Unity means victory at London school strike

A school in London’s East End have forced school management to back down on their plans to cut pay and job losses by staging determined, united strike action across two unions.

Staff at Central Foundation Girls’ School in Bow took their first day of action on Wednesday 25th April which was called by the NUT and supported by Unison after talks of pay and conditions fell through.

The school staff is being threatened with redundancies and changing support staff from all year contracts to term-time only ones which means a cut in pay and the support they give. There’s also a concern about teachers’ non-classroom time being cut meaning less time to mark work, see parents or give one-to-one tuition.

This days strike won a satisfying settlement over the compulsory redundancies and pay cuts which were threatened.

The staff and teachers struck for a second time on Friday 11th May over class-room time being cut which was still outstanding.

Following the second day of action the management said that teacher’s workload will be reviewed with all new proposals going to the union before being implemented. Teaching staff will have to increase their teaching load but by half of what the management initially wanted and this will also be reviewed next year.

By all the staff uniting and striking together they managed to achieve a victory and prove to the management that they do have the power to stop these changes going through. They now must maintain this strength to ensure the reviews do happen and the changes don’t go through un-noticed.

Staff will maintain the strike committee as a joint-union committee meeting once every half term. This will oversee the proposed changes to working structures and develop closer links between ordinary union members in Unison and NUT.

Playing unions off against each other is a favourite tactic of headteachers up and down the country. Whether they are trying to push through academisation or undermine hard-fought working conditions, this action shows union members that unity is the key to victory.

Students can also play our part in supporting struggles by our teachers. By organising boycotts, petitions and leafletting we can add dramatically to the pressure on school management. School bosses can always negotiate with trade union leaders, but the last thing they want is active, political students prepared to challenge their lying propaganda.

If there’s a strike at your school, get in touch and see the resources section for advice on organising within schools and colleges.

Raising school-leaving age is a con

Once again there is talk of the school leaving age been raised to 18, whether this is doing a-levels or taking part in ‘practical training.’

The government claims this will reduce youth unemployment – which stands at over 20% and rising. This is a total lie – those in education are removed from jobless statistics, yet thousands must balance work with study in order to complete their qualifications.

It would also seek to tackle the problem of young people leaving education without qualifications. Clearly we do not want young people leaving school at 16 without any skills or qualifications to take them forward, but we have to ask why this is happening and will increasing the leaving age to 18 actually change this?

One thing to consider is a lot of youth cannot afford to remain at school. With EMA being cut, housing and child benefit restricted and Working Tax Credits cut, remaining in education is placing intolerable financial pressure on many families.

Many families cannot afford the transport and associated costs needed to continue education after the age of 16, their children are forced to sign on the dole or find a job to help fund their family as much as possible.

The reasons for low qualifications at 16 are many, but are most common in poor areas, where students lack the material support at home to enable them to succeed in academic life. We need to be supporting students under the age of 16 rather than forcing those over 16 to remain in education which takes them nowhere simply to fill government targets.

Raising the school leaving age suggests that the reason youth unemployment is so high is because youth lack the skills needed for the jobs available, rather than revealing the real truth – that there are no jobs.

What we want is a living wage for all over the age of 16, as well as housing benefit to enable young people to gain independence from their family in making decisions about their career options. Proper financial support could be raised by taxing the super-rich and would relieve the financial burden on families.

Qualifications should be offered optionally beyond the age of 16, with EMA being paid to school students and a living wage to those taking part in training. Post-16 qualifications should be real qualifications – not apprenticeships for McJobs, but real training, paid a real wage.

Lastly, we want to reverse the privatisation of education which, far from boosting the abilities of under-performing schools, is seeing private companies cherry-picking the best schools, services and students, at the expense of schools serving poor, mainly black and Asian communities.

 

Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

New GCSEs will penalise dyslexic students

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Anti-Academy strike stays strong at Prince Henry’s School

Teachers at Prince Henry’s School in Otley entered their third day of strike action this morning against plans to turn the school into an Academy, due to come into force on December 1st.

60 teachers were joined by around 30 students for a lively picket starting at 7:30am.

The atmosphere was very positive and vibrant with lots of home-made placards in addition to the official NUT and NASUWT ones. There was lots of honking of horns from supportive motorists and food was provided by a nearby cafe.

One of the students had invited Ryk Downes, a lib dem councillor for Otley and Yeadon was the first of the school governors to resign over the matter, demonstrating a commitment to principles unusual for his party. He said it was obvious that the majority of staff, parents, students and community weren’t in favour of the academy plans. Although the school’s so-called ‘consultation process’ did not include a poll of parents, a show of hands taken at a public meeting showed only 2 for, with 72 against. He also raised the issue that school buildings would not longer by insured by the LEA, undermining the Headteacher’s promises not to cut wages and to create 10 new jobs.

He didn’t say what he’d be doing as a councillor to oppose the academy plan but said ‘it’s not really a politically situation’; meaning he plans to do precisely nothing, short of photo-shoots on picket lines.

This craven abdication of his responsibility as a local councillor reflects the fact that the Liberal Democrats are propping up the Tory government, whose Education Bill has just been signed into law, paving the way for the wholescale privatisation of all Primary and Secondary schools.

The students went into school at 8-30 despite talking to them about holding a student strike. There main concern was that although they wanted to support the teachers and oppose the Academy plans, they didn’t want to be suspended for their actions. However they were all dressed in black which was described by one student as:

‘Although it doesn’t seem to be doing anything, it is showing that we’re communicating together and behind the teachers in numbers.’

This is a good step forward, but with just 2 weeks to go until the privatisation comes into effect, we need students to

students and staff on the picket line

escalate the pressure on the governers by coming out in force alongside their teachers.

The trade unions at the school must be unequivocal in defending any student who is victimised for striking in defence of their school. While we have no illusions in the NUS’s capacity or willingness to defend school students, it too must take a stand against any threats made against students for taking poltical action.

Unbelievably, it came to light that during an assembly about the Academies, Headteacher  Janet Sheriff had told the students ‘not to worry as there would be no chavs,’ in the academy. The students said they were appalled by the language she used and the by her implicit suggestion that working class children wouldn’t be admitted to the school.

While shocking, this attitude is completely in keeping with the Academies ethos – under Labour, Academies were used to ‘rescue’ failing schools in poor communities; under the Tories, Academies are targetted at schools serving wealthier communities, where investors hope to get a bigger return on their investment by dumping costly provision for students with special educational needs.

At around 9 o’clock there was a march in Otley Town Centre, although quiet with no chanting it was still very much supported by passers-by and members of the community. We marched to a nearby church where a public meeting was held followed by a union meeting.

In the public meeting it emerged that the head teacher believed the strike would have crumbled by the third day and hadn’t expected it to go on so long. The NUT and NASUWT put forward 3 proposals they wanted the head teacher to agree to before they would agree to review the strike action.

  • Defer the Academy Plans instead of allowing them to go ahead on Dec 1st
  • Ballot the Parents
  • Allow the Governors to put forward their arguments for and against.

Initially, Janet Sheriff wanted to challenge the legality of the strikes, but faced with the strength of the strike and unity between staff and students, she is now looking to reach an agreement, demonstrating that determined strike action is the best way to defend profit-motivated attacks on education.

A meeting is being held tomorrow in which the union reps and head teacher will discuss what can be done to resolve the matter and how further strikes can be prevented.  The union reps are in a strong position to force the Head Teacher to back down, but further strike action should not be ruled out until the Academy proposal is abandoned.

It seemed a lot of teachers were opposed to the Academy but whether they’ll agree to the proposal being deferred and discussed more remains to be seen.

Students are going to visit LibDem MP Greg Mullholland’s surgery at 11am on Saturday at the Sainsbury’s in Otley and then leafleting within the general community afterwards.

There is also a public meeting called by Otley Town Council on Tuesday 17th November at 7pm in Otley Parish Church.

The struggle at Prince Otley’s will be seen as a test case by other schools in Leeds preparing Academy plans, and we encourage anyone concerned about the Academies rip-off to attend this meeting and organise resistance to the privatisation of our communities’ education to the lowest bidder.

Read more

Prince Henry’s School strikes against Academy plans

London School strikes against Academy proposal

Shorefields students suspended after anti-academy protest

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Web Design Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube