Studio Schools – an attack on working class youth

After completing a stint in education, be it leaving school at 16 or staying on in further education, most of us find that we are doomed to be little more than slaves to a company. For some of us however, this could now be the case from the mere age of 14.

Enter, “Studio Schools”, a government backed scheme for 14 -19 year olds that will put the education of the said school’s students firmly in the hands of big, corporate employers. For those of you unsure what a “studio school” is (join the queue), launched back in 2010 these schools sprung up without any sort of discussion of whether they are necessary or of any actual use and are state funded however run by private sponsors. The apparent aim for studio schools is to help young people get into work by making them more employable. This is to be achieved through the students of the school being taken out of the classroom environment and learning “on the job” with each school specialising in a certain area such as catering and engineering. There are currently 15 studio schools open across the UK with that figure expected to double to 30 by September 2013 as the Government gives the all clear for another 15 to be opened.

The Studio Schools Trust claims on their website that the schools offer both academic and vocational qualifications and teaches (some of) the national curriculum stating students will work towards GCSEs in at least Maths, English and Science. These qualification will be delivered however “out of a traditional classroom setting” and instead through “Enterprise projects”.

At a first glance studio schools may not seem like a bad idea. There are plenty of young people who fail to thrive in the classroom environment and there are too plenty of subjects that offer few practical skills. These schools however will usher their students down a very narrow path with the end product being working in a specific, not necessarily specialist field. The studio school’s “CREATE Framework”, consisting of modules such as “thinking” and “understanding myself”, doesn’t sound too far away from the likes of CoPE and general studies, filler qualifications seen in mainstream education which are much less valued than core subjects. What this looks like is basically a dumbing down of education making students work towards becoming the drones for giant corporations. This of course is hardly the sort of opportunity anyone would want going to school to open up for our children.

The most alarming part of this set up is also the way in which the schools claim children will be “taught”. As previously stated, students will learn “on the job”. Yes, a hands on approach like this may be better for preparing students for a lifetime of work than sitting at a table working out algebra is ever going to. Students at these schools will however be doing a job with 9 – 5 hours and short holidays reflecting this. They will be getting prepared for the world of work, by working. Over 16 students will be paid, unsurprisingly, the minimum wage. Under 16 students will be expected to work for free. This brings in an awful scent of workfare about the set up as students are in fact working for their education. Facts such as these could also point out the reasoning for the giant corporation’s involvement may be more to do with aspects such cheap labour rather than trying to help young people cement a better future. As anyone who has ever worked for pretty much any company ever will tell you, there is only one thing people at the top actually care about.

The really sickly part about this all is that we are handing over the responsibility of educating these students to the big name companies; Sony, Ikea and Hilton Hotels to name but a few. The Studio Schools Trust website states that in the most recent employer survey 70% of employers “wanted to see the new government make the employability skills of young people its top education priority”. Yes because it doesn’t matter about opening up a range of opportunities for young people, encouraging them to do something worthwhile or to ensure just a chance of doing something they enjoy does it? As long as the education process makes them able to clean a table in a hotel, right guys?

Of course not everyone gets to follow their dream. Not everyone thrives in an academic environment. But isn’t education supposed to be about that chance that a person could? It’s certainly not about securing the next generation of employees for the corporate big boys. If a young person wants the option of dropping out of the conventional academic environment as they feel it’s not for them then no one should want to say that they can’t. But is doing this as young as 14 really the answer? Is mass involvement from the private sponsors really the right way to go about this? These are still state schools remember. They are still funded by the tax payer. If this is going to be done it needs to be done properly and with young people’s best interests at heart. The corporate giants have clicked their fingers and said “we want this out of education” and just like that with little thought or discussion on the matter, now we have studio schools. Is this really for the benefit of the students who will be attending? Or is this just the big companies muscling in on our education process? Putting young people’s lives in the hands of those who care for nothing but their wealth is a dangerous route to go down however one that our government seems to backing.

Ireland: end medieval abortion ban

Late last month a woman died in an Irish hospital after being refused an abortion, even when she told the doctors she was miscarrying. The case has immediately re-opened the debate about the right to abortion not only when the mother’s life is in danger but as her right to choose.

The 31-year-old woman, Savita Halappanavar, was 17 weeks’ pregnant with her first child when she started to experience back pain. When the pain continued she asked the consultant if she could be induced and their response was “unfortunately you can’t because it’s a Catholic country.” When Savita said she is not Catholic, she is Hindu so why should the law be imposed on her the response was “I’m sorry, unfortunately it’s a Catholic country and it’s the law that they can’t abort when the foetus is live.”

The baby’s heartbeat stopped 3 days later and Savita died just 4 days after that from septicaemia.

Ireland’s position on abortion is that “it is lawful to terminate a pregnancy in Ireland if it is established as a matter of probability that there is a real and substantial risk to the life, as distinct from the health, of the mother, which can only be avoided by a termination of the pregnancy”.

However it is clear that this law isn’t followed through as Savita and her husband requested a termination several times but were told while there was still a foetal heartbeat one would not be carried out even though the couple were told the baby wouldn’t survive. Doctors are left to decide on a case-by-case basis as to whether to allow terminations to take place.

Irish anti-abortion groups continue to insist that the Republic’s laws were not responsible for Halappanavar’s death.

Niamh Uí Bhriain, of the Life Institute, said: “It is very sad to see abortion campaigners rush to exploit this case to further their own agenda. The tragic loss of Savita Halappanavar’s life was not caused by Ireland’s ban on abortion. We need to ensure that mothers and babies are best protected; and abortion is not part of best medical practise. It is medieval medicine.”

Before a women’s right to choose even comes into it there are many medically valid reasons for performing abortions ranging from physiological ones such as severe depression leading to suicidal thoughts to physical conditions such as pre-eclampsia. It is clear that it was solely Ireland’s ban on abortion which caused this woman to die as if she had been allowed a termination before she became ill it’s unlikely she would have contracted blood poisoning.

 Even if there is no medical condition associated with the pregnancy then it should be a woman’s right to choose whether she wants an abortion. Over 4000 women leave Ireland each year in search of abortions each year, which is far safer than taking the risk of a back street abortion.

We say: fighting society’s right to tell a women what to do with her body is the first step in fighting the social oppression of women, which is expressed in lower wages, higher unemployment, sexual assault and misogynist ideas in the mainstream media.  

We stand for:

A woman’s right to choose – free abortion on demand

Scrap all anti-abortion laws and the two-doctor rule

A working-class women’s movement to defend the rights of women

Minister Threatens Restrictions on Young Drivers

Plans for restrictions on young drivers, put forward by the Association of British Insurers (ABI), are currently been considered by the Department of Transport. Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin is said to be looking into measures including banning young drivers from carrying passengers who are not family members and restrictions on driving at night. Despite statistics from the ABI blaming young drivers for a disproportionate number of road mishaps, attacking young drivers and placing potentially life altering restrictions is no way to go about making our roads safer.

Driving at night is more than a little scarier than driving in the day, of course, especially for the inexperienced driver. However, this is something that you are going to have to do; it’s a fact of life. Especially as many jobs require you to be able to drive at night whether that is part of the job or just too and from hence banning young people from driving in the dark is putting them at a great disadvantage. Being mobile at night is very much a reason in itself for learning to drive. You’d have a job on trying to catch a bus at midnight after all. This is of course without even mentioning how hard to police this would actually be.

Of the proposed banning of non-family passengers, Mr McLoughlin has to say; “When I talk to young people who have recently passed their test, what they say sometimes is that peer pressure is put on them to go fast, to show off.” It would be wrong to suggest that there isn’t a sort of “boy racer” culture that some of us unfortunately fall into however making all young people pay the price for this isn’t the answer. Anyone under the impression it is “cool” to bomb down to Asda with urgency of a James Bond chase scene should be getting pulled up if seen by Police anyway. This meaning a new law banning passengers is hardly going to get adhered by either. Not all young people share this frame of mind and generalisations are not really something to base laws upon.

Roads nowadays are busier and more dangerous than ever making it a difficult and often scary time to learn to drive. You would only have to take to our roads for a mere twenty minutes or so to see just how much road safety is disregarded by drivers both young and old. It’s not often people stick to speed limits wherever they may be driving. Bad habit such as not indicating properly and trying to and nip through junctions at the last millisecond of amber are but a few common tendencies amongst drivers. This may suggest that dangerous ways of driving may be more set by the experienced rather than the inexperienced. Patience for new drivers is not something necessarily shared by older, more experienced drivers. Bullying on the road is too quite commonplace with a P or L plate often seeming like more of an invitation for older drivers to intimidate rather than to be patient with new drivers.

Plain stupidity may sometimes be a cause of road accidents however is not something one group of people can be made to account for. With a lot of young drivers been, obviously, new drivers it would seem that a lack of experience and lower confidence when driving may be a better explanation as to why young people are involved in a lot of accidents. Hitting young motorists with restrictions before they’ve had a chance to reverse out of their drives let alone cause a pile up is hardly going to be a confidence boost. The process of a person learning to drive does not necessarily covering driving at night, on the motorway, having more than one passenger, having an impatient older motorist lingering a centimetre behind or a range of other hazardous situations.  So perhaps it is the learning process of driving that should be looked at. Other options may lead to the learning process becoming a bit more drawn out however educating and addressing the hazard which is “new drivers” is a lot better than simply harassing the young. Road safety after all is of great importance hence better education and possible increased use of practical educational programmes such as Drive iQ would surely be of great benefit. Increased punishments for people who are actually breaking laws and driving dangerously, be it the driver themselves or a distractive passenger, may also be something that could be looked into. After all, driving dangerously does put lives at risk whatever age or level of experience you may be at.

Open Letter: Remove fascist Nick Griffin’s platform in the ‘Leeds Student’

Leeds Student, the Leeds University student newspaper has published an interview with Nick Griffin, leader of the fascist BNP. Below we’ve re-posted the open letter from two NUS officers which calls for the article’s removal. Add your name to the letter here.


We are appalled by the decision of ‘Leeds Student’ – an official student society of Leeds University Union – to publish an interview with Nick Griffin, leader of the fascist British National Party (BNP), on their website.

 

We demand that the Editor of ‘Leeds Student’ remove this offensive interview that gives a platform to a fascist immediately.

 

In the interview itself Nick Griffin defends the fact that he has shared a platform with the Ku Klux Klan – a white supremacist organisation responsible for attacks on and lynching of Black people in the US.

 

 

In describing his views on gay people, Nick Griffin says in the interview: “gay people have complained for years that the rest of society hasn’t understood how they feel, and has had to make allowances, has to be tolerant. So why can’t you people simply get over it and tolerate the fact that a lot of heterosexual people – we don’t want to persecute you – but we find the sight of two men kissing creepy. That’s just a fact. What’s the problem?”

 

He goes on to tell the interviewer that civil partnerships will mean that, “children will die over the next few years” because it undermines the institution of heterosexual marriage.

 

These abhorrent and utterly offensive views are just a snapshot of what the BNP represents.

 

The BNP is a fascist organisation which stands for an “all white Britain”, a goal which can only be achieved by violence, the annihilation of entire groups of people and the ending of democracy. Nick Griffin, leader of the fascist BNP is a convicted Holocaust denier.

 

In justifying the publication of this interview, the ‘Leeds Student’ states that the “paper is proud that we live in a democratic society, and that we can openly challenge and debate all manner of opinion and ideas.”

 

The BNP stands for the elimination of the democracy and all freedoms that the Leeds Student claims to support. 

 

We should always remember that the millions of people who died at the hands of the Nazis’ slaughter – in the gas chambers and the concentration camps – did not die because their debating skills or arguments were not powerful enough.  They died because once fascism had abused the democratic system to get its grip on power it soon closed down any freedoms to prevent any resistance. That is why we must never give a platform to fascists anywhere in the student movement.

 

In publishing this interview the ‘Leeds Student’ risks giving legitimacy to a fascist organisation, and boosts the BNP’s attempts to join the political mainstream when we should be isolating them.

 

We the undersigned demand the editor of the ‘Leeds Student’ to reconsider this grave error and remove the interview with fascist Nick Griffin from their website and newspaper immediately.

 

Signed

* Aaron Kiely, NUS Black Students’ Officer

* Malia Bouattia, NUS NEC (Black Students’ Campaign)

 

To add your name or organisation as a signatory please email [email protected]

Travellers face racist crackdown

Riot police dawn raid on Dale Farm

The Tories are planning to pass new laws to stop Travellers setting up sites to live on. This follows the violent eviction of Dale Farm last summer, where an entire community was forced off their land by a militarised police operation.

Britain’s Traveller community has been the victim of decades of racist attacks by Labour and Tory governments. Once again the government is using Travellers as scapegoats for their economic policies which attack all working people and benefit the rich.

In 1968 under a Labour government the Caravan Sites Act was brought in and around 400 caravan parks were built around Britain. However the act was basically cancelled out by the Criminal Justice act in 1994 which scrapped the duty on councils to provide land for Travellers.

The new law will allow town halls to put up stop notices as well as imposing unlimited fine and setting the police on peaceful communities who refuse to be shunted around like rubbish. This will give even greater power to big landowners who don’t live on the land, or work on the land, to profit from it by building useless luxury housing and offices.

Instead of trying to reduce the impact of the economic crisis on jobs, healthcare and education the Tories are more concerned with defending the right of millionaires to have instant access to police and councils to defend their property.

Eric Pickles, the community secretary claims the changes are to ‘prevent violent stand offs’ like the one we saw last year. What he fails to mention is the fact that the only reason there was any kind of ‘stand-off’ was because the local waged a ten year campaign of demonization in order to drive people out of their homes. Travellers at Dale Farm had been sold the land ten years previously and had created an integrated and successful community, yet they were still forced out by police with batons, dogs and a media hate campaign.

Given that 90% of Travellers’ planning applications are rejected as opposed to the national average of 20% it is clear that Travellers are subject to a racist policy which prevents them from building stable communities.

With a massive housing crisis and no affordable houses being built it is difficult to see where people are supposed to live if they are unable to afford rent or purchase a property. On top of this local authority departments often refuse to put travellers on housing waiting lists because they have not been a resident in the housing authority area for more than six months. The government should be taxing the rich to build millions of new homes that are affordable to all,  of a decent standard and accessible to all whether they have been a resident of that area or not.

Opinion polls showed that during the incident 63% of British people supported the eviction; this is due to racist stereotypes thrown around by the media that travellers are lazy, criminal and dirty. Politicians and the press are able to use language about travellers that they wouldn’t be able to about other ethnic groups due to the lack of organisation and support around them.

Travellers should be allowed to set up permanent sites with proper social facilities such as running hot water and electricity and be able to gain easy access to nearby educational facilities. We need to be fighting back against the prejudices they face daily, every time they walk into a shop or their children go to school. Just because they don’t choose to live in a house doesn’t mean they’re not entitled to the same support and welfare system as everyone else.

Appeal for a Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10

 

Download a pdf version of the appeal

 

November 10, 2012. Florence, Italy. Europe has been plunged into austerity and social conflict by the economic crisis. Millions say ‘enough is enough’. Florence is our chance to fight for an alternative; to build an international resistance to all attacks which make the working class and youth pay for the crisis of capitalism.

Ten years ago, radical youth sparked the call for global demonstrations against the Iraq war. Millions responded. Today, young people have again taken the lead by fighting austerity all across Europe. This is why we welcome the decision to call a new European Social Forum at a time when millions are trying to shape the struggle for an alternative.

We welcome the organisers’ pledge that:

“Florence 10+10” aims to be an inclusive and popular space, at our disposal for building alliances and concrete common initiatives: to build convergences for action on a European scale.”

We appeal to the youth of Syntagma Square and Puerta del Sol, of the occupations and the blockades, in the workplace and amongst the unemployed millions, to join us in our call for a European Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10.

We appeal also to our neighbours on other continents and above all in the lands of the Arab Spring to join us and enrich our debates with their experiences.

We want Florence 10+10 to address the key task of our movements. To succeed it must become the time and place for transforming our defensive, local struggles into Europe-wide and even worldwide action.

A Youth Assembly can be a place to debate, build networks for common action and plan an international campaign uniting all those under attack from the bankers, billionaires and their politicians in the European Union.

The EU institutions are the levers of power for an unelected class of exploiters who want to divide our resistance. Their strategy is the rise in unemployment, racism and attacks on the rights of women. Migrant workers are blamed for the lack of jobs while the unemployed and disabled are persecuted.

All who fight back confront the power of the media barons and the violence of the police, courts and fascists. But defiance alone has not been enough to throw out the austerity governments or stop the destruction of jobs, social welfare, and education.

Low-paid work, précarité and forced unpaid work is the future for millions of Europe’s young people. Education privatised, pensions demolished and training schemes abandoned. Everywhere the youth are denied a vote, economically exploited and yet made to pay for a crisis we did not cause.

We appeal the youth of the occupations, the barricades, the anti-fascist campaigns and the working class organisations everywhere to sign the appeal and join forces to build a powerful, democratic and decisive Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10.

Leeds Students Protest Against London Met Deportations

Leeds Revolution took part in a protest on Friday against the threatened deportations of 2,600 students from London Metropolitan University. Fifty students from Leeds Met and Leeds University gathered outside Leeds University, displayed banners and signs saying “hands off our classmates”. Lots of passers-by signed a petition against the deportations.

The international status of the university has been revoked by the UK Border Agency so they aren’t able to issue student visas to people from outside of the EU. The 2,600 students affected have been given 60 days to find another university or get out of the country.

Photograph by Leo Garbutt

The government made this announcement on the same day as the latest immigration statistics in a clear move to look “tough” on immigration. In reality this is a Tory stunt that could ruin the lives of thousands of people. London Met has started legal action in an attempt to overturn the decision and there is a question mark over whether the university can stay afloat if it can no longer accept non-EU students who provide 15% of its revenue.

There is a huge campaign at London Met involving students and lectures – they have held protests against the government decision and the lecturers’ union UCU has called for an amnesty for the students. We in Revolution agree that UKBA should allow the students to remain at London Met and would also demand that the government reinstates the international status of London Met and doesn’t interfere in the internal affairs of a university in this way again.

We have a meeting organised at Leeds Metropolitan University on The Case Against Immigration Controls on Thursday 20th September, 6pm at the Leslie Silver Building. We have also spoken with a number of other societies about setting up a London Met defence campaign and will keep you posted.

Check out the fb event for our meeting here http://www.facebook.com/events/360981043979839/

Check out the report from Leeds Student of the protest here http://www.leedsstudent.org/2012-09-14/ls1/ls1-news/protesters-attack-tory-racism-of-london-met-deportations

Fight racist deportations at London Met

(pic: Soren Goard)

Thousands of students have been given until December 1 to find a new university place or face being rounded up and deported from the UK.

Around 2,600 non-EU students have had their education thrown into jeopardy by the decision of the UK Border Agency (UKBA) to strip London Metropolitan University of its right to issue visas to students from abroad.

The decision means the students are unable to renew their visas or continue their studies past September. Both the Students’ Union and UCU branch condemned the move.

The government defended its decision by claiming ‘serious systemic failure’ meant that ‘allowing London Met to continue to sponsor and teach international students was not an option.’

The lecturers’ union, UCU, blames an incompetent management and racist government policies. For many universities, foreign students are treated as a cash-cow. They are charged much higher fees than UK students, and their dependence on the University for visas means an insecure existence.

In 2010-11 15 per cent of London Met’s income came from foreign students.

Unsurprisingly then, that the pro-fees university bosses’ organisation Universities UK condemned the decision. But their fear that it will put off foreign students is motivated more by their reliance on fees from these students than a defence of equal access to education.

Privatisation

For the overpaid pen-pushers sat in Vice-chancellor offices up and down the country, foreign students are central to new funding plans which will see many universities enter ‘partnerships’ or ‘service sharing’ schemes with private contractors.

In effect this will see student loans funded by the government used to inflate the profits of private companies, who will be paid to run services with fewer workers and a bigger bill.

Despite news that some NHS hospitals will be privatised after being bankrupted by exactly the same public-private partnerships, uni bosses have no doubt in their ability to turn a profit from overcrowded, under-resourced courses.

After revealing a £4 million surplus this year, London Met management announced plans to privatise swathes of university services: BT, Capita and Wipro are competing to win a £74 million contract to run (and wring a decent profit from) student services, careers, libraries, IT and ‘consultancy’.

The massive economic and social value invested in our universities has been built up over decades with public money. We should not allow our common wealth to be auctioned off to private businesses whose only motive is profit.

Racism

The truth is that both the government and university vice-chancellors are cynically exploiting the desperate situation of thousands of students.

It’s no coincidence that the government’s attack on foreign students came on the same day its immigration statistics were published. These figures showed a decline in the numbers of immigrants – mainly due to a 20 per cent cut in new student visas.

But the Con-Dem government is determined to distort our understanding of immigration – by blaming poor immigrant workers and students for the social problems caused by a system which exploits millions for the profit of a few.

Student visas account for 40 per cent of all immigration into the UK. The majority are paying vast sums to study with very little security. In 2008, one of the first cuts made to pay for the bailout of the banks was state funding for English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) courses. This mostly affected poor and female immigrants.

Now the students at London Met are being penalised for the failings of the university bosses and UKBA.

Defend education

Education is a right that should be provided with free and equal access to all. The barriers to education are used as a weapon to separate the skilled from unskilled, men from women and white from black.

The barriers to immigration and freedom of movement are a tool used by the bosses to keep us divided, struggling in competition against each other rather than collectively against the capitalists enriching themselves at our expense.

We oppose all barriers to freedom of movement and access to education. The rich have no barriers to hiding their fortunes in tax-havens – yet their racist border laws impose total control over the freedom to find work or education.

We reject any attempts to turn people against immigrant students and workers. They are not to blame for bosses who swindle the government or their employees. They face the same cuts and social problems as their neighbours along with the racist violence of the media and police.

Anti-racists, the NUS and teaching unions should immediately launch a campaign to get the students visas immediately reinstated.

We call for citizenship rights for all undocumented workers, with no penalisations.

We stand for equal access to education for all, free and paid for by raising taxes on the banks and capitalists.

REVOLUTION supports a statement of solidarity with the students, calling for the government to reinstate London Met’s HTS status and stop the persecution of foreign students.

You can sign the statement at www.anticuts.com

College, jobs and EMA – not resits!

Welcome to the sausage factory…

60,000 students have missed out on a place at college after the government was caught rigging GCSE results to look ‘tough’ on Education.

Every year there is heartbreak and celebration on GCSE results day, but this year the future of thousands has been thrown into doubt by the government’s decision to move grade boundaries in the middle of the year.

Across the country we have seen abnormal results in the core subjects of English and science. One AQA combined English language and literature exam saw 70% of people achieve less than a C grade – basically a fail as far as the government or an employer is concerned.

However, the most shocking detail is that the biggest jump in grade boundary shift came between D and C grades, with one foundation
English exam requiring 10 marks more to achieve a C than in January.

Theories are out there as to why this is the case. Some blame the exam boards introducing new exams with stricter marking policies. This might be true – but why change the boundaries in the middle of an academic year? At a stroke the government has needlessly thrown tens of thousands more youth onto the dole.

Also worrying is the trend for more pupils to be entered into Foundation level exams, where the highest score they can get is a C. We think the emphasis should be on methods which raise the general level, rather than results-tables, which only serve to create a market in education.

Through tinkering with results, abolishing EMA and turning schools into private academies, the government has robbed thousands of young people of the education they deserve.

The NUT (teachers union) is calling for industrial action which is good but not enough. Students need to get organised and fast, our own union the NUS won’t stand up for us but school students have taken militant action before – if these occupation, boycotts and walkouts are big enough, they can win.

But what should we fight for? Our campaign needs to go beyond the safe, government and school imposed limits. Teachers are speaking up to save their careers, ministers are lying to save their careers, now young people need to fight for ourselves. We should fight for victories which can bring real concrete benefits for school and college students.

 

We stand for:

- All students to be re-graded according to the original boundaries

- An investigation run by teachers and students into the links between exam boards and government

- Sack Gove the Education Minister and Gibb the schools minister

- The creation of student assemblies independent of school management

- Bring back EMA, give a living grant to all students, funded by taxing the rich who can afford it.

- End minimum wage discrimination, invest in training and jobs for young people

Queers Against Cuts mistreatment at Brighton Pride

Read the statement from the organiser of the Queers Against Cuts block at Brighton Pride yesterday.

I formally registered the walking group Queers Against Cuts for the Brighton Pride Parade in July, paying the £60 fee out of my own pocket and from a donation from a local trade union. Members of the group were invited from local political groups, trade unions and activist communities, to march in solidarity together against government cuts to public services and jobs.

Pride began in Stonewall in 1969 as a protest against police harassment of gay and trans people in New York. AsGovernment cuts to jobs and public services are affecting LGBTQ people disproportionately, for many reasons, this is an important reason for us to march against cuts in pride today. In my application email I explained that we would be a collective of different groups and individuals marching together, to check that this was acceptable with Pride organisers, and my application was accepted. On Thursday 30 August I was sent the parade running order (read that here: 2012 Parade Lamp Post Order) and we were pleased to discover we’d be between the National Union of Teachers, who also had an anti-cuts theme, and performance group Champagne Anarchists, at post 50.

Last Wednesday I received a call from Trevor Edwards, pride organiser, who informed me the police had been in touch with concerns about our group being a protest. Trevor said he had reassured the police we were all formally registered and there was no reason to treat us differently.

Last Thursday I received a call from the Police Protest Liaison Officer PC Frank to introduce herself and to say good luck with our banner making (i.e. to let me know she was reading our Facebook Group) and to ask for my email to send me information (which hasn’t arrived yet). I explained I had formally registered the group for the parade with no need for different treatment from the other groups.

Today I turned up to register and collected my number 50 sign. Here I was told we’d been moved to the back, but as they didn’t know why and didn’t have the paperwork for number 58, they said we could stay in our original position and they would inform the mayor the order was as originally planned when we went past.

So we all got together behind NUT at point 50 who were pleased we were marching with them and we shared accessories!

Then a Pride Organiser came and told us we were in the wrong position and had to move to the back. I informed him that the registration people had said we could stay where we were, showed him my official ’50′ sign so he went away.

Another Pride Organiser came and I explained again, and he said we were fine where we were and could stay.

Another Pride Organiser came and said we had to move back, and when we asked why, became very aggessive and threatened if we didn’t move we would get thrown off the parade. I asked him to check with the previous organisers who had said we could stay.

Then a police officer came with the final Pride Organiser and said we had all been thrown off the march and had to be removed. At this point I broke down in tears as I had put so much hard work into organising the group. At this point I asked everybody to move to the back but was told we still couldn’t join the parade.

Then Caroline Lucas from the Green Party came and spoke to the police and Pride Organisers in solidarity with us. Finally we were allowed to march.

About 100 yards into the march on Marine Parade, some latecomers to our group arrived, including a breast-feeding woman with her baby and others with children. I was told by the Pride Organiser that if I didn’t make them leave our whole group would be blocked. I explained I couldn’t force people to go anywhere. Suddenly a row of police on horseback and foot ran into the middle of our group, and I was told I had to personally identify who was officially in the group to be let through. As this was mainly organised online I didn’t know everybody’s faces. I managed to get most people out of the kettle but around 15 people were left behind. Again I was in tears and others were close to it, having been part of the group organising from the start and suddenly kettled for no reason.

Finally we continued to march. Throughout the parade, any friends or latecomers who tried to join us were pulled from the parade by police. I managed to identify some friends to keep them in with us but others were blocked from joining us.

I’m very hurt and upset at how I was treated and spoken to by Pride, how the rest of the group were treated, how we were given no reason for our sudden relegation to the back, and our mistreatment by the police.

marching along just before half of block got kettled

Being surrounded by police on horses and on foot was unnecessary and too heavy handed. I was told other latecomers were allowed to join other groups such as The Conservatives.  I believe the only reason we were treated this way is because we had political banners which challenged the status quo of a corporate sponsorship of Pride, and it has really shown the lack of political solidarity from Pride Organisers.

This is my personal statement of my experience but I will be writing a formal statement from the Socialist Party of which I am a member, and asking groups and individuals to sign it once I get chance.

Well, this has inspired me to make the group bigger and even more organised next year! Who’s with me?

Animated Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Wordpress Development Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube