Get the Troops out of Mali

2000 French troops have invaded the African country of Mali after the national government collapsed. French airstrikes have fallen on the towns of Gao and kidal amongst others. The French government says, predictably, that their intervention is “humanitarian” but it is no coincidence that French companies make a mint from the Uranium reserves in the north of Mali.

The pretext for the invasion is that Islamist forces have taken over the north of the country, named it Azawad and imposed a particularly brutal strand of Sharia law on the people living there. Most of those people are Muslim, but they haven’t voted for the National Movement for the Liberation of Azwad and certainly haven’t agreed to the new laws. There have been a number of clashes between the NMLA and people belonging to the 30 different nationalities living in Mali.

There has been footage on the news showing people cheering the French troops, so why do we not think that the invasion is the answer? Well, Mali used to be a French colony and since gaining formal “independence” it has still been exploited by French companies who have been mining all the natural wealth and taking it for themselves. The International Monetary Fund imposed “structural” adjustment on the country since 1991 and forced the government to make huge cuts to health and other public services. Now the people living there suffer from 30% unemployment, 50% of children never go to school and one third of people don’t have access to clean water. Just imagine what a difference the money from selling Uranium could make to the lives of those people.

So we think that not only should the French troops get out of Mali but so should the French companies (and all other international companies). They should leave the people of Mali alone because foreign intervention in Mali has caused nothing but trouble ever since the French drew some lines on a map and named the new country “Mali”. The best chance that the Malian people have is to be given the chance to develop their own solutions to the crisis that they face. We would encourage them to use their own forces to establish a region of political freedom, social tolerance and economic liberation from the IMF and multinational companies alongside the people of other West African countries.

Why Egyptians should reject the proposed consitution

International Statement – REVOLUTION IC

 

Since the downfall of dictator Mubarak in 2011, Egypt’s people have had to fight tooth and nail to get a new set of laws – a constitution – democratically created. Then they had to vote whether to accept the draft.

On the 15th of December, the first round of the constitution referendum started. The results were published soon after the second round on the 22nd of December with 64% voting for the constitution.

The content is reactionary in it’s Islamist character, defining the Sharia as the main source for jurisdiction, the absence of explicit women’s rights, the discrimination of religious minorities, and the unchanged autonomy and power of the military apparatus. The state shall guarantee the ethics, morals, and the law and order and gives a big space for interpretation for its use of power.

The outcome of the referendum means a preliminary victory of the counterrevolution. It means a setback for the opposition movement and a consolidation of the new – but, in fact, old – regime lead by the Muslim Brotherhood.

 In the struggle for the new constitution, President Morsi gave himself the power that his decisions couldn’t be fought by the court and argued that this would be necessary for the safety of the revolution. He sees himself in a struggle against parts of the state apparatus from the old Mubarak regime which still controls the judiciary. This also explains why only three representatives of the old regime got convicted in the course of the revolution. His fear of the court wanting to dissolve the Constituent Assembly caused him to empower himself and to push the referendum by fast tracking with reactionary means.

This caused huge protests against the president’s self-empowerment and against the constitutional referendum. While bourgeois forces like the liberals, and even openly reactionary forces like the supporters of the old regime, tried to get a voice within the uprising, its social roots lay elsewhere. The oppositional alliance, where even smaller socialist forces were involved, and the radical youth caused mass demonstrations leading to a political crisis in society where the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists revealed their reactionary character. The massive protests forced Morsi to withdraw his dictatorial decrees but not the referendum and the draft constitution.

During the protests, scores of clashes between oppositional demonstrators and supporters of Morsi occurred. Parts of the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafists started attacks on the demonstrations leading to five people being killed and 700 being injured. As a reaction to the attacks from the Islamist forces, radical youths set an office of the Muslim Brotherhood on fire. President Morsi gave permission to the military to take people under arrest and stationed soldiers and tanks near the presidential palace. Although the military asserted not to intervene into the protests, it was clear that it should frighten the demonstrators and should be ready to intervene in case of emergency.

The most militant and progressive element of the opposition is the youth, with many of them tend to Left or anarchistic positions. This is no coincidence; the youth in Egypt suffers the most from the economic crisis. 75 percent of those 15-28 years’ old are unemployed. The biggest influence spurring the youths is the April 6 youth movement, which has a huge range and force for mobilization.

Nevertheless, the movement considers itself not as a party and couldn’t organize the most radical youth on a clear and revolutionary perspective. Still the youth has to be aware to link their struggles to other social layers with a special attention to the organized working class, which is the only force in society which can really take the government and enterprises under pressure by strike and which is able to reorganize the form of production and by that the whole society. Therefore, the youth has build their own independent organization but do so on the basis of a clear and revolutionary program that orientates toward the working class.

It is also the working class which suffers alongside oppressed layers like youths, women, and immigrants from the capitalist crisis and the reactionary regime. The social and political crisis in Egypt sharpens with the ongoing differentiation between rich and poor. The economy lies down suffering under missing incomes from foreign investments and tourism. President Morsi had to make a request for an IMF credit of 4.8 billion Dollars which is as usual connected to cost-cutting measures, in particular the cutbacks of energy subsidies, the tax increase on consumption, and a higher taxation on income.

Although the president abandoned a tax increase shortly before the referendum, which displeased the IMF, one has to consider this measure as a tactic in the referendum. The credit and the cost-cutting measures will then come next year, ruining the life of many workers, peasants, and poor in Egypt. The working class and the trade unions have to pick up a fight against the cutbacks and against the government and the Muslim Brotherhood, which tries to dominate the trade unions by undemocratically replacing the union officials with people appointed from the Manpower Minister for leadership positions.

Also the government led by the Muslim Brotherhood dropped a draft law for the freedom of trade unions. Mursi’s attempts to weaken and take over the trade unions is a preparation for a bigger attack on the working class. That’s why the struggle of the workers and the trade unions must also be struggle against the Muslim Brotherhood and the constitution.

The Constituent Assembly is dominated by the Muslim brotherhood and the Salafists and doesn’t represent the people. It had been elected by the parliament with almost no discussion about the procedure of vote and without a minimum number of female representatives and representatives of religious minorities and, therefore, had been boycotted by many liberals and secularists. Moreover, the April 6 youth movement reports about the constitution referendum on later opened polling and voters being affected by members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The movement sent members to different towns to observe the referendum. In Damietta, Islamists offered money for votes for the constitution; in the province Menufija, a judge had to dismiss his advance men, because they tried to persuade voters for the constitution. Also, preachers in mosques called for the constitution. Nevertheless, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists claim that the votes for the constitution mean the will of the people in spite of the ridiculous voter participation of 32%.

A representative constitution must be a constitution of the masses of the workers, peasants, and youth. There must be a constituent assembly elected by democratic councils in districts, towns, and workplaces with delegates which can be elected and deselected. These councils have to control the assembly and have to build a power which can challenge the bureaucratic, state apparatus. They have to be defended by self-defense committees and workers and peasants’ militias. This is the only way to guarantee a constitution in the interest of the masses.

But even this isn’t enough. A new, revolutionary constitution cannot limit itself to be a democratic one, since it cannot change the living conditions of the people as long as they are being exploited and oppressed by imperialism and the Egyptian capitalist class. The capitalists will fight every democratic reform by every mean as soon as it becomes a threat to their rule and their profits.

The revolution has to go on to build up democratic councils of the masses and build dual power; it has to arm itself; it has to take the power and build it on the councils of workers, peasants, youth, and the poor. It has to decide a revolutionary constitution which dis-empowers the capitalists and landlords and, therefore, nationalizes the most important companies under worker’s control, and further steps ahead to a socialist society of justice, freedom, and equality.

This requires the buildup of a common workers’ party on a revolutionary communist program, which can fight for the power of the masses and for a socialist constitution by dual power. Currently,  the elections to parliament after the passed constitution will be an important process of political dispute and an optimal opportunity create such a workers’ party.

redrevologonew

The wages are too damn low! Fast-food workers fight back

Hundreds of low-paid New York fast-food industry workers walked off the job yesterday in protest at poverty pay which is seeing bosses rake in record profits.

The action marked escalation by the New York Communities for Change campaign which has been leading a drive to unionise workers in an industry where unions are virtually unknown – and most workers earn an average of $8.76 an hour.

40 organises have been visiting outlets, gathering support for a new union, the Fast Food Workers’ Committee, which is not recognised by the industry.

Workers from McDonald’s, Burger King, Wendy’s and other chains joined pickets across the city, which joined up to march on the McDonald’s in Time Square. They are demanding the right to join a union and an increase in pay to $15 an hour.

In an industry where trade unionists are regularly sacked, and workers who speak out victimised or even fired, this act of defiance reflects the grinding burden of austerity.

Traditionally high-turnover and limited benefits helped undermine unionisation drives. But now, as workers are forced to take out unaffordable healthcare insurance and jobs are harder to come by, many workers are forced to stay in these so-called ‘temporary’ or ‘entry-level’ jobs, while trying to feed families or pay for education.

Coming in the wake of the Black Friday strike by Walmart workers, this latest attempt to organise low-paid workers is an inspiration for the mainly young workers in the international fast-food industry.

From meat-packing to burger-flipping, the industry relies on paying the lowest possible wages in order to secure the biggest profits for its bosses.

Forming a union is a legal right, and the most effective way for workers to fight back against the bullying, limited hours and unpaid overtime which is rife within the industry.

REVOLUTION sends its solidarity to the workers America’s biggest companies taking a stand against poverty pay and exploitation.

Sign the petition in support of the workers here

 

Gaza ceasefire: stay vigilant – keep fighting

This weekend thousands marched through central London to demand an end to the Zionist occupation of Palestine. Thousands more marched through regional towns and cities, while pickets and demonstrations were also held in many European countries.

The latest bombardments came just after elections were called for January in Israel. The shelling by tanks, planes and warships killed over 130 people and injured hundreds in the Gaza strip.

Homes, schools and sports facilities were flattened. Three Israelis were killed by rockets fired by the resistance.

The offensive was launched after Israel broke a fragile 3-year ceasefire by assassinating a top leader of Hamas. Hamas had been overseeing a serious decline in rocket-fire from the strip since the last invasion in 2009 which saw nearly 1,500 Palestinians massacred by the Israeli Occupation Forces.

Turnout in the London demonstration was smaller than expected – mainly due to the ‘ceasefire’ arranged on Wednesday. A ceasefire which Israel honoured by shooting dead one and injuring ten on Thursday.

The ceasefire brought a temporary end to Israeli president Netanyahu’s warmongering; like a dog straining at the leash he was pulled back by his US paymasters who fear a ground invasion could upset their strategy of subordinating the Arab Spring revolutions to their interests.

In particular they want to ensure that new Egyptian President Morsi is firmly in their camp before there are further uprisings in the region.

Mass demonstrations against Western-backed dictatorship in Jordan, and the ongoing revolution in Syria shows that the youth and workers of the Middle East have not finished their struggle for democracy.

Israel’s continued threats to launch an unprovoked, pre-emptive strike against Iran means regional tensions remain high.

But in any new conflict Egypt will be the decisive player. The new uprisings against Morsi’s power-grab show that the Egyptian people are still  capable of mobilising to defend the gains of the revolution. Demands to open the Rafah border crossing and provide material solidarity with the Palestinians have been key demands since day one of the revolution.

But like Mubarak before him, Morsi has no intention of  challenging Israel – despite his radical talk. Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood are a barrier that must be overcome before the Egyptian people can play a decisive role in the struggle to end the occupation of Palestine.

We say: the ceasefire is a temporary pause – Israel is playing for time. All those who support the democratic revolutions and the rightful struggle for the liberation of Palestine must continue to struggle for an end to the blockade. However there can be no peace while Israel remains the puppet of US imperialism. We need to fight for one secular state where Arabs, Jews and others can share out the land and resources. 

We fight for:

Boycott Israel – down with the Apartheid state

An end to the occupation – one socialist state for all in Palestine

Down with imperialism and its puppets – kick out Morsi, Assad and King Abdullah

 

 

 

Appeal for a Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10

 

Download a pdf version of the appeal

 

November 10, 2012. Florence, Italy. Europe has been plunged into austerity and social conflict by the economic crisis. Millions say ‘enough is enough’. Florence is our chance to fight for an alternative; to build an international resistance to all attacks which make the working class and youth pay for the crisis of capitalism.

Ten years ago, radical youth sparked the call for global demonstrations against the Iraq war. Millions responded. Today, young people have again taken the lead by fighting austerity all across Europe. This is why we welcome the decision to call a new European Social Forum at a time when millions are trying to shape the struggle for an alternative.

We welcome the organisers’ pledge that:

“Florence 10+10” aims to be an inclusive and popular space, at our disposal for building alliances and concrete common initiatives: to build convergences for action on a European scale.”

We appeal to the youth of Syntagma Square and Puerta del Sol, of the occupations and the blockades, in the workplace and amongst the unemployed millions, to join us in our call for a European Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10.

We appeal also to our neighbours on other continents and above all in the lands of the Arab Spring to join us and enrich our debates with their experiences.

We want Florence 10+10 to address the key task of our movements. To succeed it must become the time and place for transforming our defensive, local struggles into Europe-wide and even worldwide action.

A Youth Assembly can be a place to debate, build networks for common action and plan an international campaign uniting all those under attack from the bankers, billionaires and their politicians in the European Union.

The EU institutions are the levers of power for an unelected class of exploiters who want to divide our resistance. Their strategy is the rise in unemployment, racism and attacks on the rights of women. Migrant workers are blamed for the lack of jobs while the unemployed and disabled are persecuted.

All who fight back confront the power of the media barons and the violence of the police, courts and fascists. But defiance alone has not been enough to throw out the austerity governments or stop the destruction of jobs, social welfare, and education.

Low-paid work, précarité and forced unpaid work is the future for millions of Europe’s young people. Education privatised, pensions demolished and training schemes abandoned. Everywhere the youth are denied a vote, economically exploited and yet made to pay for a crisis we did not cause.

We appeal the youth of the occupations, the barricades, the anti-fascist campaigns and the working class organisations everywhere to sign the appeal and join forces to build a powerful, democratic and decisive Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10.

Leeds Students Protest Against London Met Deportations

Leeds Revolution took part in a protest on Friday against the threatened deportations of 2,600 students from London Metropolitan University. Fifty students from Leeds Met and Leeds University gathered outside Leeds University, displayed banners and signs saying “hands off our classmates”. Lots of passers-by signed a petition against the deportations.

The international status of the university has been revoked by the UK Border Agency so they aren’t able to issue student visas to people from outside of the EU. The 2,600 students affected have been given 60 days to find another university or get out of the country.

Photograph by Leo Garbutt

The government made this announcement on the same day as the latest immigration statistics in a clear move to look “tough” on immigration. In reality this is a Tory stunt that could ruin the lives of thousands of people. London Met has started legal action in an attempt to overturn the decision and there is a question mark over whether the university can stay afloat if it can no longer accept non-EU students who provide 15% of its revenue.

There is a huge campaign at London Met involving students and lectures – they have held protests against the government decision and the lecturers’ union UCU has called for an amnesty for the students. We in Revolution agree that UKBA should allow the students to remain at London Met and would also demand that the government reinstates the international status of London Met and doesn’t interfere in the internal affairs of a university in this way again.

We have a meeting organised at Leeds Metropolitan University on The Case Against Immigration Controls on Thursday 20th September, 6pm at the Leslie Silver Building. We have also spoken with a number of other societies about setting up a London Met defence campaign and will keep you posted.

Check out the fb event for our meeting here http://www.facebook.com/events/360981043979839/

Check out the report from Leeds Student of the protest here http://www.leedsstudent.org/2012-09-14/ls1/ls1-news/protesters-attack-tory-racism-of-london-met-deportations

Has Pussy Riot fucked Putin?

Photo: Alessandro Della Bella

Three members of the band Pussy Riot have been sentenced to two years in prison after being found guilty of “hooliganism motivated by religious hatred”. The punishment has been denounced across the world, but Putin has launched a witch-hunt to round up remaining members of the group.

The question now is what does this latest crackdown on the right to protest mean for Russian society and will it re-ignite the pro-democracy campaigns?

The trial and sentence were used to make an example to other activists who have been making public criticisms of Putin’s undemocratic and corrupt government. It also served to boost support among his conservative base.

But even some of Putin’s close supporters have called the verdict a mistake. The Russian Orthodox Church, which pushed for prosecution in the first place, called for ‘forgiveness’. Others might be waking up to the scale of the PR disaster facing the regime, already under fire for it’s support for Syrian dictator Bashar Al-Assad.

International protests have spread rapidly – helped by the media-friendly image of Pussy Riot protesters dressed in bright colours with balaclavas.

Although the support of celebrities can sometimes be welcome – the range of US stars defending freedom of speech in Russia are less keen to defend it in their own country. Bradley Manning, the soldier who leaked the Wikileaks cables has spent a year in solitary confinement.

Nevertheless, the strength of international support will no doubt boost the confidence of those within Russia struggling against the all-powerful oligarchy, protected by the power of the Russian state.

While some criticism of officialdom is permitted, Putin and his circle have cracked down on attacks aimed at him directly or over allegations of corruption and criminality among those close to him.

Journalists, too, have been threatened, dismissed from their jobs and sometimes killed. Many high-profile opposition figures are in prison on trumped-up charges. (Though they may also well be guilty of the same kind of fraud and corruption that Putin’s gang are).

Harsh as the sentence for Pussy Riot is, it’s certainly convenient for Putin. Pundits arguing that he has scored a massive own goal, are missing a bigger issue. The focus on Russia and Pussy Riot deflects attention from Syria, giving Putin much needed breathing room to arrange Russian interests there while the attention of the world’s media is distracted.

A serious escalation of the witch-hunt will start to antagonise the youth of Russia, who will feel collectively threatened by the punishment. We support the demonstrations in solidarity with Pussy Riot, and appeal to the radical youth of Russia to embarass Putin and his gang in the church and government at every possible chance.

Pussy Riot could be one escalation too many for Putin – but that all depends on whether the Russian pro-democracy movement can overcome it’s internal divisions and unite behind a credible strategy for overthrowing Putin and the powerful capitalists who are the real rulers of Russia in the 21st century.

 

 Free Pussy Riot – Solidarity with Russian pro-democracy struggles – Kick out Putin’s gang!

Chilean youth resist police crackdown

Students in the Chilean capital, Santiago, have recently seen their 18 month mass movement hit by state attacks on their democratic rights.

It is mainly secondary school students protesting about a new law which would allow much stricter penalties to those on demonstrations.

The law would remove their freedom of speech and prevent them from legally protesting. It was passed in an attempt to suppress the a movement which has seen occupations, strikes and direct action in an campaign for free education in the country.

Recently students have been blockading roads and occupying public secondary schools as part of a campaign to force the government to withdraw the Hintzpeter law -  nicknamed after the country’s unpopular interior minister.

The law would replace fines with long prison sentences of up to three years for those who block traffic or occupy buildings.

It isn’t just the students who will be affected by the new law, any group from factory workers to environmentalists could risk time in jail for taking part in mass demonstrations. Without the ability to withdraw their labour power and cost the ruling money, the main weapon students have is though their self-organisation into a mass movement, acting jointly with the organisations of the working class.

The government are trying to criminalise their movement and ban the right to protest. The legislation aims to intimidate students, and follows an international trend set by the infamous Bill 78 in Quebec.  Santiago’s mayor has said that those who do not return to school by the end of this week risk having their scholarships removed.

It’s now key that students and the wider youth mobilise against this immediate attack on their democratic freedoms. To succeed with this resistance it will be necessary to draw the trade unions and working class who can use their economic and political power to defeat the government.

The US continent is engulfed in struggles of young people – from Montral to Oakland, Santiago to  Sao Paulo, the youth are resisting the attacks of an elite which is determined to sacrifice the jobs, education and future of an entire generation to pay for its mistakes.

We want to unite these struggles, drawing strength from our collective numbers and experiences; we fight for the youth of the world to defend ourselves and fight for our interests as part of an international movement against capitalism and for socialism and workers’ power.

Segregation and Liberation in Saudi Arabia

The despotic rulers of Saudi Arabia have announced plans to build women-only industrial zones in a move which will reinforce the country’s strict segregation of men and women.

Saudi Arabia already has segregated schools, universities, offices, restaurants and entrances to public buildings. Women are refused driving licenses and not allowed to leave the house unless escorted by a male relative.

With such strict laws governing what women can do, wear or where they can go, it’s no surprise that just 15% of the workforce is female – despite 60% of graduates being women.

But 78% of these graduates are unemployed; this is a pressure cooker for social unrest and the ruling family knows it.

Does this extreme segregation sound familiar? Under the ‘Jim Crow’ Laws in the US south there was massive racial divide ensuring ‘separate but equal’ institutions for black and white people. In reality the institutions were far from equal.

Increasing segregation by providing women-only workplaces does nothing to challenge the fundamentally sexist basis of Saudi society.

These zones will simply reinforce the ‘right’ of men to dictate women’s lives, maintaining women as a second-class social group, dictated to by men.

Just like in the US during the 1960s Saudi women, supported by a strong international solidarity movement, need to resist plans to herd them into ghettos. They should demand the right to be treated as equal to men under the law, to work alongside men, and even to have responsible positions above men.

Building such a movement won’t be an easy or a quick processs – but it’s absolutely necessary.

Protests early in 2011 during the Arab Spring showed that there’s an undercurrent of resistance in Saudi society – this attempt to legitimise gender segregation could yet be the spark for further protests.

Curiously silent in all this is the USA – the so-called global defender of freedom is Saudi Arabia’s strongest ally, and donates billions of dollars worth of military aid to the regime every year. This aid was recently used to brutally crush an uprising in neighbouring Bahrain, and the government will not hesistate to turn it’s guns on it’s own people.

But the women of Saudi Arabia do not fear guns and bombs – when their lives are in every other way controlled by a reactionary regime. They will be inspired by the women of Egypt and Tunisia who stood in the front lines to make their own democratic revolutions.

The only progressive solution is the fight for equality between all genders. But this aim is inseperable from the overthrow of the Saudi monarchy, and it’s replacement by a democratic regime. This revolutionary struggle will have women at its heart, or it will not happen at all.

 

French youth lash out against racism and unemployment

Hundreds of young people fought running battles with police in the northern French town of Amiens.

In the early hours of 14 August, police were called to disperse groups of youth, provoking a night of conflict which saw 150 police attacked with fireworks and projectiles. A school and sports centre were burned down, along with dozens of cars.

Although the ritual burning of cars and bricking cops is not unusual in the impoverished suburbs or banlieues of France’s industrial towns, it was the scale and ferocity of last night’s fighting which has made it national and even international news.

Newly elected Socialist President Francois Hollande has said security “is not a priority, but an obligation” – meaning he will deal with it no differently than Chirac did in 2005 – flooding the estates with police and the hated CRS riot squads. From September he will establish 15 ‘priority security zones’ – pouring money into tougher policing rather than investing in real jobs.

But tear gas and batons does nothing to address the underlying issues. With 50% unemployment amongst young people of Black or Arab origin, and over 20% amongst white French youth, the lack of opportunities is made worse by an intimidating police presence. Police regularly conduct sweeps of working class districts, flooding train stations and estates stopping and searching hundreds of young people at a time.

The new government came to power on a promise of ‘growing the economy’ to avoid austerity. But exactly the reverse has happened. France’s economy has flatlined, cuts have not been reversed, and French youth feel they are being made to pay for a crisis they didn’t cause.

Hollande has also failed to make a clean break with the racist policies of the last president. He has continued to round up thousands of Roma citizens, demolishing their camps and deporting them back to Eastern European countries. This is despite the fact that they are EU citizens and have every right to live in France.

Hollande is not worried about the employment or education chances for young people. He now just wants to avoid a repeat of 2005 where riots engulfed France’s major cities for more than three weeks. This is the great danger – there are now millions more youth with no future than then, millions more youth with plenty to feel angry about, and who feel they have nothing to lose by taking out their frustration on a violent and racist police force.

 

Floating Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Blog Designing Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube