fees rising, they’ve got it bad. A lot of young people couldn’t live with their parents till the age of 25 because of personal reasons or simply because their families couldn’t afford it.

More importantly why should young people be made to live at home, we want them to become independent adults who can make their own choices in life.

These proposals will increase homelessness. By removing the housing benefits the state provides and with no jobs available people have little other way of receiving money and paying bills. While there are no jobs because of the situation our government and banks put us in, then they should be supporting individuals and families until they are able to support themselves. Low interest rates fixed by the Bank of England encourage housing speculators to keep properties empty until rents are profitable enough.

His attack particularly affects single parents or families with children. With 1 in 8 leaving a job and 1 in 5 turning down a job due to the cost of childcare it is clear these families aren’t being supported enough with free crèches and nurseries to enable their parents to work. Instead the government wants to import a crazy scheme from the USA where parents are supposed to take their children into work…

His new proposal includes benefits cuts to those families with 3 or more children ‘to stop the out-of-work being better off by having children.’ With child benefits already having been slashed having another child barely gives you enough extra money to feed them let alone any left over.

‘Consider paying some benefits “in kind” rather than in cash,’ is Cameron’s way of saying ‘all these benefit scroungers spend their money on booze and drugs.’ As this is the case in some situations, support should be given through rehab schemes. Giving ‘money’ in tokens won’t get rid of the issue and it’ll mean that some children have even less to live on.  The US already has 14 million people living on food vouchers – and this number is going up not down.

The disabled are being attacked too with Cameron saying that 2/3s of those on Disability Claimant remain on it for their whole lives. He believes these people should be forced to do full-time community work and take steps to improve their health.

During his speech Cameron clearly stated that pensions wouldn’t be affected in the next wave of reforms. ‘If you work hard all your life, you deserve dignity in retirement.’ The implication being that those young people deserve nothing because they’ve given nothing to the state yet. The youth are an easy target because with no money and living with mum and dad, it’s more difficult for them to organise.

This is another attack on the working class, this time the young and he uses this to drive a wedge between the young and old. Young people didn’t cause the crisis and our future shouldn’t be sacrificed to pay back millionaire crooks like Barclays boss Bob Diamond – who carried out a giant financial fraud and got off with £2million hush money.

It’s not even like Benefits are bankrupting the country – each year more than £15 billion worth of welfare is left unclaimed, and goes back into the pot. The politicians live in giant homes and have refused to build enough decent housing for over 20 years. The private sector isn’t taking up the slack, and why would they? It’s not the capitalists’ job to look out for ordinary people.  If we want a society with proper communities and opportunities for young people, we’ll have to fight for it.

Benefits – the Tory weapon of mass distraction

When Cameron took time off to criticise Jimmy Carr’s tax-dodging, it wasn’t long before people started to ask him about his own friendly links with “morally wrong” tax dodgers. That these people happened to be using the cash they saved to fund the Tory party is no more than an unfortunate coincidence.

All very embarassing right? So the Tories took out their frustration on – you guessed it – unemployed people. With 1 million youth not in education, training or employment, there’s enough to choose from. Cameron said he wants to end the ‘culture of entitlement’. Apparently he doesn’t mean the bosses’ entitlement to chuck thousands out of a job, offshore their factories and come to an ‘arrangement’ on taxes over a cosy dinner with a Tory minister or two.

When the Tories’ economic ignorance sends the whole country to shit, the first people they blame are the people suffering the most from their extraordinary incompetence.

Cameron reckons people under the age of 25 should be stripped of their housing benefits and made to remain at home until they can afford to move out. Presumably, this will be made into a sane policy by the setting up giant plantations of magic job trees.

Youth unemployment = 1 million+

EMA = gone

Tuition fees = £9,000 a year

Minimum wage = frozen

Schools = privatised and branded with corporate logos

The record speaks for itself. Cameron obviously never did meet anyone who lived in a normal home – if he did he wouldn’t be suggesting that its normal for young people to live with their parents til they’re 25!

Anyway why should young people be made to live at home, why shouldn’t we be given the chance to become independent adults, capable of making our own decisions?

Because that would cost money – the government would have to reverse hundreds of thousands of job cuts, invest in secure jobs, regulate agency work, equalise the minimum wage – and most importantly, build millions of new homes to address Britain’s housing crisis.

What the proposals mean

The government has already overseen the destruction of millions of jobs. Now they’re taking away housing benefit. Osborne is famous for his mathematical ignorance, but even he can work out that no job + no money = no house. Or, more people will be kicked onto the streets.

Or perhaps Cameron and his mates will open up their 10-bed mansions to those whose homes get repossed by Britain’s nationalised banks?

His attack particularly affects single parents or families with children. With 1 in 8 mothers leaving a job and 1 in 5 turning down a job due to the cost of childcare, the true cost of cutting schemes like Sure Start is to plunge working families into poverty.

His new proposal includes benefits cuts to those families with 3 or more children ‘to stop the out-of-work being better of by having children.’ With child benefits already having been slashed having another child barely gives you enough extra money to feed them let alone any left over.

‘Consider paying some benefits “in kind” rather than in cash,’ is Cameron’s way of saying ‘all these benefit scroungers spend their money on booze and drugs.’ The USA and France have had ‘food voucher’ schemes for decades – and their problems are even worse.

The disabled are being attacked too with Cameron saying that two thirds of those on Disability Claimant remain on it for their whole lives. He believes these people should be forced to do full-time community work and take steps to improve their health. It’s the great irony that the high number of Disability allowance claimants stems from Tory attempts in the 1980s and 90s to disguise the tru level of unemployment by convincing people to sign on for Disability instead of Jobseekers’.

During his speech Cameron clearly stated that pensions wouldn’t be affected in the next wave of reforms. ‘If you work hard all your life, you deserve dignity in retirement.’ The implication being that those young people deserve nothing because they’ve given nothing to the state yet. The youth are an easy target because with no money and living with mum and dad, it’s more difficult for them to organise.

The real point though, is that most young people don’t vote Tory – so why look after people who’d sooner string you up than “call you ‘Dave’”?

These proposals are savage, but are mainly the reaction of a Prime Minister who knows he has blundered from one scandal to the next, and is trying to reconnect with his Party base.

Nevertheless, it’s a glimpse of what Cameron would certainly like to do, should he ever get into power with a clear majority. All the junk about big society and ‘all in this together’ has been well and truly ditched.

The Tories are telling ordinary working people that we’re going to pay for the crisis, and if we protest, they’ll simply pass laws to stop us. Are we going to let them?

From low pay to no pay

Security workers at the Jubilee event in London were forced to sleep under London
Bridge, do unpaid work and had no access to toilets for over 24 hours. 30 jobseekers
and 50 on apprentices ‘worked’ for Close Protection UK (CPUK) under the
government’s workfare system.

Downing St refused to see any criticisms and made it clear they would not be
changing its system which profits the rich by providing them with free labour while
threatening to remove the poor’s benefits unless they comply.

This is by no means a one off as workfare is rapidly taking off nationally with more
companies being exposed for profiting from the scheme.

At Tescos we see the unemployed working 40 hours a week for 6 weeks just to
receive their benefit of £53 a week, this works out at just £1.30 an hour. People are
given the impression there might be paid work at the end however less than 40% are offered a job.

Workfare seriously undermines wages and replaces jobs. If multi-millionaire
companies like Tesco’s can get workers from the government for free, then why
would they employ workers they had to pay? The government should demand that big employers, who are making record profits, should create more jobs paid a living wage.

The number of unemployed currently stands at 2.67 million (a rate of 8.9%). The
TUC has suggested that the real figure could in fact be over 6 million. Contrast this with just 400,000 or so vacancies, mainly in the south. In many regions the figure is worse. At the end of 2011 in Hull, there were over 18,000 unemployed chasing less than 500 vacancies.

It is predicted that there will be 500,000 public sector job losses over the next five
years. It is clear that the government intends to use workfare to replace gaps left in
the public sector. It is already doing this within the NHS; under-trained volunteers are
doing eight weeks of unpaid work including cleaning and feeding patients. These are
important aspects of patient care and require full training; it is appalling that untrained
volunteers have such a massive weight on their shoulders.

We need to be fighting back against this government and their scheme which benefits
only the rich. With youth taking the brunt of the unemployment, we are being scapegoated as lazy scroungers if we refuse to take unpaid work.

For professional jobs the situation is even worse, with work in law and the media almost impossible without doing months of unpaid internships.

We don’t say the government owes us a living – but we do say we don’t owe the bankers a bailout.

If money can be found for banks, wars and jubilees, then money can be found to invest in decent, secure jobs, paying living wages – but we’ll have to fight for this to happen.

“We’ve lost our patience” say Doctors planning strike action

Doctors have voted overwhelming in favour of strike action in a BMA (British Medical Association) ballot of 104,000 members over pension changes.

There was a 50% turn out and 79% of GPs, 84% of hospital consultants and 92% of junior doctors who responded voted in favour.

Doctors last took action in 1975, when Harold Wilson’s labour government was in power. Consultants worked to rule from January to April after Health Minister, Barbara Castle tried to stop them carrying out private work on top of their NHS duties. In November, junior doctors took industrial action over low pay in new contracts. A deal was struck.

The 24 hour strike will be on the 21st June and while they will still provide emergency care, outpatient appointments and non-urgent care will be affected.

BMA said:

“We will be postponing non-urgent cases and although this will be disruptive to the NHS, rest assured, doctors will be there when our patients need us most and our action will not impact on your safety.”

Doctors have been hit hard recently with pay freezes, increased workloads and the prospect of increased pension contributions.

The latest changes will see doctors paying up to 14.5 per cent of their salaries in pension contributions – twice as much as some other public-sector staff on a similar salary in order to receive a similar pension.

While the right-wing media go on about doctors pensions being higher than most it doesn’t change the fact that the government are reversing on deals made four years ago. The media have been successful in their attacks on other public sector workers which have left doctors alone amongst the pubic sector with their pensions still in tact. There should be no pensions being cut in the public sector and we want to bring other pensions up, not drive them down. Doctors earn 10 times less than the corporate CEOs and bankers who are profiting from the crisis they created and driving millions into poverty.

Recently the RCN held a ballot where the majority rejected the government’s pension changes, however the turn out was low. We call for nurses, porters, cleaners and other hospital staff to strike alongside the doctors and that they should lobby their unions until they agree to do so. If the union leaderships don’t listen, then rank and file activists need to develop their own organisation to enable other hospital staff to take solidarity action alongside doctors and smash a hole through the government’s austerity agenda.

This vote shouldn’t just be seen as the doctors and their pensions; it’s about the government’s dismantling of public services. It’s a vote against the recent changes within the NHS and the selling off of our healthcare services!

Tories expand compulsory work schemes

The work-for-welfare scheme has been scrapped right? Wrong. Tory minister Iain Duncan Smith is extending the workfare scheme, forcing thousands more youth into unpaid, dead-end jobs.

Currently, unemployed people can be made to work unpaid for large companies for up to a month. Under the new plans, the scheme will be extended to six months’ unpaid labour. Those who refuse will be stripped of their benefits and left to starve.

As we reported back in March, the negative publicity and protests did not result in the abolition of the scheme. Instead the government and big companies launched a major PR drive, while continuing to raise armies of unpaid workers to boost the profits of Britain’s richest companies.

Workfare means working up to 30 hours a week to continue receiving benefits at £53 a week. This works out at a measly £1.70 an hour – well below the official minimum wage. Working a 40 hour week on the minimum wage would still leave you below the government’s official poverty line.

The government insists this slave labour will give a work ethic to the unemployed – as though the 1 million unemployed youth are desperately trying to avoid working.

The hypocrisy of a government of millionaires talking about ‘work ethic’ at the same time that they are cutting hundreds of thousands of jobs is beyond belief. Prime Minister David Cameron only ever had one ‘proper’ job in his life – working at a friend’s PR firm practicing the lies and deceit necessary to a parliamentary career.

There are more than 1 million 16-24 year olds not in work, education or training, 20% of the total. Amongst Black youth the unemployment rate is 50%. There are 800,000 people who have been unemployed for more than a year.

There are 2.65 million people unemployed, but just 400,000 vacancies. This means 6 people chasing every job, but in areas of high unemployment like the north the average number of applicants per vacancy is much higher.

Even the welfare-to-work profiteers who run the scheme admit that less than a quarter of people on the scheme find work at the end. No matter, as long as the scheme continues to provide hundreds of millions of pounds’ profit for those involved.

Many people argue that rich companies making record profits can easily afford to employ people on proper wages. This is true. But in a capitalist market, ruled by the logic of profit, all wealth comes from the value created by workers. So inevitably, bosses must compete with each other to maximise profits by reducing the cost of their employees’ wages and conditions.

Neither the Tories, nor the Lib Dems have a real plan to eradicate unemployment – they think it’s a necessary part of society. High unemployment benefits the rich because they use the fear of sacking to keep their employees in line.

We demand an end to workfare. We won’t be made to pay the cost of a crisis we didn’t cause. We fight for an end to the minimum wage which discriminates against younger workers – we want a living wage which reflects the value we create. Instead of using us as unpaid labour to boost the bosses’ profits, the government should be taxing the billions of the super-rich and investing that in socially-useful jobs which will benefit our communities and society as a whole.

Ultimately, workfare is only the symptom of the wider disease – Capitalism and its crises, which is wrecking our lives and planet. Protests and campaigns can limit attacks and even win temporary victories like the NHS. But only socialism – the democratic economy managed by and for the working class – can start to bring about an end to the criminal waste of lives, talent and potential.

REVOLUTION says:

  • Abolish workfare – tax the rich to provide real jobs, training and education

  • For a living wage of £9 per hour

  • Share out the work – reduce hours with no loss of pay

  • Nationalise all companies closing down or sacking workers

 

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Website Redesign Experts
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube