Scandal in the House of Lords

A couple of weeks ago it was revealed that £2.3million of taxpayer’s money has been squandered in order to provide budget meals for the privileged the thieves in the House of Lords. Few people were surprised by this – many haven’t batted an eyelid as this sort of thing is nothing new anymore. It is almost as if the British public expect this of our corrupt overlords and are more than happy to sit back and allow this. Simply put, we do not need this dysfunctional set of far removed, overpaid thieves making crucial decisions on the laws that govern every one of us.

Around £2.3million a year is being used to subsidise restaurants, bars and cafes for members of the House of Lords and this vast sum is coming straight from our pockets. This works out at over £60k a week which is £84 for each individual peer. £300 a day is given to each Lord on top of this which is supposed to cover the food they eat whilst there.

The food on offer at the House of Lords ranges from full luxurious 3 course meals to canteen food. Even the more lavish food on offer is at reasonable prices, with an average main course setting them back around £14. A peer could eat very well during a day at the House of Lords and the price they would pay would hardly put a hole in the £300 a week we already pay them.

As many of the peers are millionaires it is hard to see how any right minded person could think that squandering this great amount of money to make sure the wealthy lords can afford to eat is acceptable. In this age of government austerity many working class families are living on shoe string budgets even relying on food banks to prevent them from starving. But forget that, Lord Heseltine needs his £9.50 roast of the day; surely he’ll need some financial help with as he’s only worth around £200million.

£84 a week on top of the ridiculous sum of cash already available to the Lords is £13 more than job seekers allowance. The priorities and morality of the people in charge is so wrong it is hard to see how they are been allowed to stay in a position where they can do this.

These people are taking us for a ride. The sheer arrogance and smugness of them thinking they are entitled to this money highlights the fact they are simply making lucrative careers out of the problems that plague the ordinary British people every day. They do not care about us yet we let them decide and dictate our lives. The much publicised expenses scandal in 2009 seems to have learnt us nothing.

From the day the “we are all in this together” tripe was churned out people have scoffed at it. This however shows just how much of a joke that statement really is and just how much of a joke these people see our lives as. A drastic overhaul of our government is needed with the power taken from the hands of these greedy crooks and given to the people. This is the only way we can move forward at this difficult time together and protect every single person’s interests rather than the privileged few that routinely exploit us.

Posters

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greece Solidarity 2012 Leaflet

greece-leaflet-back

Greek youth battle with police after tragic suicide of Greek pensioner

On the morning of the 4th of April, Dimitris Christoulas, a 77 year old pensioner shot himself outside the Greek parliament. He had been forced up against the wall by the savage austerity measures imposed by the banker’s dictatorship at the wishes of the European financial elite.

This old man had lived through Nazi occupation, Civil War and Military dictatorship. The fact that he took his life now is testament to the brutality of the austerity regime. His suicide note read that the “government has annihilated all traces for my survival, which was based on a very dignified pension that I alone paid for 35 years…I see no other dignified end to my life, so I don’t find myself rooting though rubbish bins for my sustenance”.

But even in such a desperate mind frame he remained hopeful that “young people with no future, will one day take up arms and hang the traitors of this country like the Italians did to Mussolini”.

Anger

Within hours of his death thousands poured into the square to pay their respects and to show their solidarity. In a shameful act of disrespect the government sent hundreds of riot police armed with batons, concussion grenades and teargas. Clashes soon broke out between rightfully angry young people and the police who had been sent to try and stop attention being brought to the embarrassing and potentially explosive situation. Youth fought the police with stones and petrol bombs and the police gassed the square and drove off the mourners with brute force.

They especially attacked journalists, hospitalising several of them, in an attempt to ensure Dimitris would not become a martyr like Mohammed Bouazizi, the Tunisian street vendor who set himself on fire, lighting the spark that ignited the Arab revolutions. His funeral was yesterday and was attended by thousands who promised that they would fight until those responsible were brought to justice. His daughter read out a note that was placed on his shrine “we are 11 million and our name is resistance”.

The misery this man felt and the anger that millions of Greeks feel comes from the policies forced upon them by the financial aristocracy. The results are unemployment rates of over 20% and more young people who can’t find work than those who can. 68,000 businesses went bankrupt in 2011 alone. Wages and pensions have lost up to 50% in value in many cases. In many working class districts child malnutrition is estimated to exceed 20%. And significantly Greece’s suicide rate which was the lowest in all Europe has risen by over 40% since the cuts took effect.

These cuts that drive people to suicide are being forced on the Greek people against their will by a government that wasn’t even elected. The Greek government was appointed by the banks and a banker, Lucas Papademos, heads it. The EU replaced Greece’s government when their last PM worried he might lose his head if he pushed through more cuts and suggested that it might be a good idea to hold a referendum on cuts.

The leaders of Europe, horrified by even the mention of democracy had him replaced in a fortnight! The austerity is pushed through to pay for the debts which are held by billionaires and banking groups. Every bailout from the EU goes to these billionaires and every bailout come with conditions and instructions to the Greek puppet regime: make the working classes pay through ruthless cuts and austerity!

Why should ordinary people pay back a debt built up by rich politicians who bailed out the banks because of the crisis of capitalism? The Greek ruling class has moved over 600 billion Euros to Swiss banks which equals much more than the national debt, make them pay! Why should the working classes suffer in poverty in a futile attempt to save their rotten system?

When capitalism is posed as the choice between defending people’s livelihoods or lining billionaires pockets, the government has shown which class it defends. The Greek people should renounce the debt and refuse to pay.

There is an alternative

But to do this would require workers and youth taking power. Elections are coming up in May and the far left has been polling at an amazing 40% and over but winning elections is not enough. Parliament has exposed itself for what it really is recently; a pig sty, where politicians all in unison try to legitimise their undemocratic brutal attacks and hypocritically cry crocodile tears for pensioners they have pushed to suicide.

The Greek working class needs to capture state power for themselves, the elections will be a great time to call for a socialist alternative but the real solution to the crisis cannot lie with an institution that has proven so ignorant of the will of the people. Democratic bodies must be formed across the country, in workplaces, especially those occupied, in the form of unemployed youth groups and in strike committees. These groups need to link up across the country to form a national organisation that can replace the sham of a democracy that exists in parliament. These groupings should then organise an indefinite general strike to bring down the government and arm workers and youth to defend it against police, military and fascist oppression.

This new structure is not a pipe dream and its embryonic form exists already in Greece; workplaces are occupied on a weekly basis and workers democratically debate what should be done with them, last year tens of thousands occupied squares to try and set up a popular democracy.

Socialists need to put all their efforts into concretising these organisations; making them democratic and accountable and making their leaders and delegates recallable. The parties on the far left should get organised in these structures and promise to enact decisions of these bodies rather than parliament. Revolutionary socialists need to organise into a revolutionary party as the best way of directing and encouraging this democratic framework for a new socialist society.

We need to create an organisation and structure that is capable of breaking the institutions of capitalism that are on a daily basis forcing misery upon the working masses of Europe and driving people like Dimitris Christoulas to suicide.

Cops on back foot as demands for justice grow louder

The #Justice4Grainger campaign is going from strength to strength, and the police are on the back foot more than a month after murdering a man in broad daylight.

Anthony Grainger was a 36 year old dad-of-two, shot by armed police in a pre-planned operation on March 3rd in Culcheth. Although the police initially tried to spread the lie that he was armed and threatening them, more and more evidence is coming to light which exposes how hollow the police’s words are.

It has recently come out that the only evidence that Mr. Grainger was armed was that a friend of his was seen carrying a hacksaw and a large object in a bin-bag. Despite this flimsy evidence, 16 armed officers (as well as a number of unarmed officers) were sent to surround and swarm Anthony and two friends as they sat in an Audi in the corner of a car-park. A recent post-mortem showed that he was shot through the side and the bullet entered first one lung, then his heart, then the next lung, suggesting he was trying to cover himself as he was shot.

Witnesses of the event described police officers in gas masks rushing towards the car while other officers ensured members of the public couldn’t see what was going on. The police have claimed that there is no video evidence of the event, which is dubious to say the least, given the huge amounts of resources they put into the operation.

The Indepent Police Complaints Commission has begun investigating the shooting and has stated that the cop who shot Anthony will face a ‘criminal interview’ in the coming days. He has still not been named and has not been placed under arrest. I can’t imagine the same happening if a police officer was shot by a member of the public.

The fact that the IPCC is now having to treat this like a criminal case is clearly a positive step forward and a testament to the family-led campaign for justice. Gail Hadfield, Anthony’s partner, and other members of his family have been actively campaigning for over a month now.

What started with a few banner-drops and some social media awareness-raising has now escalated, with the national press becoming more and more interested in the case, and the story getting featured in The Guardian and ITV News. A charity fundraiser is being organised at the Pint Pot in Salford on 12th May to raise funds for his children, and a demonstration has been called for June 17th (Father’s Day) at Picadilly Gardens in Manchester to demand justice. His family, friends and supporters have been regularly leafletting and using social media to advertise the rally and vigil.

Members of the family have also made links with other groups demanding justice, including the campaign for Christopher Alder who died in 1998 in police custody. The facebook group for the campaign is growing massively (with nearly 5000 members as of writing) and has become a hive of discussion, with not just Anthony’s death being talked about, but also Trayvon Martin and other victims of the police brutality both in Britain and world-wide.

The campaign is making huge leaps forward but a question still remains- can the IPCC really be trusted to lead a non-biased investigation?
In 2008 over a hundred lawyers who specialised in complaints against the police resigned from an advisory body for the IPCC, stating it failed to consider all evidence, often treated complainants poorly, and was too quick to rule out police wrong-doing. The IPCC failed to get justice for Ian Tomlinson or Jean Charles de Menezes, both killed by the police for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The body has even refused to release information about Mark Duggan’s death, meaning an inquest may not be possible for some time.

In this current case, the IPCC has not even requested CCTV footage from a nearby takeaway which had a video camera covering the exact spot where the fatal shooting occurred.
The state looks after its own, and despite nearly 400 deaths at the hands of the police or in police custody over the past decade, not one cop has been sentenced. Inquiries should not be hampered by ex-police officers who cover each others’ backs, but should be accountable to the communities affected.

Tories plan for a surveillance state

After the budget, the petrol chaos and the pasty tax, the Tories’ latest attack comes in the form of wide-ranging powers to snoop on our online communications.

 

A new proposal expected to be outlined in the Queen’s speech in May would allow the secret services to have ‘on demand’ access to online traffic in real time.

 

Officials say that the government want to bring social networking sites such as twitter and facebook into line with existing legislation which covers surveillance of phone calls – but Liberal Democrats and civil servants fear the the planned powers would be much more extensive.

 

The government claim it will only be used to solve ‘crime’ and not to carry out surveillance on the general population. However many security analysts have argued that the technology would allow access far beyond the current limits of user, time and location details.

 

Civil rights activists fear that the extensive powers would be abused by the security services and police.

 

No internet businesses were willing to mount a public criticism of the coalition’s controversial plans on Monday, but many privately raised fears over the power of authorities to see who is contacting whom online in real time.

 

It isn’t just the public that are stirring up an opposition to these new plans, but Senior Liberal Democrat MPs are also threatening to rebel against these plans.

 

They question whether the new legislation means the government’s interception agency, GCHQ, could access the content of communications without a warrant. It still remains unclear whether a warrant will be necessary.

 

The Lib Dems say the plans are a complete contradiction to their core beliefs and could put extreme pressure on the coalition as they will refuse to back down. Clegg defended the plans saying “[civil liberties] is something I acutally really care about” … unlike the NHS then?

 

Like all measures to boost the powers of police and secretive, unaccountable services, the proposals are given the ‘tough on crime’ gloss. But the increasing shift towards the militarisation of Britain’s domestic security should worry all of us.

 

Plans to securitize the internet come just months after the FBI launched a wave of international arrests to shut down websites breaching US copyright laws. The Stop Online Piracy Act which motivated these arrests was rejected by Congress after an innovative ‘blackout’ protest by internet giants like Google and Wikipedia.

 

They also come in the context of spiralling spending by the government on security for the London Olympics. The total cost, which has ballooned from the estimated £2.4 billion to over £12 billion, has been grossly inflated by the entry of the domestic and international security industries.

 

These companies specialise in arming government and private security services with the latest military-grade technology – fresh from the testing-grounds of Afghanistan and Colombia. With 10,000 private security guards, 13,500 soldiers and 500 FBI agents, the Olympics will be as much about demonstrating the power of the state’s security infrastructure as it is about the sports.

 

Once paid for, it’s hard to imagine these contracts will simply disappear after the events. In reality, the government is using taxpayers cash to fund a massive increase in the militarisation of the surveillance state, under the cover of the ‘permanent terrorist threat’ – provoked by the wars in the Middle East.

 

Measures to control the internet will shift the balance of power firmly in favour of the state and its security apparatus.

 

With the Tories prepared to mobilise the army to break strikes, the use of courts to hand down punitive sentences and the use of a violent, unaccountable police force, it’s becoming clearer than ever that we need to think seriously about taking steps to defend ourselves.

 

From students to trade unionists, those fighting the cuts have felt the weight of police and government repression. By means legal and illegal, the coalition is determined to bulldoze all opposition.

 

We cannot stand by and allow the millionaires in Parliament to make us pay for a security machine designed purely to keep them safe.

 

Resisting and reversing the entrenchment of the Big Brother state means mobilising against them, but also creating the democratic forms of organisation necessary to protect our campaigns, unions and communities from attack.

DR2P FINAL1

Twitter Censorship + ??? = PROFIT!

In a move calculated to appeal to investors, Twitter has announced it is now able to censor tweets by country of origin. Previously, if a tweet was deleted, it disappeared from worldwide search results. The new technology allows Twitter to selectively target content and remove it from search listings within a particular country.

Twitter said they had made the move in an attempt to accommodate countries with “different ideas about freedom of expression”. Quite.

Looking to expand its global business, Twitter is developing ways in which it can ensure that its information-sharing model doesn’t stand in the way of securing operating rights in countries whose governments exercise tight censorship laws.

Twitter is willing to accept limits on its operations, in return for access to an even wider user-base. Making a principled stand in defence of internet freedom is not part of this equation. Twitter CEO Dick Costolo explicitly made this point when he said that Wikipedia’s 24-hour blackout over the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) was “bad for business”.

The new tools, strongly criticised by Twitter users and Reporters without Borders as ‘opening the floodgates’ to internet censorship, has been justified as a ‘clarification’ of Twitter’s response to legal requirements.

Twitter feels that its brand image was soiled during the Arab Spring, when the media routinely reported the role that Twitter played in helping to organise protests. Rather than protest against repressive regimes, they chose to accept censorship rules.

For all the talk of how revolutionary social media can be, it is gradually integrating itself into the business model of ‘old’ media – compromising with the established power structures if its profit margins are threatened.


Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

FBI Bursts Kim Dotcom’s Bubble

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Ideas, culture and Media under Capitalism

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Stop SOPA: The internet strikes back

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Web Design Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube