Studio Schools – an attack on working class youth

After completing a stint in education, be it leaving school at 16 or staying on in further education, most of us find that we are doomed to be little more than slaves to a company. For some of us however, this could now be the case from the mere age of 14.

Enter, “Studio Schools”, a government backed scheme for 14 -19 year olds that will put the education of the said school’s students firmly in the hands of big, corporate employers. For those of you unsure what a “studio school” is (join the queue), launched back in 2010 these schools sprung up without any sort of discussion of whether they are necessary or of any actual use and are state funded however run by private sponsors. The apparent aim for studio schools is to help young people get into work by making them more employable. This is to be achieved through the students of the school being taken out of the classroom environment and learning “on the job” with each school specialising in a certain area such as catering and engineering. There are currently 15 studio schools open across the UK with that figure expected to double to 30 by September 2013 as the Government gives the all clear for another 15 to be opened.

The Studio Schools Trust claims on their website that the schools offer both academic and vocational qualifications and teaches (some of) the national curriculum stating students will work towards GCSEs in at least Maths, English and Science. These qualification will be delivered however “out of a traditional classroom setting” and instead through “Enterprise projects”.

At a first glance studio schools may not seem like a bad idea. There are plenty of young people who fail to thrive in the classroom environment and there are too plenty of subjects that offer few practical skills. These schools however will usher their students down a very narrow path with the end product being working in a specific, not necessarily specialist field. The studio school’s “CREATE Framework”, consisting of modules such as “thinking” and “understanding myself”, doesn’t sound too far away from the likes of CoPE and general studies, filler qualifications seen in mainstream education which are much less valued than core subjects. What this looks like is basically a dumbing down of education making students work towards becoming the drones for giant corporations. This of course is hardly the sort of opportunity anyone would want going to school to open up for our children.

The most alarming part of this set up is also the way in which the schools claim children will be “taught”. As previously stated, students will learn “on the job”. Yes, a hands on approach like this may be better for preparing students for a lifetime of work than sitting at a table working out algebra is ever going to. Students at these schools will however be doing a job with 9 – 5 hours and short holidays reflecting this. They will be getting prepared for the world of work, by working. Over 16 students will be paid, unsurprisingly, the minimum wage. Under 16 students will be expected to work for free. This brings in an awful scent of workfare about the set up as students are in fact working for their education. Facts such as these could also point out the reasoning for the giant corporation’s involvement may be more to do with aspects such cheap labour rather than trying to help young people cement a better future. As anyone who has ever worked for pretty much any company ever will tell you, there is only one thing people at the top actually care about.

The really sickly part about this all is that we are handing over the responsibility of educating these students to the big name companies; Sony, Ikea and Hilton Hotels to name but a few. The Studio Schools Trust website states that in the most recent employer survey 70% of employers “wanted to see the new government make the employability skills of young people its top education priority”. Yes because it doesn’t matter about opening up a range of opportunities for young people, encouraging them to do something worthwhile or to ensure just a chance of doing something they enjoy does it? As long as the education process makes them able to clean a table in a hotel, right guys?

Of course not everyone gets to follow their dream. Not everyone thrives in an academic environment. But isn’t education supposed to be about that chance that a person could? It’s certainly not about securing the next generation of employees for the corporate big boys. If a young person wants the option of dropping out of the conventional academic environment as they feel it’s not for them then no one should want to say that they can’t. But is doing this as young as 14 really the answer? Is mass involvement from the private sponsors really the right way to go about this? These are still state schools remember. They are still funded by the tax payer. If this is going to be done it needs to be done properly and with young people’s best interests at heart. The corporate giants have clicked their fingers and said “we want this out of education” and just like that with little thought or discussion on the matter, now we have studio schools. Is this really for the benefit of the students who will be attending? Or is this just the big companies muscling in on our education process? Putting young people’s lives in the hands of those who care for nothing but their wealth is a dangerous route to go down however one that our government seems to backing.

UK Firms Help Rich Dodge Millions In Taxes

Firms in the United Kingdom have been helping millionaires avoid millions in taxes using complex tax evasion schemes.

With the BBC Panorama program on Sunday, it is has become obvious how easy the rich can trick Her Majesties Revenue and Customs out of billions. HM Revenue and Customs claim that tax evasion costs the tax payer on average £4 billion a year.

This is just another example in recent times, of the rich selfishly passing their burdens onto the working class.

The structure proposed by James Turner, of Turner Little, a corporate service provider, used nominee directors to help keep the clients name from being on the company paperwork. These nominee directors can be lawfully appointed to run companies on behalf of others, but they would be running nothing. In other words, it would be a web of lies and deception.

James Turner, told the undercover reporter: “They wont even know that they are a director, they just get paid,” he also told the reporter that adding the directors signature could be done by using a stamp. Corporate service providers, are legal companies that assist people in creating a business, both in the UK, and abroad, but these companies have been helping set up these fake companies, just to help the upper classes hide their money from HM Revenue and customs. If a business is set up like this, then it is no longer legal, it is a criminal offence.

In spite of this, Jack Turner denies allegations of criminal misconduct, and has stated that Turner Little will conduct an internal investigation, and if it is appropriate, it will take action.

In a statement, HM Revenue and Customs, which regulates all of the 2467 company service providers in the UK, claimed that most of the firms have nothing to do with illegal or criminal activity. However, it did confirm that it has never prosecuted a single corporate service provider for breaching money laundering regulations.

In recent times of austerity, cuts have hit everybody hard. From the student, with the rising university fees, to the pensioner, having their monthly amount cut. Everybody, or so it seems, but the rich, who have found yet another way to steal money once again, costing the taxpayer £4 billion a year.

The Tory government is supported and funded by the banks and big business and media so they would only regulate tax evasion and avoidance if we put enormous pressure on them – they don’t want to bite that hand that feeds them.

We need to tax the rich and use the money to pay for education, healthcare and jobs, but we also would need to stop these companies from moving their money abroad to avoid tax – we would need to take it off them and say that they are welcome to move but their  (our) wealth stays here.

Travellers face racist crackdown

Riot police dawn raid on Dale Farm

The Tories are planning to pass new laws to stop Travellers setting up sites to live on. This follows the violent eviction of Dale Farm last summer, where an entire community was forced off their land by a militarised police operation.

Britain’s Traveller community has been the victim of decades of racist attacks by Labour and Tory governments. Once again the government is using Travellers as scapegoats for their economic policies which attack all working people and benefit the rich.

In 1968 under a Labour government the Caravan Sites Act was brought in and around 400 caravan parks were built around Britain. However the act was basically cancelled out by the Criminal Justice act in 1994 which scrapped the duty on councils to provide land for Travellers.

The new law will allow town halls to put up stop notices as well as imposing unlimited fine and setting the police on peaceful communities who refuse to be shunted around like rubbish. This will give even greater power to big landowners who don’t live on the land, or work on the land, to profit from it by building useless luxury housing and offices.

Instead of trying to reduce the impact of the economic crisis on jobs, healthcare and education the Tories are more concerned with defending the right of millionaires to have instant access to police and councils to defend their property.

Eric Pickles, the community secretary claims the changes are to ‘prevent violent stand offs’ like the one we saw last year. What he fails to mention is the fact that the only reason there was any kind of ‘stand-off’ was because the local waged a ten year campaign of demonization in order to drive people out of their homes. Travellers at Dale Farm had been sold the land ten years previously and had created an integrated and successful community, yet they were still forced out by police with batons, dogs and a media hate campaign.

Given that 90% of Travellers’ planning applications are rejected as opposed to the national average of 20% it is clear that Travellers are subject to a racist policy which prevents them from building stable communities.

With a massive housing crisis and no affordable houses being built it is difficult to see where people are supposed to live if they are unable to afford rent or purchase a property. On top of this local authority departments often refuse to put travellers on housing waiting lists because they have not been a resident in the housing authority area for more than six months. The government should be taxing the rich to build millions of new homes that are affordable to all,  of a decent standard and accessible to all whether they have been a resident of that area or not.

Opinion polls showed that during the incident 63% of British people supported the eviction; this is due to racist stereotypes thrown around by the media that travellers are lazy, criminal and dirty. Politicians and the press are able to use language about travellers that they wouldn’t be able to about other ethnic groups due to the lack of organisation and support around them.

Travellers should be allowed to set up permanent sites with proper social facilities such as running hot water and electricity and be able to gain easy access to nearby educational facilities. We need to be fighting back against the prejudices they face daily, every time they walk into a shop or their children go to school. Just because they don’t choose to live in a house doesn’t mean they’re not entitled to the same support and welfare system as everyone else.

Benefits – the Tory weapon of mass distraction

When Cameron took time off to criticise Jimmy Carr’s tax-dodging, it wasn’t long before people started to ask him about his own friendly links with “morally wrong” tax dodgers. That these people happened to be using the cash they saved to fund the Tory party is no more than an unfortunate coincidence.

All very embarassing right? So the Tories took out their frustration on – you guessed it – unemployed people. With 1 million youth not in education, training or employment, there’s enough to choose from. Cameron said he wants to end the ‘culture of entitlement’. Apparently he doesn’t mean the bosses’ entitlement to chuck thousands out of a job, offshore their factories and come to an ‘arrangement’ on taxes over a cosy dinner with a Tory minister or two.

When the Tories’ economic ignorance sends the whole country to shit, the first people they blame are the people suffering the most from their extraordinary incompetence.

Cameron reckons people under the age of 25 should be stripped of their housing benefits and made to remain at home until they can afford to move out. Presumably, this will be made into a sane policy by the setting up giant plantations of magic job trees.

Youth unemployment = 1 million+

EMA = gone

Tuition fees = £9,000 a year

Minimum wage = frozen

Schools = privatised and branded with corporate logos

The record speaks for itself. Cameron obviously never did meet anyone who lived in a normal home – if he did he wouldn’t be suggesting that its normal for young people to live with their parents til they’re 25!

Anyway why should young people be made to live at home, why shouldn’t we be given the chance to become independent adults, capable of making our own decisions?

Because that would cost money – the government would have to reverse hundreds of thousands of job cuts, invest in secure jobs, regulate agency work, equalise the minimum wage – and most importantly, build millions of new homes to address Britain’s housing crisis.

What the proposals mean

The government has already overseen the destruction of millions of jobs. Now they’re taking away housing benefit. Osborne is famous for his mathematical ignorance, but even he can work out that no job + no money = no house. Or, more people will be kicked onto the streets.

Or perhaps Cameron and his mates will open up their 10-bed mansions to those whose homes get repossed by Britain’s nationalised banks?

His attack particularly affects single parents or families with children. With 1 in 8 mothers leaving a job and 1 in 5 turning down a job due to the cost of childcare, the true cost of cutting schemes like Sure Start is to plunge working families into poverty.

His new proposal includes benefits cuts to those families with 3 or more children ‘to stop the out-of-work being better of by having children.’ With child benefits already having been slashed having another child barely gives you enough extra money to feed them let alone any left over.

‘Consider paying some benefits “in kind” rather than in cash,’ is Cameron’s way of saying ‘all these benefit scroungers spend their money on booze and drugs.’ The USA and France have had ‘food voucher’ schemes for decades – and their problems are even worse.

The disabled are being attacked too with Cameron saying that two thirds of those on Disability Claimant remain on it for their whole lives. He believes these people should be forced to do full-time community work and take steps to improve their health. It’s the great irony that the high number of Disability allowance claimants stems from Tory attempts in the 1980s and 90s to disguise the tru level of unemployment by convincing people to sign on for Disability instead of Jobseekers’.

During his speech Cameron clearly stated that pensions wouldn’t be affected in the next wave of reforms. ‘If you work hard all your life, you deserve dignity in retirement.’ The implication being that those young people deserve nothing because they’ve given nothing to the state yet. The youth are an easy target because with no money and living with mum and dad, it’s more difficult for them to organise.

The real point though, is that most young people don’t vote Tory – so why look after people who’d sooner string you up than “call you ‘Dave’”?

These proposals are savage, but are mainly the reaction of a Prime Minister who knows he has blundered from one scandal to the next, and is trying to reconnect with his Party base.

Nevertheless, it’s a glimpse of what Cameron would certainly like to do, should he ever get into power with a clear majority. All the junk about big society and ‘all in this together’ has been well and truly ditched.

The Tories are telling ordinary working people that we’re going to pay for the crisis, and if we protest, they’ll simply pass laws to stop us. Are we going to let them?

Tax dodging bosses in the dock

UK Uncut, known for it’s high-profile protests against tax-dodging business, has won the right to challenge a deal between HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and Goldman Sachs which let the investment bank avoid paying £20m in tax.

A judge said the group had an ‘arguable case’ which should go to a full judicial review hearing.

UK Uncut lawyers reckon HMRC had a legal obligation to renegotiate the deal after it was discovered that the government had made ‘a mistake’ in the original discussions.

The ‘mistake’ meant that debts owed by Goldman Sachs to the government did not include interest payments. HMRC should have penalised the bank for paying its taxes late by ensuring that interest on late payment was included.

Typically HMRC said the judicial review shouldn’t happen, because it would compromise the confidentiality of taxpayers. But, rightly, the confidentiality of Goldman Sachs is worthless if they won’t pay their tax. They’ve been exposed, and HMRC subservience has been exposed too.

The case is clearly of public interest, with £billions of pounds worth of cuts, we can’t afford to be giving away millions to the richest people on the planet. But that’s just what the Con-Dem government is doing.

Companies and bosses worth billions of pounds are being given extravagant tax breaks, and when they get caught dodging they get a slap on the wrist.

Meanwhile, working class people are demonised for benefit fraud, which is carried out by less than 1% of those on benefits and amounts to only £1billion a year.

Compare this to the £4.5billion wasted by the government in overpayments. Or the £15billion a year in unclaimed benefits. Or the £80 billion in tax, illegally dodged by Britain’s wealthiest corporations.

Welcome to Tory Britain – government by millionaires, for millionaires.

A judicial review is a good way to attract popular knowledge of tax dodging by the super-rich. But we can’t rely on judges, who are among the richest people in the country, to bring big companies to justice.

We need to organise direct action alongside using the courts and mainstream media to highlight our message. By blockading their shops, boycotting their goods and wrecking their brand-image we can make life difficult for the bosses.

But ultimately, the state and laws are skewed in favour of those with the most power. When we mobilise for small or large protests against the minority elite, we need to remember that protest can’t achieve permanent change – for that we need a revolution and a fundamental reorganisation of society’s priorities.

The 1% exposed! Baroness Warsi

Following in the great British tradition of Tory sleaze, co-chairman of the Tory Party, Baroness Warsi has been caught trying to dodge declaring how much she gets from rent on a posh north London flat.

She joins a growing list of more than 30 Tory MPs exposed as expenses cheats, including previous chairman Caroline Spelman, government ministers Gove (Schools), Lansley (Health) and Willets (Univesities).

Baroness Warsi used to sit in the unelected House of Lords. Members of the Lords are required to sign the register of interests when rent on their properties exceeds £500.

Now the dodge is exposed and her cover blown, she is desperately trying to claim the whole situation was an ‘oversight’. No doubt she’s very busy, and rich enough that a few grand here and there seems like no big deal. But after all, that’s why they get tens of thousands of pounds expenses to employ staff to do their paperwork.

She brought the flat back in 2007; however it was not ready to be lived in for another year. During this time she stayed at hotels and in an Acton property occupied by Tory advisor Naweed Khan.

While staying at theActonproperty she put in claims for the Lord’s subsistence allowance of £165.50 a night for the various occasions she stayed there.

Mr Khan released a statement saying she paid him for each time she stayed there – to compensate for the inconvenience, apparently.

Yet, in a further twist it turns out that Mr Khan was himself living at the property rent-free. The Acton flat was owned by Tory party donor Dr Wakif Moustafa; he denies having ever received any money from Khan or Warsi.

Dr Moustafa, chairman of the Conversative Arab Nework, said that Warsi had her own front door key and never offered to pay rent or bills. He admits he didn’t ask her for money as he was hoping to further his political career.

Labour MP, John Mann has called for the Lords commissioner for standards to look into the matter, he rightly said, “You cannot be claiming an allowance while living in a property rent free.”

Laughably, Mr Cameron and Baroness Warsi have both spoken about the importance of a ‘transparent’ government and Cameron aims for his to be the ‘one of the most transparent governments in the world.’

It is a joke that our country is run by politicians who own flats in high priced areas of London, don’t declare how much they earn from it and at the same time claim they are paying money to stay in a flat, which they aren’t.

The expenses scandal has not gone away, politicians are still sponging off taxpayers while demanding ever greater sacrifices from ordinary families.

At the same time that the government is closing hospital wards and selling off schools, they are spending £1million on a boat to ferry the Queen down the Thames for her Jubilee.

We are told that Britain is back in recession and Europe faces a second economic crisis, yet our government of millionaire Eton schoolboys is enjoying the good life like never before.

Our political rulers are corrupt and incompetent. They’ve got their noses so far in the trough they can’t even cover their tracks properly.

We want to put power in the hands of ordinary people. By building collective, democratic councils and bringing the big banks and industries under the control of workers’ and consumers we can start to challenge the parasitic grip of the 1% over our wallets and lives.

What happened to EMA?

When the Tories came to power, attacks on working-class people were inevitable. The austerity offensive will punish everyone but the rich elites. However, some of the first people to experience the cuts were those who were the most vulnerable and defenceless.  Without the vote or any say in society, it is the young who are especially vulnerable to these attacks, and within months the Tories announced their plans to triple tuition fees and scrap EMA.

This essential money paid for everything from equipment and books to bus fare and food.  Without it, many students, whose families are already on a tight budget, have been forced to drop out of college and seek work – but with 1 million unemployed 16-24 year olds, job-hunting isn’t a much better option.

The replacement for EMA is a highly restricted fund available to a fraction of people. However, as with many benefits, applying is a complex, bureuacratic process designed to shame people rather than help them.

The student’s response to these attacks was inspirational to the movement as a whole.  50,000 attending the first demonstration and the numbers steadily rose over the winter.  While not solely against the cut to EMA, the high numbers of usually apolitical school and college students mobilised showed how the Tories have angered everyone and how they have driven young people to take to the streets to defend their EMA, their right to affordable education and their right to a future.

Although the defeat was demoralising, it left behind huge numbers of newly-political young people determined to carry on the struggle. Importantly it showed the political class that young people won’t just take their attacks lying down.

This is why Ken Livingstone, the Labour candidate in the London Mayor’s election has promised to bring back EMA if elected. This would be a massive victory, and a real blow to the Tories. If this happened we would need to build a national campaign to bring back EMA for all youth, not just those in London.

NASUWT conference backs further action against austerity

Teachers have voted for an escalation in industrial action over the government’s attacks on state education.

 

NASUWT, a teachers union not typically known for its militancy, held their annual conference in Birmingham this weekend and delegates unanimously backed a resolution that could see walkouts closing schools in the autumn term.
The motion said that teachers faced “scurrilous attacks, abuse, intimidation and lies”, and accused the government of a “vicious assault” on the profession.  The motion is said to have highlighted the unions concern over the privatisation of our schools and the economic interest in education, evidenced by the huge expansion of privately-run and privately-owned academies in recent years.

 

Education provision faces a very real attack, and not just from the government’s cuts. Figures published last week by the Department for Education revealed that the majority of England’s state secondary schools are, or are about to become, academies, taking them out of the hands of local councils and making them the property of private companies.

 

Private sponsors have little incentive to improve support for students with the most problems, since their investment in school is calculated on its ability to produce a direct profit or reinforce a business’s ‘community friendly’ credentials. Frequently academies refuse to take on pupils with lower grades or patterns of bad behaviour, for fear that it will tarnish the reputation of their school.

 

The union’s leadership claim that their motion will allow them to prepare and carry out a flexible campaign in the autumn with actions short of a strike (also known as ‘work-to-rule’, which often involves boycotting admin work and marking), leading up to a ballot for strikes, in response to the attacks on their pay & conditions coming from academies and austerity.
The threat to teachers’ pay and conditions from academies is also being debated by the National Union of Teachers at its currently ongoing annual conference, with a motion pushing for fresh strike action to be debated.

 

Last month we saw the union leaders back out of a national strike and in the end, the NUT and UCU held a regional strike in London. This kind of action won’t be enough to beat the government on pensions or prevent the expansion of private academies.

 

If the next wave of public-sector strikes are delayed until Autumn, then it will have been nearly a year between national strikes. With this strategy, strikes become more like expensive protests for workers, rather than a direct attempt to stop the government enforcing policy. This can be counter-productive, as workers often won’t take part in strikes they don’t think can win. There needs to be a strategy of escalating action which leads towards indefinite strikes.

 

Young people in the trade unions should take the example of the successful electricians’ campaign and organise with other ordinary members to pressure the leaders into taking serious action sooner rather than later. School, college and university students should aim to take their own action- occupations, stunts, and protests, with the view to encourage staff to join them. Our unity in action remains the only way to halt the government’s attacks.

Tory sleaze exposed in “cash for access” scandal

David Cameron must have hoped the drama over a threated tanker drivers’ strike would take the heat off the latest Tory sleaze scandal. Well he can trust REVOLUTION to stay on the case.

While media headlines fuss over the Pasty-tax, what about the resignation of the Tory Party treasurer, in the doghouse after being caught selling influence on government policy in an undercover reporters’ sting?

For just £250,000 Peter Cruddas claimed to get you in the ‘premier league’ with personal access to Cameron and Osborne and privileged access to the No. 10 policy unit.

Many donors have gone to ground, afraid of having their influence over the millionaires’ government exposed by the media.

The Tory damage-limitation unit went into overdrove earlier this week, claiming that donors had no influence over government policy…yeah, right.

Contrast this total denial of reality with the reaction of the Tories’ big business backers who insist they should be congratulated for funding a party whose policies they support. They insist the coalition limits their influence.

They might have a point were it not for the fact that the majority of the Liberal Democrats funding comes from giant private healthcare companies… If anyone was wondering why the Lib Dems were so keen to privatise the NHS, they won’t be now.

The Tories’ strategy to reduce the impact of this latest sleaze scandal seems to be to treat voters like idiots, by claiming that party donations have no impact on policy.

But if these businesses and millionaires weren’t getting something out of government policies then why would they be pumping so much into these parties?

The answer is that they are working hand-in-glove with the Tories to fuck over ordinary people and ensure that everyone pays for the crisis except the banks, bosses and speculators who caused it.

These are the same people who Osborne just gave a massive tax cut to, despite the fact that they already manage to dodge £120 billion a year in tax anyway. It’s obvious they are funding the party which will push through policies that benefit them, not us.

The party which appointed Philip Green, Topshop owner, ninth richest man in Britain, and tax-dodger extraordinaire… to be the government’s advisor on new tax policies!

The Tories’ union-baiting attack dog Francis Maude called on Labour to agree to a £50,000 cap for donations to party. As this wouldn’t just count for individuals, but also unions it is unlikely Labour would agree – and why should they? Labour don’t deny that interest groups fund the parties which they think can deliver the policies they want – they just take the money without delivering the policy.

But of course, this isn’t about Labour, who have always been funded by the unions, supposedly to represent the interests of ordinary working-class people. The fact that they don’t is another matter.

The Tories are the party of big business and the rich, they can rely on the super-rich parasites to bung them £50k a year; Labour voters can only fund a party by pooling their money though unions and political associations.

We know political parties are funded by people in order to be able to fight for a certain set of policies – this isn’t corruption, it’s just politics. If you want something to happen in Parliament, you’ve got to pay for a political party and the apparatus which keeps it running.

We defend the right of people to donate as much as they want to any party of their choice. However we’re under no illusion that the Tories, who are funded by billionaires, millionaires and tax-dodging businesses, are going to turn around and bite the hand that feeds by helping out ordinary people whose jobs, pay and services are being wrecked by the capitalists’ crisis.

The Tories, with a dozen or so millionaires in the cabinet should stop treating the public like they’re stupid, we all know who funds them and that’s why they’ve always been, and always will be the party of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.

Tory budget feeds poor to the rich

The Face of Evil

Today the lastest Tory budget was unveiled; tax breaks for rich, job cuts for the poor, surprised?

The budget drawn up by George Osborne is all about the redistribution of wealth… from the poorest to the richest.

The headline measure is the tax-cut for Britain’s richest people. Those earning more than £150,000 a year will enjoy a tax-cut of 5% – or £40,000 a year for 14,000 millionaires. Good news for the dozens of millionaire Tory and Liberal MPs…

The top rate of tax will be reduced by another 5% by 2014 – bringing it down to 40%.

You might think that paying 50% income tax is pretty steep, but let’s not forget that it’s this parasitic minority – just 275,000 people – collectively manage to dodge over £100 BILLION A YEAR in illegal tax-dodging.

With this money, they fund hate campaign against migrants and benefit claimants in the Murdoch rags.

The Tories are hoping to balance this blatant gift to their rich mates (and themselves) by raising the point at which people start paying tax to £10,000. This would leave people £220 a year better off. Except it won’t. Inflation at 5% a year, VAT at 20% and pay-freezes mean that the income of ordinary workers has decreased in real terms by more than 10% since the start of the crisis. We’re not fooled.

Scratch beneath the headline-grabbing announcements, and the true extent of the Tories’ war on the working class becomes clear.

Cutting tax for the richest will make a massive hole in the country’s budget – how does Osborne plan to fill this? Well the budget makes plans for a further £10.5bn cuts to welfare spending, and adding another 20,000 public-sector job cuts, on top of the 750,000 already announced. Simples.

Tax on tobacco will rise by 5% above inflation, adding 37p to a pack of cigarettes. However duty on alcohol is frozen, presumably so we can still (just about) afford to drown our miseries.

The minimum wage for young workers has been frozen, while for those over 21 it will rise by a miserly 11p. This is a joke – the inflation caused by the bank bailouts, means wages lose their value much faster than pitiful increases can make up for.

Need we mention today’s ‘success’ in passing privatisation of the NHS through parliament?

This is a class-war budget drawn up and supported by the people whose obscene wealth is based on impoverishing millions of ordinary Britons.

But while Cameron, Clegg and co. might have no idea what’s it’s like for ordinary people already struggling to make ends meet, they know exactly where their money comes from – the working poor, the unemployed, the pensioners, and the youth, who are all being made to pay for an economic crisis we didn’t cause.



Read more

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Minimum wage frozen for youth

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Black youth unemployment nears 50%

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Workfare the symptom – socialism the cure

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Web Design Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube