Videos

Videos of REVOLUTION

Get the Troops out of Mali

2000 French troops have invaded the African country of Mali after the national government collapsed. French airstrikes have fallen on the towns of Gao and kidal amongst others. The French government says, predictably, that their intervention is “humanitarian” but it is no coincidence that French companies make a mint from the Uranium reserves in the north of Mali.

The pretext for the invasion is that Islamist forces have taken over the north of the country, named it Azawad and imposed a particularly brutal strand of Sharia law on the people living there. Most of those people are Muslim, but they haven’t voted for the National Movement for the Liberation of Azwad and certainly haven’t agreed to the new laws. There have been a number of clashes between the NMLA and people belonging to the 30 different nationalities living in Mali.

There has been footage on the news showing people cheering the French troops, so why do we not think that the invasion is the answer? Well, Mali used to be a French colony and since gaining formal “independence” it has still been exploited by French companies who have been mining all the natural wealth and taking it for themselves. The International Monetary Fund imposed “structural” adjustment on the country since 1991 and forced the government to make huge cuts to health and other public services. Now the people living there suffer from 30% unemployment, 50% of children never go to school and one third of people don’t have access to clean water. Just imagine what a difference the money from selling Uranium could make to the lives of those people.

So we think that not only should the French troops get out of Mali but so should the French companies (and all other international companies). They should leave the people of Mali alone because foreign intervention in Mali has caused nothing but trouble ever since the French drew some lines on a map and named the new country “Mali”. The best chance that the Malian people have is to be given the chance to develop their own solutions to the crisis that they face. We would encourage them to use their own forces to establish a region of political freedom, social tolerance and economic liberation from the IMF and multinational companies alongside the people of other West African countries.

Studio Schools – an attack on working class youth

After completing a stint in education, be it leaving school at 16 or staying on in further education, most of us find that we are doomed to be little more than slaves to a company. For some of us however, this could now be the case from the mere age of 14.

Enter, “Studio Schools”, a government backed scheme for 14 -19 year olds that will put the education of the said school’s students firmly in the hands of big, corporate employers. For those of you unsure what a “studio school” is (join the queue), launched back in 2010 these schools sprung up without any sort of discussion of whether they are necessary or of any actual use and are state funded however run by private sponsors. The apparent aim for studio schools is to help young people get into work by making them more employable. This is to be achieved through the students of the school being taken out of the classroom environment and learning “on the job” with each school specialising in a certain area such as catering and engineering. There are currently 15 studio schools open across the UK with that figure expected to double to 30 by September 2013 as the Government gives the all clear for another 15 to be opened.

The Studio Schools Trust claims on their website that the schools offer both academic and vocational qualifications and teaches (some of) the national curriculum stating students will work towards GCSEs in at least Maths, English and Science. These qualification will be delivered however “out of a traditional classroom setting” and instead through “Enterprise projects”.

At a first glance studio schools may not seem like a bad idea. There are plenty of young people who fail to thrive in the classroom environment and there are too plenty of subjects that offer few practical skills. These schools however will usher their students down a very narrow path with the end product being working in a specific, not necessarily specialist field. The studio school’s “CREATE Framework”, consisting of modules such as “thinking” and “understanding myself”, doesn’t sound too far away from the likes of CoPE and general studies, filler qualifications seen in mainstream education which are much less valued than core subjects. What this looks like is basically a dumbing down of education making students work towards becoming the drones for giant corporations. This of course is hardly the sort of opportunity anyone would want going to school to open up for our children.

The most alarming part of this set up is also the way in which the schools claim children will be “taught”. As previously stated, students will learn “on the job”. Yes, a hands on approach like this may be better for preparing students for a lifetime of work than sitting at a table working out algebra is ever going to. Students at these schools will however be doing a job with 9 – 5 hours and short holidays reflecting this. They will be getting prepared for the world of work, by working. Over 16 students will be paid, unsurprisingly, the minimum wage. Under 16 students will be expected to work for free. This brings in an awful scent of workfare about the set up as students are in fact working for their education. Facts such as these could also point out the reasoning for the giant corporation’s involvement may be more to do with aspects such cheap labour rather than trying to help young people cement a better future. As anyone who has ever worked for pretty much any company ever will tell you, there is only one thing people at the top actually care about.

The really sickly part about this all is that we are handing over the responsibility of educating these students to the big name companies; Sony, Ikea and Hilton Hotels to name but a few. The Studio Schools Trust website states that in the most recent employer survey 70% of employers “wanted to see the new government make the employability skills of young people its top education priority”. Yes because it doesn’t matter about opening up a range of opportunities for young people, encouraging them to do something worthwhile or to ensure just a chance of doing something they enjoy does it? As long as the education process makes them able to clean a table in a hotel, right guys?

Of course not everyone gets to follow their dream. Not everyone thrives in an academic environment. But isn’t education supposed to be about that chance that a person could? It’s certainly not about securing the next generation of employees for the corporate big boys. If a young person wants the option of dropping out of the conventional academic environment as they feel it’s not for them then no one should want to say that they can’t. But is doing this as young as 14 really the answer? Is mass involvement from the private sponsors really the right way to go about this? These are still state schools remember. They are still funded by the tax payer. If this is going to be done it needs to be done properly and with young people’s best interests at heart. The corporate giants have clicked their fingers and said “we want this out of education” and just like that with little thought or discussion on the matter, now we have studio schools. Is this really for the benefit of the students who will be attending? Or is this just the big companies muscling in on our education process? Putting young people’s lives in the hands of those who care for nothing but their wealth is a dangerous route to go down however one that our government seems to backing.

UK Firms Help Rich Dodge Millions In Taxes

Firms in the United Kingdom have been helping millionaires avoid millions in taxes using complex tax evasion schemes.

With the BBC Panorama program on Sunday, it is has become obvious how easy the rich can trick Her Majesties Revenue and Customs out of billions. HM Revenue and Customs claim that tax evasion costs the tax payer on average £4 billion a year.

This is just another example in recent times, of the rich selfishly passing their burdens onto the working class.

The structure proposed by James Turner, of Turner Little, a corporate service provider, used nominee directors to help keep the clients name from being on the company paperwork. These nominee directors can be lawfully appointed to run companies on behalf of others, but they would be running nothing. In other words, it would be a web of lies and deception.

James Turner, told the undercover reporter: “They wont even know that they are a director, they just get paid,” he also told the reporter that adding the directors signature could be done by using a stamp. Corporate service providers, are legal companies that assist people in creating a business, both in the UK, and abroad, but these companies have been helping set up these fake companies, just to help the upper classes hide their money from HM Revenue and customs. If a business is set up like this, then it is no longer legal, it is a criminal offence.

In spite of this, Jack Turner denies allegations of criminal misconduct, and has stated that Turner Little will conduct an internal investigation, and if it is appropriate, it will take action.

In a statement, HM Revenue and Customs, which regulates all of the 2467 company service providers in the UK, claimed that most of the firms have nothing to do with illegal or criminal activity. However, it did confirm that it has never prosecuted a single corporate service provider for breaching money laundering regulations.

In recent times of austerity, cuts have hit everybody hard. From the student, with the rising university fees, to the pensioner, having their monthly amount cut. Everybody, or so it seems, but the rich, who have found yet another way to steal money once again, costing the taxpayer £4 billion a year.

The Tory government is supported and funded by the banks and big business and media so they would only regulate tax evasion and avoidance if we put enormous pressure on them – they don’t want to bite that hand that feeds them.

We need to tax the rich and use the money to pay for education, healthcare and jobs, but we also would need to stop these companies from moving their money abroad to avoid tax – we would need to take it off them and say that they are welcome to move but their  (our) wealth stays here.

Minister Threatens Restrictions on Young Drivers

Plans for restrictions on young drivers, put forward by the Association of British Insurers (ABI), are currently been considered by the Department of Transport. Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin is said to be looking into measures including banning young drivers from carrying passengers who are not family members and restrictions on driving at night. Despite statistics from the ABI blaming young drivers for a disproportionate number of road mishaps, attacking young drivers and placing potentially life altering restrictions is no way to go about making our roads safer.

Driving at night is more than a little scarier than driving in the day, of course, especially for the inexperienced driver. However, this is something that you are going to have to do; it’s a fact of life. Especially as many jobs require you to be able to drive at night whether that is part of the job or just too and from hence banning young people from driving in the dark is putting them at a great disadvantage. Being mobile at night is very much a reason in itself for learning to drive. You’d have a job on trying to catch a bus at midnight after all. This is of course without even mentioning how hard to police this would actually be.

Of the proposed banning of non-family passengers, Mr McLoughlin has to say; “When I talk to young people who have recently passed their test, what they say sometimes is that peer pressure is put on them to go fast, to show off.” It would be wrong to suggest that there isn’t a sort of “boy racer” culture that some of us unfortunately fall into however making all young people pay the price for this isn’t the answer. Anyone under the impression it is “cool” to bomb down to Asda with urgency of a James Bond chase scene should be getting pulled up if seen by Police anyway. This meaning a new law banning passengers is hardly going to get adhered by either. Not all young people share this frame of mind and generalisations are not really something to base laws upon.

Roads nowadays are busier and more dangerous than ever making it a difficult and often scary time to learn to drive. You would only have to take to our roads for a mere twenty minutes or so to see just how much road safety is disregarded by drivers both young and old. It’s not often people stick to speed limits wherever they may be driving. Bad habit such as not indicating properly and trying to and nip through junctions at the last millisecond of amber are but a few common tendencies amongst drivers. This may suggest that dangerous ways of driving may be more set by the experienced rather than the inexperienced. Patience for new drivers is not something necessarily shared by older, more experienced drivers. Bullying on the road is too quite commonplace with a P or L plate often seeming like more of an invitation for older drivers to intimidate rather than to be patient with new drivers.

Plain stupidity may sometimes be a cause of road accidents however is not something one group of people can be made to account for. With a lot of young drivers been, obviously, new drivers it would seem that a lack of experience and lower confidence when driving may be a better explanation as to why young people are involved in a lot of accidents. Hitting young motorists with restrictions before they’ve had a chance to reverse out of their drives let alone cause a pile up is hardly going to be a confidence boost. The process of a person learning to drive does not necessarily covering driving at night, on the motorway, having more than one passenger, having an impatient older motorist lingering a centimetre behind or a range of other hazardous situations.  So perhaps it is the learning process of driving that should be looked at. Other options may lead to the learning process becoming a bit more drawn out however educating and addressing the hazard which is “new drivers” is a lot better than simply harassing the young. Road safety after all is of great importance hence better education and possible increased use of practical educational programmes such as Drive iQ would surely be of great benefit. Increased punishments for people who are actually breaking laws and driving dangerously, be it the driver themselves or a distractive passenger, may also be something that could be looked into. After all, driving dangerously does put lives at risk whatever age or level of experience you may be at.

Nick Clegg Tuition Fee Apology Backfires

On Wednesday night, the Liberal Democrats made a party political broadcast in which their leader, and Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg apologised for breaking their pledge to oppose a rise in tuition fees. He said he was sorry for making “a promise we were not absolutely sure we could deliver”.

Clegg was concerned that on the eve of the Lim Dem conference the party is still dogged by their broken pledge and the loss of a huge number of voters, particularly amongst students. He clearly hoped that the apology would go some way towards rebuilding this support and he might be applauded for his honesty.

Fortunately the whole thing has backfired on this lying politician. The video of his apology speech been remixed by Poke into a hilarious viral video song with hundreds of thousands of views and he is well and truly a laughing stock. Nick Clegg Apology Song – Sorry

Even more importantly, everyone from the National Union of Students to mainstream media pundits are saying that Clegg apologised for the wrong thing – he should be sorry for breaking the pledge not for making it in the first place. In his broadcast he says “”It was a pledge made with the best of intentions – but we should not have made a promise we were not absolutely sure we could deliver. I shouldn’t have committed to a policy that was so expensive when there was no money around. Not least when the most likely way we would end up in government was in coalition with Labour or the Conservatives who were both committed to put fees up.” The fact is that the Lib Dems still had a choice about how to vote on the bill to raise tuition fees to £9,000 per year and when they voted for it they broke their pledge.

Journalist Rob Wilson in an article on the Guardian website has claimed that secret Lib Dem documents passed to him reveal that in March 2012 Lib Dem leaders decided that if they got into government they would ditch the pledge. The document says “On tuition fees we should seek agreement on part-time students and leave the rest. We will have clear yellow water with the other [parties] on raising the tuition fee cap, so let us not cause ourselves more headaches.” However, in public they continued to make the pledge and used it to win the student vote in the 2010 general election.

Clegg hoped that his broadcast would save his politically bankrupt party, but it could well be the final nail in the Lib Dem coffin. People voted for the Lib Dems because they had policies like opposing the Iraq war (though once the invasion began they supported it) and tuition fees, but now they are in power it’s become clear that there’s no difference between them and the Tories. The fact is that the Lib Dems are a pro-capitalist party so in a time of economic crisis they want to make us pay for it – students, workers and the vulnerable people in society. We need a new political party, and anti-capitalist party, that will make the rich pay for their own crisis.

Leeds Students Protest Against London Met Deportations

Leeds Revolution took part in a protest on Friday against the threatened deportations of 2,600 students from London Metropolitan University. Fifty students from Leeds Met and Leeds University gathered outside Leeds University, displayed banners and signs saying “hands off our classmates”. Lots of passers-by signed a petition against the deportations.

The international status of the university has been revoked by the UK Border Agency so they aren’t able to issue student visas to people from outside of the EU. The 2,600 students affected have been given 60 days to find another university or get out of the country.

Photograph by Leo Garbutt

The government made this announcement on the same day as the latest immigration statistics in a clear move to look “tough” on immigration. In reality this is a Tory stunt that could ruin the lives of thousands of people. London Met has started legal action in an attempt to overturn the decision and there is a question mark over whether the university can stay afloat if it can no longer accept non-EU students who provide 15% of its revenue.

There is a huge campaign at London Met involving students and lectures – they have held protests against the government decision and the lecturers’ union UCU has called for an amnesty for the students. We in Revolution agree that UKBA should allow the students to remain at London Met and would also demand that the government reinstates the international status of London Met and doesn’t interfere in the internal affairs of a university in this way again.

We have a meeting organised at Leeds Metropolitan University on The Case Against Immigration Controls on Thursday 20th September, 6pm at the Leslie Silver Building. We have also spoken with a number of other societies about setting up a London Met defence campaign and will keep you posted.

Check out the fb event for our meeting here http://www.facebook.com/events/360981043979839/

Check out the report from Leeds Student of the protest here http://www.leedsstudent.org/2012-09-14/ls1/ls1-news/protesters-attack-tory-racism-of-london-met-deportations

Hungry Britain: austerity drives millions to foodbanks

At least 13 million people in the UK live below the poverty line and every day people in the UK go hungry for reasons ranging from unemployment to having to pay off debts to doorstop lenders. In 2011-12 food banks fed 128,687 people nationwide which was 100% more than the previous year.

The busiest food bank in Britain is in Coventry, it is run by the Trussell Trust and it can provide people three days of good quality food such as rice, sugar, tinned meat/fish and cereals. However you can’t just turn up their and get some grub, the only people who can receive food are those that have been referred by social services, youth offending teams or the citizen’s advice bureau.

Once they’ve been referred they can only go once or twice before they are put onto programmes to address the root cause of their poverty.

43% of people who attend the food bank do so because they are on benefits but they have been cut, delayed or the money they are getting simply isn’t enough to feed them. In the first 3 months of 2012, 167,000 people had their job seekers allowance stopped for no apparent reason. When this is what they’re surviving off and it is taken away from them they have little other choice but to go to food banks and take out a crisis loan.

The other 57% are people who have jobs but still cannot afford to feed themselves. A lot of the time it is because they have borrowed money in order to pay for bills and they have to pay it back out of money they would buy food with. Most people borrow off door stop lenders who befriend them and then guilt trip them into paying the money back with a massive interest rate. It can be very difficult and embarrassing to admit you can’t afford to feed yourself and you need help, but these people have no other choice.

There are no 250 food banks with 3 more opening each week. While our welfare system is suppose to support those who can’t support themselves it is in fact making life more difficult. With benefits not paying a living wage and with the government cutting thousands of peoples everyday for no reason except to make figures go down it is no wonder that people are beginning to starve.

We say

• Jobs for all and a living wage to be paid
• Benefits to be paid at a living wage for those who are unable to work

Massacre at Marikana Mine

Just two weeks after police killed 34 miners striking at a platinum mine in South Africa, four more have been shot and injured.

The incident came as the first group of miners were released from custody following the Lonmin platinum mine massacre in which police gunned down 34 of their colleagues.

The first group of 42 miners were released after the dropping of fiercely controversial murder charges against them. The miners, among 270 arrested for public violence at the incident last month despite it being the police who opened fire.

Just three weeks ago workers demanded a pay increase to 12,500 rand (£976) a month. The action turned nasty when the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) clashed with South Africa’s dominant National Union of Mineworkers (NUM).

There were some 3,000 miners and police opened fire on them, it has been named one of the deadliest days of protest since the end of apartheid

The further attacks today at the Gold One mine using rubber bullet and tear gas have left all four workers in hospital and one critically injured.

The mining sector is now seeing wildcat strikes of over 12,500 in reaction to the deaths and injuries.

Frans Baleni, general secretary of the National Union of Mineworkers, told South Africa’s Business Day newspaper “The issues at Marikana are overflowing. It’s quite clear that this wave of new developments on the platinum mines is coming down on us at the gold mines.”

One journalist has argued, “It is becoming clear to this reporter that heavily armed police hunted down and killed the miners in cold blood,” “A minority were killed in the filmed event where police claim they acted in self-defence. The rest was murder on a massive scale.”

There are also investigations into the miners being tortured while in custody.

It is clear that the workers are fighting back against their low pay and are being psychically oppressed by the government.

Keep football fascist free!

One  of the biggest events in the sporting calendar looks set to be overshadowed by evidence of racist and fascist hooliganism and attacks. Anticipation is building for Euro 2012, an international football competition organised by UEFA every year. It will see teams from all over the world descend upon Poland and Ukraine to play. Rather than the usual triumphant flag-waving and punditry on who will turn up trumps when it comes to game itself, the report at the forefront of the news focuses on the disturbingly common on and off-terrace racism of sections of fans in both Poland and Ukraine.

Both countries have a history of neo-Nazi groupings and violence, especially surrounding football. A recent BBC Panorama report documented incidences of Nazi salutes by legions of fans in Ukrainian stadiums and anti-Semitic chants. There is also the all-too-common ‘monkey noises’ made towards black players, something which is still seen on British pitches today. Tellingly, the families of England players Theo Walcott and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain have stated they will not be attending the competition in fear of racist attack. This evidence has led England international legend Sol Campbell to call on black and Asian fans to avoid the tournament due to the threat of, not just racist abuse, but violent attack. He stated “don’t even risk it, because you could end up coming back in a coffin”. But this is not scaremongering, but an opinion based on fact. On April 14, at the Metalist stadium in Kharkiv, Ukraine, an organised mass of more than 2,000 fans from both sides of the stands gave a Nazi salute. At a match two weeks later, amid scuffles between rival fans, a group of Metalist supporters proceeded to attack several of their own fans; fans who happened to be Asian. The Asian students had to withstand punches and kicks as they escaped almost unaided by stewards, and completely ignored by cops.

A Ukrainian police chief interviewed by the BBC laughably claimed the fans were “pointing in the direction of opponents as it were, the fans, so it looked like they were pointing with the right hand to the fans, kind of attracting attention to themselves.”

The BBC documentary also showed abundant evidence of a real fascist presence on the streets of many of the Euro 2012 host cities, with white power symbols, swastikas and anti-Semitic slogans adorning the walls around football grounds and in local communities. It also unearthed the involvement of organised fascists such as Patriot of Ukraine, who use football hooligan ‘firms’ and supporters’ clubs as a recruiting ground for their organisations. This is similar to way the English Defence League (EDL) has been organising around football in Britain.

What is clear here is that the threat of fascist violence will be very real during Euro 2012, as police and official bodies do little or nothing to stamp out this cancer at the heart of football. UEFA pays lip service to its policy of ‘zero tolerance’ for racism while allowing anti-Semitic and racist chanting to go ahead in its stadiums. Players such as England’s John Terry, who is due to face a criminal trial for the racial abuse of another player, also go with next to no punishment for their actions by the bodies that exist to regulate footballing standards. The defence of our communities and a great sporting event such as Euro 2012 from fascists is clearly not something that can be left to the state or official authorities. We need to defend our matches from these racist thugs and ensure they do not tarnish ‘the beautiful game’ with their divisive politics and bonehead violence. Football, a sport with so much power to bring people of different backgrounds together should be fascist free. The task is for antifascists and football fans to stand together and organise against this threat before it’s too late.

Unemployment at its highest in decades

Unemployment is currently rising to the historic mark of 3 million. Although recent statistic show that it has dipped slightly, the reality is the coalition have fiddled the figures by placing the unemployed onto workfare training courses such as A4E and Best. Recently A4E has been in the spotlight for allegations of fraud by making up jobs that they managed to find for them or another tactic being used is to sanction those that are unemployed for menial errors.

Leeds Unemployment Action group has recently been set up; we have regular meetings and leaflet local jobcentres talking to people signing on. Last week whilst down at park place job centre I was speaking to a young man who told me he’s lost his Job seeker’s allowance (JSA) due to the fact he misunderstood the time of his next appointment to sign on subsequently he lost his JSA for a month. I asked him “Did you apply for a crisis loan?” His reply “Yeah but they wouldn’t give me one as they didn’t in their opinion consider me in severe enough need!” The fact somebody else can decide whether or not you need money to live off just highlights the disgrace our government are.

The argument the coalition give for cutting public sector jobs is that it will be offset by the boost in private sector jobs. Latest evidence show the contrary happening as those in the public sector lose their jobs

The private sector is unable to make up for the demand as the economy is being hampered by the lack of consumer spending and the crisis in the Eurozone.

Those that claim disability living allowance (DSA) or Employment support allowance (ESA) are facing re-assessment. Already dozens of disabled people who can’t cope with facing re-assessment and consequently losing their benefit have committed suicide. The coalition government has contracted out the re-assessment to a private multinational corporation called Atos. The re-assessment criteria is deliberately geared towards throwing as many disabled people off the sick register, Atos is given a bonus incentive by the government for every sick person it manages to find somehow rather miraculously “fit and healthy.” With Remploy factories been closed down it will throw even more disabled people into unemployment because they simply can’t get a job anywhere else.

Being unemployed is a constant uphill struggle and incredibly demoralising. Unite have recently launched a community membership programme. For just 50p a week, people not in work and over the age of 16 can receive a range of advice, including access to Unite’s legal helpline, debt counselling, assistance on claiming benefits and the chance to talk to people in a similar position as them. There are already branches set up in Sheffield, Salford and Liverpool with plans to extend further afield. Having the unemployed in a union branch would be a step forward in giving them a bigger voice and fighting back against austerity.

 

 

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Wordpress Development Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube