Join NCAFC, fight for democratic unity

ncafc-logo-new

Following the decisions of its December conference, the National Campaign Against Fees & Cuts (NCAFC) has created membership and affiliation structures.

All students can now join NCAFC for £1, and school, college and university anti-cuts groups can affiliate. This will give activists a democratic voice in the campaign and greatly strengthen national and local co-ordination.

The student movement, like the wider anti-cuts anti-cuts movement is in desperate need of a united federation that can carry out a common strategy of resistance to Tory austerity.

The fight to defend education is far from over – as the upcoming strikes by the NUT show.

We think all the education campaigns – NCAFC, Education Activists Network, SBL and YFFJE should hold a joint conference to agree a plan of action and fuse into one federation.

This will stop the unnecessary and destructive competition which is holding us back.

We encourage all students and anti-cuts group to join NCAFC and work to build anti-cuts groups on campus and regionally which draw in representatives from as many institutions and campaigns as possible.

Only by building a strong, unified campaign based on the most effective democratic structures like general assemblies can we hope to have a chance of taking on the Tories – and winning.

Students: reorganise our resistance

red square-quebecThis article originally appeared at www.workerspower.com

2012 was a year to forget for the Tories. It was, in the main, a year to forget for student activists as well. The first year of £9,000 fees saw a 10 per cent drop in student numbers. September saw the government try to deport thousands of overseas students from London Met. Aside from local struggles which flared up at a few universities, the winter mobilisations of 2010/11 aren’t exactly casting a long shadow outside vice-chancellors’ windows.

And what of the other 50 per cent of young people who aren’t cooped up in overcrowded lecture theatres and battling slum landlords and rip-off letting agencies? Well, over a million remain locked into the Tories’ unemployment trap. In an economy with more unemployed than vacancies, the only alternatives are the workfare schemes (where there’s no shortage of places, surprisingly) or unpaid internships.

It might seem like resistance to the Tories’ class war is flagging. This is true. The failure of the unions’ strikes to defend pensions means millions of workers are less confident that militant industrial action can deliver success. The rivalries in the anti-cuts movement, with three competing anti-cuts campaigns, make effective resistance is almost impossible. Coming into the fifth year of austerity, the fight back is stagnating.

But we aren’t beaten yet. It’s clear something has to change and students have to look at how we can take the best of our experiences in collective, democratic organisation and apply that to the wider struggles in society.

NUS – leaders who won’t lead

Since the grassroots protests and walkouts of winter 2010, the NUS has firmly reasserted its control, its right to lead – and to mislead.

Many Student Unions have dismantled their democratic structures, replacing democratic accountability with tokenistic and passive participation which is incapable of engaging more than a small minority of students –leaving decisions from grand strategy to publicity in the hands of time-serving bureaucrats who are divorced from the mass of students.

But the fiasco of the NUS’s 2012 demonstration shows that we ignore the bureaucrats at our peril. Equally, joining in the petty squabbling and factionalism of NUS conference in order to win a few positions is no long-term solution.

By drawing in students into genuinely democratic structures we can expose the undemocratic nature of ‘student democracy’ on campus. Working with sab officers where possible and against them where necessary we can start to break the stifling bureaucratic attitude which sees students as a stage army, not as conscious participants.

There is no question of ‘reclaiming’ the NUS for the students. But its peculiar character – funded and managed as a mechanism of state control, yet with leaders reliant on a relationship with students – means we should work with them where they act in our interests, yet be able to openly criticise and self-organise everywhere that they put their own careers before the needs of students.

Self-organisation

The student movement didn’t spring out of thin air. The wave of occupations against the war in Gaza in 2009 fuelled the growth of student committees which took on the task of coordinating action against cuts and the tuition fee increase.

During the student movement, several towns organised general assemblies which represented the highest form of democratic decision-making and representation. At their best, they attracted participation from schools, colleges and organisations of students and education workers.

Many of these structures have withered, but they remain the basic tactic for collective struggle both on campus and in schools.

Our primary task is to rebuild these committees. They should have representatives from every academic department and the trade unions. It’s important that we pressure the Student Unions to submit to the democratic decisions of the general assemblies.

On campuses, the UCU and workers’ unions are fighting to defend education and save jobs. In universities, schools and colleges, students need to launch a determined struggle for democratic rights to oversee education policy, financial decisions and hold management to account.

In the fight to defend education and to increase students’ control over what we learn, committees of action should work for the widest representation, drawing in students, teachers, cleaners and other staff – all who have a common interest in defending a properly funded, accessible education system.

Unite the movement

The infighting and competition that plagues the anti-cuts movement has its echo in the student movement too. But the solution is the same.

We think all the campus and school anti-cuts groups should affiliate to a democratic, national federation. The decision by the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts to allow both group affiliation and individual membership (£1) with full democratic rights is a good step forward.

NCAFC should hold a spring conference, co-sponsored with Education Activist Network, and Youth Fight for Jobs to fuse into one federation, with a common strategy for organising the defence of our education. We encourage all youth to join NCAFC and fight for this to happen – a united campaign around a strategy decided by students is the strongest basis for entering the working class struggle against Tory austerity and capitalist crisis.

Teachers’ Union to strike against Tory attacks

NUT teachers voting unanimously for strike action

NUT teachers voting unanimously for strike action

Teachers in the National Union of Teachers (NUT) will strike on March 13th. This is to strike back against endless attacks by education secretary Michael Gove.

The Tories want to abolish automatic pay progression and replace it with performance-related pay. This isn’t about giving teachers’ incentives to work harder. It’s about getting rid of national pay bargaining – where rates won by unions apply to all equivalent staff.

This latest attack comes shortly after teachers’ were defeated in their struggle to defend pensions. The union leaders’ inability to wage a sustained, effective campaign means teachers have lost on average 16% of their pay through freezes and higher pension contributions.

The divisions and lack of strategy has given Michael Gove the confidence to press ahead with his plans to transform education – destroying the comprehensive system and replacing it with privately-run for-profit schools.

The Tories don’t want to reform education in order to improve everyone’s chances. They want to take it over, let the market run it, and use it to suit the needs of millionaire bosses and politicians.

This means we need a credible strategy for fighting back. An NUT strike on March 13th could be joined by civil servants in the PCS and university and college lecturers in the UCU. This will also be the day for second European Day of Action – like the one on November 14 which saw millions of workers striking against austerity across Europe.

The last few years have shown that young people, too, will need to take our place in the front lines of this struggle. From the students in parliament square defending access to education, to the youth on the streets of August 2011 rising up against routine police violence, we have been the most willing to join together to take on the Tories.

School students should support their teachers on strike and organise to raise their own demands alongside them. Action committees in schools can unite students and teachers in planning joint action and be stronger by struggling together.

Studio Schools – an attack on working class youth

After completing a stint in education, be it leaving school at 16 or staying on in further education, most of us find that we are doomed to be little more than slaves to a company. For some of us however, this could now be the case from the mere age of 14.

Enter, “Studio Schools”, a government backed scheme for 14 -19 year olds that will put the education of the said school’s students firmly in the hands of big, corporate employers. For those of you unsure what a “studio school” is (join the queue), launched back in 2010 these schools sprung up without any sort of discussion of whether they are necessary or of any actual use and are state funded however run by private sponsors. The apparent aim for studio schools is to help young people get into work by making them more employable. This is to be achieved through the students of the school being taken out of the classroom environment and learning “on the job” with each school specialising in a certain area such as catering and engineering. There are currently 15 studio schools open across the UK with that figure expected to double to 30 by September 2013 as the Government gives the all clear for another 15 to be opened.

The Studio Schools Trust claims on their website that the schools offer both academic and vocational qualifications and teaches (some of) the national curriculum stating students will work towards GCSEs in at least Maths, English and Science. These qualification will be delivered however “out of a traditional classroom setting” and instead through “Enterprise projects”.

At a first glance studio schools may not seem like a bad idea. There are plenty of young people who fail to thrive in the classroom environment and there are too plenty of subjects that offer few practical skills. These schools however will usher their students down a very narrow path with the end product being working in a specific, not necessarily specialist field. The studio school’s “CREATE Framework”, consisting of modules such as “thinking” and “understanding myself”, doesn’t sound too far away from the likes of CoPE and general studies, filler qualifications seen in mainstream education which are much less valued than core subjects. What this looks like is basically a dumbing down of education making students work towards becoming the drones for giant corporations. This of course is hardly the sort of opportunity anyone would want going to school to open up for our children.

The most alarming part of this set up is also the way in which the schools claim children will be “taught”. As previously stated, students will learn “on the job”. Yes, a hands on approach like this may be better for preparing students for a lifetime of work than sitting at a table working out algebra is ever going to. Students at these schools will however be doing a job with 9 – 5 hours and short holidays reflecting this. They will be getting prepared for the world of work, by working. Over 16 students will be paid, unsurprisingly, the minimum wage. Under 16 students will be expected to work for free. This brings in an awful scent of workfare about the set up as students are in fact working for their education. Facts such as these could also point out the reasoning for the giant corporation’s involvement may be more to do with aspects such cheap labour rather than trying to help young people cement a better future. As anyone who has ever worked for pretty much any company ever will tell you, there is only one thing people at the top actually care about.

The really sickly part about this all is that we are handing over the responsibility of educating these students to the big name companies; Sony, Ikea and Hilton Hotels to name but a few. The Studio Schools Trust website states that in the most recent employer survey 70% of employers “wanted to see the new government make the employability skills of young people its top education priority”. Yes because it doesn’t matter about opening up a range of opportunities for young people, encouraging them to do something worthwhile or to ensure just a chance of doing something they enjoy does it? As long as the education process makes them able to clean a table in a hotel, right guys?

Of course not everyone gets to follow their dream. Not everyone thrives in an academic environment. But isn’t education supposed to be about that chance that a person could? It’s certainly not about securing the next generation of employees for the corporate big boys. If a young person wants the option of dropping out of the conventional academic environment as they feel it’s not for them then no one should want to say that they can’t. But is doing this as young as 14 really the answer? Is mass involvement from the private sponsors really the right way to go about this? These are still state schools remember. They are still funded by the tax payer. If this is going to be done it needs to be done properly and with young people’s best interests at heart. The corporate giants have clicked their fingers and said “we want this out of education” and just like that with little thought or discussion on the matter, now we have studio schools. Is this really for the benefit of the students who will be attending? Or is this just the big companies muscling in on our education process? Putting young people’s lives in the hands of those who care for nothing but their wealth is a dangerous route to go down however one that our government seems to backing.

Open Letter: Remove fascist Nick Griffin’s platform in the ‘Leeds Student’

Leeds Student, the Leeds University student newspaper has published an interview with Nick Griffin, leader of the fascist BNP. Below we’ve re-posted the open letter from two NUS officers which calls for the article’s removal. Add your name to the letter here.


We are appalled by the decision of ‘Leeds Student’ – an official student society of Leeds University Union – to publish an interview with Nick Griffin, leader of the fascist British National Party (BNP), on their website.

 

We demand that the Editor of ‘Leeds Student’ remove this offensive interview that gives a platform to a fascist immediately.

 

In the interview itself Nick Griffin defends the fact that he has shared a platform with the Ku Klux Klan – a white supremacist organisation responsible for attacks on and lynching of Black people in the US.

 

 

In describing his views on gay people, Nick Griffin says in the interview: “gay people have complained for years that the rest of society hasn’t understood how they feel, and has had to make allowances, has to be tolerant. So why can’t you people simply get over it and tolerate the fact that a lot of heterosexual people – we don’t want to persecute you – but we find the sight of two men kissing creepy. That’s just a fact. What’s the problem?”

 

He goes on to tell the interviewer that civil partnerships will mean that, “children will die over the next few years” because it undermines the institution of heterosexual marriage.

 

These abhorrent and utterly offensive views are just a snapshot of what the BNP represents.

 

The BNP is a fascist organisation which stands for an “all white Britain”, a goal which can only be achieved by violence, the annihilation of entire groups of people and the ending of democracy. Nick Griffin, leader of the fascist BNP is a convicted Holocaust denier.

 

In justifying the publication of this interview, the ‘Leeds Student’ states that the “paper is proud that we live in a democratic society, and that we can openly challenge and debate all manner of opinion and ideas.”

 

The BNP stands for the elimination of the democracy and all freedoms that the Leeds Student claims to support. 

 

We should always remember that the millions of people who died at the hands of the Nazis’ slaughter – in the gas chambers and the concentration camps – did not die because their debating skills or arguments were not powerful enough.  They died because once fascism had abused the democratic system to get its grip on power it soon closed down any freedoms to prevent any resistance. That is why we must never give a platform to fascists anywhere in the student movement.

 

In publishing this interview the ‘Leeds Student’ risks giving legitimacy to a fascist organisation, and boosts the BNP’s attempts to join the political mainstream when we should be isolating them.

 

We the undersigned demand the editor of the ‘Leeds Student’ to reconsider this grave error and remove the interview with fascist Nick Griffin from their website and newspaper immediately.

 

Signed

* Aaron Kiely, NUS Black Students’ Officer

* Malia Bouattia, NUS NEC (Black Students’ Campaign)

 

To add your name or organisation as a signatory please email [email protected]

#Demo 2012: Stop Tory attacks on education

On 21 November, thousands of students will march in London to say no to cuts, fees and privatisation.

Since the Con-Dem government came to power, education has been under constant attack. Tuition fees were tripled to £9k a year, EMA was scrapped and now schools and universities are being sold off to private companies.

On October 20th, 150, 000 workers marched in London demanding an end to cuts.

#Demo2012 on November 21st is our chance to strike back.

The trashing of Tory party HQ at Millbank, the occupations and education assemblies showed how we become stronger when we unite and fight. The victory of the Quebec students’ strike proves that militant struggle is the best way to defeat government attacks.

The student movement needs to reorganise and create the weapons necessary to win. This means uniting the different campaigns like EAN, NCAFC and YFJ into a single, democratic federation which fights for a general strike to stop the cuts.

A big demonstration on N21 will send Cameron’s toffs the message that students won’t lie down and watch our universities privatised and a generation of young people denied access to real education.

All out to defend education on N21 – Scrap fees & cuts, bring back EMA – Build a general strike to stop the cuts!

Stop the English Baccalaureate

 “Time to tackle the dumbing down” is the new slogan promoting the Tories’ latest attack on education. The introduction of the English Baccalaureate to replace GCSEs will drag education back to a two-tier system – dividing students by class and ‘intelligence’.

Gove claims a new system is needed because currently too many students are getting too high grades and achievement levels are increasing each year. He blames exam boards competing and giving schools too much information about what will be on exam papers and students not completing their own coursework.

If that’s true, why not nationalise the exam boards into one single board under the control of students and education workers – those best placed to measure educational achievement.

And if competition amongst exam boards has been such a disaster how is allowing competition amongst schools going to solve the problem?

The reality is that the Tories have a plan for education – and it doesn’t have students’ best interests at heart. The scrapping of EMA, the reform of teachers’ pensions and the introduction of private schools funded by the taxpayer (academies, free schools) all serve to increase the control of British bosses over our education.

They want to choose what we learn, how we learn, and indoctrinate us with the attitudes and values that suit them. They are making education for profit, not knowledge.

The Tories have already shown their contempt for young people, when they decided to fail tens of thousands of GCSE students this summer so they could look tough on ‘grade inflation’.

Rather  than the current module-based exams with some being taken at the end of year 10 and some at the end of year 11, all exams would be taken at the end of the final year.

This prevents students from being able to take resits and also massively increases the pressure during exams season at the end of year 11. Not only will all the exams been taken at once but unlike in GCSES where in some subjects a percentage of the final grade is from coursework, particularly in more vocational subjects such as health and social care, the EBC will be 100% exams.

One key area the EBC will affect is those with dyslexia or other learning difficulties. The British Dyslexia Association said an emphasis on exams rather than coursework and the breaking of two-year studies into smaller units and the extra stress associated with once-and-for-all exams could disadvantage candidates with some learning difficulties. The changes would also damage their chances of going on to higher education.

With all this change going to happen you’d assume the English Baccalaureate would go through some serious piloting before being introduced into schools permanently, but oh no it is likely to go ahead initially in English, Maths and Science from 2015 without any conventional pre-trials. It seems that, Ofqual, the exams regulator, has quietly abandoned a promise to ensure that all major exam reforms are piloted in advance. A spokesman simply says:  ”Due to concerns that pilots can stifle innovation and the length of time required for meaningful pilots to be undertaken, [the piloting principles] were not taken forward.”

It seems that young people’s education simply isn’t important enough to spend time getting right before they’re just thrown in at the deep end.

Schools for students – not for profit

Education is one of the last areas of the economy not run in the interest of private profit. Part of the bosses’ solution to the crisis is to open up new markets to invest in. This is why the Tories are desperately rushing through new laws which give businesses the right to run schools, hospitals and public services.

But the biggest barrier to education marketisation is the students and staff themselves – those who will be funnelled through a superficial, stripped-back education industry and those who are expected to work in it.

This explains the attempt to reform pensions and break the monopoly of state education. The new pensions will make workers work longer and receive less. The introduction of academies and free schools gives bosses the ‘right’ and incentive to profit from providing education.

Privatisation, new exams, higher fees; all have the aim of gradually eroding the ability of state schools to function outside of the market. Directly by buying schools, or indirectly by influencing government policy in smoky backrooms, employers will gain extensive powers to dictate the kind of education they want working people to have.

Reform of education is a permanent task of any society. But we think if ‘reform’ means ‘improvement’ then that can only come with greater investment. This investment should be under the control of education workers and communities – those who know best what their educational needs are.

We have to be clear that these reforms are not about providing real apprenticeships, giving young people secure futures, but transforming the school system into another tool to discipline the working class. The bosses’ vision for education is one which imposes flexibility, insecurity and division as facts of life, which future generations will learn from their first day in school.

We oppose the English Baccalaureate. Exams and education should be managed by teachers, education workers and students themselves.

We are fighting for free and equal access to education for all who want it.

The November 21 demonstration and Global Education Strike give students a great opportunity to re-kindle the flames of revolt.

Our education is not for sale!

Join the Education bloc on #Oct20

The University of London Union (ULU) has called an education bloc on the Trades Union Congress (TUC) demonstration for ‘A Future That Works’ on October 20th.

The call has been supported by all the students unions in the University of London as well as the Birkbeck, Senate House, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) and Institution of Education (IOE) branches of Unison, and University College London (UCL), IOE and SOAS branches of the University and College Union (UCU).

The education bloc will assemble at 11am outside the ULU building on Malet Street and form a feeder march to join the main demonstration.

ULU Vice President Daniel Cooper said: “The government’s austerity agenda affects all of us. The attacks on education form part of the wider assault on public services. Many students now work part-time or are destined for a precarious job market. On October 20th we will be marching together with the organised labour movement to send a message of defiance and opposition to the Coalition.”

Naomi Bain from Birkbeck Unison said: “I am really pleased that students are supporting this march, just as education workers will support the student march in November. We have been planning together and supporting one another’s struggles and will continue to do so.”

ENDS

Facebook event: https://www.facebook.com/events/232513776877359/

Leeds Students Protest Against London Met Deportations

Leeds Revolution took part in a protest on Friday against the threatened deportations of 2,600 students from London Metropolitan University. Fifty students from Leeds Met and Leeds University gathered outside Leeds University, displayed banners and signs saying “hands off our classmates”. Lots of passers-by signed a petition against the deportations.

The international status of the university has been revoked by the UK Border Agency so they aren’t able to issue student visas to people from outside of the EU. The 2,600 students affected have been given 60 days to find another university or get out of the country.

Photograph by Leo Garbutt

The government made this announcement on the same day as the latest immigration statistics in a clear move to look “tough” on immigration. In reality this is a Tory stunt that could ruin the lives of thousands of people. London Met has started legal action in an attempt to overturn the decision and there is a question mark over whether the university can stay afloat if it can no longer accept non-EU students who provide 15% of its revenue.

There is a huge campaign at London Met involving students and lectures – they have held protests against the government decision and the lecturers’ union UCU has called for an amnesty for the students. We in Revolution agree that UKBA should allow the students to remain at London Met and would also demand that the government reinstates the international status of London Met and doesn’t interfere in the internal affairs of a university in this way again.

We have a meeting organised at Leeds Metropolitan University on The Case Against Immigration Controls on Thursday 20th September, 6pm at the Leslie Silver Building. We have also spoken with a number of other societies about setting up a London Met defence campaign and will keep you posted.

Check out the fb event for our meeting here http://www.facebook.com/events/360981043979839/

Check out the report from Leeds Student of the protest here http://www.leedsstudent.org/2012-09-14/ls1/ls1-news/protesters-attack-tory-racism-of-london-met-deportations

Fight racist deportations at London Met

(pic: Soren Goard)

Thousands of students have been given until December 1 to find a new university place or face being rounded up and deported from the UK.

Around 2,600 non-EU students have had their education thrown into jeopardy by the decision of the UK Border Agency (UKBA) to strip London Metropolitan University of its right to issue visas to students from abroad.

The decision means the students are unable to renew their visas or continue their studies past September. Both the Students’ Union and UCU branch condemned the move.

The government defended its decision by claiming ‘serious systemic failure’ meant that ‘allowing London Met to continue to sponsor and teach international students was not an option.’

The lecturers’ union, UCU, blames an incompetent management and racist government policies. For many universities, foreign students are treated as a cash-cow. They are charged much higher fees than UK students, and their dependence on the University for visas means an insecure existence.

In 2010-11 15 per cent of London Met’s income came from foreign students.

Unsurprisingly then, that the pro-fees university bosses’ organisation Universities UK condemned the decision. But their fear that it will put off foreign students is motivated more by their reliance on fees from these students than a defence of equal access to education.

Privatisation

For the overpaid pen-pushers sat in Vice-chancellor offices up and down the country, foreign students are central to new funding plans which will see many universities enter ‘partnerships’ or ‘service sharing’ schemes with private contractors.

In effect this will see student loans funded by the government used to inflate the profits of private companies, who will be paid to run services with fewer workers and a bigger bill.

Despite news that some NHS hospitals will be privatised after being bankrupted by exactly the same public-private partnerships, uni bosses have no doubt in their ability to turn a profit from overcrowded, under-resourced courses.

After revealing a £4 million surplus this year, London Met management announced plans to privatise swathes of university services: BT, Capita and Wipro are competing to win a £74 million contract to run (and wring a decent profit from) student services, careers, libraries, IT and ‘consultancy’.

The massive economic and social value invested in our universities has been built up over decades with public money. We should not allow our common wealth to be auctioned off to private businesses whose only motive is profit.

Racism

The truth is that both the government and university vice-chancellors are cynically exploiting the desperate situation of thousands of students.

It’s no coincidence that the government’s attack on foreign students came on the same day its immigration statistics were published. These figures showed a decline in the numbers of immigrants – mainly due to a 20 per cent cut in new student visas.

But the Con-Dem government is determined to distort our understanding of immigration – by blaming poor immigrant workers and students for the social problems caused by a system which exploits millions for the profit of a few.

Student visas account for 40 per cent of all immigration into the UK. The majority are paying vast sums to study with very little security. In 2008, one of the first cuts made to pay for the bailout of the banks was state funding for English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) courses. This mostly affected poor and female immigrants.

Now the students at London Met are being penalised for the failings of the university bosses and UKBA.

Defend education

Education is a right that should be provided with free and equal access to all. The barriers to education are used as a weapon to separate the skilled from unskilled, men from women and white from black.

The barriers to immigration and freedom of movement are a tool used by the bosses to keep us divided, struggling in competition against each other rather than collectively against the capitalists enriching themselves at our expense.

We oppose all barriers to freedom of movement and access to education. The rich have no barriers to hiding their fortunes in tax-havens – yet their racist border laws impose total control over the freedom to find work or education.

We reject any attempts to turn people against immigrant students and workers. They are not to blame for bosses who swindle the government or their employees. They face the same cuts and social problems as their neighbours along with the racist violence of the media and police.

Anti-racists, the NUS and teaching unions should immediately launch a campaign to get the students visas immediately reinstated.

We call for citizenship rights for all undocumented workers, with no penalisations.

We stand for equal access to education for all, free and paid for by raising taxes on the banks and capitalists.

REVOLUTION supports a statement of solidarity with the students, calling for the government to reinstate London Met’s HTS status and stop the persecution of foreign students.

You can sign the statement at www.anticuts.com

Animated Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Wordpress Development Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube