Scandal in the House of Lords

A couple of weeks ago it was revealed that £2.3million of taxpayer’s money has been squandered in order to provide budget meals for the privileged the thieves in the House of Lords. Few people were surprised by this – many haven’t batted an eyelid as this sort of thing is nothing new anymore. It is almost as if the British public expect this of our corrupt overlords and are more than happy to sit back and allow this. Simply put, we do not need this dysfunctional set of far removed, overpaid thieves making crucial decisions on the laws that govern every one of us.

Around £2.3million a year is being used to subsidise restaurants, bars and cafes for members of the House of Lords and this vast sum is coming straight from our pockets. This works out at over £60k a week which is £84 for each individual peer. £300 a day is given to each Lord on top of this which is supposed to cover the food they eat whilst there.

The food on offer at the House of Lords ranges from full luxurious 3 course meals to canteen food. Even the more lavish food on offer is at reasonable prices, with an average main course setting them back around £14. A peer could eat very well during a day at the House of Lords and the price they would pay would hardly put a hole in the £300 a week we already pay them.

As many of the peers are millionaires it is hard to see how any right minded person could think that squandering this great amount of money to make sure the wealthy lords can afford to eat is acceptable. In this age of government austerity many working class families are living on shoe string budgets even relying on food banks to prevent them from starving. But forget that, Lord Heseltine needs his £9.50 roast of the day; surely he’ll need some financial help with as he’s only worth around £200million.

£84 a week on top of the ridiculous sum of cash already available to the Lords is £13 more than job seekers allowance. The priorities and morality of the people in charge is so wrong it is hard to see how they are been allowed to stay in a position where they can do this.

These people are taking us for a ride. The sheer arrogance and smugness of them thinking they are entitled to this money highlights the fact they are simply making lucrative careers out of the problems that plague the ordinary British people every day. They do not care about us yet we let them decide and dictate our lives. The much publicised expenses scandal in 2009 seems to have learnt us nothing.

From the day the “we are all in this together” tripe was churned out people have scoffed at it. This however shows just how much of a joke that statement really is and just how much of a joke these people see our lives as. A drastic overhaul of our government is needed with the power taken from the hands of these greedy crooks and given to the people. This is the only way we can move forward at this difficult time together and protect every single person’s interests rather than the privileged few that routinely exploit us.

Get the Troops out of Mali

2000 French troops have invaded the African country of Mali after the national government collapsed. French airstrikes have fallen on the towns of Gao and kidal amongst others. The French government says, predictably, that their intervention is “humanitarian” but it is no coincidence that French companies make a mint from the Uranium reserves in the north of Mali.

The pretext for the invasion is that Islamist forces have taken over the north of the country, named it Azawad and imposed a particularly brutal strand of Sharia law on the people living there. Most of those people are Muslim, but they haven’t voted for the National Movement for the Liberation of Azwad and certainly haven’t agreed to the new laws. There have been a number of clashes between the NMLA and people belonging to the 30 different nationalities living in Mali.

There has been footage on the news showing people cheering the French troops, so why do we not think that the invasion is the answer? Well, Mali used to be a French colony and since gaining formal “independence” it has still been exploited by French companies who have been mining all the natural wealth and taking it for themselves. The International Monetary Fund imposed “structural” adjustment on the country since 1991 and forced the government to make huge cuts to health and other public services. Now the people living there suffer from 30% unemployment, 50% of children never go to school and one third of people don’t have access to clean water. Just imagine what a difference the money from selling Uranium could make to the lives of those people.

So we think that not only should the French troops get out of Mali but so should the French companies (and all other international companies). They should leave the people of Mali alone because foreign intervention in Mali has caused nothing but trouble ever since the French drew some lines on a map and named the new country “Mali”. The best chance that the Malian people have is to be given the chance to develop their own solutions to the crisis that they face. We would encourage them to use their own forces to establish a region of political freedom, social tolerance and economic liberation from the IMF and multinational companies alongside the people of other West African countries.

Join NCAFC, fight for democratic unity

ncafc-logo-new

Following the decisions of its December conference, the National Campaign Against Fees & Cuts (NCAFC) has created membership and affiliation structures.

All students can now join NCAFC for £1, and school, college and university anti-cuts groups can affiliate. This will give activists a democratic voice in the campaign and greatly strengthen national and local co-ordination.

The student movement, like the wider anti-cuts anti-cuts movement is in desperate need of a united federation that can carry out a common strategy of resistance to Tory austerity.

The fight to defend education is far from over – as the upcoming strikes by the NUT show.

We think all the education campaigns – NCAFC, Education Activists Network, SBL and YFFJE should hold a joint conference to agree a plan of action and fuse into one federation.

This will stop the unnecessary and destructive competition which is holding us back.

We encourage all students and anti-cuts group to join NCAFC and work to build anti-cuts groups on campus and regionally which draw in representatives from as many institutions and campaigns as possible.

Only by building a strong, unified campaign based on the most effective democratic structures like general assemblies can we hope to have a chance of taking on the Tories – and winning.

Students: reorganise our resistance

red square-quebecThis article originally appeared at www.workerspower.com

2012 was a year to forget for the Tories. It was, in the main, a year to forget for student activists as well. The first year of £9,000 fees saw a 10 per cent drop in student numbers. September saw the government try to deport thousands of overseas students from London Met. Aside from local struggles which flared up at a few universities, the winter mobilisations of 2010/11 aren’t exactly casting a long shadow outside vice-chancellors’ windows.

And what of the other 50 per cent of young people who aren’t cooped up in overcrowded lecture theatres and battling slum landlords and rip-off letting agencies? Well, over a million remain locked into the Tories’ unemployment trap. In an economy with more unemployed than vacancies, the only alternatives are the workfare schemes (where there’s no shortage of places, surprisingly) or unpaid internships.

It might seem like resistance to the Tories’ class war is flagging. This is true. The failure of the unions’ strikes to defend pensions means millions of workers are less confident that militant industrial action can deliver success. The rivalries in the anti-cuts movement, with three competing anti-cuts campaigns, make effective resistance is almost impossible. Coming into the fifth year of austerity, the fight back is stagnating.

But we aren’t beaten yet. It’s clear something has to change and students have to look at how we can take the best of our experiences in collective, democratic organisation and apply that to the wider struggles in society.

NUS – leaders who won’t lead

Since the grassroots protests and walkouts of winter 2010, the NUS has firmly reasserted its control, its right to lead – and to mislead.

Many Student Unions have dismantled their democratic structures, replacing democratic accountability with tokenistic and passive participation which is incapable of engaging more than a small minority of students –leaving decisions from grand strategy to publicity in the hands of time-serving bureaucrats who are divorced from the mass of students.

But the fiasco of the NUS’s 2012 demonstration shows that we ignore the bureaucrats at our peril. Equally, joining in the petty squabbling and factionalism of NUS conference in order to win a few positions is no long-term solution.

By drawing in students into genuinely democratic structures we can expose the undemocratic nature of ‘student democracy’ on campus. Working with sab officers where possible and against them where necessary we can start to break the stifling bureaucratic attitude which sees students as a stage army, not as conscious participants.

There is no question of ‘reclaiming’ the NUS for the students. But its peculiar character – funded and managed as a mechanism of state control, yet with leaders reliant on a relationship with students – means we should work with them where they act in our interests, yet be able to openly criticise and self-organise everywhere that they put their own careers before the needs of students.

Self-organisation

The student movement didn’t spring out of thin air. The wave of occupations against the war in Gaza in 2009 fuelled the growth of student committees which took on the task of coordinating action against cuts and the tuition fee increase.

During the student movement, several towns organised general assemblies which represented the highest form of democratic decision-making and representation. At their best, they attracted participation from schools, colleges and organisations of students and education workers.

Many of these structures have withered, but they remain the basic tactic for collective struggle both on campus and in schools.

Our primary task is to rebuild these committees. They should have representatives from every academic department and the trade unions. It’s important that we pressure the Student Unions to submit to the democratic decisions of the general assemblies.

On campuses, the UCU and workers’ unions are fighting to defend education and save jobs. In universities, schools and colleges, students need to launch a determined struggle for democratic rights to oversee education policy, financial decisions and hold management to account.

In the fight to defend education and to increase students’ control over what we learn, committees of action should work for the widest representation, drawing in students, teachers, cleaners and other staff – all who have a common interest in defending a properly funded, accessible education system.

Unite the movement

The infighting and competition that plagues the anti-cuts movement has its echo in the student movement too. But the solution is the same.

We think all the campus and school anti-cuts groups should affiliate to a democratic, national federation. The decision by the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts to allow both group affiliation and individual membership (£1) with full democratic rights is a good step forward.

NCAFC should hold a spring conference, co-sponsored with Education Activist Network, and Youth Fight for Jobs to fuse into one federation, with a common strategy for organising the defence of our education. We encourage all youth to join NCAFC and fight for this to happen – a united campaign around a strategy decided by students is the strongest basis for entering the working class struggle against Tory austerity and capitalist crisis.

Teachers’ Union to strike against Tory attacks

NUT teachers voting unanimously for strike action

NUT teachers voting unanimously for strike action

Teachers in the National Union of Teachers (NUT) will strike on March 13th. This is to strike back against endless attacks by education secretary Michael Gove.

The Tories want to abolish automatic pay progression and replace it with performance-related pay. This isn’t about giving teachers’ incentives to work harder. It’s about getting rid of national pay bargaining – where rates won by unions apply to all equivalent staff.

This latest attack comes shortly after teachers’ were defeated in their struggle to defend pensions. The union leaders’ inability to wage a sustained, effective campaign means teachers have lost on average 16% of their pay through freezes and higher pension contributions.

The divisions and lack of strategy has given Michael Gove the confidence to press ahead with his plans to transform education – destroying the comprehensive system and replacing it with privately-run for-profit schools.

The Tories don’t want to reform education in order to improve everyone’s chances. They want to take it over, let the market run it, and use it to suit the needs of millionaire bosses and politicians.

This means we need a credible strategy for fighting back. An NUT strike on March 13th could be joined by civil servants in the PCS and university and college lecturers in the UCU. This will also be the day for second European Day of Action – like the one on November 14 which saw millions of workers striking against austerity across Europe.

The last few years have shown that young people, too, will need to take our place in the front lines of this struggle. From the students in parliament square defending access to education, to the youth on the streets of August 2011 rising up against routine police violence, we have been the most willing to join together to take on the Tories.

School students should support their teachers on strike and organise to raise their own demands alongside them. Action committees in schools can unite students and teachers in planning joint action and be stronger by struggling together.

Why Egyptians should reject the proposed consitution

International Statement – REVOLUTION IC

 

Since the downfall of dictator Mubarak in 2011, Egypt’s people have had to fight tooth and nail to get a new set of laws – a constitution – democratically created. Then they had to vote whether to accept the draft.

On the 15th of December, the first round of the constitution referendum started. The results were published soon after the second round on the 22nd of December with 64% voting for the constitution.

The content is reactionary in it’s Islamist character, defining the Sharia as the main source for jurisdiction, the absence of explicit women’s rights, the discrimination of religious minorities, and the unchanged autonomy and power of the military apparatus. The state shall guarantee the ethics, morals, and the law and order and gives a big space for interpretation for its use of power.

The outcome of the referendum means a preliminary victory of the counterrevolution. It means a setback for the opposition movement and a consolidation of the new – but, in fact, old – regime lead by the Muslim Brotherhood.

 In the struggle for the new constitution, President Morsi gave himself the power that his decisions couldn’t be fought by the court and argued that this would be necessary for the safety of the revolution. He sees himself in a struggle against parts of the state apparatus from the old Mubarak regime which still controls the judiciary. This also explains why only three representatives of the old regime got convicted in the course of the revolution. His fear of the court wanting to dissolve the Constituent Assembly caused him to empower himself and to push the referendum by fast tracking with reactionary means.

This caused huge protests against the president’s self-empowerment and against the constitutional referendum. While bourgeois forces like the liberals, and even openly reactionary forces like the supporters of the old regime, tried to get a voice within the uprising, its social roots lay elsewhere. The oppositional alliance, where even smaller socialist forces were involved, and the radical youth caused mass demonstrations leading to a political crisis in society where the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists revealed their reactionary character. The massive protests forced Morsi to withdraw his dictatorial decrees but not the referendum and the draft constitution.

During the protests, scores of clashes between oppositional demonstrators and supporters of Morsi occurred. Parts of the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafists started attacks on the demonstrations leading to five people being killed and 700 being injured. As a reaction to the attacks from the Islamist forces, radical youths set an office of the Muslim Brotherhood on fire. President Morsi gave permission to the military to take people under arrest and stationed soldiers and tanks near the presidential palace. Although the military asserted not to intervene into the protests, it was clear that it should frighten the demonstrators and should be ready to intervene in case of emergency.

The most militant and progressive element of the opposition is the youth, with many of them tend to Left or anarchistic positions. This is no coincidence; the youth in Egypt suffers the most from the economic crisis. 75 percent of those 15-28 years’ old are unemployed. The biggest influence spurring the youths is the April 6 youth movement, which has a huge range and force for mobilization.

Nevertheless, the movement considers itself not as a party and couldn’t organize the most radical youth on a clear and revolutionary perspective. Still the youth has to be aware to link their struggles to other social layers with a special attention to the organized working class, which is the only force in society which can really take the government and enterprises under pressure by strike and which is able to reorganize the form of production and by that the whole society. Therefore, the youth has build their own independent organization but do so on the basis of a clear and revolutionary program that orientates toward the working class.

It is also the working class which suffers alongside oppressed layers like youths, women, and immigrants from the capitalist crisis and the reactionary regime. The social and political crisis in Egypt sharpens with the ongoing differentiation between rich and poor. The economy lies down suffering under missing incomes from foreign investments and tourism. President Morsi had to make a request for an IMF credit of 4.8 billion Dollars which is as usual connected to cost-cutting measures, in particular the cutbacks of energy subsidies, the tax increase on consumption, and a higher taxation on income.

Although the president abandoned a tax increase shortly before the referendum, which displeased the IMF, one has to consider this measure as a tactic in the referendum. The credit and the cost-cutting measures will then come next year, ruining the life of many workers, peasants, and poor in Egypt. The working class and the trade unions have to pick up a fight against the cutbacks and against the government and the Muslim Brotherhood, which tries to dominate the trade unions by undemocratically replacing the union officials with people appointed from the Manpower Minister for leadership positions.

Also the government led by the Muslim Brotherhood dropped a draft law for the freedom of trade unions. Mursi’s attempts to weaken and take over the trade unions is a preparation for a bigger attack on the working class. That’s why the struggle of the workers and the trade unions must also be struggle against the Muslim Brotherhood and the constitution.

The Constituent Assembly is dominated by the Muslim brotherhood and the Salafists and doesn’t represent the people. It had been elected by the parliament with almost no discussion about the procedure of vote and without a minimum number of female representatives and representatives of religious minorities and, therefore, had been boycotted by many liberals and secularists. Moreover, the April 6 youth movement reports about the constitution referendum on later opened polling and voters being affected by members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The movement sent members to different towns to observe the referendum. In Damietta, Islamists offered money for votes for the constitution; in the province Menufija, a judge had to dismiss his advance men, because they tried to persuade voters for the constitution. Also, preachers in mosques called for the constitution. Nevertheless, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists claim that the votes for the constitution mean the will of the people in spite of the ridiculous voter participation of 32%.

A representative constitution must be a constitution of the masses of the workers, peasants, and youth. There must be a constituent assembly elected by democratic councils in districts, towns, and workplaces with delegates which can be elected and deselected. These councils have to control the assembly and have to build a power which can challenge the bureaucratic, state apparatus. They have to be defended by self-defense committees and workers and peasants’ militias. This is the only way to guarantee a constitution in the interest of the masses.

But even this isn’t enough. A new, revolutionary constitution cannot limit itself to be a democratic one, since it cannot change the living conditions of the people as long as they are being exploited and oppressed by imperialism and the Egyptian capitalist class. The capitalists will fight every democratic reform by every mean as soon as it becomes a threat to their rule and their profits.

The revolution has to go on to build up democratic councils of the masses and build dual power; it has to arm itself; it has to take the power and build it on the councils of workers, peasants, youth, and the poor. It has to decide a revolutionary constitution which dis-empowers the capitalists and landlords and, therefore, nationalizes the most important companies under worker’s control, and further steps ahead to a socialist society of justice, freedom, and equality.

This requires the buildup of a common workers’ party on a revolutionary communist program, which can fight for the power of the masses and for a socialist constitution by dual power. Currently,  the elections to parliament after the passed constitution will be an important process of political dispute and an optimal opportunity create such a workers’ party.

redrevologonew

Studio Schools – an attack on working class youth

After completing a stint in education, be it leaving school at 16 or staying on in further education, most of us find that we are doomed to be little more than slaves to a company. For some of us however, this could now be the case from the mere age of 14.

Enter, “Studio Schools”, a government backed scheme for 14 -19 year olds that will put the education of the said school’s students firmly in the hands of big, corporate employers. For those of you unsure what a “studio school” is (join the queue), launched back in 2010 these schools sprung up without any sort of discussion of whether they are necessary or of any actual use and are state funded however run by private sponsors. The apparent aim for studio schools is to help young people get into work by making them more employable. This is to be achieved through the students of the school being taken out of the classroom environment and learning “on the job” with each school specialising in a certain area such as catering and engineering. There are currently 15 studio schools open across the UK with that figure expected to double to 30 by September 2013 as the Government gives the all clear for another 15 to be opened.

The Studio Schools Trust claims on their website that the schools offer both academic and vocational qualifications and teaches (some of) the national curriculum stating students will work towards GCSEs in at least Maths, English and Science. These qualification will be delivered however “out of a traditional classroom setting” and instead through “Enterprise projects”.

At a first glance studio schools may not seem like a bad idea. There are plenty of young people who fail to thrive in the classroom environment and there are too plenty of subjects that offer few practical skills. These schools however will usher their students down a very narrow path with the end product being working in a specific, not necessarily specialist field. The studio school’s “CREATE Framework”, consisting of modules such as “thinking” and “understanding myself”, doesn’t sound too far away from the likes of CoPE and general studies, filler qualifications seen in mainstream education which are much less valued than core subjects. What this looks like is basically a dumbing down of education making students work towards becoming the drones for giant corporations. This of course is hardly the sort of opportunity anyone would want going to school to open up for our children.

The most alarming part of this set up is also the way in which the schools claim children will be “taught”. As previously stated, students will learn “on the job”. Yes, a hands on approach like this may be better for preparing students for a lifetime of work than sitting at a table working out algebra is ever going to. Students at these schools will however be doing a job with 9 – 5 hours and short holidays reflecting this. They will be getting prepared for the world of work, by working. Over 16 students will be paid, unsurprisingly, the minimum wage. Under 16 students will be expected to work for free. This brings in an awful scent of workfare about the set up as students are in fact working for their education. Facts such as these could also point out the reasoning for the giant corporation’s involvement may be more to do with aspects such cheap labour rather than trying to help young people cement a better future. As anyone who has ever worked for pretty much any company ever will tell you, there is only one thing people at the top actually care about.

The really sickly part about this all is that we are handing over the responsibility of educating these students to the big name companies; Sony, Ikea and Hilton Hotels to name but a few. The Studio Schools Trust website states that in the most recent employer survey 70% of employers “wanted to see the new government make the employability skills of young people its top education priority”. Yes because it doesn’t matter about opening up a range of opportunities for young people, encouraging them to do something worthwhile or to ensure just a chance of doing something they enjoy does it? As long as the education process makes them able to clean a table in a hotel, right guys?

Of course not everyone gets to follow their dream. Not everyone thrives in an academic environment. But isn’t education supposed to be about that chance that a person could? It’s certainly not about securing the next generation of employees for the corporate big boys. If a young person wants the option of dropping out of the conventional academic environment as they feel it’s not for them then no one should want to say that they can’t. But is doing this as young as 14 really the answer? Is mass involvement from the private sponsors really the right way to go about this? These are still state schools remember. They are still funded by the tax payer. If this is going to be done it needs to be done properly and with young people’s best interests at heart. The corporate giants have clicked their fingers and said “we want this out of education” and just like that with little thought or discussion on the matter, now we have studio schools. Is this really for the benefit of the students who will be attending? Or is this just the big companies muscling in on our education process? Putting young people’s lives in the hands of those who care for nothing but their wealth is a dangerous route to go down however one that our government seems to backing.

Nevermind the cuts… ROYAL SCROUNGER PREGNANT!

Who cares?

Politicians, journalists and boot-licking monarchists have been competing to celebrate the announcement that an unemployed couple – living on benefits – are to have a baby.

Usually the Tories and their mates in the millionaires’ media spend their time demonising those with an over-inflated sense of entitlement, over-sized families, who sponge off the taxpayer (but not Starbucks, who don’t pay any tax).

But apparently, the addition of an absurd number of fairy-tale titles (Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, Earl and Countess of Strathearn, Baron and Baroness Carrikfergus, Royal Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, Knight of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle)  and hobbies which include playing soldiers, fancy dress, and an endless round of taxpayer-funded luxury holidays, makes these parents’ irresponsible decision totally OK.

Will and Kate (as they’re known to the plebs on Fleet Street) are currently living rent-free in some of Britain’s biggest mansions.

The fanfare surrounding this announcement obviously has nothing to do with the fact that on Wednesday the Tories will have to announce that their cuts (including cuts to child-support and free nursery places) have totally and miserably failed to ‘Get Britain Working Again’.

In fact, more people are unemployed than ever, with official unemployment at 10% and rising.

For those worried that devastating cuts to the NHS could threaten the safe and healthy delivery of the young parasite, fear not; they are well out of reach of germs, cramped conditions, lack of beds and rising mortality rates in the under-fire NHS.

Instead, cards, flowers and contraceptives should be sent to the private King Edward VII Hospital, London. There the mother will receive the finest care available – paid for by us, the taxpayer.

In these harsh economic conditions, the news that we’ll have to fork out to feed another Royal mouth is unwelcome.

Millions of ordinary people face an uncertain future as cut after cut destroys our hospitals, schools, wages and jobs.

The happy parents-to-be will face only the hardship of a lifetime of privilege. The arduous duties of representing Britain’s aristocratic and business elite are compensated by every imaginable perk.

While struggling families are told by the Tories to rent spare rooms to strangers or lose their housing benefit, Kate and Will (or rather, their army of nannies) will raise the new Royal in houses with dozens of bedrooms and bathrooms that have never been used.

The monstrous institution called the Royal Family is a senseless waste of money that could be used to cut fees, fund EMA and build desperately-needed homes.

While a third of children in Britain live in poverty, Labour leader Ed Miliband claims this pregnancy is ‘something the whole nation can celebrate’.

Well, he can celebrate if he wants – it won’t help him win the election.

We won’t be celebrating. Instead we’ll be fighting to defend our services, education and jobs from destruction.

We say: Make Royals work for minimum wage, and see how fast things change!

We fight to:

Abolish the Monarchy – let them eat Cornflakes

Share out the Royal wealth, turn the palaces into affordable housing

Create real jobs for all – including the princes and princesses

The wages are too damn low! Fast-food workers fight back

Hundreds of low-paid New York fast-food industry workers walked off the job yesterday in protest at poverty pay which is seeing bosses rake in record profits.

The action marked escalation by the New York Communities for Change campaign which has been leading a drive to unionise workers in an industry where unions are virtually unknown – and most workers earn an average of $8.76 an hour.

40 organises have been visiting outlets, gathering support for a new union, the Fast Food Workers’ Committee, which is not recognised by the industry.

Workers from McDonald’s, Burger King, Wendy’s and other chains joined pickets across the city, which joined up to march on the McDonald’s in Time Square. They are demanding the right to join a union and an increase in pay to $15 an hour.

In an industry where trade unionists are regularly sacked, and workers who speak out victimised or even fired, this act of defiance reflects the grinding burden of austerity.

Traditionally high-turnover and limited benefits helped undermine unionisation drives. But now, as workers are forced to take out unaffordable healthcare insurance and jobs are harder to come by, many workers are forced to stay in these so-called ‘temporary’ or ‘entry-level’ jobs, while trying to feed families or pay for education.

Coming in the wake of the Black Friday strike by Walmart workers, this latest attempt to organise low-paid workers is an inspiration for the mainly young workers in the international fast-food industry.

From meat-packing to burger-flipping, the industry relies on paying the lowest possible wages in order to secure the biggest profits for its bosses.

Forming a union is a legal right, and the most effective way for workers to fight back against the bullying, limited hours and unpaid overtime which is rife within the industry.

REVOLUTION sends its solidarity to the workers America’s biggest companies taking a stand against poverty pay and exploitation.

Sign the petition in support of the workers here

 

UK Firms Help Rich Dodge Millions In Taxes

Firms in the United Kingdom have been helping millionaires avoid millions in taxes using complex tax evasion schemes.

With the BBC Panorama program on Sunday, it is has become obvious how easy the rich can trick Her Majesties Revenue and Customs out of billions. HM Revenue and Customs claim that tax evasion costs the tax payer on average £4 billion a year.

This is just another example in recent times, of the rich selfishly passing their burdens onto the working class.

The structure proposed by James Turner, of Turner Little, a corporate service provider, used nominee directors to help keep the clients name from being on the company paperwork. These nominee directors can be lawfully appointed to run companies on behalf of others, but they would be running nothing. In other words, it would be a web of lies and deception.

James Turner, told the undercover reporter: “They wont even know that they are a director, they just get paid,” he also told the reporter that adding the directors signature could be done by using a stamp. Corporate service providers, are legal companies that assist people in creating a business, both in the UK, and abroad, but these companies have been helping set up these fake companies, just to help the upper classes hide their money from HM Revenue and customs. If a business is set up like this, then it is no longer legal, it is a criminal offence.

In spite of this, Jack Turner denies allegations of criminal misconduct, and has stated that Turner Little will conduct an internal investigation, and if it is appropriate, it will take action.

In a statement, HM Revenue and Customs, which regulates all of the 2467 company service providers in the UK, claimed that most of the firms have nothing to do with illegal or criminal activity. However, it did confirm that it has never prosecuted a single corporate service provider for breaching money laundering regulations.

In recent times of austerity, cuts have hit everybody hard. From the student, with the rising university fees, to the pensioner, having their monthly amount cut. Everybody, or so it seems, but the rich, who have found yet another way to steal money once again, costing the taxpayer £4 billion a year.

The Tory government is supported and funded by the banks and big business and media so they would only regulate tax evasion and avoidance if we put enormous pressure on them – they don’t want to bite that hand that feeds them.

We need to tax the rich and use the money to pay for education, healthcare and jobs, but we also would need to stop these companies from moving their money abroad to avoid tax – we would need to take it off them and say that they are welcome to move but their  (our) wealth stays here.

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Website Design Expert
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube