Travellers face racist crackdown

Riot police dawn raid on Dale Farm

The Tories are planning to pass new laws to stop Travellers setting up sites to live on. This follows the violent eviction of Dale Farm last summer, where an entire community was forced off their land by a militarised police operation.

Britain’s Traveller community has been the victim of decades of racist attacks by Labour and Tory governments. Once again the government is using Travellers as scapegoats for their economic policies which attack all working people and benefit the rich.

In 1968 under a Labour government the Caravan Sites Act was brought in and around 400 caravan parks were built around Britain. However the act was basically cancelled out by the Criminal Justice act in 1994 which scrapped the duty on councils to provide land for Travellers.

The new law will allow town halls to put up stop notices as well as imposing unlimited fine and setting the police on peaceful communities who refuse to be shunted around like rubbish. This will give even greater power to big landowners who don’t live on the land, or work on the land, to profit from it by building useless luxury housing and offices.

Instead of trying to reduce the impact of the economic crisis on jobs, healthcare and education the Tories are more concerned with defending the right of millionaires to have instant access to police and councils to defend their property.

Eric Pickles, the community secretary claims the changes are to ‘prevent violent stand offs’ like the one we saw last year. What he fails to mention is the fact that the only reason there was any kind of ‘stand-off’ was because the local waged a ten year campaign of demonization in order to drive people out of their homes. Travellers at Dale Farm had been sold the land ten years previously and had created an integrated and successful community, yet they were still forced out by police with batons, dogs and a media hate campaign.

Given that 90% of Travellers’ planning applications are rejected as opposed to the national average of 20% it is clear that Travellers are subject to a racist policy which prevents them from building stable communities.

With a massive housing crisis and no affordable houses being built it is difficult to see where people are supposed to live if they are unable to afford rent or purchase a property. On top of this local authority departments often refuse to put travellers on housing waiting lists because they have not been a resident in the housing authority area for more than six months. The government should be taxing the rich to build millions of new homes that are affordable to all,  of a decent standard and accessible to all whether they have been a resident of that area or not.

Opinion polls showed that during the incident 63% of British people supported the eviction; this is due to racist stereotypes thrown around by the media that travellers are lazy, criminal and dirty. Politicians and the press are able to use language about travellers that they wouldn’t be able to about other ethnic groups due to the lack of organisation and support around them.

Travellers should be allowed to set up permanent sites with proper social facilities such as running hot water and electricity and be able to gain easy access to nearby educational facilities. We need to be fighting back against the prejudices they face daily, every time they walk into a shop or their children go to school. Just because they don’t choose to live in a house doesn’t mean they’re not entitled to the same support and welfare system as everyone else.

Massacre at Marikana Mine

Just two weeks after police killed 34 miners striking at a platinum mine in South Africa, four more have been shot and injured.

The incident came as the first group of miners were released from custody following the Lonmin platinum mine massacre in which police gunned down 34 of their colleagues.

The first group of 42 miners were released after the dropping of fiercely controversial murder charges against them. The miners, among 270 arrested for public violence at the incident last month despite it being the police who opened fire.

Just three weeks ago workers demanded a pay increase to 12,500 rand (£976) a month. The action turned nasty when the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) clashed with South Africa’s dominant National Union of Mineworkers (NUM).

There were some 3,000 miners and police opened fire on them, it has been named one of the deadliest days of protest since the end of apartheid

The further attacks today at the Gold One mine using rubber bullet and tear gas have left all four workers in hospital and one critically injured.

The mining sector is now seeing wildcat strikes of over 12,500 in reaction to the deaths and injuries.

Frans Baleni, general secretary of the National Union of Mineworkers, told South Africa’s Business Day newspaper “The issues at Marikana are overflowing. It’s quite clear that this wave of new developments on the platinum mines is coming down on us at the gold mines.”

One journalist has argued, “It is becoming clear to this reporter that heavily armed police hunted down and killed the miners in cold blood,” “A minority were killed in the filmed event where police claim they acted in self-defence. The rest was murder on a massive scale.”

There are also investigations into the miners being tortured while in custody.

It is clear that the workers are fighting back against their low pay and are being psychically oppressed by the government.

French youth lash out against racism and unemployment

Hundreds of young people fought running battles with police in the northern French town of Amiens.

In the early hours of 14 August, police were called to disperse groups of youth, provoking a night of conflict which saw 150 police attacked with fireworks and projectiles. A school and sports centre were burned down, along with dozens of cars.

Although the ritual burning of cars and bricking cops is not unusual in the impoverished suburbs or banlieues of France’s industrial towns, it was the scale and ferocity of last night’s fighting which has made it national and even international news.

Newly elected Socialist President Francois Hollande has said security “is not a priority, but an obligation” – meaning he will deal with it no differently than Chirac did in 2005 – flooding the estates with police and the hated CRS riot squads. From September he will establish 15 ‘priority security zones’ – pouring money into tougher policing rather than investing in real jobs.

But tear gas and batons does nothing to address the underlying issues. With 50% unemployment amongst young people of Black or Arab origin, and over 20% amongst white French youth, the lack of opportunities is made worse by an intimidating police presence. Police regularly conduct sweeps of working class districts, flooding train stations and estates stopping and searching hundreds of young people at a time.

The new government came to power on a promise of ‘growing the economy’ to avoid austerity. But exactly the reverse has happened. France’s economy has flatlined, cuts have not been reversed, and French youth feel they are being made to pay for a crisis they didn’t cause.

Hollande has also failed to make a clean break with the racist policies of the last president. He has continued to round up thousands of Roma citizens, demolishing their camps and deporting them back to Eastern European countries. This is despite the fact that they are EU citizens and have every right to live in France.

Hollande is not worried about the employment or education chances for young people. He now just wants to avoid a repeat of 2005 where riots engulfed France’s major cities for more than three weeks. This is the great danger – there are now millions more youth with no future than then, millions more youth with plenty to feel angry about, and who feel they have nothing to lose by taking out their frustration on a violent and racist police force.

 

Tomlinson killer found ‘not guilty’

The face of evil

The murderer of Ian Tomlinson, PC Simon Harwood, of the Met police riot squad, has been found not guilty of manslaughter.

The verdict comes despite video of the officer hitting Tomlinson from behind, and pushing him over, during protests at the G20 in 2009.

PC Harwood is now free to roam the streets – free to kill again, with no consequences.

The police have been responsible for hundreds of deaths, from covered-up murders in custody, to brutal attacks in broad daylight which caused fatal injuries. No officer has ever been convicted of a murder for which they are responsible.

This police officer will now continue his career, and can look fowards to a fat taxpayer-funded pension.

The verdict shows that the police are totally unaccountable to the people they are supposed to protect. Just like politicians they are not subject to the same laws as normal people. This is because both exist to defend the interests of the powerful and privileged in our society.

That’s why they can get away with murder.

From Blair Peach to Alfie Meadows, the London Met has a bloody record of attacking, injuring and killing unarmed, peaceful demonstrators.

We say the police riot squads should be disarmed, and disbanded. The officers in them are violent criminals responsible for terrible abuses, which have gone unpunished.

The police, the courts and the politicians are all party of a cozy corrupt set up which looks out for each others’ interests.

The phone-hacking scandal shows that the police have been spending as much time covering up their own crimes as they have investigating others.

We say that all accusations of police brutality and corruption should be investigated by democratic committees formed by the communities affected.

The police aren’t here to protect us – they are here to police us, to keep us in line, to keep us in our place. They will never be punished for their crimes, because that would send the wrong message.

The police are the biggest gang on the streets, and the biggest gang on the streets doesn’t let its members go down just for killing a newspaper seller. That’s the message that Brtish Justice has delivered today.

PC Harwood is guilty of murder, the Met is guilty of a cover-up, and the british court system has another innocent man’s blood on its hands.

Leeds justice vigil for police victims

Supporters of a campaign fighting for justice for victims of police murder and violence met across from Millgarth police station for a vigil and leafleting last Sunday. The rally was organised on Fathers’ Day to coincide with nationwide protests by victims’ friends’ and families campaigns.

Many of the people who passed were receptive to our message and a lot of interesting conversations were had with people who agreed that the police had no right to kill people.  The main argument we faced was opposition to disarming the police, however this is an important argument to make. The police never use to be armed and in their position of power, in an institutionally racist organisation, we have seen too many examples of police killing innocent people and facing no punishment.

 The group leafleted besides Revolution’s banner, whose message of the 3180 deaths just in police custody with no convictions, really showed to people the police’s freedom to do as they please. This figure does not even include the deaths of people such as Anthony Grainger and Mark Duggan who were both killed before they were arrested.

We were confronted with one police officer trying to gain the details of someone on the vigil in the usual police fashion, however he left empty-handed.

Later on, National Express security attempted to confront us on where we were leafleting, which was apparently on pavement “owned” by National Express.  On confronting the manager and after a chance meeting with a member of the council planning department, our group moved forward 6 feet meaning that National Express could do nothing.

All in all the vigil was peaceful and successful. We engaged with a lot of people who were opposed to police brutality and the murder of innocent people.  The police force has blood on its hands and it is important that as many people as possible know about what the police are doing.  It is a shame that more people didn’t turn out but for the size of the vigil, it reached out to a lot of people.

No Justice, No Peace – protest against deaths in police custody

This Sunday, on Fathers’ Day, vigils will take place across the country, to protest against thousands of deaths in police custody.

Between 2000 and 2011 there were 5,998 deaths in police, immigration, prison and psychiactric custody.

Since 1990 there have been 1,432 deaths at the hands of the police.

These figures record only those who had been formally arrested at time of death. In the last two years, several more people have been murdered – most famously, Mark Duggan, whose execution in Tottenham sparked the August Riots.

For more than 20 years there’s been an average of 1.3 deaths a week during an encounter with the police.  Yet there’s only been a pitiful 11 verdicts of unlawful killing – and no officer has ever been convicted in relation to these deaths.

Quite simply, the police are allowed to get away with murder.

The police are so confident they won’t face real justice, that they’ve stopped bothering to create excuses:

Officers said Smiley Culture died during a drug raid when the police supposedly allowed him to go on his own to make a cup of tea in kitchen, where – no doubt to their intense surprise – he proceeded to stab himself fatally through the heart with a butchers’ knife.

Or consider the tragic case of Shenice Paris-Goff, who died after allegedly trying to escape out of the window of her flat… 17 storeys above ground.

The police know they’re the biggest gang on the streets, and they aren’t about looking out for ordinary working class people. Youth and Black and Asian people know what the deal is with the cops – we’re more likely to be “stopped and searched” (harassed), attacked, and ultimately killed, by a police force which is too good for the justice it dishes out.

It’s the police who protect the politicians and the property of the millionaires. It’s the police who are the first line of defence for the rich and privileged. It’s no surprise that lawyers and judges, whose wealth puts them among the top 1% of earners, aren’t keen to put coppers behind bars.

If cops start to think they can’t police their way, then they won’t simply reform themselves. They’ll just become more unpredictable, violent and political. Millbank and the first nights of the August Riots were an example of the police force sending a message to the government – look what will happen if we’re not here to defend you.

Protests will be held in Manchester, Birmingham, Central London, Brixton, Tottenham, Sheffield, Slough, High Wycombe, Leeds, and several other locations.

We’ll be joining the protests to demand that the police are held accountable for the criminals they shelter in their own ranks.

We think the IPCC – a toothless fig-leaf staffed by ex-cops, should be abolished and replaced with democratic, community-led investigations of police brutality and corruption.

Join your local demonstration, let’s use Fathers’ Day 2012 as a springboard to launching a movement, rooted in our communties, with a strategy for ending the tyranny of police violence.

Visit the United Friends and Families Campaign page

Your job’s next! Police protest is not our fight

About to get a lot more miserable too

Yesterday up to 30,000 police officers from England and Wales marched through London in protest at job cuts and privatisation.

Rank-and-file cops were spared the beating dished out to most protests, and enjoyed favourable media coverage from all corners.

Police have been banned from taking strike action since the Police Strike of 1919, apparently because their job is “to protect the people”.

In return for their loyalty to the state they get excellent pay, excellent pensions, early retirement, a job for life and plenty of other perks. Not least of which is the protection of the state from any criminal charges resulting from the thousands of beating and deaths which take place in police custody.

The truth is that the police have traded their right to strike for the favour of the ruling government. Police don’t need the right to strike because they aren’t part of the working class.

They do not produce any value; their wages and jobs depend solely on their ability to act as the state’s monopoly on violence. This is the reason why there is a special law covering assaults on police officers, but no equivalent for the daily cases of police brutality in our communities.

Some say that police are just ‘workers in uniform’ and that we should try to win them to our side. This is a fantasy. From Wall Street to Tahrir Square the police are the brute force of the government, and as such they know where their interests lie – with those who pay them and protect them.

The 1984 Miners’ strike is a perfect example of the role of the police and why they can’t be won to working class struggles.

When Thatcher declared war on the unions as part of her drive to privatise vast swathes of the British economy, the police declared they would go on strike for a pay rise.

Thatcher knew that resistance to her unpopular policies could only be overcome if the police felt they had the unconditional support of the government.

So she gave them a pay rise, spent millions on new equipment and paid overtime to thousands of officers sent to occupy the mining villages of the North for more than a year.

The police have always been the iron fist of a state based on exploitation and division. They are a thin blue line, but they don’t stand between a fictional horde of rapists and murderers and ‘normal’ people.

Instead, when they are not harassing us on our streets, they are protecting scab workers to break strikes, and defending the wealth and property of the rich.

The police have a long and inglorious history of violently attacking workers’ movements and organisations.

Since the death penalty was abolished, there have been more than 3000 murders at the hands of the police – with not one conviction.

The officer in charge of the operation which ended with the execution of Jean Charles de Menezes was given a medal by the Queen, instead of being stripped of her pension and sacked.

Yesterday’s protest was not an example of police joining nurses, students and the unemployed to demand an end to austerity.

Those same police will be back on the streets tomorrow, pocketing bribes and swinging their batons. The protest reflected the police’s image of itself as a ‘public service’ exempt from the attacks launched against millions of public sector workers.

The whole campaign against police privatisation has been carefully orchestrated by a police force which has seen government come and go, inquiries launched and ditched, and remained almost entirely resistant to change.

From letting students ransack Tory HQ in 2010, to co-ordinating with the media to frame protesters, to standing aside during the August Riots, the police have been trying to pressure the government and people into thinking that they are all that stands between honest law-abiding subjects and a feral mob waiting to burn our homes.

The truth is somewhat less apocalyptic. The police are simply trying to defend their cosy number from any outside interference. The perks of the job are so good, that it’s no wonder thousands of police are demanding the right to strike to protect them.

But you won’t see coppers marching to defend anyone else’s right to strike.

It’s true that the government is trying to privatise large swathes of police work – including arrest and detention. With thousands of officers jobs lost already and some forces contracting out services to private providers, the end result is a police force made up of badly trained uniformed thugs (small difference) with a ‘professional’ force reserved for public order situations.

We are totally opposed to attempts to privatise the police. The police force as it stands is a violent, racist and unaccountable institution. A private service would be far worse.

Nevertheless we will not extend our support to a gang of liars and killers. The police must stand alone, and there is no doubt the government will avoid coming into open conflict with those who, after all, exist to protect their power and property.

We call for the disarming and abolition of the police, to be replaced by organised self-defence of our communities.

We don’t deny that poverty and unemployment ravages our communities, fuelling prostitution, theft and hundreds of other crimes. But the police don’t solve these problems – where they aren’t taking bribes from pimps and drugdealers, they are simply absent.

We believe that ordinary people have the power and the motive to organise our own collective protection from crime and violence – whether it comes with a badge or a balaclava.

Read more:

 

Police: just doing their job?

 

Why the police aren’t on our side

Olympics security uses civilians as human shields

Makes you feel real safe right?

Air defence missle systems, fighter jets, armoured cars and an aircraft carrier sailing up the Thames… you could be forgiven for thinking East London had turned into a film set when the government launched a propaganda exercise designed to flaunt Britain’s militarisation of London ahead of the Olympics.

With just over two months to go, tens of thousands of police, soldiers and private security are completing preparations for London Lock-Down 2012.

The escalation of the military presence in and around London is greater than anything seen since WW2. It’s hard to imagine what kind of threat Britain faces that means we need our biggest warship docked in the Thames.

Plans to place High Velocity Missiles on the Lexington Building in Tower Hamlets and the Fred Wigg Tower in Waltham Forest, both in east London have provoked furious opposition from residents, who resent being used as human shields.

Rapier missiles would be positioned on Blackheath Common and in Oxleas Wood, both in south east London, and at William Girling Reservoir Chain in Enfield and Barn Hill at Netherhouse Farm in Epping Forest, both in north London, as though World War 3 had been declared.

The policy of siting huge numbers of soldiers in civilian areas exposes the hypocrisy of a government which excuses the murder of Palestinians in Gaza on the grounds that resistance fighters are ‘hiding’ amongst civilians. Yet when it comes to London, it becomes perfectly OK to set up their killing machines on our rooftops.

Some of the buildings are residential flats and the occupants have had no consultation of the deploying of the missiles which would see people’s homes overrun by armed police and soldiers for several weeks… with enough explosives packed on their roof to demolish several city blocks.

The Ministry of Defence claims the missile systems will pose no threat to residents, and that anyway they should be grateful because the systems will deter terrorists.

Are we at war?

The supposed threat of terrorism has been a goldmine for the international arms trade – in which British companies are some of the biggest players.

The militarisation of London during the Olympics has given the merchants of death a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to fleece the taxpayer.

The original estimated cost for hosting the Olympics has ballooned from £2.4billion to £12 billion largely as a result of the cost of stationing an army capable of repelling a full-scale invasion.

Londoners in particular are being rinsed to fund the Olympics which is becoming a playground for multi-national corporations. Londoners have had a £20 levy slapped onto their council tax, while the word ‘Olympics’ has been exclusively reserved for those who can fork out the exorbitant licensing fee.

The Olympics will see 14, 000 British soldiers patrolling the streets of London – more than are currently fighting in Afghanistan.

In reality, the latest military exercise is designed to create a level of fear of terrorism way out of proportion to the actual threat. Sailing an aircraft up the Thames and posting soldiers on our doorsteps is nothing more than a crude attempt at intimidation.

With a ban on all assembly and protest in the area for the period of the Olympics, we can see the government is determined to use the Olympics as a cover for ramping up the power of its security apparatus.

Having invested this kind of money into it, they are very unlikely to simply ditch the whole scheme at the end of the Olympics.

Despite all the money we’re spending on ‘keeping London safe’ the United States are still brining a private army of 500 FBI agents – and the US refuses to let any of it’s citizens be subject to foreign laws.

The security is not about keeping Londoners safe, it’s a giant advert for Britain’s shiny (and very expensive) weapons which Cameron is desperate to sell to any regime that wants such toys to menace it’s people with.

The Con-Dems cuts have thrown Britain back into a new recession. With millions of Londoners living in unfit housing, suffering from high rents and mass unemployment amongst youth, do we really need to be wasting billions on a travelling circus which will come and go leaving no positive benefit for those who paid for it.

 

Join #Justice4Grainger campaign: killer cops off our streets!

On March 3rd Anthony Grainger, 36, was executed by police in a car park in suburban Manchester. He was sat, unarmed, in a stationary vehicle, having been followed by police in a pre-planned operation.

Anthony’s death shocked thousands of people, and left many close to him – including his partner and two young children – devastated. He had no previous convictions for violent offences, and presented no threat to the masked police, armed with machine guns, who surrounded him in several cars.

He was suspected of carrying out a robbery. But this is no justification for murder. What gives the police to take an innocent life, and not suffer the consequences of their actions?

Anthony was not resisting arrest, he was unarmed, and he was immobilised by a CS canister thrown through the window of his car. He was a defenceless man murdered by Greater Manchester Police.

We – his family, his friends, and all those opposed to a police force operating above the law, want answers. We want the officer who fired the fatal shot to be charged.

There have been 333 deaths at the hands of police officers in the past ten years, and not a single officer has been convicted. We are demanding answers and fighting for justice.

The number of innocent deaths at the hands of the police is growing – rapidly. Harry Stanley was shot from behind whilst carrying a table leg in a bag, which police suspected was a gun. Jean Charles de Menezes was shot 7 times in the back of the head after being “mistaken” for a terrorist. Smiley Culture and Mark Duggan were both murdered in unexplained circumstances. The list goes on.

The death sentence was abolished for many reasons, one of them being innocent people were losing their lives, but with trigger-happy police shooting people down, guilty or not, how is it any different?

Consider the obscene reactions everytime a police officer is killed – tears in the media, in parliament, everywhere except the communities where the police are nobody’s friend.

Police officers who take away the lives of innocent people should be tried, convicted and subject to the same punishment as other murderers.

Our campaign has touched the hearts of many, and there are thousands who think this is a disgrace. This is seen on the comments on twitter (#justice4grainger) and facebook, with people writing and commenting daily. There are banners on houses all over the Northwest, and photographs of people with posters calling for justice.

Leaflets have been posted and handed out all over Manchester, Salford, Bolton and many other areas.

Wristbands and hoodies have been made with the campaign name to raise money for his children, their education, and their life without a father.

Our campaign is a campaign for all the victims of extra-judicial killings by a police force which is out of control and above the law.

There will be a demonstration in Manchester, Piccadilly Gardens, on June 17th – Fathers’ Day.

Spread the details of the demo and join the Facebook group #Justice4Grainger to show your support.

Cops on back foot as demands for justice grow louder

The #Justice4Grainger campaign is going from strength to strength, and the police are on the back foot more than a month after murdering a man in broad daylight.

Anthony Grainger was a 36 year old dad-of-two, shot by armed police in a pre-planned operation on March 3rd in Culcheth. Although the police initially tried to spread the lie that he was armed and threatening them, more and more evidence is coming to light which exposes how hollow the police’s words are.

It has recently come out that the only evidence that Mr. Grainger was armed was that a friend of his was seen carrying a hacksaw and a large object in a bin-bag. Despite this flimsy evidence, 16 armed officers (as well as a number of unarmed officers) were sent to surround and swarm Anthony and two friends as they sat in an Audi in the corner of a car-park. A recent post-mortem showed that he was shot through the side and the bullet entered first one lung, then his heart, then the next lung, suggesting he was trying to cover himself as he was shot.

Witnesses of the event described police officers in gas masks rushing towards the car while other officers ensured members of the public couldn’t see what was going on. The police have claimed that there is no video evidence of the event, which is dubious to say the least, given the huge amounts of resources they put into the operation.

The Indepent Police Complaints Commission has begun investigating the shooting and has stated that the cop who shot Anthony will face a ‘criminal interview’ in the coming days. He has still not been named and has not been placed under arrest. I can’t imagine the same happening if a police officer was shot by a member of the public.

The fact that the IPCC is now having to treat this like a criminal case is clearly a positive step forward and a testament to the family-led campaign for justice. Gail Hadfield, Anthony’s partner, and other members of his family have been actively campaigning for over a month now.

What started with a few banner-drops and some social media awareness-raising has now escalated, with the national press becoming more and more interested in the case, and the story getting featured in The Guardian and ITV News. A charity fundraiser is being organised at the Pint Pot in Salford on 12th May to raise funds for his children, and a demonstration has been called for June 17th (Father’s Day) at Picadilly Gardens in Manchester to demand justice. His family, friends and supporters have been regularly leafletting and using social media to advertise the rally and vigil.

Members of the family have also made links with other groups demanding justice, including the campaign for Christopher Alder who died in 1998 in police custody. The facebook group for the campaign is growing massively (with nearly 5000 members as of writing) and has become a hive of discussion, with not just Anthony’s death being talked about, but also Trayvon Martin and other victims of the police brutality both in Britain and world-wide.

The campaign is making huge leaps forward but a question still remains- can the IPCC really be trusted to lead a non-biased investigation?
In 2008 over a hundred lawyers who specialised in complaints against the police resigned from an advisory body for the IPCC, stating it failed to consider all evidence, often treated complainants poorly, and was too quick to rule out police wrong-doing. The IPCC failed to get justice for Ian Tomlinson or Jean Charles de Menezes, both killed by the police for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The body has even refused to release information about Mark Duggan’s death, meaning an inquest may not be possible for some time.

In this current case, the IPCC has not even requested CCTV footage from a nearby takeaway which had a video camera covering the exact spot where the fatal shooting occurred.
The state looks after its own, and despite nearly 400 deaths at the hands of the police or in police custody over the past decade, not one cop has been sentenced. Inquiries should not be hampered by ex-police officers who cover each others’ backs, but should be accountable to the communities affected.

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Web Design Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube