Anti-workfare tour of shame in Leeds

With the workfare scheme still forcing thousands into unpaid work placements, REVOLUTION joined up with others to organise two walks of shame to target business exploiting young unemployed.

With around 8 people on the first day, this number rose to 14 on the second. The atmosphere was lively, out of the people there; there were members from the SWP, Leeds Unemployment Action Group and members of trade union Unite. Around half of the people hadn’t been involved in action before and had got involved through receiving a leaflet the previous day.

The tour began at Asda where the staff seemed to be pro-workfare and quite happy to let their managers profit at the expense the unemployed. At the Hilton we handed workfare leaflets to the staff manager who denied the Hilton had any participation in Workfare. At the point someone got their phone out to show the manager the Hilton’s quote on the workfare website. He walked away threatening to call the police if we didn’t get off ‘his property’ – another boss who knows the police can always be called on to defend the privelege of the bosses’ private property.

Finally we went to Greggs where we handed out leaflets and collected signatures from customers.

Overall we got a good response from people and they were interested to hear about workfare and what it was doing.

We must continue this fightback and force more companies to back out of the scheme as Hollandand Barrett and Pizza Hut have recently done.

This Sunday in Leeds we are having a demonstration outside Argos on the Headrow. Spread the word and see you there!

 

No wages – outrageous!

 

Leeds justice vigil for police victims

Supporters of a campaign fighting for justice for victims of police murder and violence met across from Millgarth police station for a vigil and leafleting last Sunday. The rally was organised on Fathers’ Day to coincide with nationwide protests by victims’ friends’ and families campaigns.

Many of the people who passed were receptive to our message and a lot of interesting conversations were had with people who agreed that the police had no right to kill people.  The main argument we faced was opposition to disarming the police, however this is an important argument to make. The police never use to be armed and in their position of power, in an institutionally racist organisation, we have seen too many examples of police killing innocent people and facing no punishment.

 The group leafleted besides Revolution’s banner, whose message of the 3180 deaths just in police custody with no convictions, really showed to people the police’s freedom to do as they please. This figure does not even include the deaths of people such as Anthony Grainger and Mark Duggan who were both killed before they were arrested.

We were confronted with one police officer trying to gain the details of someone on the vigil in the usual police fashion, however he left empty-handed.

Later on, National Express security attempted to confront us on where we were leafleting, which was apparently on pavement “owned” by National Express.  On confronting the manager and after a chance meeting with a member of the council planning department, our group moved forward 6 feet meaning that National Express could do nothing.

All in all the vigil was peaceful and successful. We engaged with a lot of people who were opposed to police brutality and the murder of innocent people.  The police force has blood on its hands and it is important that as many people as possible know about what the police are doing.  It is a shame that more people didn’t turn out but for the size of the vigil, it reached out to a lot of people.

Bolton: defend union democracy!

On Monday evening around 80 students and activists gathered at the University of Bolton to protest against the suspension of Student Union President, Shana Begum.

A combination of Bolton students, local youth, trade unionists and activists from anti-cuts campaigns converged on the University buildings to put pressure on the University management.

Although Student Unions must legally be run through student-democracy, the University bosses have replaced Shana with an unelected University Governor, Chris Minta.

Minta has been installed by the VC, George Holmes and is only accountable to the University itself, not the student body he is supposed to represent.

Whilst it was encouraging to see activists from many different campaigns and organisations coming out in support of Shana, there is one organisation who’s presence would make a huge difference.

Chris Minta is the branch secretary for the UCU at Bolton, although there were UCU members at the demonstration, a greater presence from them would surely have been hugely significant.

After meeting outside the Students Union, the demonstration moved to the Octagon Theatre to pressure the University officials enjoying themselves in there, probably under the pretext of having a meeting.

Of course, a peaceful gathering of activists and students merits a small amount of police harassment, and we were not disappointed. Our friends in blue were out in force making sure we did not commit atrocities such as blocking a footpath or “causing a fire-hazard.” It was disheartening for activists on the demonstration to see the organisers asking the police for permission to walk about in a public area and advising the police as to where we were headed next.

Overall the demo was important step towards organising more widely to defend student democracy. Student Unions are an important part of the fight against the Con-Dem Government’s attacks on higher education as well as a vital support for students against problems such as racism, coping with disabilities, academic issues and financial problems.

Without a democratically elected leadership, Student Unions are just another part of the University bureaucracy and will not work in the interests of students.

Successive governments have gradually restricted SU powers, enthusiastically supported by the University itself, which funds the SU. Ultimately the role of the state and university bosses in funding our Student Unions means they can never be truly independent bodies fighting in our interest.

  • Shana Begum should be immediately reinstated, with unreserved apology from uni bosses.

  • Campus Student Unions should organise solidarity action, and offer practical support like fundraising.
     
  • At a national level, the NUS and UCU should condemn this attack. 
     
  • Students should form a democratic committee to investigate the actions of university management. 

The National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts is a grassroots organisation dedicated to fighting for student democracy and free education. It organises in many universities across Britain and led the student movement in 2010 after the NUS shamefully caved in to the Con-Dem coalition. Find out more

Salford TUC ‘Changing Unemployment’ – a good start but few people and fewer conclusions

 On Saturday around 40 people got together to discuss how people are being forced out of work, off benefits, and out of their houses, as well as how the unemployed can fight back. Sponsored by Salford TUC and with a range of speakers from different organisations, the small turnout was something of a let-down, particularly given the quality of some of the sessions.

Perhaps the bright sunny day meant more people decided to go to the park than to an all-day conference, perhaps not enough leaflets and posters were put out for the event, perhaps too many people simply feel as though we’ve already lost the fight. Whatever the reason, it had a tangible effect on the mood of the day (and the timings, as meetings were pushed back by over an hour). However, the presence of activists and unemployed workers from Leeds helped boost spirits as people used the opportunity to discuss how they could work together to practically organise across different cities.

The day started with a good speech from Alec McFadden who talked about the unemployment centres that the TUC is aiming to set up in towns and cities across the country, which could act as centres of resistance, as well as places where the unemployed could simply go to get out of the house and meet up with other people in a similar situation. He also complained that the trade unions traditionally kicked out members once they were on the dole, but pointed out that Unite and the RMT (as well as others, potentially) were starting up community sections with the aim of organising the unemployed, pensioners, students and youth.

We then broke out into workshops. Unfortunately two really good ones were on at the same time- one on benefit cuts and the disabled, the other on setting up community trade unions in Manchester. I went to the former due to an interest in the current anti-ATOS campaign. A young guy called Ryan who had worked as benefits advisor gave a really informative talk about the current attempts to slash benefits spending, how it’s being done, the human impact of these cuts, and ways to resist. Perhaps the most important message to take away was that around 70% of those people who’ve been kicked of disability benefits by dodgy bastards like ATOS and appealed against their decision have won. With decent legal advice and support that goes up to around 90%. We need to ensure that people who are facing getting their support taken off them that challenging the cutters in the courts is doable and winnable.

A young PCS rep also mentioned how her union had just passed two motions at national conference, one opposing the workfare programme, the other opposing the Tories’ benefits reforms, both of which could be used to encourage and justify trade unionists taking action to stop these Slash-and-Burn policies.

At the other workshop, participants agreed to set up a Unite community branch in Manchester which could focus on equalling-up wages, campaigning against unemployment, taking direct action to stop evictions and support striking workers.

In the afternoon, parallel sessions were run on pensioners and the cuts, the cuts and the rise of racism, and community housing. Though there were some interesting discussions, these sessions seemed less hands-on, despite an agreement to support and extend a network (Manchester Housing Action) which could resist evictions of private housing, social housing and squats.

The day ended on a sour note as a Labour MP (Kate Green) decided to address the last session of about 25 people. When asked if a Labour government would promise to stop the cuts, not invade any more foreign countries, abolish tuition fees, or repeal the anti-trade union laws set up by Thatcher, she rejected each one, causing a number of people to leave in disgust. All she could do was parrot the Labour Party official line- that there are too many cuts coming too fast, but ultimately cuts needed to be made. Needless to say this was not warmly received.

It was a real shame there weren’t more people present on the day, as the initiatives put forward were very positive and potentially useful tools for the struggle against unemployment, exploitation and austerity across Manchester.

Revolution welcomes all new initiatives which aim to organise the unemployed as part of the working-class resistance to cuts. Unemployment amongst youth is particularly severe, and we believe that trade unions should be leading a militant struggle in favour of real jobs, paid a decent wage.

But the crisis can’t be ‘solved’ simply by creating more jobs. The capitalist market ensures it’s always more profitable to have fewer people working longer than more people working less. This is why we see the struggle against unemployment as inseparable from the class struggle against capitalism.

As transitional measures to limit the power of the bosses to rule us by controlling access to jobs we demand:

  • Scrap workfare – A living wage for all – £9 an hour or the trade union rate
  • Nationalisation of all companies closing down or sacking workers
  • Jobs for all – share out the work by reducing hours with no loss of pay
  • Full living allowance for the disabled and those without work

These measures are a step towards challenging the right of the capitalists to control the economy for their own benefit. Through these struggles we can strengthen the level of working-class organisation and fight for a programme of socialist revolution which is the only means of ensuring the possibility of a society based on human need, not private greed. 

Report from Bradford Occupy Westfield – pile on the pressure

Over 30 people including George Galloway MP started an Occupation in Bradford this weekend over the space that Westfield have left in the town centre. As well as putting up tents and collecting essentials, they have published an initial statement.

The statement states that the current state of Bradford City centre is unacceptable. Businesses are closing or relocating, the few shops that are left are struggling, there are many empty buildings and regeneration has been at a standstill for nearly ten years.

We will occupy in a peaceful, lawful manor and come from all ethnicities, backgrounds, genders, generations, sexualities, disabilities and faiths to work together.

Our  intention is to stay until these demands have been met:

  • We demand an audience, here, with the leaders ofBradfordcouncil and the head of regeneration.
  • We demand an audience with all local MPs and all Councillors to stand with us and discuss how to prevent this City sinking further.
  • We demand a public inquiry be conducted into how and why Bradford has been left devastated by Bradford council and Westfield.

The people of Bradford feel very let down by Westfield and the council. Westfield were awarded planning permission in 2003, have since demolished an area of around 3 football pitches and just left it hidden behind fences.

I visited the occupation on the Sunday evening when around 30 people were putting up tents and talking to people passing.

As around the demolition site is a fence which hides the area, it is difficult to understand how much space there is. The occupiers have open up this fence and created a space where people can look at the giant hole of wasteland.

Local MP George Galloway had spent Saturday at the occupation and one of the occupiers had emailed all the local mps and councillors asking for their support and appearance.

The atmosphere was really good with lots of people stopping to talk, look at the site and take leaflets.

Previous Occupy camps served to highlight the role of unaccountable companies and bosses in putting profit before the needs of the people. But without a concrete strategy to turn their demands into mass action, they were isolated by the authorities and harassed by the police.

The demands on Bradford councillors and Westfield to explain themselves are a step in the right direction. Now we need to organise to draw in wider layers of support to ensure that those in charge can’t get away with this scandal any longer.

We should appeal to local organisations, including the Trades Council and residents’ associations to support the occupation.

We should organise a mass meeting for Bradford residents where councillors and company representatives can listen to the demands of the public and explain what they are going to do to sort out this mess.

Ultimately we should not leave those responsible with the last word on the matter. Ten years have shown that there is a real lack of interest in developping the site and now things have come to a head. If we are ignored then we must organise a campaign to turn up the pressure on our elected representatives.

The Westfield side is an aesthetic eyesore. But more than this, it’s a criminal waste of opportunity. We demand that either Westfield resume work on the site, or the council take it over and start a building programme for socially-useful services to be decided by the people of Bradford themselves.

This would provide much-needed jobs and investment both now and for the future.

We demand that Bradford city council take the necessary steps to put the needs of the people before the profit of the bosses!

Leeds May Day protest targets NHS profiteers

150 people turned out in the cold sunshine today for International Workers’ Day (May 1). Home-made placards and flags waved alongside banners representing most of the big trade unions – including the PCS and NUT who will be striking on May 10.

The atmosphere was lively despite the cold and once the demonstration started there was lots of chanting. ‘They say cut back, we say fight back’ echoed the streets as shoppers stopped to watch us march down the roads. A splinter group of youth and NHS activists broke off from the main march to picket the Virgin store.  We chanted slogans denouncing the attempted privatisation of parts of the NHS by Virgin Health, owned by billionaire Richard Branson.

The rally was good with speakers from the PCS, TUSC and Labour MP John McDonnell, who said people felt ‘let down’ by the Coalition. Unlike Leeds’ own MPs McDonnell called on people to support the upcoming May 10 Pensions’ strike and called for a general strike against cuts. A PCS member spoke about the action and why the attacks on jobs, education and health can only be stopped by fighting back.

We spoke to some young trade unionists on the march who said this:

Rebecca (PCS) “ I’m here because International Workers’ Day is all about fighting for workers rights and defending ourselves against the austerity, the worst austerity since WW2. I’m here to fight for my pension, job and pay, I will be out on strike on the 10th of May, we need to be striking and demonstrating against this government.”

Sam (UCU)   “It’s disgraceful what’s happening to our services and jobs. Our union leaders need to start fighting for us and stop selling us out.”

Mike (UNISON Health)  “Working within the NHS I can see what the recent health and social care bill is doing already, here in Leeds the cytology (study of cells) service is being made to compete with Serco, a private provider. People will lose jobs and services will suffer.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disabled workers spark resistance to Remploy cuts

Hundreds of Remploy factory workers protested in London, Sheffield, Cardiff and Edinburgh on the 20th of April against the government’s shameful attempt to throw thousands of disabled people onto the dole in their bid to destroy another pillar of the welfare state.

Disabled people often face discrimination in society, they are more likely to be unemployed and living in poverty. The need of employers to make as much profit as possible, by ruthlessly exploiting their workers, means that they will often avoid employing disabled people because of their physical or learning disabilities. Remploy was created in 1946 alongside the welfare state to try and address this injustice by providing an industry for disabled people to work in where they can learn skills, integrate in their community and produce useful goods that benefit society.

The government have decided to shut down Remploy by withdrawing the subsidy they gave towards it. This means the closure of 36 out of 54 factories by the 17th of august 2012, but probably sooner for many. This will mean 1752 workers in useful, skilled jobs will have to join millions in the dole queues – and with few bosses recruiting, they will face a serious disadvantage. The last Labour government made a similar move in 2008 shutting 28 factories. Out of those who lost jobs in the last attack only 5% are working now and out of those only 5% have found work of an equal standard. If these 36 are allowed to close it will only be a matter of time before the government ditches the remaining 18, meaning the end of Remploy.

The government’s justification is that the 36 factories are not profitable; this argument boils down to: workers in the third-world can be found cheaper and worked harder. But Remploy helps disabled people fight isolation in society and they produce goods that are used in the NHS and education, things everyone in society benefits from, it shouldn’t matter whether it makes a profit or not. Besides, there is plenty of money available; the rich in the UK have seen their wealth rise over 20% annually over the last few years while the rest of us suffer; the wealth of the rich flows from the cuts in spending and jobs suffered by the majority. The money saved by closing Remploy is a fraction of the cost to society of throwing thousands more out of work, impoverishing them and their families.

Fight to win

This fight is an all or nothing struggle, and the workers know it. The mood of the workers on the protest was one of defiance. 400 marched in Sheffield chanting and spreading their message to the sound of car horns from supporters, one placard read ‘disable the government not Remploy’. 300 packed into Sheffield town hall for a rally with GMB officials, Labour politicians and a Unite organiser from the Socialist Workers Party, unfortunately none of the speakers were disabled or Remploy workers. They all made fiery speeches about fighting back and the atmosphere was electric.

Though the rhetoric was radical the mention of real action was lacking; the labour politicians focused on punishing the government at the elections, but were forced to admit, by a well placed question, that Remploy would be long dead if it was not saved now and also that Labour wouldn’t reverse most of the cuts. The GMB bureaucrats including Paul Kenny the General Secretary focused on elections too and failed to mention strikes apart from to remind workers of the need to obey anti-union laws.

The only exception to the cautious rhetoric was the Unite organiser, Gareth, who called for militant civil disobedience and factory occupations to create a national storm, but he also didn’t mention strikes. However his speech was met with huge cheers and almost constant applause throughout. In an interview afterwards he said “Factory occupations are a necessary part of the fight-back against the Tories. During the Olympics and Jubilee the government will be scared of public disorder and so that is what we need to create”. The workers cheered every mention of a fight back, and at the end dozens stood up to say they would resist. They have proven their willingness to oppose the closures. Now they need to force their leaders to back up their militant words with real action that is capable of winning.

Remploy workers can learn from the electricians who recently beat a 35% pay cut. They did this by taking militant action and illegal strikes by organising themselves democratically at first in a conference and later in rank and file meetings. This allowed the workers themselves to decide on the action and to provide an alternative leadership to ensure that union leaders would not back down or sell out.

Remploy workers should do the same; the union leaders won’t be unemployed if the factories close and so when under pressure they can easily try and negotiate or back down from confrontation. The Remploy workers, with their backs to the wall, can’t back down – they need to organise themselves for an all out fight to win, they should call a conference of workers to decide on a strategy and then lobby the union as a whole to enact these decisions. If the unions refuse to then the conference should set up local workplace meetings to organise the action themselves.

What kind of action?

The government have made it clear that they want to shut the factories; the consultation period is a diversion to hold back the struggle why they pretend to listen to workers’ concerns. Remploy workers should go on strike as soon as possible and refuse to go back until the bosses back down. The government’s determination needs to be met by equally determined resistance.

The strike must also be across all of Remploy, even the factories that are not closing. If these workers won’t go on strike then pickets should be sent to the factories to explain to them that they will be next and win them to a national strike.

If a factory is set to close then the workers should occupy it and stop the bosses taking away the machinery to sell for scrap. They should then call for support from local communities, link up with others in struggle such as public sector workers and refuse to leave until the government guarantees the jobs and future of all the Remploy factories.

A determined fight back like this would strengthen the position of all Remploy workers and show millions that resistance is necessary and victory is possible.

You can download the leaflet we distributed at Remploy factories here.

Sign the petition against closures here

NUT strike shows potential for united resistance

After a strong regional strike, around 8000 demonstrators marched through central London today demanding an end to the government’s attacks on public-sector pensions. Though the march and rally were called to support striking workers, it became a site for a number of different groups to express their anger with the government and the austerity agenda.

When I first arrived at the demo start-point, I looked up and could only see in tones of pink and blue. The UCU had doled out thousands of bright pink helium balloons, and the NUT had produced thousands of little blue flags. The NUT also brought along a massive inflatable pound-sign which was being crushed in a vice (credit crunch- dyageddit?), adorned with the demand for ‘decent pensions for all.’ The overall effect was pretty cool, as flags rippled and balloons bobbed about in the (ridiculously) sunny sky. It was also good to see a number of Unison and PCS flags out on the demo, showing solidarity and support between different trade unionists, even if their leaders had held them back from striking on the day. Likewise, there were a number of banners from NUT and UCU branches beyond London, as well as a banner from Unite construction members in London.

There was a truck with a soundsystem heading the demo which served as a portable stage for speakers from the various trade union leaderships (sadly we have not learnt the lesson of our German comrades that these trucks can also be used to play music, lead chants, and make for a more engaging experience). I could barely hear them over the noise of the crowd, as people discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the movement, and where they should go next. Needless to say I was more interested in their conversations than the speeches of the bureaucracy (although it was good to hear Owen Jones talk about how the Tories are trying to play private and public sector workers against each other, in a classic game of divide-and-rule).

One lecturer told me that they felt annoyed that it was only a London-wide strike, and that their union leadership should be playing a more active role to ensure that everyone came out on the same day. This thought was echoed by Katherine and Ella, two teachers from southeast London, who felt that there would be more media attention if everyone struck together.

Likewise, Kester and Issy, two students from Queen Mary’s, told me that they’d hoped to be seeing the PCS coming out on the day, and that we ultimately need “as many strikes as possible” to beat the government. They also felt that the trade unions would only attract more members and gain strength through strong action and a willingness to tackle the Tories head-on. They also complained that the NUS leadership had done nothing to make the March 14th demo as attractive or visible as this one, and went on to say that they were let down by the lack of organisation on behalf of the NUS, but encouraged by grassroots student groups such as NCAFC and EAN.

The mood of the demo was determined, and a good range of people from different backgrounds, trade unions and social groups turned out to show their anger with the Tory cutters. Amy, a teacher from Hammersmith, told me that “it’s not over,” and that “more action is on the way” to stop the pension cuts. Sadly, her union leaders might disagree with her. Despite the militancy, the desire for coordinated strikes, the demands for more demonstrations, and the willingness of many ordinary people to struggle, the heads of the unions have been determined to halt action, or have backed down from calling it for fear of ‘going alone’.

 

Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Pension sellout: don’t get demoralised – get organised!

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Why did PCS leaders pull the plug on M28?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Tory budget, stealing from the poor to fund the rich

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Alfie Meadows in court – Drop the charges, fuck the police

Monday morning saw the first day of Alfie Meadows’ trial for violent disorder – after he recovered from being beaten into a coma by police batons. No police officer has been charged.

Despite having to receive emergency brain surgery following being bludgeoned by a police baton is now facing up to 5 years in prison for causing ‘sustained and widespread violence and disorder’ along with five other men.

On December 9th 2010 over 10,000 people, mostly school and college students, took to the streets of London to protest against the rise in tuition fees. It was the last of four mass demonstrations against the increase and was the day of the vote in Parliament.

The demonstration route was from University Union London and due to finish at Victoria Embankment; however a large section of the march broke off into Parliament Square.

One of the students on the demonstration was Alfie Meadows, a 20 year-old Philosophy student at Middlesex University. He was hit over the head with a police baton while trying to exit the police kettle on Westminster Bridge.

He was one of 44 people badly injured by the London Met’s out-of-control TSG thugs.

As if surviving a life-threatening injury, for which no-one will be punished wasn’t bad enough, Alfie now faces the prospect of a trial at Kingston Crown Court.

A rally called by the Defend the Right To Protest Campaign was held in solidarity under the slogan ‘We are all Alfie Meadows’ and was attended by around 200 people – a good turnout for a Monday morning in the middle of nowhere.

The rally was lively with some good speakers giving facts about how many people had been killed by the police in the past few years and how no copper has ever been up in court for it.

Reports from the court case say that Alfie was at the front of the crowds face to face with police with a balaclava on. However he was not responsible for hurting anybody and only 6 police officers suffered minor injuries that day.

These students are being made an example of and used to scare other students from demonstrating in the future. We absolutely supported the students who broke through police lines to occupy Parliament Square, and our members were leading that charge.

We need to be asking why it is Alfie being charged with violence and disorder and the policeman who nearly killed him is able to continue carrying a baton, swaggering around London, free to continue to abuse, attack and potentially kill someone with no repercussions.

REVOLUTION demands the disarming and disbanding of the police, to be replaced by self-defence democratically organised by our own communities.

Read our new pamphlet: Defend the Right to Protest

 

Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Corrupt cop chief jailed – again

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Exclusive: police killed my sister’s boyfriend

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Police role in Blacklist scandal exposed

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Revolution and resistance in the air at Northern Gathering

This weekend young people from across Yorkshire and Greater Manchester (with the odd southerner making an appearance) got together for the REVOLUTION Northern Gathering to share experiences and ideas, and to discuss how we can organise young people in the fight against cuts in Britain and across the world.

On Saturday, REVO members took part in the 500 strong demonstration against the Tories’ local government conference. This was followed by a series of flash occupations of stores such as Greggs and Primark which have been using young people as free labour in the workfare scheme. In the evening we organised a gig with local artist Miranda Versus The Crok playing an acoustic set. A big thanks to the artists, the people who helped to organise the event, and every one who came to make it such a success.

On Sunday the Gathering began proper, with the first session seeing Rebecca from Leeds talk about the many struggles of the last year. We talked about what happened to the student movement, the inspiration of seeing thousands of women march against sexual violence and victim-blaming on the Slutwalks, the power of the Arab Spring and its global importance, and how #occupy managed to break the silence about the misery of capitalism. We also discussed the recent pension strikes and the threats of the trade-union leaders to sell out the workers they’re meant to represent, which would mean less jobs for young people and worse conditions in the few jobs there are.

The next meeting looked at how young people are oppressed. There was a lively discussion about the family unit, economic independence, and how the cuts are aimed at attacking young people in particular. We also talked about how the alienation of young people was expressed during the  August riots, and the importance of organising marginalised youth into progressive actions. We also talked about the risk of the far-right and particularly the EDL capitalising on this anger and turning young people towards fascist politics – as the EDL and BNP tried to do stirring up racial tension in Hyde, Manchester.

Afterwards we looked at how we can use social media, videos and graphics to form campaigns. Coupled with a few videos, some hands-on tips, and a political context, this made for an interesting planning session which we hope to demonstrate the results of soon (watch this space…).

In the final session we discussed how revolutionaries can engage with wider layers of young people. We talked about the growing anti-workfare campaign, the Tories’ attacks on the NHS, revolutionary counter-culture, how we link up with other radical youth groups internationally, and the prospect of forming a united anti-capitalist organisation with wider layers of activists.

Matt from Manchester said “I particularly enjoyed the practical sessions which I think show how young people can get involved in political struggles without having lots of knowledge about theory… Our priority is to get young people involved in the fight-back at whatever level they start at.”

All in all it was an exciting and interesting weekend. Thanks once again to everyone who came, everyone who spoke, and everyone who helped organise the event. If you couldn’t make it this time, don’t worry, we’ll be organising lots more events in the near future, and it’s really easy to get involved.

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Social Profile Design Experts
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube