Studio Schools – an attack on working class youth

After completing a stint in education, be it leaving school at 16 or staying on in further education, most of us find that we are doomed to be little more than slaves to a company. For some of us however, this could now be the case from the mere age of 14.

Enter, “Studio Schools”, a government backed scheme for 14 -19 year olds that will put the education of the said school’s students firmly in the hands of big, corporate employers. For those of you unsure what a “studio school” is (join the queue), launched back in 2010 these schools sprung up without any sort of discussion of whether they are necessary or of any actual use and are state funded however run by private sponsors. The apparent aim for studio schools is to help young people get into work by making them more employable. This is to be achieved through the students of the school being taken out of the classroom environment and learning “on the job” with each school specialising in a certain area such as catering and engineering. There are currently 15 studio schools open across the UK with that figure expected to double to 30 by September 2013 as the Government gives the all clear for another 15 to be opened.

The Studio Schools Trust claims on their website that the schools offer both academic and vocational qualifications and teaches (some of) the national curriculum stating students will work towards GCSEs in at least Maths, English and Science. These qualification will be delivered however “out of a traditional classroom setting” and instead through “Enterprise projects”.

At a first glance studio schools may not seem like a bad idea. There are plenty of young people who fail to thrive in the classroom environment and there are too plenty of subjects that offer few practical skills. These schools however will usher their students down a very narrow path with the end product being working in a specific, not necessarily specialist field. The studio school’s “CREATE Framework”, consisting of modules such as “thinking” and “understanding myself”, doesn’t sound too far away from the likes of CoPE and general studies, filler qualifications seen in mainstream education which are much less valued than core subjects. What this looks like is basically a dumbing down of education making students work towards becoming the drones for giant corporations. This of course is hardly the sort of opportunity anyone would want going to school to open up for our children.

The most alarming part of this set up is also the way in which the schools claim children will be “taught”. As previously stated, students will learn “on the job”. Yes, a hands on approach like this may be better for preparing students for a lifetime of work than sitting at a table working out algebra is ever going to. Students at these schools will however be doing a job with 9 – 5 hours and short holidays reflecting this. They will be getting prepared for the world of work, by working. Over 16 students will be paid, unsurprisingly, the minimum wage. Under 16 students will be expected to work for free. This brings in an awful scent of workfare about the set up as students are in fact working for their education. Facts such as these could also point out the reasoning for the giant corporation’s involvement may be more to do with aspects such cheap labour rather than trying to help young people cement a better future. As anyone who has ever worked for pretty much any company ever will tell you, there is only one thing people at the top actually care about.

The really sickly part about this all is that we are handing over the responsibility of educating these students to the big name companies; Sony, Ikea and Hilton Hotels to name but a few. The Studio Schools Trust website states that in the most recent employer survey 70% of employers “wanted to see the new government make the employability skills of young people its top education priority”. Yes because it doesn’t matter about opening up a range of opportunities for young people, encouraging them to do something worthwhile or to ensure just a chance of doing something they enjoy does it? As long as the education process makes them able to clean a table in a hotel, right guys?

Of course not everyone gets to follow their dream. Not everyone thrives in an academic environment. But isn’t education supposed to be about that chance that a person could? It’s certainly not about securing the next generation of employees for the corporate big boys. If a young person wants the option of dropping out of the conventional academic environment as they feel it’s not for them then no one should want to say that they can’t. But is doing this as young as 14 really the answer? Is mass involvement from the private sponsors really the right way to go about this? These are still state schools remember. They are still funded by the tax payer. If this is going to be done it needs to be done properly and with young people’s best interests at heart. The corporate giants have clicked their fingers and said “we want this out of education” and just like that with little thought or discussion on the matter, now we have studio schools. Is this really for the benefit of the students who will be attending? Or is this just the big companies muscling in on our education process? Putting young people’s lives in the hands of those who care for nothing but their wealth is a dangerous route to go down however one that our government seems to backing.

Minister Threatens Restrictions on Young Drivers

Plans for restrictions on young drivers, put forward by the Association of British Insurers (ABI), are currently been considered by the Department of Transport. Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin is said to be looking into measures including banning young drivers from carrying passengers who are not family members and restrictions on driving at night. Despite statistics from the ABI blaming young drivers for a disproportionate number of road mishaps, attacking young drivers and placing potentially life altering restrictions is no way to go about making our roads safer.

Driving at night is more than a little scarier than driving in the day, of course, especially for the inexperienced driver. However, this is something that you are going to have to do; it’s a fact of life. Especially as many jobs require you to be able to drive at night whether that is part of the job or just too and from hence banning young people from driving in the dark is putting them at a great disadvantage. Being mobile at night is very much a reason in itself for learning to drive. You’d have a job on trying to catch a bus at midnight after all. This is of course without even mentioning how hard to police this would actually be.

Of the proposed banning of non-family passengers, Mr McLoughlin has to say; “When I talk to young people who have recently passed their test, what they say sometimes is that peer pressure is put on them to go fast, to show off.” It would be wrong to suggest that there isn’t a sort of “boy racer” culture that some of us unfortunately fall into however making all young people pay the price for this isn’t the answer. Anyone under the impression it is “cool” to bomb down to Asda with urgency of a James Bond chase scene should be getting pulled up if seen by Police anyway. This meaning a new law banning passengers is hardly going to get adhered by either. Not all young people share this frame of mind and generalisations are not really something to base laws upon.

Roads nowadays are busier and more dangerous than ever making it a difficult and often scary time to learn to drive. You would only have to take to our roads for a mere twenty minutes or so to see just how much road safety is disregarded by drivers both young and old. It’s not often people stick to speed limits wherever they may be driving. Bad habit such as not indicating properly and trying to and nip through junctions at the last millisecond of amber are but a few common tendencies amongst drivers. This may suggest that dangerous ways of driving may be more set by the experienced rather than the inexperienced. Patience for new drivers is not something necessarily shared by older, more experienced drivers. Bullying on the road is too quite commonplace with a P or L plate often seeming like more of an invitation for older drivers to intimidate rather than to be patient with new drivers.

Plain stupidity may sometimes be a cause of road accidents however is not something one group of people can be made to account for. With a lot of young drivers been, obviously, new drivers it would seem that a lack of experience and lower confidence when driving may be a better explanation as to why young people are involved in a lot of accidents. Hitting young motorists with restrictions before they’ve had a chance to reverse out of their drives let alone cause a pile up is hardly going to be a confidence boost. The process of a person learning to drive does not necessarily covering driving at night, on the motorway, having more than one passenger, having an impatient older motorist lingering a centimetre behind or a range of other hazardous situations.  So perhaps it is the learning process of driving that should be looked at. Other options may lead to the learning process becoming a bit more drawn out however educating and addressing the hazard which is “new drivers” is a lot better than simply harassing the young. Road safety after all is of great importance hence better education and possible increased use of practical educational programmes such as Drive iQ would surely be of great benefit. Increased punishments for people who are actually breaking laws and driving dangerously, be it the driver themselves or a distractive passenger, may also be something that could be looked into. After all, driving dangerously does put lives at risk whatever age or level of experience you may be at.

Appeal for a Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10

 

Download a pdf version of the appeal

 

November 10, 2012. Florence, Italy. Europe has been plunged into austerity and social conflict by the economic crisis. Millions say ‘enough is enough’. Florence is our chance to fight for an alternative; to build an international resistance to all attacks which make the working class and youth pay for the crisis of capitalism.

Ten years ago, radical youth sparked the call for global demonstrations against the Iraq war. Millions responded. Today, young people have again taken the lead by fighting austerity all across Europe. This is why we welcome the decision to call a new European Social Forum at a time when millions are trying to shape the struggle for an alternative.

We welcome the organisers’ pledge that:

“Florence 10+10” aims to be an inclusive and popular space, at our disposal for building alliances and concrete common initiatives: to build convergences for action on a European scale.”

We appeal to the youth of Syntagma Square and Puerta del Sol, of the occupations and the blockades, in the workplace and amongst the unemployed millions, to join us in our call for a European Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10.

We appeal also to our neighbours on other continents and above all in the lands of the Arab Spring to join us and enrich our debates with their experiences.

We want Florence 10+10 to address the key task of our movements. To succeed it must become the time and place for transforming our defensive, local struggles into Europe-wide and even worldwide action.

A Youth Assembly can be a place to debate, build networks for common action and plan an international campaign uniting all those under attack from the bankers, billionaires and their politicians in the European Union.

The EU institutions are the levers of power for an unelected class of exploiters who want to divide our resistance. Their strategy is the rise in unemployment, racism and attacks on the rights of women. Migrant workers are blamed for the lack of jobs while the unemployed and disabled are persecuted.

All who fight back confront the power of the media barons and the violence of the police, courts and fascists. But defiance alone has not been enough to throw out the austerity governments or stop the destruction of jobs, social welfare, and education.

Low-paid work, précarité and forced unpaid work is the future for millions of Europe’s young people. Education privatised, pensions demolished and training schemes abandoned. Everywhere the youth are denied a vote, economically exploited and yet made to pay for a crisis we did not cause.

We appeal the youth of the occupations, the barricades, the anti-fascist campaigns and the working class organisations everywhere to sign the appeal and join forces to build a powerful, democratic and decisive Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10.

Leeds Students Protest Against London Met Deportations

Leeds Revolution took part in a protest on Friday against the threatened deportations of 2,600 students from London Metropolitan University. Fifty students from Leeds Met and Leeds University gathered outside Leeds University, displayed banners and signs saying “hands off our classmates”. Lots of passers-by signed a petition against the deportations.

The international status of the university has been revoked by the UK Border Agency so they aren’t able to issue student visas to people from outside of the EU. The 2,600 students affected have been given 60 days to find another university or get out of the country.

Photograph by Leo Garbutt

The government made this announcement on the same day as the latest immigration statistics in a clear move to look “tough” on immigration. In reality this is a Tory stunt that could ruin the lives of thousands of people. London Met has started legal action in an attempt to overturn the decision and there is a question mark over whether the university can stay afloat if it can no longer accept non-EU students who provide 15% of its revenue.

There is a huge campaign at London Met involving students and lectures – they have held protests against the government decision and the lecturers’ union UCU has called for an amnesty for the students. We in Revolution agree that UKBA should allow the students to remain at London Met and would also demand that the government reinstates the international status of London Met and doesn’t interfere in the internal affairs of a university in this way again.

We have a meeting organised at Leeds Metropolitan University on The Case Against Immigration Controls on Thursday 20th September, 6pm at the Leslie Silver Building. We have also spoken with a number of other societies about setting up a London Met defence campaign and will keep you posted.

Check out the fb event for our meeting here http://www.facebook.com/events/360981043979839/

Check out the report from Leeds Student of the protest here http://www.leedsstudent.org/2012-09-14/ls1/ls1-news/protesters-attack-tory-racism-of-london-met-deportations

College, jobs and EMA – not resits!

Welcome to the sausage factory…

60,000 students have missed out on a place at college after the government was caught rigging GCSE results to look ‘tough’ on Education.

Every year there is heartbreak and celebration on GCSE results day, but this year the future of thousands has been thrown into doubt by the government’s decision to move grade boundaries in the middle of the year.

Across the country we have seen abnormal results in the core subjects of English and science. One AQA combined English language and literature exam saw 70% of people achieve less than a C grade – basically a fail as far as the government or an employer is concerned.

However, the most shocking detail is that the biggest jump in grade boundary shift came between D and C grades, with one foundation
English exam requiring 10 marks more to achieve a C than in January.

Theories are out there as to why this is the case. Some blame the exam boards introducing new exams with stricter marking policies. This might be true – but why change the boundaries in the middle of an academic year? At a stroke the government has needlessly thrown tens of thousands more youth onto the dole.

Also worrying is the trend for more pupils to be entered into Foundation level exams, where the highest score they can get is a C. We think the emphasis should be on methods which raise the general level, rather than results-tables, which only serve to create a market in education.

Through tinkering with results, abolishing EMA and turning schools into private academies, the government has robbed thousands of young people of the education they deserve.

The NUT (teachers union) is calling for industrial action which is good but not enough. Students need to get organised and fast, our own union the NUS won’t stand up for us but school students have taken militant action before – if these occupation, boycotts and walkouts are big enough, they can win.

But what should we fight for? Our campaign needs to go beyond the safe, government and school imposed limits. Teachers are speaking up to save their careers, ministers are lying to save their careers, now young people need to fight for ourselves. We should fight for victories which can bring real concrete benefits for school and college students.

 

We stand for:

- All students to be re-graded according to the original boundaries

- An investigation run by teachers and students into the links between exam boards and government

- Sack Gove the Education Minister and Gibb the schools minister

- The creation of student assemblies independent of school management

- Bring back EMA, give a living grant to all students, funded by taxing the rich who can afford it.

- End minimum wage discrimination, invest in training and jobs for young people

Young people don’t need jobs or housing say Tory millionaires

Cameron’s £750,000 pile – got a spare bed?

The government is determined to boost tax revenues. But instead of collecting some of the £70million+ illegally dodged in taxes by the super rich every year, Cameron says young people must pay – by being denied access to jobs and houses. Of course, a government whose ministers are almost all millionaires isn’t likely to demand their rich mates pay their share.

Amid a recession and huge youth unemployment, in a speech on welfare he said that people under the age of 25 should be stripped of their housing benefits and made to remain at home until they can afford to move out with no government support.

With youth unemployment hitting 1 million, minimum wage being frozen, EMA being cut and tuition fees rising, they’ve got it bad. A lot of young people couldn’t live with their parents till the age of 25 because of personal reasons or simply because their families couldn’t afford it.

More importantly why should young people be made to live at home, we want them to become independent adults who can make their own choices in life.

These proposals will increase homelessness. By removing the housing benefits the state provides and with no jobs available people have little other way of receiving money and paying bills. While there are no jobs because of the situation our government and banks put us in, then they should be supporting individuals and families until they are able to support themselves. Low interest rates fixed by the Bank of England encourage housing speculators to keep properties empty until rents are profitable enough.

His attack particularly affects single parents or families with children. With 1 in 8 leaving a job and 1 in 5 turning down a job due to the cost of childcare it is clear these families aren’t being supported enough with free crèches and nurseries to enable their parents to work. Instead the government wants to import a crazy scheme from the USA where parents are supposed to take their children into work…

His new proposal includes benefits cuts to those families with 3 or more children ‘to stop the out-of-work being better off by having children.’ With child benefits already having been slashed having another child barely gives you enough extra money to feed them let alone any left over.

‘Consider paying some benefits “in kind” rather than in cash,’ is Cameron’s way of saying ‘all these benefit scroungers spend their money on booze and drugs.’ As this is the case in some situations, support should be given through rehab schemes. Giving ‘money’ in tokens won’t get rid of the issue and it’ll mean that some children have even less to live on.  The US already has 14 million people living on food vouchers – and this number is going up not down.

The disabled are being attacked too with Cameron saying that 2/3s of those on Disability Claimant remain on it for their whole lives. He believes these people should be forced to do full-time community work and take steps to improve their health.

During his speech Cameron clearly stated that pensions wouldn’t be affected in the next wave of reforms. ‘If you work hard all your life, you deserve dignity in retirement.’ The implication being that those young people deserve nothing because they’ve given nothing to the state yet. The youth are an easy target because with no money and living with mum and dad, it’s more difficult for them to organise.

This is another attack on the working class, this time the young and he uses this to drive a wedge between the young and old. Young people didn’t cause the crisis and our future shouldn’t be sacrificed to pay back millionaire crooks like Barclays boss Bob Diamond – who carried out a giant financial fraud and got off with £2million hush money.

It’s not even like Benefits are bankrupting the country – each year more than £15 billion worth of welfare is left unclaimed, and goes back into the pot. The politicians live in giant homes and have refused to build enough decent housing for over 20 years. The private sector isn’t taking up the slack, and why would they? It’s not the capitalists’ job to look out for ordinary people.  If we want a society with proper communities and opportunities for young people, we’ll have to fight for it.

N21: Fight cuts, defend education; make it happen!

The National Union of Students (NUS) has called for a national demonstration on 21st November against the funding cuts which aim to transform education into a playground for speculators and profit-hungry capitalists.

The call is supported by National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts, EAN, the UCU and others.

Young people have had our EMA robbed, fees tripled and our schools handed over to religious fanatics and greedy businesses. 1 million are unemployed.

This year 462,507 students will be billed £9,000 – the highest fees ever to go to university in overcrowded courses with few employment prospects.

This demonstration is our chance to strike back.

The wave of strikes, occupations and protests which followed the destruction of Tory HQ at Millbank in 2010 has given us plenty of experience.

Rebuilding anti-cuts groups this Freshers’, drawing national anti-cuts campaigns into organising school students, and preparing a fighting strategy to defend education is needed to make this demo a success.

Above all we need a commitment to unity on a democratic basis from the different education campaigns.

A march by the TUC, strikes by teachers and public sector workers will create a hot autumn. Let’s make sure November 21 keeps the heat up on the Con-Dem government into the winter.

REVOLUTION fights for

• Free education for all, living grants, abolition of student debt for local and international students

• No to all the education cuts

• Kick out the bosses – nationalise all academies, religious and ‘free’ schools

 

Tories expand compulsory work schemes

The work-for-welfare scheme has been scrapped right? Wrong. Tory minister Iain Duncan Smith is extending the workfare scheme, forcing thousands more youth into unpaid, dead-end jobs.

Currently, unemployed people can be made to work unpaid for large companies for up to a month. Under the new plans, the scheme will be extended to six months’ unpaid labour. Those who refuse will be stripped of their benefits and left to starve.

As we reported back in March, the negative publicity and protests did not result in the abolition of the scheme. Instead the government and big companies launched a major PR drive, while continuing to raise armies of unpaid workers to boost the profits of Britain’s richest companies.

Workfare means working up to 30 hours a week to continue receiving benefits at £53 a week. This works out at a measly £1.70 an hour – well below the official minimum wage. Working a 40 hour week on the minimum wage would still leave you below the government’s official poverty line.

The government insists this slave labour will give a work ethic to the unemployed – as though the 1 million unemployed youth are desperately trying to avoid working.

The hypocrisy of a government of millionaires talking about ‘work ethic’ at the same time that they are cutting hundreds of thousands of jobs is beyond belief. Prime Minister David Cameron only ever had one ‘proper’ job in his life – working at a friend’s PR firm practicing the lies and deceit necessary to a parliamentary career.

There are more than 1 million 16-24 year olds not in work, education or training, 20% of the total. Amongst Black youth the unemployment rate is 50%. There are 800,000 people who have been unemployed for more than a year.

There are 2.65 million people unemployed, but just 400,000 vacancies. This means 6 people chasing every job, but in areas of high unemployment like the north the average number of applicants per vacancy is much higher.

Even the welfare-to-work profiteers who run the scheme admit that less than a quarter of people on the scheme find work at the end. No matter, as long as the scheme continues to provide hundreds of millions of pounds’ profit for those involved.

Many people argue that rich companies making record profits can easily afford to employ people on proper wages. This is true. But in a capitalist market, ruled by the logic of profit, all wealth comes from the value created by workers. So inevitably, bosses must compete with each other to maximise profits by reducing the cost of their employees’ wages and conditions.

Neither the Tories, nor the Lib Dems have a real plan to eradicate unemployment – they think it’s a necessary part of society. High unemployment benefits the rich because they use the fear of sacking to keep their employees in line.

We demand an end to workfare. We won’t be made to pay the cost of a crisis we didn’t cause. We fight for an end to the minimum wage which discriminates against younger workers – we want a living wage which reflects the value we create. Instead of using us as unpaid labour to boost the bosses’ profits, the government should be taxing the billions of the super-rich and investing that in socially-useful jobs which will benefit our communities and society as a whole.

Ultimately, workfare is only the symptom of the wider disease – Capitalism and its crises, which is wrecking our lives and planet. Protests and campaigns can limit attacks and even win temporary victories like the NHS. But only socialism – the democratic economy managed by and for the working class – can start to bring about an end to the criminal waste of lives, talent and potential.

REVOLUTION says:

  • Abolish workfare – tax the rich to provide real jobs, training and education

  • For a living wage of £9 per hour

  • Share out the work – reduce hours with no loss of pay

  • Nationalise all companies closing down or sacking workers

 

What happened to EMA?

When the Tories came to power, attacks on working-class people were inevitable. The austerity offensive will punish everyone but the rich elites. However, some of the first people to experience the cuts were those who were the most vulnerable and defenceless.  Without the vote or any say in society, it is the young who are especially vulnerable to these attacks, and within months the Tories announced their plans to triple tuition fees and scrap EMA.

This essential money paid for everything from equipment and books to bus fare and food.  Without it, many students, whose families are already on a tight budget, have been forced to drop out of college and seek work – but with 1 million unemployed 16-24 year olds, job-hunting isn’t a much better option.

The replacement for EMA is a highly restricted fund available to a fraction of people. However, as with many benefits, applying is a complex, bureuacratic process designed to shame people rather than help them.

The student’s response to these attacks was inspirational to the movement as a whole.  50,000 attending the first demonstration and the numbers steadily rose over the winter.  While not solely against the cut to EMA, the high numbers of usually apolitical school and college students mobilised showed how the Tories have angered everyone and how they have driven young people to take to the streets to defend their EMA, their right to affordable education and their right to a future.

Although the defeat was demoralising, it left behind huge numbers of newly-political young people determined to carry on the struggle. Importantly it showed the political class that young people won’t just take their attacks lying down.

This is why Ken Livingstone, the Labour candidate in the London Mayor’s election has promised to bring back EMA if elected. This would be a massive victory, and a real blow to the Tories. If this happened we would need to build a national campaign to bring back EMA for all youth, not just those in London.

Black youth unemployment only getting worse

This March it was announced that Black youth unemployment had reached 47.4%, more than double that for white young people and more than five times the national average. Although Black people make up just 2.2% of Britain’s population, they suffer disproportionately higher unemployment rates.

The first section of society that the Tories chose to attack after coming to power was the youth, trebling tuition fees and cutting EMA. This has led to less people going to further and higher education, meaning there is more competition for the already scarce jobs available to those without degrees.

This has affected all working class youth but has hit black youth worst of all because many black people live in poorer working class areas. This makes them less likely to be successful in education, and therefore rely on less skilled jobs. However, most of these jobs have been moved to countries with cheaper labour.

The services that help people escape the traps of poverty and long term unemployment are being cut, from direct help such as language courses for immigrants to the privatisation of education and the NHS. What’s more, a racist police service means that black youth are much more likely to have a criminal record that white youth, hindering their chances of finding work.

There has been little outcry over this shocking statistic because Black people are still a vulnerable, marginalised section of society. The capitalists understand that to control the workforce they must divide it and that is why we have heard David Cameron denouncing multiculturalism and the Daily Mail demonising immigrants. By bombarding us with anti-immigrant propaganda, they believe we won’t realise the true reasons for the economic crisis and fight back.

We must unite to take on the capitalists and create a socialist society based on common ownership, not exploitation and oppression.

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Website Design Expert
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube