Can the Syrian revolution win?

The revolutionary wave that toppled dictators in Tunisia,Egypt and Libya is continued by those fighting to overthrow Bashar Al-Assad inSyria. Like Gadaffi in Libya, Assad tried to prevent uprisings by bribing different parts of the population and playing Syria’s many religious and ethnic minorities against each other.

We know that the Kurds, who make up around 10% of the population, were bribed with Syrian citizenship – but this citizenship forced them to identify as Syrians, denying their true Kurdish heritage. The Kurds are a powerful force in parts of Syria, with many links to Kurdish communities in Iraq and Turkey which are fighting for an independent homeland.

By granting some autonomy and privileges to them, Assad hopes that they will side with him against the revolutionaries. Kurds, Assyrians and Azeris have long been the target of Assad’s Alawite gangs, but now he has made his main target Syria’s Sunni Muslims.

According to the UN, Syria’s death toll has exceeded 7,500 since the rising started in 2011. The true figure is probably several times higher, with thousands ‘disappeared’ into the regime’s torture camps, and tens of thousands forced to flee their homes.

Kofi Annan’s “master plan” to make UN members and Syria commit to peaceful negotiations failed because China and Russia are locked into astruggle for influence in the region with the big western powers.

Assad and his family are the loyal servants of Russian and Chinese imperialism… just as Mubarak and Gadaffi were the puppets of US, French and British oil interests in north Africa.

The Assad family have rule Syria with an iron fist fordecades – surviving by acting loyally on behalf of one or other of the great powers.

Previously in power was Bashar’s father, Hafez Al-Assad. Hafez was recognised as a man of genocide, killing thousands in places such asHoms which is also being targeted today. It’s true when they say, like father like son, huh?

On May 25 this year a total of 108 people were butchered in the Houla Massacre; the toll included 34 women, and 49 children. Militas known as Shabiha (translated to thugs in Arabic) were responsible and obviously, this incident only strengthened peoples’anger and determination to rid their country of Asad and all his supporters.

You may think, why is the West not intervening with Syria?Why can NATO murder a dictator but not even take a glance at Syria? It is such a shame that the world we live in revolves around money and oil – David Cameron continues to “mourn” for Syria, but would rather lay back and watch the Arab Spring boil right under his feet.

Syria shows that ‘humanitarian intervention’ by the imperialists is never about humanity. Indeed, in Libya British warplanes didnot drop humanitarian aid, but instead delivered death from a mile high at thespeed of sound, dropping thousands of tons of high explosive on Libyan homes.

The Western imperialists would certainly like to have areliable puppet government in Syria, like they do in many other countries – butthey don’t want a military confrontation with China and Russia.

The most important thing is that Syrian revolutionaries and their supporters win the revolution. This can be done by demanding weapons without strings attached from those who claim to support them, and building real links with the Kurds and other oppressed minorities, for example bysupporting and fighting to make the Kurdish demand for an independent homeland a reality.

This will only happen if the workers and youth overthrow Assad themselves – the interference of NATO and Russian imperialists has only brought decades of bloodshed and tragedy to the peoples of the Middle East.

Zionism in the water?

With echoes of the South African Anti-Apartheid movement, activists in Palestine – from Students’ Unions to LGBTQ organisations – have asked international supporters to join a growing boycott of companies and institutions that profit from the zionist occupation.

The National Union of Students is boycotting two key companies operating on UK campuses that are directly implicated in sustaining the occupation.

The first is a water company called Eden Springs, also operating under the name “Mayanot Eden.” It is based in and sources water from an illegal Israeli settlement in the Golan Heights called Katzrin.

Eden Springs UK is a parent company of this and it provides water coolers on many campuses.

The NUS are encouraging students to lobby their universities to cancel contracts with this company to pressure it into withdrawing from all its operations in occupied territory.

A second priority is Veolia, a French company dealing in waste management and recycling. They have taken over many privatised local services across Britain which including councils, universities and colleges waste management.

This company has a major investment in the Jerusalem Light Rail. This tram network, when completed will link dozens of illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank to Israel.

In April 2010, the United Nations Human Rights Council specifically declared the Jerusalem Light Railway to be “in clear breach of international law”.

Veolia also provide bus services for the settlements, yet most Palestinians can only use the buses for two stops – after which they are booted off. Alongside Israeli-only roads and a web of military checkpoints, Palestinians are subjected to the most brutal, militarised and blatant apartheid regime in the world.

Eden Springs operates on land taken by Israel in the 1967 war, evicting over 100,000 of its Palestinian inhabitants in the process. Since then, Israel has refused to allow inhabitants to return to their villages, houses and schools. They have moved Israeli settlers into the region instead and mean to stay.

The settlements are internationally recognised as illegal yet western imperialist countries are not going to condemn a state which policies the region for them. Nothing is free, and the $billions of annual US military aid to Israel is ensured only as long as Israel uses its military in the interests of imperialism.

Likewise the imperialists are silent on the right of refugees to return. It seems they are willing to take action, if belatedly, when ethnic cleansing arrives on their doorstep, as it did in the former Yugoslavia, but operate an ‘out of sight, out of mind policy’ in the Middle East. Except when they needed to invade Iraq (again).

The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign targets a whole range of companies which profit from the occupation of the Palestinians’ land. The settlements are motivated as much by their exclusive access to valuable resources as they are by theological concerns. As such the BDS campaign is an important weapon which allows us to focus resistance against the economic motivation for settlement expansion.

Ultimately, the fate of the Arab revolutions will be of far greater significance to the conflict in Palestine, than any boycott campaign.

A boycott against South Africa worked in the end, but millions of those on whose behalf it was waged remain imprisoned in the unemployment and poverty ridden shanty towns.

A struggle for lasting liberation in the Middle East must be one that is carried out by the young people and workers of those countries themselves, supported by the action of an international solidarity movement. Victory means a struggle for the power of the working class over society, to create a union of secular, socialist states for workers of all faiths and none.

Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Balfour Beatty reaps rewards of occupation

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Can the UN liberate Palestine?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Will the Arab Spring reach Palestine

.………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

 

Libya’s Revolution: our perspective

By Jafe Arnoldski, www.revousa.org

The Libyan struggle began as a real peoples’ struggle, a revolution waged by the masses of Libya encompassing a variety of political tendencies and classes aimed at bringing down the tyrannical Gaddafi regime that has oppressed them for half a century. Emboldened and inspired by the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt, workers and youth rose up in peaceful protests against Gaddafi’s government. But the brutal violence of the regime compelled the masses to go as far as to commit to civil war, as a peaceful road to freedom didn’t exist and no bloodless shake-up of power would prove possible. The Libyans would not have the luxury of protesting their way to freedom, and thus Libyans declared no amnesty, no grace, and no mercy in the fight against the dictatorship, allowing Gaddafi no way to worm himself out of the conflict.

In reaction, watching the Arab Spring unfold and topple one after another of their strategic allies, the imperialist powers of the West knew they could not afford the loss of any more influence and control over the region and, therefore, pledged their support to the popular rebellion. The imperialists could not be on the losing side again, and as the civil war dragged on, NATO became increasingly involved in the fight against Gaddafi, abandoning its former seemingly “neutral”, humanitarian-aid position. Seeing the potential exposure of their hypocrisy in the event that Gaddafi crushed the resistance and then turned around and denounced them for their hypocrisy, NATO decided to throw in their support entirely with the rebels and hoped that it could pull those rebel leaders already favorable to imperialism ever closer. The imperialists hoped they could capitalize on heterogeneity existing within the rebel cause so as to protect their fragile position and secure their interests after the fighting was done.

Shocked at the turn of events in which the imperialists began supporting the revolutionary uprising by intervening with their own bombing missions, revolutionaries in the West mistakenly jumped to conclusions: halt the civil war; form a united front against imperialism. Some socialists, more or less, proposed an alliance with Gaddafi in order to drive out imperialist intervention, disregarding the position of the rebels in the revolutionary situation and, thus, writing their death sentence. These forces failed to recognize that Gaddafi had no intention of uniting against imperialism or doing anything but crushing and eliminating all opposition.

Unity between distinct entities in common struggle is a tactic, and as a tactic, it was impossible in this instance. The rebels had to continue their struggle even with the intervention of imperialism, while it was 100% correct to demand the withdrawal of all NATO forces from the country, as these were and are enemies of the revolution, masquerading cynically as “friends” and “allies” of the Libyan masses.

Now the tentative victory of the rebels in the civil war has raised key questions that face communists about the future of the conflict. The first centers around the National Transition Council (NTC) itself. Like any entity that serves to protect the capitalist state and property, it is a bourgeois government. Revolutionary-socialists within the resistance must argue for “uninterrupted” revolution. That is, for the mass overthrow of the reactionary NTC, the left-over state bureaucracy, Gadaffi’s police and “secret services,” and their replacement with workers and farmers’ councils backed up by an armed workers and popular militia: for a workers and peasants’ government in Libya.

The second question centers around the presence and role of NATO in the affairs of the country. Revolutionary socialists must be clear that they have nothing but hostility for NATO and any of its attempts at establishing a military or political foothold in the country. Plain and simple: NATO out!

Whether the workers and youth of Libya can defeat the traitorous NTC that desires to push the country even farther into the orbit of imperialism depends on the organizational methods they enact in the coming months. To achieve successfully the objective of permanent revolution (i.e., a workers’ revolution) they must form up a new revolutionary workers’ party to lead the struggle for power, to transform the present struggle for democracy into a struggle for socialism. The militias and the popular committees in existence provide the preconditions, the foundation whereby such a strategy can become concertized.

The workers and youth of Libya can and must form up a revolutionary party, overthrow the NTC government, establish their own class power, and seek to spread social revolution across the region and, indeed, the world – this is the uncompromisable, irrepressible demand of REVOLUTION.

Read more:

5 reasons we oppose NATO intervention in Libya

Who runs Egypt, the people or the army?

Middle East uprisings continue

Tunisia: another prime minister bites the dust

The protesters in Tunisia have been an inspiration to the rest of the Middle East and to the world. Their actions have catalysed a revolutionary movement that is now on the verge of toppling its third dictatorship and is threatening the interests of American and European imperialism.

[Read more...]

Tunisian Revolution Detonates Arab Struggles

The Tunisian revolution was the product of decades of poverty, unemployment and political repression, worsened by IMF-inspired privatization processes, austerity measures and the reduction of subsidies on fuel and staple foods.

The country, which was ruled by President Zine el Abidine Ben Ali, was pointed to as an example of the good work the IMF did, despite its brutal oppression of political opponents, rampant corruption and staggering youth unemployment, which has remained around 40% since Ben Ali came to power in 1987.

Since the beginning of the economic crisis Tunisia has seen a huge fightback against Ben Ali, the ruling RCD (Rassamblement Constitutionelle Democratique) and the crushing poverty that millions have endured for so long. Massive demonstrations which clashed with the police took place in 2008 in Gafsa, Shkira and Ben Gourdans, with dozens killed by savage police brutality. In the build-up to the recent uprising Tunisia was in dire straits; 52% of 18-19 year olds were unemployed, 200,000 unemployed graduates and a shift in government subsidies fanned the flames of anger felt by the population.

The movement was kick started on December 17th by the death of Mohamed Bouazizi, a 26 year old graduate from Sidi Bouzid who was trading illegally to support his family of 8, for which he was the only provider. Bouazizi had his goods confiscated by a policewoman who slapped him and spat at him when he attempted to pay his fine of 10 dinar (roughly $7USD or a day’s wages). In response he went to the municipal office to make a complaint and was ignored by the staff there. He returned an hour later and set himself alight.

This act of desperation inspired protests across Sidi Bouzid, as well as similarly tragic suicides, including Lahsi Najeen, who electrocuted himself on an electricity pylon. By the December 27th protests had spread throughout the country and two days later Ben Ali reshuffled his cabinet in an attempt to pacify the demonstrators. It didn’t work. On January 3rd protesters in Thala were assaulted by the police and responded by attacking the RCD office in the city. By January 11th lawyers and teachers were on strike and the military had been deployed in Tunis.

After weeks of revolt and the threat of a general strike Ben Ali was forced to flee the country,  taking $60million USD worth of gold with him to Saudi Arabia. The same day Mohammed Ghannouchi, the prime minister under Ben Ali, declared himself to be leader of the government and appointed Fouad Mebazaa, a member of the RCD central committee and President of the Chamber of Deputies, as interim President. He has 45-60 days to hold elections.

Ghannouchi quickly put together a coalition cabinet with RCD ministers and opposition figures, including 3 members of the UGTT (Union Generale Tunisienne de Travail). These were quickly forced to withdraw due to immense pressure from rank-and-file activists. Anti-RCD rallies continued across Tunisia, which led to the dismissal of all RCD members from the cabinet on January 27th, excluding Ghannouchi who resigned from the RCD. This was followed by anti-Ghannouchi protests outside his office the next day.

On February 7th the Defence Ministry called up recently retired soldiers for service, the same day that the RCD was banned. This does not mean that the RCD is finished.  It will reform to contest elections and has former members in the highest positions of power; the President, Prime Minister and within the Army. The RCD is still exerting power through the police and military presence, alongside the curfews which they put in place. These give the Army a dominant position across the country and are being used in an attempt to demobilize protesters.

All of this raises one simple question – who will take control? The most widely recognized opposition parties are the Parti Democrate Progressiste (PDP – Progressive Democratic party) and the Congres Pour la Republique (CPR – Congress for the Republic). Both are happy to work within the hand-picked Ghannouchi cabinet, have done little to mobilize demonstrators during the uprising and are certainly not interested in taking power away from the IMF or the French and American multi-nationals that control the economy.

There is also a workers’ party, the Parti Communiste Ouvrier Tunisien (PCOT – Worker Communist Party of Tunisia), but unfortunately it has similar flaws; it adheres to a stagist, Stalinist approach to the revolution, arguing that a period of parliamentary democracy must come about before socialism is possible. However, this leaves power in the hands of the bosses during this period, meaning that workers will continue to be exploited in the workplace beaten by the police and suppressed by the bourgeois state whilst the government of Tunisia bends a knee to the IMF and the imperialist interests it represents.

REVOLUTION advocates a policy of Permanent Revolution in Tunisia. We recognise that the democratic gains of the Tunisian revolution can only be defended and extended if the working-class takes power. The Tunisian workers must not accept a return to a weak parliamentary democracy which is controlled by capitalist parties and leaves the state bureaucracy unchanged.

Only the establishment of a workers’ state, based on the popular committees of workers, unemployed and poor farmers which have built the revolution, will ensure its gains are maintained and not rolled back by the Tunisian ruling-class and their imperialist backers. The popular committees must convene a constituent assembly, with delegates elected directly from the popular committees to draft a new constitution and form a new government. This government must immediately task itself with addressing the burning needs of the masses – providing work, housing and services to the working-class, unemployed and youth.

This can only be accomplished by seizing the wealth and land of the capitalists, and beginning the construction of socialism. Solidarity should be given to all the other peoples of North Africa and the Middle East who have risen up against tyranny.

The Tunisian revolution is spreading. We have seen it inspire the fall of Hosni Mubarak in Egypt and huge demonstrations and strikes in Algeria, Yemen, Jordan, Syria and Bahrain. Libya is only the latest country to rise up against oppression, with large areas of the country liberated from the control of dictator Muammar Gadaffi.

These truly historic protests show the strength of workers and young people; we need to follow suit and make a revolution in Britain!

Leeds demonstrates in support of Libyan uprising

Today around 80 people of all ages held lively demonstrations outside Leeds Met and Leeds Uni in support of the Libyan uprising.

Called at short notice by the Libyan community in Leeds, protestors chanted “Hey, Ho, Gaddafi has got to go!” and “Free Free Tripoli” outside Leeds City Council and the Parkinson steps.

Inspired by the wave of revolutions across the Middle East which have toppled dictators in Tunisia and Egypt, a mass movement has emerged in Libya aiming to overthrow the brutal regime of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.

Demonstrations across the country have been brutally repressed, with the regime calling in airstrikes on working-class districts where the the resistance is concentrated.

After storming the barracks, protestors have seized control of Benghazi, a major town in Libya, with several other towns under the control of anti-government forces.

The Libyan people have displayed enormous courage and determination in the face of a government crackdown which has seen hundreds killed. Armed and financed by the US and UK, Gaddafi’s regime has tortured and oppressed the Libyan people for decades.

The people of Libya need our support in their struggle to free themselves from a corrupt and oppressive dictatorship.

Today a handful of students made it to the protests, tomorrow we need every student to come and stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the Libyan people and say that we won’t let David Cameron and his merchants of death continue to finance and arm the Middle East’s dictatorships.

DEMONSTRATION IN SOLIDARITY WITH LIBYAN UPRISING

26TH FEB 1PM LEEDS CITY SQUARE

ONE WORLD – ONE STRUGGLE

LSE students occupy against university’s relationship with Libya regime

Statement from the occupiers

At 7PM on February 22nd, Students at the LSE began an occupation of the Senior Common Room in the Old Building (Houghton St.) against the LSE’s regarding their association with the Libyan regime. In light of recent events the LSE administration announced that they would no longer be accepting the money from the Gaddafi family. They have already accepted £300,000 and were scheduled to receive and additional £1.2.

[Read more...]

REVOLUTION supporters report live from Tahrir Square, Egypt

Simon Hardy and Joana Ramiro are reporting live from events in Cairo. To see their reports click here

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Wordpress Development Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube