Teachers’ Union to strike against Tory attacks

NUT teachers voting unanimously for strike action

NUT teachers voting unanimously for strike action

Teachers in the National Union of Teachers (NUT) will strike on March 13th. This is to strike back against endless attacks by education secretary Michael Gove.

The Tories want to abolish automatic pay progression and replace it with performance-related pay. This isn’t about giving teachers’ incentives to work harder. It’s about getting rid of national pay bargaining – where rates won by unions apply to all equivalent staff.

This latest attack comes shortly after teachers’ were defeated in their struggle to defend pensions. The union leaders’ inability to wage a sustained, effective campaign means teachers have lost on average 16% of their pay through freezes and higher pension contributions.

The divisions and lack of strategy has given Michael Gove the confidence to press ahead with his plans to transform education – destroying the comprehensive system and replacing it with privately-run for-profit schools.

The Tories don’t want to reform education in order to improve everyone’s chances. They want to take it over, let the market run it, and use it to suit the needs of millionaire bosses and politicians.

This means we need a credible strategy for fighting back. An NUT strike on March 13th could be joined by civil servants in the PCS and university and college lecturers in the UCU. This will also be the day for second European Day of Action – like the one on November 14 which saw millions of workers striking against austerity across Europe.

The last few years have shown that young people, too, will need to take our place in the front lines of this struggle. From the students in parliament square defending access to education, to the youth on the streets of August 2011 rising up against routine police violence, we have been the most willing to join together to take on the Tories.

School students should support their teachers on strike and organise to raise their own demands alongside them. Action committees in schools can unite students and teachers in planning joint action and be stronger by struggling together.

College, jobs and EMA – not resits!

Welcome to the sausage factory…

60,000 students have missed out on a place at college after the government was caught rigging GCSE results to look ‘tough’ on Education.

Every year there is heartbreak and celebration on GCSE results day, but this year the future of thousands has been thrown into doubt by the government’s decision to move grade boundaries in the middle of the year.

Across the country we have seen abnormal results in the core subjects of English and science. One AQA combined English language and literature exam saw 70% of people achieve less than a C grade – basically a fail as far as the government or an employer is concerned.

However, the most shocking detail is that the biggest jump in grade boundary shift came between D and C grades, with one foundation
English exam requiring 10 marks more to achieve a C than in January.

Theories are out there as to why this is the case. Some blame the exam boards introducing new exams with stricter marking policies. This might be true – but why change the boundaries in the middle of an academic year? At a stroke the government has needlessly thrown tens of thousands more youth onto the dole.

Also worrying is the trend for more pupils to be entered into Foundation level exams, where the highest score they can get is a C. We think the emphasis should be on methods which raise the general level, rather than results-tables, which only serve to create a market in education.

Through tinkering with results, abolishing EMA and turning schools into private academies, the government has robbed thousands of young people of the education they deserve.

The NUT (teachers union) is calling for industrial action which is good but not enough. Students need to get organised and fast, our own union the NUS won’t stand up for us but school students have taken militant action before – if these occupation, boycotts and walkouts are big enough, they can win.

But what should we fight for? Our campaign needs to go beyond the safe, government and school imposed limits. Teachers are speaking up to save their careers, ministers are lying to save their careers, now young people need to fight for ourselves. We should fight for victories which can bring real concrete benefits for school and college students.

 

We stand for:

- All students to be re-graded according to the original boundaries

- An investigation run by teachers and students into the links between exam boards and government

- Sack Gove the Education Minister and Gibb the schools minister

- The creation of student assemblies independent of school management

- Bring back EMA, give a living grant to all students, funded by taxing the rich who can afford it.

- End minimum wage discrimination, invest in training and jobs for young people

Why school students should get organised

Teaching unions NUT and NASUWT, which organise 85% of teachers in England and Wales have announced plans to mount a joint campaign against attacks on education.

The new campaign will see members balloted for strike action and action short of a strike in the autumn term.

Sustained attacks on working conditions, pensions, pay, conditions of service and the threat to jobs are now so severe that the NASUWT and the NUT believe joint, coordinated and sustained action may become necessary:

“Should the Government refuse to take the current opportunity to negotiate sensible arrangements which protect teachers and defend education, then it is our intention to move to escalate industrial action, including jointly coordinated strike action and action short of strike action in the autumn,” a joint statement said.

By this Autumn teachers will be in the second year of pay freezes and six months into their increased pension contributions. This means real terms cuts of £5,500 for senior staff and £3,500 for those on lower grades.

The two unions are calling on Gove to reach agreements with them on the vital issues before the beginning of the next academic year.

Yet the union leaders’ preferred tactic of negotiation has failed. NUT leaders ignored conference decision to hold regional strikes this term as part of a build-up to a national strike in June.

Attacks on pensions have already been imposed, meaning teachers are taking home less pay – while the government pockets the difference to fund new bailouts for bankers.

Michael Gove recently revealed plans to turn education over the bosses – letting them make a profit out of schools and their students.

Where’s the logic?

The attacks on our education don’t come from a desire to improve schools or the employment prospects for youth. If that were true the Tories wouldn’t have cut money for rebuilding programmes, scrapped EMA or left more than a million youth with no jobs, training or education.

The government has just announced another £100 billion bailout for banks. The same banks who got £1 trillion of our money in 2008/9, whose wealth has increased because millions of us got sacked or had our pay frozen.

This money has to come from somewhere. For the millionaire Tory ministers, the cowardly Lib-Dems and their big business backers, it has to be raised by cutting spending on schools, hospitals and jobs. In other words, the working-class will pay, not the bosses.

Education provides huge benefits for individuals and so for society too. Undermining it might seem perverse. But that’s the perverse logic of capitalism. The government serves the powerful, and the powerful are the billionaire capitalists, whose interests are always totally counterposed to ours.

Resistance is necessary

The determination of the bosses to make ordinary people pay for their crisis, means the unions’ timed strategy of limited action is woefully inadequate.

The news of united action by the NUT and NASUWT is good news. But youth need to take the defence of education into our own hands. We can’t rely on trade union leaders, who don’t represent or speak for us.

Action by teachers gives students the chance to join them, and organise ourselves to defend our interests by working alongside the unions and wider working class.

School students should form strike committees to organise picket line support, and form their own demands which lead towards an education worth defending.

School students are the lowest paid, suffer the most police harassment and are the biggest slice of the unemployed in our society. Any struggle to defend education must include the students themselves – it’s in our interests to put ourselves at the heart of the resistance.

  •  Education not for sale! – Kick out the bosses, nationalise the academies
     

  • We won’t pay for their crisis! – Bring back EMA, living grants for all students
     

  • Make the bosses pay! – tax the rich to fund jobs and a living wage for all


When homework = profit… we say hands off our education!

Education Minister Michael Gove has let slip what we knew all along – he wants schools to become institutions run for profit, where profitability takes priority over education. 

In his appearance at the Leveson Inquiry into phone-hacking by Murdoch’s media empire, he revealed that the Tories’ pet ‘free schools’ “could” become profit-making businesses “when we come to that bridge”. A bridge he hopes to construct as soon as possible – in the Tories’ second term.

The New Statesman calls this a “policy shift”. We call it a liar caught out by his own over-inflated sense of self-importance.

Last year he said:

Nick (Clegg) and I are completely in agreement on this (banning for-profit free schools). It’s not an issue.

The Conservative election manifesto said that we don’t need to have profit at the moment, the Liberal Democrat manifesto said that we don’t need profit at the moment and we don’t.

While Clegg cemented his reputation as a liar of the highest calibre by claiming:

To anyone worried that, by expanding the mix of providers in our education system, we are inching towards inserting the profit motive into our school system, again, let me reassure you. Yes to greater diversity; yes to more choice for parents. But no to running schools for profit, not in our state-funded education sector.

The revelation of the Tories’ plans to put our education under the control of the profit-hungry bosses and banks who caused the economic crisis should come as no surprise. It comes as the Tories seek to distance themselves from the Liberal Democrats – trying to make themselves more attractive to their big-business backers who are demanding a harder line on austerity and privatisation.

The ongoing privatisation of universities was merely the first step in their offensive against the remaining elements of the Welfare State.

With these plans  out in the open, resistance to the current attacks on teachers’ pensions, working conditions and national pay agreements becomes ever-more urgent.

The Tories are hoping to win a decisive confrontation against the teachers’ unions over the issue of pensions. If they succeed, this will dramatically weaken the power and militancy of the unions, making them incapable of resisting the introduction of the profit-motive into our schools.

Academies and ‘free’ schools are not required to sign up to the nationally-agreed pay, pension and working conditions implemented by the Labour government. Many are now employing teachers on lower salaries, with longer hours and fewer support services.

If big business are so interested in running our education for their profit, let them pay their taxes so we can decide how money is spent in our society.

If the Tory plans are succesful, the idea of comprehensive, free education for all will disappear from Britain. In it’s place will be a patchwork system of private schools competing for the brightest and wealthiest students. This will result in a two-tier education system, where schools in working class and immigrant areas are starved of funds, staff and resources.

In this context, it’s good news that the NUT and NASUWT unions – which represent 85% of Britain’s teachers – have announced plans to stage joint strike action this autum.

As the recent victory at Central Foundation Girls’ School in London showed, united cross-union action is the most effective way to beat the attacks.

We support the planned strike action and will organise a solidarity campaign amongst school students. Students should form strike committees in their schools to democratically organise action alongside their teachers – from picket line support to boycotts and demonstrations.

The unions are striking over jobs, pay, workload and pensions – but students can strike in defence of the right to free, high-quality education that leads us to real jobs, paid a living wage. 

If the government doesn’t back down over these plans, we must organise young people to build a movement which demands the support of the trade unions and Labour Party in defeating the idea of for-profit education for good.

  • Education is not for sale!

  • Kick the profiteers out of our schools!

  • Nationalise the academies and free schools!

  • Bring back EMA – a living grant for all students!

 

Unity means victory at London school strike

A school in London’s East End have forced school management to back down on their plans to cut pay and job losses by staging determined, united strike action across two unions.

Staff at Central Foundation Girls’ School in Bow took their first day of action on Wednesday 25th April which was called by the NUT and supported by Unison after talks of pay and conditions fell through.

The school staff is being threatened with redundancies and changing support staff from all year contracts to term-time only ones which means a cut in pay and the support they give. There’s also a concern about teachers’ non-classroom time being cut meaning less time to mark work, see parents or give one-to-one tuition.

This days strike won a satisfying settlement over the compulsory redundancies and pay cuts which were threatened.

The staff and teachers struck for a second time on Friday 11th May over class-room time being cut which was still outstanding.

Following the second day of action the management said that teacher’s workload will be reviewed with all new proposals going to the union before being implemented. Teaching staff will have to increase their teaching load but by half of what the management initially wanted and this will also be reviewed next year.

By all the staff uniting and striking together they managed to achieve a victory and prove to the management that they do have the power to stop these changes going through. They now must maintain this strength to ensure the reviews do happen and the changes don’t go through un-noticed.

Staff will maintain the strike committee as a joint-union committee meeting once every half term. This will oversee the proposed changes to working structures and develop closer links between ordinary union members in Unison and NUT.

Playing unions off against each other is a favourite tactic of headteachers up and down the country. Whether they are trying to push through academisation or undermine hard-fought working conditions, this action shows union members that unity is the key to victory.

Students can also play our part in supporting struggles by our teachers. By organising boycotts, petitions and leafletting we can add dramatically to the pressure on school management. School bosses can always negotiate with trade union leaders, but the last thing they want is active, political students prepared to challenge their lying propaganda.

If there’s a strike at your school, get in touch and see the resources section for advice on organising within schools and colleges.

Cuts to blame for teachers taking unpaid work

Working for free is a increasingly becoming a ‘right of passage’ for young people. This practice, originally limited to industries like Art, Media and Law, is now making an appearance in the Further Education sector.

Unlike school teachers, who are all required to have a PGCE qualifiaction, FE has three different routes into teaching. Two of these routes can only be undertaken by those already in a teaching role.

Trainee lecturers must have 150 hours of teaching in order to receive their qualification; however there aren’t enough jobs to go around. To get around this, students do voluntary teaching, while paying for their course which can range from £500 – £3000.

It is easy to see why this might be attractive to the students, they can’t get paid work, but they are working towards a qualification. However as there is a shortage of jobs, it’s likely a lot of won’t be able to find employment once qualified.

During this time trainee teachers should be assisting with teaching, improving their skills and taking on bigger tasks as they become more qualified. They must also be allocated a mentor to help them through their training and be their point of contact within the college. However many are teaching students alone and colleges are using it as an excuse for a free teacher. They’re not getting the proper training they need to gain the skills necessary to qualify.

It could also have legal repercussions, it is likely they are not covered by employers’ insurance and some may not have been CRB checked and therefore shouldn’t be left alone in a classroom with students.

The UCU general secretary, Sally Hunt, says the union will now be raising the issue with ministers and employers. “Trainee teachers must be properly supported and mentored at work for the sake of their development and students’ education,” she says. “They must not under any circumstances be used as free labour or to take paid work away from existing staff. There is a very strong case for a national code of practice for all colleges to ensure trainee teachers are not exploited.”

We say trainee teachers should be paid a living wage and must be provided with the support needed to enable them to achieve their qualification. We are opposed to colleges using them to save on employing qualified teachers – after all there are plenty out there looking for a job.

Equally, we recognise that many colleges are struggling under the impact of devastating cuts to education budgets. We demand the government provide a massive investment in all levels of education, to provide trained teachers and suitable equipment, buildings and resources. Most employers using unpaid workers are taking the piss, but colleges often have to choose between cutting courses for students or using trainees to fill in the gaps left by central government cuts.

The rise of ‘free work’ to get ‘experience’ is one of the most dishonest developments to hit young people during the economic crisis. With millions unemployed and the UK back in recession, bosses are reinforcing a vicious circle – luring young people into free work, but the future job usually turns out to be a mirage.

We demand that all workers are paid a living wage, or the trade union agreed rate for their workplace  - no pay, no way!

NUT strike shows potential for united resistance

After a strong regional strike, around 8000 demonstrators marched through central London today demanding an end to the government’s attacks on public-sector pensions. Though the march and rally were called to support striking workers, it became a site for a number of different groups to express their anger with the government and the austerity agenda.

When I first arrived at the demo start-point, I looked up and could only see in tones of pink and blue. The UCU had doled out thousands of bright pink helium balloons, and the NUT had produced thousands of little blue flags. The NUT also brought along a massive inflatable pound-sign which was being crushed in a vice (credit crunch- dyageddit?), adorned with the demand for ‘decent pensions for all.’ The overall effect was pretty cool, as flags rippled and balloons bobbed about in the (ridiculously) sunny sky. It was also good to see a number of Unison and PCS flags out on the demo, showing solidarity and support between different trade unionists, even if their leaders had held them back from striking on the day. Likewise, there were a number of banners from NUT and UCU branches beyond London, as well as a banner from Unite construction members in London.

There was a truck with a soundsystem heading the demo which served as a portable stage for speakers from the various trade union leaderships (sadly we have not learnt the lesson of our German comrades that these trucks can also be used to play music, lead chants, and make for a more engaging experience). I could barely hear them over the noise of the crowd, as people discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the movement, and where they should go next. Needless to say I was more interested in their conversations than the speeches of the bureaucracy (although it was good to hear Owen Jones talk about how the Tories are trying to play private and public sector workers against each other, in a classic game of divide-and-rule).

One lecturer told me that they felt annoyed that it was only a London-wide strike, and that their union leadership should be playing a more active role to ensure that everyone came out on the same day. This thought was echoed by Katherine and Ella, two teachers from southeast London, who felt that there would be more media attention if everyone struck together.

Likewise, Kester and Issy, two students from Queen Mary’s, told me that they’d hoped to be seeing the PCS coming out on the day, and that we ultimately need “as many strikes as possible” to beat the government. They also felt that the trade unions would only attract more members and gain strength through strong action and a willingness to tackle the Tories head-on. They also complained that the NUS leadership had done nothing to make the March 14th demo as attractive or visible as this one, and went on to say that they were let down by the lack of organisation on behalf of the NUS, but encouraged by grassroots student groups such as NCAFC and EAN.

The mood of the demo was determined, and a good range of people from different backgrounds, trade unions and social groups turned out to show their anger with the Tory cutters. Amy, a teacher from Hammersmith, told me that “it’s not over,” and that “more action is on the way” to stop the pension cuts. Sadly, her union leaders might disagree with her. Despite the militancy, the desire for coordinated strikes, the demands for more demonstrations, and the willingness of many ordinary people to struggle, the heads of the unions have been determined to halt action, or have backed down from calling it for fear of ‘going alone’.

 

Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Pension sellout: don’t get demoralised – get organised!

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Why did PCS leaders pull the plug on M28?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Tory budget, stealing from the poor to fund the rich

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Pension sellout: don’t get demoralised – get organised!

Statement by REVOLUTION National Council – 28 MARCH 2012

Trade Union leaders have sold out the campaign against pension cuts right, left, and centre. Despite some of the biggest strikes in British history, with over 750,000 people on strike last June and nearly 2 million last November, backed by huge levels of public support, it seems that none of the union leaders have the stomach to stay in it to win it.

First the most right-wing trade union leaders pulled their members out of the struggle- Unison leader Dave Prentis and GMB’s Paul Kenny were quick to accept the government’s pension offer in December which made some minor reforms to the rotten deal. The leaders of Unite were next to duck the struggle.

With the big three unions all out of the picture for the time being, the leaders of the NUT, PCS, and UCU dithered over their next steps, before eventually deciding to do very little. Initial plans for a joint strike on March 28th were cancelled after the NUT decided to only strike in London (despite 73% of its members supporting national action). The UCU agreed to do the same, and the PCS said that it wouldn’t strike unless other unions were willing to do so nationally.

Unless the NUT agrees to some significant action at its upcoming conference (April 6th – April 10th) then it seems unlikely that the more left-wing union leaders will challenge the right-wingers by going ahead with strikes or calling on grassroots Unison, Unite and GMB members to join them.

The two big socialist groups in Britain- the Socialist Party and Socialist Workers Party- have also failed to offer us any alternative. While SWP members have certainly voted in favour strikes every time the issue has been raised (unlike the SP leadership of PCS which ignored its members’ 70%+ vote in favour of action), they seem to be content merely cheerleading the left-wing leaders’ (like Mark Serwotka of the PCS) strategy of occasional one-day strikes.

This is a huge setback for young people, as well as current public-sector workers. With the retirement age raised, huge numbers of jobs being slashed, and more experienced workers joining millions of others in the search for work, our chances of getting a decent job are getting slimmer by the day. What’s more if we do manage to get a job in the public-sector, our pensions will be a pittance, our unions will be weakened, and our pay and conditions will be far worse.

The trade unions have a duty to organise and fight, not only to their own members, but to young people and the unemployed who can’t take strike action to defend the public-sector and their futures. The trade union leaders who back down in the face of government threats, right-wing leaders’ sell-outs, or a fear of striking alone, are letting us down.

But all is not lost and the battle against cuts is far from over. Recent campaigns have shown how workers and the unemployed can organise without having to wait for their bureaucratic union leaderships to give them the go-ahead. The electricians’ victorious fight against 35% pay cuts often seemed more like a social movement than a trade union campaign. There were blockades and occupations of building sites, building industry award ceremonies stormed, and a constant series of protests and pickets of workplaces, even by people who didn’t work there.

A number of trade union national conferences are coming up soon. Young people need to get down to them and cause a stir- we need to make it clear to ordinary trade unionists that the leaders’ strategy isn’t working for them or us. We also need to convince the union members of the desperate need to organise young people and the unemployed; to prevent them from being used to undermine wages and strike action – like during the last Royal Mail strikes, where students were recruited to break picket lines. Most importantly, joining unions gives us a voice and a fighting chance to challenge the leaders’ sellouts.

The NUT conference at the start of April in Torquay will be crucial. If national strikes aren’t supported by those present then it seems unlikely that the other union leaders will take the initiative to strike alone. NUT members need to emphasise the importance of taking the lead in the fight to save not just their own pensions, but the futures of the students they see graduating into a nosediving labour market.

In the meantime we should not just wait for the unions to take the lead. The occupation of Millbank and the student movement of 2010 helped invigorate trade unionists, non-organised workers and the unemployed last year. We have the power to take inspiring action, and this time we have to make the demand ‘students and workers unite and fight’ a practical reality.

As young people with the least to lose and the most to gain, we have to be prepared to take our place at the head of the struggles, taking direct action to the heart of the capitalist system. We cannot change society on our own, but we can show that we are determined to fight for our futures – with or without the fat-cat union bosses. 

Why have PCS leaders pulled the plug on M28?

Cold feet, Mark?

March 28th has been talked up as the next date for joint strikes by different trade unions against the government’s pension cuts, but despite overwhelming votes for strike action in several unions, it seems the leaders don’t have the stomach for a fight.

They aren’t just betraying their own members – they’re selling out millions of unemployed young people, who will have to begin the fight for a fair pension from scratch.

One-by-one the main unions involved (NUT, PCS, UCU) have decided to ditch action or else undermine it:

  • The UCU decided it would onlystrike nationally if the PCS was striking. The anti-trade union laws mean members in pre-92 universities on a different pension scheme could not be ballotted for action.
  • Then the NUT leaders decided that they would only call for strikes in London on the day.
  • Then the UCU leaders scaled down their action even further by also limiting strikes to London (unless PCS shamed them into striking nationwide by being the first to bite the bullet and call a national strike on March 28.
  • Now the PCS leaders have announced that they will not strike until April.

This is despite the fact that the members of these unions have shown that they want to fight. The NUT got a 70% ‘yes’ vote in its latest ballot for further strikes against pension cuts, with a similar number of PCS members voting ‘yes’ too.

The PCS leadership have claimed that they are only doing this because they want to coordinate their strikes with other unions. This begs the question why they aren’t calling their members out on a day when at least 2 other unions are? They aren’t even following their own logic!

But more importantly, the PCS leader Mark Serwotka is allowing his members to be fucked over by the more right-wing leaders of other trade unions. At a recent meeting in Manchester of Unite the Resistance, he criticised the leadership of Unison for selling out the pension dispute, but then admitted he did not want to take action without them.

Serwotka should be organising more strikes, not less, and appealing to grassroots members of other unions to join the PCS’s actions. But trade union leaders often refuse to call out different unions’ members for fear of breaking the ‘gentleman’s agreement’ between the different union bureaucrats which says that they won’t challenge each other’s power.

Young people need to help and support trade unionists organise against their rotten leaders, who would rather give up their members’ pensions than fight for them. If public sector positions are cut and the workers forced to stay in their jobs for longer, then there are less jobs for us to take up, and youth unemployment will rise. Not to mention the fact that cuts to our hospitals, education and communities all negatively impact our quality of life any way.

We also need to organise to pressure the unions to fight back against the worrying rise of two-tier workforces – where young workers are paid less, with worse pension rights, for doing the same job as older co-workers.

In the trade unions we need networks of ordinary members to challenge the leaders and act as an alternative when the bureaucrats sell us out. Those of us not in unions should make links with these workers, and plan our own actions to stop the government’s austerity drive.

 

 

Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Will Tescos keep its jobs promise?

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Police role in blacklist scandal exposed

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Save NHS rally is missed opportunity

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Birmingham school defies privatisation pressure

A primary school in Birmingham has become the latest to join a growing tide of strikes and industrial action by teachers opposed to the privatisation of schools through the Academies programme.

Staff at Montgomery Primary school first took action in December when NASUWT, NUT and GMB members were on strike and the school was closed.

The school is in one of the most deprived areas in Birmingham and is one of the schools on Gove’s hit list of ‘underperforming schools.’ In reality, like most of the schools being targeted it is a school handicapped by the effects of poverty on its intake, which is doing its best to improve.

Today the picket line was even bigger than previously with over 100 people there, including parents, students and members of the public.

Teachers and parents recognise that what is needed is an investment in support and resources to improve the school – not flogging it off to the highest bidder.

With three outstanding schools in the area, teachers believe they could offer support through the local authority to Montgomery who received a ‘satisfactory’ in their last Ofsted report of 2009.

As usual many of the school governors are sitting on the fence, with Councillor Victoria Quinn (Labour, Sparkbrook) saying she would ‘oppose the idea of academies in theory.’ She added they were trying to buy time by looking for a sponsor themselves but that the Department of Education has the power to appoint one.

DavidRoom, deputy general secretary of Birmingham NUT argued there was no pressure on the school to become an academy.

He said: “There are other means of supporting schools and raising standards.”

The unions have asked for further negotiations and parents have handed in a petition calling for proper consultation signed by more than 700 people, but both have been ignored. The purpose of this is to avoid giving people a public forum where they can voice their opposition and expose the councillors and governors who back this sell-off.

The head-teacher and majority of the governors believe that if they refuse to become an academy then Education Secretary Michael Gove will send in Ofsted and fail the school. This is what Gove is relying on – bullying schools into becoming academies.

The determination showed by the staff and parents in Montgomery school in Birmingham and Downhills School in Haringey show that there is alternative to this.

Schools need clear structures linking parents, students, teachers and the governing body together to improve standards of education. Academy status takes school out of Local Authority oversight, meaning that specialist services become more expense and are quickly ditched, as the sponsor focuses on boosting league table rankings.

Private sponsors have no incentive to improve support for students with the most problems, since their investment in the school is calculated on its ability to produce a direct profit, or reinforce a business’s ‘community-friendly’ credentials.

The withdrawal of the White Paper on Higher Education shows that mass opposition can achieve results. So far schools have been left to fight Academy proposals alone – this is a strategy doomed to failure. We need to make the campaign against Academies part of the wider resistance to cuts and austerity.

Only in this way can we bring our maximum collective strength to bear against those who are determined to tear up our social inheritance and flog it to their rich friends.

 


Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Privatisation bill rolled into ditch – for now

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

NUS ducks united action – we can make it happen

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Barclays sinks millions into education gold-rush

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Animated Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Wordpress Development Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube