Open Letter: Remove fascist Nick Griffin’s platform in the ‘Leeds Student’

Leeds Student, the Leeds University student newspaper has published an interview with Nick Griffin, leader of the fascist BNP. Below we’ve re-posted the open letter from two NUS officers which calls for the article’s removal. Add your name to the letter here.


We are appalled by the decision of ‘Leeds Student’ – an official student society of Leeds University Union – to publish an interview with Nick Griffin, leader of the fascist British National Party (BNP), on their website.

 

We demand that the Editor of ‘Leeds Student’ remove this offensive interview that gives a platform to a fascist immediately.

 

In the interview itself Nick Griffin defends the fact that he has shared a platform with the Ku Klux Klan – a white supremacist organisation responsible for attacks on and lynching of Black people in the US.

 

 

In describing his views on gay people, Nick Griffin says in the interview: “gay people have complained for years that the rest of society hasn’t understood how they feel, and has had to make allowances, has to be tolerant. So why can’t you people simply get over it and tolerate the fact that a lot of heterosexual people – we don’t want to persecute you – but we find the sight of two men kissing creepy. That’s just a fact. What’s the problem?”

 

He goes on to tell the interviewer that civil partnerships will mean that, “children will die over the next few years” because it undermines the institution of heterosexual marriage.

 

These abhorrent and utterly offensive views are just a snapshot of what the BNP represents.

 

The BNP is a fascist organisation which stands for an “all white Britain”, a goal which can only be achieved by violence, the annihilation of entire groups of people and the ending of democracy. Nick Griffin, leader of the fascist BNP is a convicted Holocaust denier.

 

In justifying the publication of this interview, the ‘Leeds Student’ states that the “paper is proud that we live in a democratic society, and that we can openly challenge and debate all manner of opinion and ideas.”

 

The BNP stands for the elimination of the democracy and all freedoms that the Leeds Student claims to support. 

 

We should always remember that the millions of people who died at the hands of the Nazis’ slaughter – in the gas chambers and the concentration camps – did not die because their debating skills or arguments were not powerful enough.  They died because once fascism had abused the democratic system to get its grip on power it soon closed down any freedoms to prevent any resistance. That is why we must never give a platform to fascists anywhere in the student movement.

 

In publishing this interview the ‘Leeds Student’ risks giving legitimacy to a fascist organisation, and boosts the BNP’s attempts to join the political mainstream when we should be isolating them.

 

We the undersigned demand the editor of the ‘Leeds Student’ to reconsider this grave error and remove the interview with fascist Nick Griffin from their website and newspaper immediately.

 

Signed

* Aaron Kiely, NUS Black Students’ Officer

* Malia Bouattia, NUS NEC (Black Students’ Campaign)

 

To add your name or organisation as a signatory please email [email protected]

Fight racist deportations at London Met

(pic: Soren Goard)

Thousands of students have been given until December 1 to find a new university place or face being rounded up and deported from the UK.

Around 2,600 non-EU students have had their education thrown into jeopardy by the decision of the UK Border Agency (UKBA) to strip London Metropolitan University of its right to issue visas to students from abroad.

The decision means the students are unable to renew their visas or continue their studies past September. Both the Students’ Union and UCU branch condemned the move.

The government defended its decision by claiming ‘serious systemic failure’ meant that ‘allowing London Met to continue to sponsor and teach international students was not an option.’

The lecturers’ union, UCU, blames an incompetent management and racist government policies. For many universities, foreign students are treated as a cash-cow. They are charged much higher fees than UK students, and their dependence on the University for visas means an insecure existence.

In 2010-11 15 per cent of London Met’s income came from foreign students.

Unsurprisingly then, that the pro-fees university bosses’ organisation Universities UK condemned the decision. But their fear that it will put off foreign students is motivated more by their reliance on fees from these students than a defence of equal access to education.

Privatisation

For the overpaid pen-pushers sat in Vice-chancellor offices up and down the country, foreign students are central to new funding plans which will see many universities enter ‘partnerships’ or ‘service sharing’ schemes with private contractors.

In effect this will see student loans funded by the government used to inflate the profits of private companies, who will be paid to run services with fewer workers and a bigger bill.

Despite news that some NHS hospitals will be privatised after being bankrupted by exactly the same public-private partnerships, uni bosses have no doubt in their ability to turn a profit from overcrowded, under-resourced courses.

After revealing a £4 million surplus this year, London Met management announced plans to privatise swathes of university services: BT, Capita and Wipro are competing to win a £74 million contract to run (and wring a decent profit from) student services, careers, libraries, IT and ‘consultancy’.

The massive economic and social value invested in our universities has been built up over decades with public money. We should not allow our common wealth to be auctioned off to private businesses whose only motive is profit.

Racism

The truth is that both the government and university vice-chancellors are cynically exploiting the desperate situation of thousands of students.

It’s no coincidence that the government’s attack on foreign students came on the same day its immigration statistics were published. These figures showed a decline in the numbers of immigrants – mainly due to a 20 per cent cut in new student visas.

But the Con-Dem government is determined to distort our understanding of immigration – by blaming poor immigrant workers and students for the social problems caused by a system which exploits millions for the profit of a few.

Student visas account for 40 per cent of all immigration into the UK. The majority are paying vast sums to study with very little security. In 2008, one of the first cuts made to pay for the bailout of the banks was state funding for English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) courses. This mostly affected poor and female immigrants.

Now the students at London Met are being penalised for the failings of the university bosses and UKBA.

Defend education

Education is a right that should be provided with free and equal access to all. The barriers to education are used as a weapon to separate the skilled from unskilled, men from women and white from black.

The barriers to immigration and freedom of movement are a tool used by the bosses to keep us divided, struggling in competition against each other rather than collectively against the capitalists enriching themselves at our expense.

We oppose all barriers to freedom of movement and access to education. The rich have no barriers to hiding their fortunes in tax-havens – yet their racist border laws impose total control over the freedom to find work or education.

We reject any attempts to turn people against immigrant students and workers. They are not to blame for bosses who swindle the government or their employees. They face the same cuts and social problems as their neighbours along with the racist violence of the media and police.

Anti-racists, the NUS and teaching unions should immediately launch a campaign to get the students visas immediately reinstated.

We call for citizenship rights for all undocumented workers, with no penalisations.

We stand for equal access to education for all, free and paid for by raising taxes on the banks and capitalists.

REVOLUTION supports a statement of solidarity with the students, calling for the government to reinstate London Met’s HTS status and stop the persecution of foreign students.

You can sign the statement at www.anticuts.com

French youth lash out against racism and unemployment

Hundreds of young people fought running battles with police in the northern French town of Amiens.

In the early hours of 14 August, police were called to disperse groups of youth, provoking a night of conflict which saw 150 police attacked with fireworks and projectiles. A school and sports centre were burned down, along with dozens of cars.

Although the ritual burning of cars and bricking cops is not unusual in the impoverished suburbs or banlieues of France’s industrial towns, it was the scale and ferocity of last night’s fighting which has made it national and even international news.

Newly elected Socialist President Francois Hollande has said security “is not a priority, but an obligation” – meaning he will deal with it no differently than Chirac did in 2005 – flooding the estates with police and the hated CRS riot squads. From September he will establish 15 ‘priority security zones’ – pouring money into tougher policing rather than investing in real jobs.

But tear gas and batons does nothing to address the underlying issues. With 50% unemployment amongst young people of Black or Arab origin, and over 20% amongst white French youth, the lack of opportunities is made worse by an intimidating police presence. Police regularly conduct sweeps of working class districts, flooding train stations and estates stopping and searching hundreds of young people at a time.

The new government came to power on a promise of ‘growing the economy’ to avoid austerity. But exactly the reverse has happened. France’s economy has flatlined, cuts have not been reversed, and French youth feel they are being made to pay for a crisis they didn’t cause.

Hollande has also failed to make a clean break with the racist policies of the last president. He has continued to round up thousands of Roma citizens, demolishing their camps and deporting them back to Eastern European countries. This is despite the fact that they are EU citizens and have every right to live in France.

Hollande is not worried about the employment or education chances for young people. He now just wants to avoid a repeat of 2005 where riots engulfed France’s major cities for more than three weeks. This is the great danger – there are now millions more youth with no future than then, millions more youth with plenty to feel angry about, and who feel they have nothing to lose by taking out their frustration on a violent and racist police force.

 

Bolton: defend union democracy!

On Monday evening around 80 students and activists gathered at the University of Bolton to protest against the suspension of Student Union President, Shana Begum.

A combination of Bolton students, local youth, trade unionists and activists from anti-cuts campaigns converged on the University buildings to put pressure on the University management.

Although Student Unions must legally be run through student-democracy, the University bosses have replaced Shana with an unelected University Governor, Chris Minta.

Minta has been installed by the VC, George Holmes and is only accountable to the University itself, not the student body he is supposed to represent.

Whilst it was encouraging to see activists from many different campaigns and organisations coming out in support of Shana, there is one organisation who’s presence would make a huge difference.

Chris Minta is the branch secretary for the UCU at Bolton, although there were UCU members at the demonstration, a greater presence from them would surely have been hugely significant.

After meeting outside the Students Union, the demonstration moved to the Octagon Theatre to pressure the University officials enjoying themselves in there, probably under the pretext of having a meeting.

Of course, a peaceful gathering of activists and students merits a small amount of police harassment, and we were not disappointed. Our friends in blue were out in force making sure we did not commit atrocities such as blocking a footpath or “causing a fire-hazard.” It was disheartening for activists on the demonstration to see the organisers asking the police for permission to walk about in a public area and advising the police as to where we were headed next.

Overall the demo was important step towards organising more widely to defend student democracy. Student Unions are an important part of the fight against the Con-Dem Government’s attacks on higher education as well as a vital support for students against problems such as racism, coping with disabilities, academic issues and financial problems.

Without a democratically elected leadership, Student Unions are just another part of the University bureaucracy and will not work in the interests of students.

Successive governments have gradually restricted SU powers, enthusiastically supported by the University itself, which funds the SU. Ultimately the role of the state and university bosses in funding our Student Unions means they can never be truly independent bodies fighting in our interest.

  • Shana Begum should be immediately reinstated, with unreserved apology from uni bosses.

  • Campus Student Unions should organise solidarity action, and offer practical support like fundraising.
     
  • At a national level, the NUS and UCU should condemn this attack. 
     
  • Students should form a democratic committee to investigate the actions of university management. 

The National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts is a grassroots organisation dedicated to fighting for student democracy and free education. It organises in many universities across Britain and led the student movement in 2010 after the NUS shamefully caved in to the Con-Dem coalition. Find out more

Make Bradford British: one step forward, two steps back

With its provocative (and xenophobic) title and Big-Brother-meets-Wife-Swap format, Make Bradford British was destined to be trash TV. But there were some interesting twists and turns along the way. Dan Edwards reviews C4’s latest effort at Diversity Telly.

The basic premise is pretty simple- get eight born-and-bred British people from a variety of backgrounds who all fail the British citizenship test (used to deny immigrants and refugees the right to live here) to live together as a group for a few days, and then partner them up to live each others’ lifestyles for a further couple of days. What could possibly go wrong?

Well let’s start with the biggest problems first. It portrays Bradford as highly segregated, with communities virtually at war with one another due to differences in lifestyle. I’m not denying that are racial tensions in Bradford, but it fails to point out that this is far from universal- when the thugs of the EDL tried to start a riot in Bradford, few locals joined them, and the anti-fascist turnout was incredibly racially and culturally diverse. The show also failed to look at how increasing poverty in Bradford, caused by Thatcher’s gutting of northern industries, has been manipulated by the far-right to stoke racial tension.

The programme also assumes that the way to overcome racism is simply by getting people to befriend people of different backgrounds. While greater social mixing is definitely a good thing and can help individuals overcome unfounded fears and prejudices of different ethnic groups, it overlooks the fact that racism is a problem with societies rather than individual people. When a racist says ‘I’m not racist, one of my best friends is black,’ they’re not necessarily lying to you- it’s just that they view the overall threat of the black community as different and separate to the relationship they have with one or two black people. Mixed-race landlady Audrey was an excellent example of this- though she had Asian family members she was also incredibly prejudiced and came out with a lot of phrases that wouldn’t be out of place in the worst right-wing rags.

There were some genuinely interesting aspects of this program. When the whole house had to live together, Rashid’s frequent trips to the Mosque to pray were repeatedly criticised by the rest of the house, and he was portrayed as not willing to help the collective out because he didn’t get to the shops in time to buy the ingredients to make dinner, and instead ended up getting everyone a take-away. While this intolerance was not commented upon by ‘diversity experts’ Laurie Trott and Taiba Yasseen, who acted as hosts, other instances were. Why should this guy be singled out for going to pray? Knowing that prayer would prevent him from buying the chicken, why wasn’t someone else asked to go? Why is this intolerance overlooked and legitimised?

Another moment from the same episode provided a bit more hope for anti-racists, as a discussion over the use of racist words seemed to genuinely change the housemates’ opinions. While a couple of the white members of the house and Audrey felt perfectly comfortable saying ‘paki’ when they first came in, the pain caused by racist words – permanent reminders of a colonial past and oppressive present –  soon became pretty obvious and they stopped using them. The only person who didn’t feel this way was (surprise, surprise) an ex-cop. This prick aside, it was a nice moment.

Perhaps the most worrying moment in the two-part series came when Muslim woman Sabbiyah tried a day’s work in a city centre pub. While there two customers racially abused her, with a burly thick-as-shit piece of EDL-fodder insisting she should wear a mini-skirt while in ‘his’ country, while touching her legs and cornering her. This was painful viewing and has even prompted complaints from Bradford city councillors, who question why the programme-makers didn’t intervene to stop this racist and sexual harassment.

Overall I think we should be grateful that Make Bradford British showed that cultural differences don’t inevitably lead to conflict (a great moment was watching white sheet-metal worker Jacob overcome his assumption that Muslims are all terrorists and extremists), and that the idea of an all-encompassing ‘British culture’ is unrealistic and unhelpful.

But, by failing to look at the material deprivation of Bradford, or the relationships between other ethnic/cultural communities in the city, the programme ultimately helped to reinforce the prevalent idea that Britain is being torn apart by the divide between the white working-class and Asian Muslims. One step forwards, two step back.

Black youth unemployment only getting worse

This March it was announced that Black youth unemployment had reached 47.4%, more than double that for white young people and more than five times the national average. Although Black people make up just 2.2% of Britain’s population, they suffer disproportionately higher unemployment rates.

The first section of society that the Tories chose to attack after coming to power was the youth, trebling tuition fees and cutting EMA. This has led to less people going to further and higher education, meaning there is more competition for the already scarce jobs available to those without degrees.

This has affected all working class youth but has hit black youth worst of all because many black people live in poorer working class areas. This makes them less likely to be successful in education, and therefore rely on less skilled jobs. However, most of these jobs have been moved to countries with cheaper labour.

The services that help people escape the traps of poverty and long term unemployment are being cut, from direct help such as language courses for immigrants to the privatisation of education and the NHS. What’s more, a racist police service means that black youth are much more likely to have a criminal record that white youth, hindering their chances of finding work.

There has been little outcry over this shocking statistic because Black people are still a vulnerable, marginalised section of society. The capitalists understand that to control the workforce they must divide it and that is why we have heard David Cameron denouncing multiculturalism and the Daily Mail demonising immigrants. By bombarding us with anti-immigrant propaganda, they believe we won’t realise the true reasons for the economic crisis and fight back.

We must unite to take on the capitalists and create a socialist society based on common ownership, not exploitation and oppression.

Racist CPS to investigate racist police

Scotland Yard is caught up in another of its regular racism scandals after a recording emerged of its officers arresting a young black man, then violently assaulting him and subjecting him to racist abuse in the back of a meat wagon.

In a scene that will be all-too-familiar to thousands of young black and asian men, the 21 one year old was stopped in his car during the summer riots in August last year, he was arrested on ‘suspicion of driving under the influence of drugs’ (no charges ever brought) and thrown into the back of a police van.

The man from Beckton said he was made to feel like an animal as coppers knelt on his chest and strangled him, ‘I couldn’t breathe; I thought I was going to die.’

During this time he turned a recording device on his phone on, you can hear a police officer admitting he strangled the man because he was ‘a cunt’ and just a few seconds later another officer, identified by investigators as PC Alex MacFarlane, saying ‘The problem with you is you’ll always be a nigger.’ This was followed by more racial abuse saying he’ll always be black and he shouldn’t hide or be ashamed of his colour.

The IPCC referred the case to the crown prosecution service on the basis that the three officers involved might have committed a criminal offense. However the CPS initially decided no charges should be brought against the officers, despite the evidence of their ears.

The CPS initially said charges should not be brought against MacFarlane because the remarks did not cause the man harassment, distress or alarm.

It is difficult to understand how the CPS can say the remarks caused the man none of the above, while being strangled and attacked racially by police, I’m sure it’s quite obvious he would have been distressed and alarmed.

The case is now being reviewed, but only because the man’s lawyer threatened to challenge the decision in a high court judicial review. MacFarlane has since been suspended.

Without the recording of the attack, this would never have gone to court. The fact that the CPS initially decided not to prosecute sends a clear signal to coppers that they can expect to get away with this kind of behaviour.

The police are institutionally racist, a fact which no amount of ‘independent inquiries’ or ‘community liaison’ can change. Cops always get themselves off the hook, no matter how serious the crime they commit.

After all who polices the police? The police!

We can’t trust the CPS or the IPCC to regulate the police – they’re all ex-police, in the pay of the police or simply just friends with the police.

Police officers should be treated the same way they treat us. If accusations are made they should be turned over to an investigating body made up of people delegated by the local community.

If the police commit a crime then they should be sent to jail, stripped of their pension and left to rot.

Instead of overpaid, underworked cops whizzing round estates in flash BMWs, occasionally getting out to beat or abuse someone, we believe in community self-defence; organised democratically and accountable to residents, we would be able to police our own communities, dealing with the real problems in working class areas.

Miami students walkout to demand justice for Trayvon

Hundreds of school students from Miami’s Carol City High School staged a massive walkout on Friday afternoon to demand that Trayvon Martin’s killer be brought to justice.

Students chanted ”What do we want? Justice. When do we want it? Now.” At least 400 students were estimated to have taken part. Local news footage showed hundreds pouring out of school and marching down the middle of the streets at lunchtime.

Many carried cans of ice tea and bags of skittles – which Trayvon was carrying when he was shot dead by a security guard, who has not been charged with any crime.

Alysa Robinson, a student on the protest said: ”It’s a bunch of kids, walking around screaming justice for Trayvon cause that’s what we need. We are going to get it. If we don’t get no justice there ain’t going to be no peace.”

The walkout comes on the heels of the ‘Million Hoodie March’ in New York, at which Trayvon’s parents said ‘our son is your son’.

Trayvon Martin was shot dead as he was walking through his estate, carrying a can of ice tea, a bag of skittles and wearing a hoodie. The man who shot him said he looked ‘suspicious’.

The local police chief has temporarily stepped down, after the Sanford City Commission voted 3-2 to express no confidence in his ability to carry out a proper investigation.

It has taken protests and media coverage to force the police and justice officials to belatedly announce an investigation into the murder.

Many young people who knew Trayvon have spoken to the media saying that they do not think justice will be done – “we live in America” as one young woman put it on the New York march on Wednesday evening.

We’ll be bringing you all the latest coverage of the case as it unfolds.

 

Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Exclusive: police killed my sister’s boyfriend

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Racism: where does it come from?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Black youth unemployment nears 50%

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Racist police arrest Teen sickened by war propaganda

Afghan child - victim of a NATO airstrike

A British teenager has been arrested and charged with causing racially-aggravated offense over a Facebook status about the media circus which surrounded the recent deaths of six British soldiers.

Azhar Ahmed is due in court on Tuesday. The police officer in charge said “he didn’t make his point very well, and that’s why he’s got into trouble.”

So just what point did he make, that was serious enough to land him in jail on serious charges?

“People gassin about the deaths of British soldiers! What about the innocent families who have been brutally killed.. The women who have been raped.. The children who have been sliced up..! Your enemy’s were the Taliban not innocent harmless familys. All soldiers should DIE and go to HELL! THE LOWLIFE FOKKIN SCUM! gotta problem go cry at your soldier’s grave and wish him hell because that where he is going..”

Obviously there’s nothing racist about this comment. His arrest is simply pandering to a tiny, bigoted minority who insist that ‘racism goes both ways’.

Well it doesn’t.

Muslims and people from an Asian or Black background are a small minority of the British population. While they have the same formal rights as white British, they consistently live in worse housing, have lower pay, are more likely to be harassed by the police and suffer racist abuse and violence on a regular basis.

Politicians and the media blame unemployment on migrant workers undercutting wages. Why are they not fighting the gangmasters, people-traffickers and huge companies who profit from these exploited workers – demanding they be paid at least the minimum wage?

The riots were blamed on ‘pure criminality’ – the idea that some people are just plain bad for society, and should be locked up. No questions asked about why Asian and Black youth are seven times more likely to be stopped and searched by police. No investigation into crumbling council houses, rising rents and 50% unemployment amongst black youth.

Instead we get privatisation of ‘failing’ schools – instead of addressing the poverty of income and culture which handicaps so many youth through no fault of their own or their parents.

The racism of our system is as callous as it is absurd. While the arrest of Azhar Ahmed is a tragedy for a young man, there is a really existing racism in British society, and it’s not directed against white people.

Instead the government spends £millions on police to protect the fascist gangs organising across the north and midlands who are using this episode to champion the lie that ‘white people are victims of racism in their own country’.

But the truth is that millions of working class people – white, black and asian – are the victims of a systematic attack on our jobs, wages and public services, which is devastating communities.

The impoverishment of work and social life under the Con-Dem coalition is driving people to blame minorities who are less able to defend themselves. Crucially it becomes easy to blame the victims of society when the government, police and media are always doing their best to hide the real causes of society’s problems.

The charges are ridiculous – thousands have re-posted Azhar’s post on facebook to show their contempt for his arrest. A democratic and rational legal system would have to arrest everyone who voiced similar ideas. Clearly they won’t, and that is what reveals the petty and racist motivations behind this victimisation.

 

Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Iraqi militias hunt down ‘emo’ youth

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

The problem with the Poppy

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

The War on Terror

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Immigration sweeps target Latin American workers

In late February, the police and Border Agency launched a series of co-ordinated sweeps for undocumented ‘illegal’ workers. The mass raids are staged in order to inflict maximum intimidation. The aim is simple: punish the unlucky few to set an example to all workers without the right visas.

At the end of February, dozens of police showed up to a concert by an artist with a mainly Spanish-speaking fanbase. 90 people were pulled from the queue and thrown into waiting vans.

While some of the arrested were later released, one man was put through the government’s fast-track deportation scheme and found himself escorted by hired thugs on a government-charter plane back to his native country.

Since the number of people succesfully deported remains a tiny fraction of the estimated number of undocumented workers, why are the police going to all this expense?

There are two main reasons: the first is that high-profile raids like these send out a powerful message about the police’s commitment to persecuting ordinary working people and their families. Those living and working in Britain without the correct visa live in constant fear of arrest and deportation, with the threat of being separated from their parents or children. The impact on family and work life is incalculable.

Secondly, so-called ‘illegal immigrants’ are every government’s favourite punch-bag; blamed for everything from Cancer in your coffee to the world financial crisis, Britain’s ethnic minorities are made the scapegoat for the social policies beyond their control. To make the victimisation of Britain’s super-exploited illegal workers easier, they are not entitled to state-appointed lawyers.

Unless they are married to an EU national, their only option is to seek asylum. However the UK government has proved it has no problems sending people back to certain torture and death on flights billed to the taxpayer.

Put simply, when those fleeing war and persecution cannot be certain of sanctuary on British shores, then those ‘merely’ fleeing poverty and hopelessness have no chance.

One of Britain’s major exports is weapons. But since an expanding arms industry relies on more and more wars, it’s obvious that Britain is not going to welcome the millions left homeless, injured and jobless by british-made bombs.

European governments have been deporting illegal immigrants since mass immigration started in the 50s and 60s. French President Sarkozy has deported more than 10,000 Roma in less than a year.

Nor are mass raids by large numbers of armed police anything new. Such tactics are used by any government which wants to make its point in an unsubtle but efficient way.

Don’t believe the government and tabloid scare-mongering about illegal migrants bleeding Britain dry. The reason there’s a shortage of houses is because the government and private sector have only built a few thousand affordable houses in the last 20 years. The reason the country has debt is because we borrowed £1trillion from bankers to bail out other bankers.

Immigration laws against the free movement of the world’s people are a racist hypocrisy. Money can buy you citizenship in any country in the world, and countries like the US and UK invade other countries to ensure that British millionaires can move their money into new markets.

We think that the true purpose of barriers to movement are to keep working people divided. Immigrants are presented as a threat to ‘our’ jobs, ‘our’ culture and ‘our’ country. But migrant workers don’t sack tens of thousands of British workers, while creaming off a fat bonus. Migrant workers don’t shut thousands of libraries and privatise schools. And it wasn’t migrant workers who benefitted when a tiny clique of bankers held our country to ransom.

No, millions of ordinary British workers, native and migrant, Muslim and Christian are paying the price of the capitalist crisis. We say blame the bosses and bankers – not the foreign workers who have more in common with us than we do with our politicians and corporate elite.

We want to kick out those who profit from exploitation and poverty, not those who are fleeing poverty and find only harsher, more precarious exploitation on our shores.

 

 

Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

No-one is illegal!

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Racism and capitalism

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Black youth unemployment hits 40%

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Floating Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Blog Designing Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube