Salford TUC ‘Changing Unemployment’ – a good start but few people and fewer conclusions

 On Saturday around 40 people got together to discuss how people are being forced out of work, off benefits, and out of their houses, as well as how the unemployed can fight back. Sponsored by Salford TUC and with a range of speakers from different organisations, the small turnout was something of a let-down, particularly given the quality of some of the sessions.

Perhaps the bright sunny day meant more people decided to go to the park than to an all-day conference, perhaps not enough leaflets and posters were put out for the event, perhaps too many people simply feel as though we’ve already lost the fight. Whatever the reason, it had a tangible effect on the mood of the day (and the timings, as meetings were pushed back by over an hour). However, the presence of activists and unemployed workers from Leeds helped boost spirits as people used the opportunity to discuss how they could work together to practically organise across different cities.

The day started with a good speech from Alec McFadden who talked about the unemployment centres that the TUC is aiming to set up in towns and cities across the country, which could act as centres of resistance, as well as places where the unemployed could simply go to get out of the house and meet up with other people in a similar situation. He also complained that the trade unions traditionally kicked out members once they were on the dole, but pointed out that Unite and the RMT (as well as others, potentially) were starting up community sections with the aim of organising the unemployed, pensioners, students and youth.

We then broke out into workshops. Unfortunately two really good ones were on at the same time- one on benefit cuts and the disabled, the other on setting up community trade unions in Manchester. I went to the former due to an interest in the current anti-ATOS campaign. A young guy called Ryan who had worked as benefits advisor gave a really informative talk about the current attempts to slash benefits spending, how it’s being done, the human impact of these cuts, and ways to resist. Perhaps the most important message to take away was that around 70% of those people who’ve been kicked of disability benefits by dodgy bastards like ATOS and appealed against their decision have won. With decent legal advice and support that goes up to around 90%. We need to ensure that people who are facing getting their support taken off them that challenging the cutters in the courts is doable and winnable.

A young PCS rep also mentioned how her union had just passed two motions at national conference, one opposing the workfare programme, the other opposing the Tories’ benefits reforms, both of which could be used to encourage and justify trade unionists taking action to stop these Slash-and-Burn policies.

At the other workshop, participants agreed to set up a Unite community branch in Manchester which could focus on equalling-up wages, campaigning against unemployment, taking direct action to stop evictions and support striking workers.

In the afternoon, parallel sessions were run on pensioners and the cuts, the cuts and the rise of racism, and community housing. Though there were some interesting discussions, these sessions seemed less hands-on, despite an agreement to support and extend a network (Manchester Housing Action) which could resist evictions of private housing, social housing and squats.

The day ended on a sour note as a Labour MP (Kate Green) decided to address the last session of about 25 people. When asked if a Labour government would promise to stop the cuts, not invade any more foreign countries, abolish tuition fees, or repeal the anti-trade union laws set up by Thatcher, she rejected each one, causing a number of people to leave in disgust. All she could do was parrot the Labour Party official line- that there are too many cuts coming too fast, but ultimately cuts needed to be made. Needless to say this was not warmly received.

It was a real shame there weren’t more people present on the day, as the initiatives put forward were very positive and potentially useful tools for the struggle against unemployment, exploitation and austerity across Manchester.

Revolution welcomes all new initiatives which aim to organise the unemployed as part of the working-class resistance to cuts. Unemployment amongst youth is particularly severe, and we believe that trade unions should be leading a militant struggle in favour of real jobs, paid a decent wage.

But the crisis can’t be ‘solved’ simply by creating more jobs. The capitalist market ensures it’s always more profitable to have fewer people working longer than more people working less. This is why we see the struggle against unemployment as inseparable from the class struggle against capitalism.

As transitional measures to limit the power of the bosses to rule us by controlling access to jobs we demand:

  • Scrap workfare – A living wage for all – £9 an hour or the trade union rate
  • Nationalisation of all companies closing down or sacking workers
  • Jobs for all – share out the work by reducing hours with no loss of pay
  • Full living allowance for the disabled and those without work

These measures are a step towards challenging the right of the capitalists to control the economy for their own benefit. Through these struggles we can strengthen the level of working-class organisation and fight for a programme of socialist revolution which is the only means of ensuring the possibility of a society based on human need, not private greed. 

Leeds May Day protest targets NHS profiteers

150 people turned out in the cold sunshine today for International Workers’ Day (May 1). Home-made placards and flags waved alongside banners representing most of the big trade unions – including the PCS and NUT who will be striking on May 10.

The atmosphere was lively despite the cold and once the demonstration started there was lots of chanting. ‘They say cut back, we say fight back’ echoed the streets as shoppers stopped to watch us march down the roads. A splinter group of youth and NHS activists broke off from the main march to picket the Virgin store.  We chanted slogans denouncing the attempted privatisation of parts of the NHS by Virgin Health, owned by billionaire Richard Branson.

The rally was good with speakers from the PCS, TUSC and Labour MP John McDonnell, who said people felt ‘let down’ by the Coalition. Unlike Leeds’ own MPs McDonnell called on people to support the upcoming May 10 Pensions’ strike and called for a general strike against cuts. A PCS member spoke about the action and why the attacks on jobs, education and health can only be stopped by fighting back.

We spoke to some young trade unionists on the march who said this:

Rebecca (PCS) “ I’m here because International Workers’ Day is all about fighting for workers rights and defending ourselves against the austerity, the worst austerity since WW2. I’m here to fight for my pension, job and pay, I will be out on strike on the 10th of May, we need to be striking and demonstrating against this government.”

Sam (UCU)   “It’s disgraceful what’s happening to our services and jobs. Our union leaders need to start fighting for us and stop selling us out.”

Mike (UNISON Health)  “Working within the NHS I can see what the recent health and social care bill is doing already, here in Leeds the cytology (study of cells) service is being made to compete with Serco, a private provider. People will lose jobs and services will suffer.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension sellout: don’t get demoralised – get organised!

Statement by REVOLUTION National Council – 28 MARCH 2012

Trade Union leaders have sold out the campaign against pension cuts right, left, and centre. Despite some of the biggest strikes in British history, with over 750,000 people on strike last June and nearly 2 million last November, backed by huge levels of public support, it seems that none of the union leaders have the stomach to stay in it to win it.

First the most right-wing trade union leaders pulled their members out of the struggle- Unison leader Dave Prentis and GMB’s Paul Kenny were quick to accept the government’s pension offer in December which made some minor reforms to the rotten deal. The leaders of Unite were next to duck the struggle.

With the big three unions all out of the picture for the time being, the leaders of the NUT, PCS, and UCU dithered over their next steps, before eventually deciding to do very little. Initial plans for a joint strike on March 28th were cancelled after the NUT decided to only strike in London (despite 73% of its members supporting national action). The UCU agreed to do the same, and the PCS said that it wouldn’t strike unless other unions were willing to do so nationally.

Unless the NUT agrees to some significant action at its upcoming conference (April 6th – April 10th) then it seems unlikely that the more left-wing union leaders will challenge the right-wingers by going ahead with strikes or calling on grassroots Unison, Unite and GMB members to join them.

The two big socialist groups in Britain- the Socialist Party and Socialist Workers Party- have also failed to offer us any alternative. While SWP members have certainly voted in favour strikes every time the issue has been raised (unlike the SP leadership of PCS which ignored its members’ 70%+ vote in favour of action), they seem to be content merely cheerleading the left-wing leaders’ (like Mark Serwotka of the PCS) strategy of occasional one-day strikes.

This is a huge setback for young people, as well as current public-sector workers. With the retirement age raised, huge numbers of jobs being slashed, and more experienced workers joining millions of others in the search for work, our chances of getting a decent job are getting slimmer by the day. What’s more if we do manage to get a job in the public-sector, our pensions will be a pittance, our unions will be weakened, and our pay and conditions will be far worse.

The trade unions have a duty to organise and fight, not only to their own members, but to young people and the unemployed who can’t take strike action to defend the public-sector and their futures. The trade union leaders who back down in the face of government threats, right-wing leaders’ sell-outs, or a fear of striking alone, are letting us down.

But all is not lost and the battle against cuts is far from over. Recent campaigns have shown how workers and the unemployed can organise without having to wait for their bureaucratic union leaderships to give them the go-ahead. The electricians’ victorious fight against 35% pay cuts often seemed more like a social movement than a trade union campaign. There were blockades and occupations of building sites, building industry award ceremonies stormed, and a constant series of protests and pickets of workplaces, even by people who didn’t work there.

A number of trade union national conferences are coming up soon. Young people need to get down to them and cause a stir- we need to make it clear to ordinary trade unionists that the leaders’ strategy isn’t working for them or us. We also need to convince the union members of the desperate need to organise young people and the unemployed; to prevent them from being used to undermine wages and strike action – like during the last Royal Mail strikes, where students were recruited to break picket lines. Most importantly, joining unions gives us a voice and a fighting chance to challenge the leaders’ sellouts.

The NUT conference at the start of April in Torquay will be crucial. If national strikes aren’t supported by those present then it seems unlikely that the other union leaders will take the initiative to strike alone. NUT members need to emphasise the importance of taking the lead in the fight to save not just their own pensions, but the futures of the students they see graduating into a nosediving labour market.

In the meantime we should not just wait for the unions to take the lead. The occupation of Millbank and the student movement of 2010 helped invigorate trade unionists, non-organised workers and the unemployed last year. We have the power to take inspiring action, and this time we have to make the demand ‘students and workers unite and fight’ a practical reality.

As young people with the least to lose and the most to gain, we have to be prepared to take our place at the head of the struggles, taking direct action to the heart of the capitalist system. We cannot change society on our own, but we can show that we are determined to fight for our futures – with or without the fat-cat union bosses. 

Tories try to split striking workers

Enjoying an eclairFrightened by the potential power of the November 30th public sector strikes, where up to 4 million workers could strike together, Cameron and co are now trying to spin their way out of this confrontation with the unions. They’re aiming to split the workers in the public sector, to confuse and disorientate them, and to prevent united strike action which could lead to the downfall of the millionaires’ coalition.

The ConDems have made two minor tweaks to their attacks. Their first proposal is an attempt to split young workers from their older colleagues. Danny Alexander (Chief Secretary to the Treasury and tax-avoider par excellence) announced this morning that anyone who retires in the next 10 years would get the pre-cuts pension deal, where the government pays your pension based on your yearly earnings at the end of your career, rather than the new deal where it would be based on your average earnings throughout your career.

Splitting young workers from old is nothing new- it happened in a pension dispute from 2005-2007 in the PCS union, which ended with the leaders of the union selling out new (younger) workers’ pensions to maintain older members’ existing pension scheme.

Their second proposal is to reduce the cut to the amount the government would pay towards public-sector workers’ pensions. This isn’t some loving gift from a caring government concerned about the elderly- it’s just the government slightly reducing the amount they are trying to steal from people’s pension pots. They are still trying to make us work for longer, pay more towards our pensions, and reduce the amount they’d have to pay.

The union leaders may try to use this government ‘offer’ as an excuse to try to hold back the strike movement. The TUC (Trade Unions’ Congress) Public Sector Liaison Group said they ‘welcomed’ it, but would continue pressing forward in negotiations. Negotiations for what exactly? Just last month it was revealed that the head of the TUC, Brendan Barber, had secretly been meeting with George Osborne to try to work out a way to prevent the N30 strikes.

The trade union leaders want to keep hold of their position of privilege within the unions. Many of them are on 3-figure salaries and get the kind of perks of the job you would expect a CEO of a multinational company to be getting, rather than the head of a workers’ organisation. Widespread industrial action and strikes could lead to the creation of strike committees and democratic campaigns within the unions, and an end to their corrupt leaders’ control.

These union leaders are close to the heads of the Labour Party. Ed Miliband wouldn’t have won the leadership race without their support. With Labour trying to avoid taking a clear side in the pensions to dispute to avoid scaring off either middle-class voters they’re trying to win from the Tories and Lib Dems, or more traditional Labour supporters in the trade unions, the heads of the unions are trying to avoid strikes which could embarrass the party.

Workers and young people can’t soften their protests, stop their strikes or halt their actions just because the heads of the Labour Party might be embarrassed, or because the Tories are offering a different (still shoddy) deal, or because the trade union leaders want to negotiate for longer. We will each lose thousands of pounds a year because of these attacks- we can’t afford not to fight.

If we want to stop these cuts we need to bring down this government, not negotiate with it or lobby it. Let’s not view November 30th as one day of action, but instead let’s turn it into the beginning of a wave of action, and a move towards the general strike we need to take out the Tories.

Read more:

Anger rises as 30,000 people march against Tories

Protest on 9th November but fight for clear objectives

Left-winger Mick Dooley banned from UCATT elections

Construction workers’ campaigner Mick Dooley has been barred from contesting the UCATT (Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians) general secretary election by a trade union leadership frightened of seeing him winning.

On Saturday, Dooley, who is seeking election to the highest position in the union and has taken an active role in the recent sparks’ protests, was told he could not contest the election on the grounds that he was ‘not competent.’

Once a candidate has received the right amount of votes they have to go before a panel, chosen by the bureaucracy to ensure control over the candidates and stop radicals from taking leadership. Three members of UCATT’s general council and three members of its executive council including President John Thompson formed the selection panel which determined Mick’s fate.

The former General Secretary, Alan Ritchie, who was removed from office earlier this year when he was found guilty of corruption, has also been found incompetent and won’t be standing. This means his former ally, Steve Murphy, will have a clean run against the more overt right-winger Joe Swain.

Dooley responded to his disqualification by saying “UCATT can now say they have undemocratically disqualified the two known candidates who have over 150 branch nominations between them, more nominations than the other candidates put together. I say why not allow all the candidates state their position on the election address and allow the members to decide.”

Dooley now wants to take out a High Court injunction to prevent the election going on without him. However, if he loses his case it would mean he would have to declare himself bankrupt and lose the home he rents with his family.

However, we shouldn’t have to rely on High Court judges to get democracy back in the unions when they’re part of the same system which declares unions’ actions illegal. UCATT members should form a rank and file (grassroots) campaign to challenge these bureaucrats, and to challenge this attack on democratic rights in the union. UCATT members can take inspiration from the Unite union, where a rank and file committee has been formed to provide an alternative to the overpaid leadership when they won’t represent their workers. It’s time to take control of our unions.

Read more:

Sparks of resistance: the electricians’ fight is our fight

Wisconsin fightback – the makings of a protest wave

By Revo USA

The USA might not be known for militant class struggle, but the battle of Wisconsin is a taste of Tahrir Square in the heart of the capitalist beast. Protesters were brandishing placards and banners sporting slogans many of which alluded to those slogans raised against Mubarak in Egypt. Now protests by public-sector workers, young people, teachers, and communities against anti-worker, anti-union legislation are spreading to neighbouring mid-western states.

[Read more...]

Villiers High School student: “How we overthrew our headteacher bully”

A much hated headteacher at Villiers High School has been sent packing after a huge rebellion of students, teachers, parents and the local community scored a magnificent victory.

Headteacher Ms Juliet Strang had always been unpopular with students and staff, but the final straw was when a National Union of Teachers rep, and popular maths teacher was suspended under allegations that many people at the school believed to be nothing more than an attack on the trade union.

Teachers took strike action to save Mr Virdee, which was soon followed by mass petitioning, huge student strikes and walkouts, and a 300 strong community meeting.

REVOLUTION spoke to Priya Soroay, a student at the school.

So how did this all start? Why did so many people dislike the head teacher at Villiers?

This was all started by a group of students when they had found out that our maths teacher Mr Virdee was accused of wrongdoing. MOST students did not believe the allegations against him, and after hearing Ms Strang was about to sack him, a group of yr11’s took action and decided to SAVE MR VIRDEE!!! Many students dislike Ms Strang due to her changing the school rules, the uniform, the timetable, also starting school at 8.20 etc. Also many students & parents complained how she’s a bully to the school students and most teachers.

Why were students so determined to save Mr Virdee?

Mr Virdee was a brilliant teacher. He did not deserve to be sacked – he was friendly to all students and had a high reputation. He has been working in the school for 29 years and has never been accused of anything before. So after all these years why so randomly is he being accused? This is all a LIE!!!!

When did the first protest happen and what did it feel like?

The first protest took place on the 2nd February after school at 2:50 out side the school. It felt as if we were in a riot but it felt extremely good and something to be proud of as myself & other students were so determined to get Mr Virdee back in the school. On the other hand i felt upset hearing Mr Virdee (MY maths teacher) had been sacked, not only me, other school students felt the same way. So we decided to take action and stick together.
On the following Tuesday 8 February the protest had began again from 8.20 till 3.

Did the campaign start with the students, or were teachers and parents involved from the beginning? How did teachers and parents get involved in the campaign too?

The campaign was started by the yr 11 students, after hearing about Mr Virdee’s case. Other years agreed with us and felt strongly about this situation, so they decided to take action too.  The protest on Friday was on till 5 O’clock after school. Students had gone home and informed their parents which led parents to get involved and get Virdee back and Strang OUT!!! The teachers and parents mostly started getting involved when the strikes took place and many teachers agreed with us students about the protests and getting Strang out and Mr Virdee BACK in!!

What was the response of the head teacher towards the protesters, and what impact did it have?

After the protest on Tuesday 8th February 2011 Ms Strang had decided to only allow Yr7’s, Yr8’s & Yr9’s to school so there would be no protest by the yr10’s & yr11’s. On the following day she allowed the Yr7’S, 8’S & 10’S in school and the yr 10’s where told to “Bring a note” and the Yr10 students that did not turn up with a note were sent home to go bring one back! And the yr11’s were told to do the same thing but on THAT following day which was a Friday with only yr7, 8, 11’s in school.  Also each year that arrived to school (Wednesday-yr9, Thursday-yr10, Friday-yr11’s) had a assembly token by Ms Strang and where bullied by her since she tried scaring them by saying “Who ever talks about the protest will be sent home and get in trouble. Who ever MENTIONS MR VIRDEE’S name in school would also be in BIG, BIG trouble, and anyone that talks about the situation that had happened would be in serious trouble.” After that had been said many students had STOPPED talking about the situation since they did not want to get sent home because that would be their education gone & dusted, thrown in the bin.

Update for Thursday 10 Feb 2011

Only years 7, 8, & 10 will be allowed in school tomorrow, 10 February 2011.

The Sixth Form will also be open as normal.
Special Information for Year 10 Pupils

1. Year 10 pupils will only be allowed in through the main school gate.
2. Year 10 students MUST have a signed note in their diaries from their parent/carer stating: “My child is attending school today and will not participate in any protests or disruptive behavior.”

What other protests and actions took place?

After the first protest that took place on a Friday, the students decided to hold another, even bigger protest on the following week, Tuesday 8 February. And this time every student that had been there yelled constantly “WE WANT VIRDEE” and they would not stop!

What message would you send to students in other schools who might be suffering similar bullying head teachers and management?

To students in other schools that may be suffering from the same problem by their headteacher my message to them would be “Stick together and do what you have to do what you as students think is right”. And get your parents involved and prove the head teacher WRONG and make them see that you’re strong!!!!

What do you think should happen next?

I personally think MS STRANG SHOULD BE THE ONE SACKED! & MR VIRDEE BACK IN! And many other students would want that too! Because Ms Strang has upset & wound up a lot of students and parents and this must stop!! But overall I wish to see Mr Virdee Back into school and Ms Strang OUT of school!

Bosses in ‘Ban Trade Unions’ shocker

The Institute of Directors (IoD), an organization of  directors of big businesses, whose members plan attacks on workers’ rights, have today announced that the government could get “something for nothing” if they were to cut back on collective bargaining in the public sector, namely NHS and education.

This recommendation comes as the Tories and their rich friends look for ways to sell off the NHS and state schooling system, bit by bit. Banning Trade Unions in Health and Education would massively undermine the efforts of workers to defend these services, and enable the Tories to break-up our public services without serious resistance.

Collective bargaining is one of the greatest gains of the workers’ movement and has a huge impact in the NHS and education especially. In a school for example: if the National Union of Teachers (NUT) calls its members out on strike over, say, pay, and they win the demand, the entire workforce benefits, not just the union members who went out.

At the moment state maintained schools (those that are not academies, independent schools etc) practice collective bargaining. In countries with a strong workers movement, like France, collective bargaining is the standard, and it benefits the entire working class. If a workplace knows that if they fight they all win, then they tend to fight for their rights, rather than not bothering.

Collective bargaining is very much the last bastion of the public sector unions and must be defended with all their might. Its existence has led to public sector workers having a national pay scale; this means that all workers in that industry know the benchmark of their own pay, how much they should be earning and how much they should be fighting for.

This prevents a situation where bosses pay teachers or nurses less then others in different areas, despite doing the same job. Without a national pay scale what is to stop bosses paying women, part-time workers or even trade union activists vastly less? Collective bargaining and the  national pay scale keeps the bosses in check.

Which is why the bosses hate it. Mike Templeman, general director of IoD has put forward this suggestion as part of a “freebies” program for the government. By ‘freebies’ he means things the government can cut that would cost them nothing to do so, but ‘save’ a lot. But what the government ‘saves’ in collective bargaining costs is the workers loss of pay, grading and conditions.

However, this is not the first time this has been attempted; in the early 2000s the Labour government planned to end collective bargaining in schools, but the unions managed to fight it off. Unfortunately losing collective bargaining is something that happens the moment a school becomes an academy because they lose union recognition.

The academies project is still ravaging  state education, with schools turning into academies overnight. The NUT has a reasonable record on fighting academies locally. The Anti-Academies Alliance, which is supported by the NUT has helped organized campaigns and strikes that have stopped some schools from becoming academies. But now that the Academies Bill is law it is no longer a local problem, but very much a national one. Members of the teachers unions should be putting maximum pressure on their leadership for a national strike over academies. If they fail to do this then the union simply won’t mean anything, and comprehensive education will become a thing of the past.

The public sector unions need to fight against this “recommendation” from the IoD: it represents a genuine step back for the workers’ movement, and shows that the bosses – and this Tory government- are determined to crush the gains of the working class, finishing off Thatcher’s dirty work.

We have no chance of winning without a national campaign of co-ordinated strikes, protests and occupations, so let’s build anti-cuts groups in every school and college to unite students, staff and teachers to fight the cuts and defend union rights.

Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Social Profile Design Experts
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube