Join NCAFC, fight for democratic unity

ncafc-logo-new

Following the decisions of its December conference, the National Campaign Against Fees & Cuts (NCAFC) has created membership and affiliation structures.

All students can now join NCAFC for £1, and school, college and university anti-cuts groups can affiliate. This will give activists a democratic voice in the campaign and greatly strengthen national and local co-ordination.

The student movement, like the wider anti-cuts anti-cuts movement is in desperate need of a united federation that can carry out a common strategy of resistance to Tory austerity.

The fight to defend education is far from over – as the upcoming strikes by the NUT show.

We think all the education campaigns – NCAFC, Education Activists Network, SBL and YFFJE should hold a joint conference to agree a plan of action and fuse into one federation.

This will stop the unnecessary and destructive competition which is holding us back.

We encourage all students and anti-cuts group to join NCAFC and work to build anti-cuts groups on campus and regionally which draw in representatives from as many institutions and campaigns as possible.

Only by building a strong, unified campaign based on the most effective democratic structures like general assemblies can we hope to have a chance of taking on the Tories – and winning.

Students: reorganise our resistance

red square-quebecThis article originally appeared at www.workerspower.com

2012 was a year to forget for the Tories. It was, in the main, a year to forget for student activists as well. The first year of £9,000 fees saw a 10 per cent drop in student numbers. September saw the government try to deport thousands of overseas students from London Met. Aside from local struggles which flared up at a few universities, the winter mobilisations of 2010/11 aren’t exactly casting a long shadow outside vice-chancellors’ windows.

And what of the other 50 per cent of young people who aren’t cooped up in overcrowded lecture theatres and battling slum landlords and rip-off letting agencies? Well, over a million remain locked into the Tories’ unemployment trap. In an economy with more unemployed than vacancies, the only alternatives are the workfare schemes (where there’s no shortage of places, surprisingly) or unpaid internships.

It might seem like resistance to the Tories’ class war is flagging. This is true. The failure of the unions’ strikes to defend pensions means millions of workers are less confident that militant industrial action can deliver success. The rivalries in the anti-cuts movement, with three competing anti-cuts campaigns, make effective resistance is almost impossible. Coming into the fifth year of austerity, the fight back is stagnating.

But we aren’t beaten yet. It’s clear something has to change and students have to look at how we can take the best of our experiences in collective, democratic organisation and apply that to the wider struggles in society.

NUS – leaders who won’t lead

Since the grassroots protests and walkouts of winter 2010, the NUS has firmly reasserted its control, its right to lead – and to mislead.

Many Student Unions have dismantled their democratic structures, replacing democratic accountability with tokenistic and passive participation which is incapable of engaging more than a small minority of students –leaving decisions from grand strategy to publicity in the hands of time-serving bureaucrats who are divorced from the mass of students.

But the fiasco of the NUS’s 2012 demonstration shows that we ignore the bureaucrats at our peril. Equally, joining in the petty squabbling and factionalism of NUS conference in order to win a few positions is no long-term solution.

By drawing in students into genuinely democratic structures we can expose the undemocratic nature of ‘student democracy’ on campus. Working with sab officers where possible and against them where necessary we can start to break the stifling bureaucratic attitude which sees students as a stage army, not as conscious participants.

There is no question of ‘reclaiming’ the NUS for the students. But its peculiar character – funded and managed as a mechanism of state control, yet with leaders reliant on a relationship with students – means we should work with them where they act in our interests, yet be able to openly criticise and self-organise everywhere that they put their own careers before the needs of students.

Self-organisation

The student movement didn’t spring out of thin air. The wave of occupations against the war in Gaza in 2009 fuelled the growth of student committees which took on the task of coordinating action against cuts and the tuition fee increase.

During the student movement, several towns organised general assemblies which represented the highest form of democratic decision-making and representation. At their best, they attracted participation from schools, colleges and organisations of students and education workers.

Many of these structures have withered, but they remain the basic tactic for collective struggle both on campus and in schools.

Our primary task is to rebuild these committees. They should have representatives from every academic department and the trade unions. It’s important that we pressure the Student Unions to submit to the democratic decisions of the general assemblies.

On campuses, the UCU and workers’ unions are fighting to defend education and save jobs. In universities, schools and colleges, students need to launch a determined struggle for democratic rights to oversee education policy, financial decisions and hold management to account.

In the fight to defend education and to increase students’ control over what we learn, committees of action should work for the widest representation, drawing in students, teachers, cleaners and other staff – all who have a common interest in defending a properly funded, accessible education system.

Unite the movement

The infighting and competition that plagues the anti-cuts movement has its echo in the student movement too. But the solution is the same.

We think all the campus and school anti-cuts groups should affiliate to a democratic, national federation. The decision by the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts to allow both group affiliation and individual membership (£1) with full democratic rights is a good step forward.

NCAFC should hold a spring conference, co-sponsored with Education Activist Network, and Youth Fight for Jobs to fuse into one federation, with a common strategy for organising the defence of our education. We encourage all youth to join NCAFC and fight for this to happen – a united campaign around a strategy decided by students is the strongest basis for entering the working class struggle against Tory austerity and capitalist crisis.

#Demo 2012: Stop Tory attacks on education

On 21 November, thousands of students will march in London to say no to cuts, fees and privatisation.

Since the Con-Dem government came to power, education has been under constant attack. Tuition fees were tripled to £9k a year, EMA was scrapped and now schools and universities are being sold off to private companies.

On October 20th, 150, 000 workers marched in London demanding an end to cuts.

#Demo2012 on November 21st is our chance to strike back.

The trashing of Tory party HQ at Millbank, the occupations and education assemblies showed how we become stronger when we unite and fight. The victory of the Quebec students’ strike proves that militant struggle is the best way to defeat government attacks.

The student movement needs to reorganise and create the weapons necessary to win. This means uniting the different campaigns like EAN, NCAFC and YFJ into a single, democratic federation which fights for a general strike to stop the cuts.

A big demonstration on N21 will send Cameron’s toffs the message that students won’t lie down and watch our universities privatised and a generation of young people denied access to real education.

All out to defend education on N21 – Scrap fees & cuts, bring back EMA – Build a general strike to stop the cuts!

Bolton: defend union democracy!

On Monday evening around 80 students and activists gathered at the University of Bolton to protest against the suspension of Student Union President, Shana Begum.

A combination of Bolton students, local youth, trade unionists and activists from anti-cuts campaigns converged on the University buildings to put pressure on the University management.

Although Student Unions must legally be run through student-democracy, the University bosses have replaced Shana with an unelected University Governor, Chris Minta.

Minta has been installed by the VC, George Holmes and is only accountable to the University itself, not the student body he is supposed to represent.

Whilst it was encouraging to see activists from many different campaigns and organisations coming out in support of Shana, there is one organisation who’s presence would make a huge difference.

Chris Minta is the branch secretary for the UCU at Bolton, although there were UCU members at the demonstration, a greater presence from them would surely have been hugely significant.

After meeting outside the Students Union, the demonstration moved to the Octagon Theatre to pressure the University officials enjoying themselves in there, probably under the pretext of having a meeting.

Of course, a peaceful gathering of activists and students merits a small amount of police harassment, and we were not disappointed. Our friends in blue were out in force making sure we did not commit atrocities such as blocking a footpath or “causing a fire-hazard.” It was disheartening for activists on the demonstration to see the organisers asking the police for permission to walk about in a public area and advising the police as to where we were headed next.

Overall the demo was important step towards organising more widely to defend student democracy. Student Unions are an important part of the fight against the Con-Dem Government’s attacks on higher education as well as a vital support for students against problems such as racism, coping with disabilities, academic issues and financial problems.

Without a democratically elected leadership, Student Unions are just another part of the University bureaucracy and will not work in the interests of students.

Successive governments have gradually restricted SU powers, enthusiastically supported by the University itself, which funds the SU. Ultimately the role of the state and university bosses in funding our Student Unions means they can never be truly independent bodies fighting in our interest.

  • Shana Begum should be immediately reinstated, with unreserved apology from uni bosses.

  • Campus Student Unions should organise solidarity action, and offer practical support like fundraising.
     
  • At a national level, the NUS and UCU should condemn this attack. 
     
  • Students should form a democratic committee to investigate the actions of university management. 

The National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts is a grassroots organisation dedicated to fighting for student democracy and free education. It organises in many universities across Britain and led the student movement in 2010 after the NUS shamefully caved in to the Con-Dem coalition. Find out more

200,000 students strike against Quebec fee hike

Students in Quebec, Canada, have been on strike for three months against efforts by the government to raise university tuition fees.

The strike, organised by a coalition of student federations, was declared on February 13, and has drawn in more than 190,000 students across the province.

Tuition fees in Quebec, a semi-autonomous region of Canada, are $2168 per year. Overall fees have increased by 300 per cent since 1989.

Over 12 weeks of campaigning, students in Quebec have demonstrated what can be achieved by a national student leadership which is accountable to its members. Certainly there are no lessons for Liam Burns and his ilk, determined to see out his 2nd term as NUS president with the least possible antagonising of his future Labour paymasters.

The government, backed by the vocal support of the bosses’ organisations in the national media have done their best to defeat the movement. The students and their federations have seen off government-sponsored scabbing, mass arrests and rubber bullets.

But while the violence and longevity of the protest has surprised many, Quebec students have a record of resisting attacks on education. Big strike waves in 1996 and 2005 slowed the price hikes, but did not defeat the government.

However the idea that ‘resistance works’ is borne out by the fact that tuition fees in the rest of Canada are more than double those in Quebec.

For Quebecois, then, opposition to tuition fees is not undermined by arguments that Quebec should ‘catch up’ with the rest of Canada, but rather is strengthened by the knowledge that social conquests like education, health and social services can only be maintained if they are fought for.

Canada might seem a world away from the austerity regimes which are plunging Europe into deeper austerity in a vain, and unsuccessful, bid to stave off a double-dip recession. But like their UK counterparts who sparked a wave of resistance to Con-Dem cuts, Quebec students recognise that attacks on education are merely the herald of further cuts in wider society.

There is no doubt that the most organised Canadian workers understand this too, reflected by the practical support of many trade unions which led to a 200,000-strong march through Quebec City on 26 March. The strength of the movement has no doubt shaken the government, who view Education reform as key to softening opposition to more fundamental reforms to workplace rights, jobs and welfare.

Three months of protest have taken their toll on the students themselves, many of whom will struggle to complete the course requirements for this year. The ‘agreement in principle’ reached between the Education Minister and leaders of Quebec’s largest student federation is the most serious threat to the movement yet seen.

After an offer to spread price hikes over five years instead of seven was rejected, the government’s latest concession is a six-month freeze on price rises.

This sham is nothing more than an attempt to demobilise resistance, getting students out of the way so the government can concentrate on ‘reforming’ the rest of the welfare system.

The offer must be put to students, who will vote whether to accept it. The ‘concession’ is in reality nothing of the sort – it simply demonstrates that the government has no intention of backing down on Higher Education privatisation.

Therefore we think students should reject the ‘deal’ and press their leaderships to escalate the struggle.

At this level of mobilisation, where government and its repressive apparatus in the police, media and courts faces the collective power of organised young people, the struggle becomes about much more than the accessibility of Quebec’s universities.

While the social status of students enables them to play the role of ‘detonator’ the implications of this struggle go far beyond defending the material privileges of a minority. A defeat for the movement in Quebec will be the signal for a general offensive against what remains of the state’s obligations to society.

With the intransigence of the government matched only by the determination of the students, the movement awaits the entry of a decisive force to swing the balance. The student strike is a source of politicisation and channels social anger against the government. But it does not have the economic muscle to hit the bosses where it hurts – in the pocket.

As the slow but inexorable rise in tuition fees shows, it will take the weight of the working class – millions and tens of millions strong – to achieve a sectional victory for students, and a class victory against the government, in defence of wider social services.

CLASSE, the main student federation representing nearly 100,000 students in 57 different organisations, is appealing for a ‘social’ general strike. This is great, but the bitter experience of Winter 2010/11 teaches us that trade union leaderships are in general deaf to appeals for solidarity action i.e. a political struggle in defence of another section of society is impossible without pressure from grassroots union members.

The potential power of Britain’s youth glimpsed in November 2010 was frittered away by disunity and the delayed action of the trade unions. A wave of strikes in education in Britain was ignored by students who had seen their appeals for help ignored by union leaders. Young people have been largely absent from the great set-piece confrontations in the last year.

Quebec’s rulers don’t fear the union leaders – they’ve been doing business together for decades. What they do fear is the anger of the youth who have no job, no prospect and therefore no stake in society.

If the working class is to be mobilised in this struggle then two things must happen. Firstly, the students must organise to go beyond the official bureaucratic routes – sending delegates to speak to union branch meetings, and inviting union branches to send their delegates to students’ assemblies.

Building practical links is the first step, but on what basis can Quebec’s youth achieve real joint action with the organisations of the working class?

The message must be: first they come for the students, next they will turn on the workers. From Greece to Chile, education reforms have been the opening skirmish in the global assault on the social wage – schools, pensions, health and housing.

If the government says there is no money for education, what stops them from saying there’s no money for healthcare or housing or jobs?

Like healthcare, housing and a living wage, education is a right. Fighting to keep and to extend rights across a whole society is impossible without mobilising the majority – the working class – behind that struggle.

Student organisations should appeal to unions to unite the resistance. A general strike to defend education is no instant fix, but it will take the struggle to a new level. With the working class on the sidelines, the government feel they can isolate the students. But with a working class mobilised in conscious defence of its interests, alongside students, the stage will be set for a decisive confrontation between the ranks of the privileged represented by the government and the millions who continue to be ground down by their attacks in one of the world’s richest countries.

There is a solidarity demonstration at the Canadian Embassy in London, Wednesday 16th May 5:30pm

Unfinished Business: the student movement 1 year after

It’s now been a year since students from across the country descended on parliament square in an attempt to block the Tories and Lib Dem sell-outs from tripling top-up fees and slashing EMA and education budgets. Paint bombs flew, the book bloc was in full effect, and students prepared to take on the police who had violently attacked and kettled the previous two London students demonstrations. At the same time the NUS leadership, headed by the (self-proclaimed) spineless Aaron Porter held a glow-stick vigil for the death of Higher Education.

Shock turned to anger when we heard that the government had succesfully driven through the tuition fee rise. Though we managed to ensure that it passed through parliament with a low majority of 28, we failed to stop it or force the break-up of the coalition government.

There were several problems for the movement. Sadly, although many members of trade unions offered their support, attended demonstrations and donated to the occupations, there was never a real attempt to pressure the trade union leaders to order strike action to block the bill. Though ‘students and workers, unite and fight’ was heard on every demo, it was not realised in practice.

A number of activists popularised the idea that the answer to stopping fees was to ‘crack the coalition’ by pressuring Lib Dem MP’s to stick to their promises and vote against the bill. However, the Lib Dems’ popularity had already been shattered by December 9th, and a defeat for the government could have led to a new election which would have driven them out of the Westminster bubble permanently.

The idea of appealing to the Lib Dems’ conscience was always a pipe dream. Even if these Tory-Lite stooges had consciences, they would not sacrifice a place at the Cabinet table for the sake of an opportunistic election pledge.

Despite the mass participation of young people in the movement (over 130,000 walked out of their schools, colleges and universities on November 24th), there were few structures established which were able to channel the initial spontaneous anger and action into a strong base which could keep mobilising people for further demonstrations and actions. Anti-cuts groups in the schools and colleges could have led to a larger youth mobilisation for the J30 and N30 strikes, and tried to bring the radicalism of the student movement to the trade unionists.

This is not to undermine the achievements of the movement. It was successful in showing people that you can organise without your official leaders and even against them when they sell you out. It revived the tactic of occupation on a scale not seen in many years, with many people realising the power of using them to collectively organise on a local, national and international scale. *

It also radicalised a huge number of people, demonstrating in practice that the police were there to stamp out protest which got too close to defeating the politicians, and that parliament exists to monopolise political power for a social elite whose interests our totally opposed to ours. It created a whole new layer of anti-capitalists who have continued to organise, occupy and resist the Con-Dems’ austerity.

In the twelve months since the student movement Britain has changed a lot. The trade unions have entered into open confrontation with the Tories, staging two of the largest days of coordinated strike action (June 30th and November 30th) in decades, and organising the biggest demonstration (March 26th- 750,000 demonstrators) since 2003′s anti-Iraq War demo. We’ve also had the riots which showed that young people’s anger was still there- with the politicians, the police and the cuts all being blamed by rioters for causing a situation of desperation, alienation and poverty.

Internationally, we’ve had inspiring examples from Egypt, Tunisia and Libya, where hated tyrants have been brought down through general strikes, mass occupations and even civil wars. Student and youth protests in countries as diverse as Chile, Spain and Israel have demonstrated the huge extent of opposition to austerity and corruption. Finally, the #Occupy movement has started to channel this general anger into opposition to a world economic system which ensures that wealth, and therefore power, is concentrated in the hands of “the 1%”.

Each of these movements have left their mark on people’s understanding of the world, and increasingly we find people people who hate the banks and the system they represent, but aren’t sure what, if any, alternative is possible.

As we prepare for the government White Paper on education (which will see universities turned into money-making businesses proper) and a further round of cuts to please the ‘bond-markets’ (read: the few billionaires’ whose speculation led us to the crisis, before they got bailed-out with our money and then lent it back to us with interest), we can be sure that will resistance will intensify. The PCS, UCU and NUT trade unions are talking about another wave of strikes early next year, while the police and media predict years of unrest as service cuts throw millions more into poverty.

But is this the best type of resistance we have? One-day strikes can be brushed off  - the Greek governments has seen off 15 in 18 months - and rioting brings only devastation, police repression and patronising quick-fix schemes to working class communities.

With youth unemployment at a record peak, the Tories regouping for a fresh assault on the NHS, and trade unionists across the country drawing a line in the sand, young people need to ask ourselves how we can engage with these different groups of people to create a united anti-cuts movement.

While it will be necessary to prepare fresh struggles against the wave of redundancies, closures and cuts unleashed by the government’s White Paper, it is vital that we look beyond just ’education issues.’ Mobilising students for strike action, to fight cuts in our local communities, and to build a movement against youth unemployment; all these will be necessary. So what’s stopping us?

Most campus anti-cuts groups have a policy of focusing on education cuts or cheerleading lecturers’ strikes leading to the marginalisation of other issues which affect both students and the wider community.  The failure to build a mass basis around an alternative pole of resistance to NUS is reflected in the demoralisation and apolitical campaigning seen at the campus level.

The right wing, Labour and apolitical bureaucrats in the NUS, while shaken, have managed to retain their grip on power, and some of the student left are all too content to rely on their executives rather than organising at the grassroots.

It was to be expected that last year’s defeat would lead to a loss of activists and a temporary retreat amongst students. This is even more the case, since although the movement was co-ordinated through student campaigns like NCAFC, it was dominated on the streets by tens of thousands of school and college students who had no existing networks, resources or tradition of struggle to fall back on. The lapse into inactivity by those who were the most courageous in confronting the police sent out to crush our protests has been the most significant loss in the last 12 months – especially since many of those are now languishing in the dole queues or press-ganged into unpaid work for supermarkets.

The movements which have erupted since December 2010 provide inspiration and examples which we must seize with both hands if we are to reinvigorate campus based resistance and combine the resources and traditions of students with the radicalism of a youth with no future and deploy it with maximum effect against the millionaire’s coalition.

The importance of youth-worker unity seen in the Arab Spring, the power of rank-and-file organisation seen in the recent electricians’ wildcat strikes and protests, and the power of creative campaigning on broader issues to unite disparate groups, as seen in the #Occupy movement must form the bedrock of a drive to unite local and national student campaigns in one federation which can bring students out of the campus, into the communities, in common action  alongside the millions resisting austerity.

The next step is not lobbying the government to stop this or that cut. but fighting to bring down the government to stop every cut. Prioritising certain struggles over others plays into the government’s hands – they will look to divide us, play us against each other and buy off, bribe and isolate different sections wherever they can. The coalition’s mission is to force through a comprehensive package of cuts – they can afford temporary concessions which allow them to regroup, but we cannot. To stop the cuts, we must bring down the government.

We need to build a movement to create a general strike which draws together public-sector and private-sector workers, students, the unemployment, benefits claimants and the disabled, and we can’t do that if we rely on bureaucrats, sectional struggles, or a sectarian left. It’s time for real unity in action.

 

Read more

 

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Acts of Resistance: the story of the student movement

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Thousands defy intimidation to march on bankers

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Bring down the millionaire coalition

.………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

 

 

Students build resistance on the run to strikes

ON 9 November the national demonstration called by the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts and supported by a plethora of other organisations and individuals, is set to march on the City of London. This protest is a response to the unprecedented attack on young people by the ConDem government and will be an important opportunity to show that the struggle over how our education is run is not over.

One of the issues central to the  demonstration is the Higher Education White Paper, a report which opens higher education to privatisation. If implemented this paper willthreaten funding for research at many universities and allow businesses to buy degree awarding powers.  These radical changes would transfer universities from the public to the private sector, meaning they will be run in the interests of investors and profit rather than students.

Yet, this demonstration will be about more than the White Paper. Organisers are demanding Free Education, an end to course closures and the reinstatement of the Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA).  These are arguably the most important demands, as college enrolments have dropped since the scrapping of EMA and large numbers of people are being priced out of university by £9,000 fees.

November 9 will be an important opportunity to build resistance to the ConDem government in the run up to the 30 November, where up to 3 million are set to strike. Students must support the strikes with occupations and demonstrations in order to create a strong and united opposition to the government’s destructive policies. However, we should remember that one day action won’t win back EMA or force government to provide higher education free at the point of delivery. As socialists we must make the case for the type of action that can win: a general strike lasting for as long as it takes to bring down the government!

Read more:

Call for a General Strike

N30: strike out on the road to resistance

Strikes, occupations and the rising of the enraged

Birmingham students occupy!

Dozens of students have occupied the Corporate Conference Centre at Birmingham University. The occupation is part of a series of actions across the country in the run-up to the national demonstration on 9th November.

More info:

Birmingham Occupation Blog

Birmingham and St Andrews occupied – NCAFC

Fight for clear objectives on 9 November

Lobby your  SU to support 30 November strike

Lobby your student union to support the strike on 30th November

Below is a model resolution to put to your student union, through referendum or general assembly, to take action to support the strike on 30th November.

With NUS back-pedaling on its official support for the national student demonstration on 9th November, its crucial that ordinary students maintain the pressure by taking the struggle into their campus unions.


This Union notes:

  • On 30 November up to 4 million public sector workers, including our lecturers and support staff, will be taking strike action against the government’s attacks on their pensions.
  • The government is raising the retirement age, increasing the pension contributions that these workers have to make, and reducing the pension that they receive on retirement.
  • None of the increased contributions that public sector workers will have to make will go to their pensions – it will go straight into the treasury.
  • Hutton, who wrote the report that the government is using to back up these attacks, has admitted that public sector pensions are already sustainable and viable.
  • This Tory-led government is forcing upon us an austerity package that nobody voted for to pay for the bailout of the banks and destroy the welfare state. They have abolished EMA, raised fees to £9000 a year, are privatising the NHS, have cut public sector jobs and are now using pensions to try and levy a tax on public sector workers to make them pay for an economic crisis they didn’t cause.

This Union believes

  • That if the public sector trade unions win over pensions then it would open the road to defeating the government over cuts to education, training and employment.
  •  We are better placed to defeat the cuts if we unite to fight them – students, workers, unemployed and pensioners.

This Union resolves to

  • Call for a Student Strike on 30 November in solidarity with the public sector strike. The aim of the Student Strike will be to help lecturers and support staff shut down the university on 30 November, and to build a unity between staff and students in resistance to cuts.
  • Encourage students to join their department’s picket lines on the morning of the strike.
  • Work with trade unions based at this university to organise a march into the city centre after the morning picket lines.
  • Advertise the Student Strike to all [unviersity name] students through emails, posters and any other available mediums.

Read more:

Students march on bankers

Protest on 9th November but fight for clear objectives

Electricians to join 9th November protest

Students continue fight for free education in Chile

Chile has been rocked by two months of student protests against the privatisation of education. Despite numerous government concessions, the students have maintained their demands for universal free education, paralysing the streets of capital city Santiago with 100,000-strong demonstrations.

A crackdown by the security forces has resulted in nearly 1,000 arrests, yet polls show students have the support of 70% of the population.

Now the opposition has intensified, with the public sector and copper workers trade unions declaring their support for the students’ demands.

Free education for all

Secondary school students, who have occupied 150 schools during the protests, are demanding state control over primary and secondary education. Currently these institutions are managed by local councils. Starved of funds from central government, the result is that poor areas can only afford third-rate schools, while the children of Chile’s ruling class are educated abroad or in elite private institutions.

University students’ demands centre on providing equal access to higher education by abolishing tuition fees, which must be borrowed from private banks. Students want to end the current financing policy of universities by criminalising profiteering in education and enforcing a current ban on for-profit activities by universities.

The first announcement from the government in July failed to address the students’ demands, and even outlined policy to permit for-profit activity by universities which is currently illegal but widely practised.

This was met with a march of 200,000 students on June 30th – the same day that tens of thousands of teachers and lecturers went on strike in Britain. This was the biggest protest in Chile since the downfall of US-backed dictator, Pinochet. In the immediate aftermath, 150 schools were occupied and the Education Minister was sacked. 

After this, the movement consolidated its position with demonstration of tens of thousands involving trade unions, communities, and parents reinforcing the social support of the struggle for free education.

Resistance spreads

The strength of the students’ position was confirmed when the August deal proposed by the government showed they had conceded many of the students’ demands, notably:

  • a constitutional guarantee to a quality education
  • allowing student participation in university governance
  • the end of local control over public secondary education
  • increase university scholarships and provide help for people with un-payable student debt

However, like previous offer, this deal was described as ‘backwards step’ by student leaders who said the proposal did not criminalize profiteering in education, did not seek to provide free or equitable access to higher education, and was not specific.

Despite a third proposal on August 18, offering to reduce interest on government loans to 2%, students held the biggest protests yet just 3 days later. 

With less than 50% of secondary students studying at a state school, and majority private ownership over universities, overcoming the educational apartheid in Chile is a strategic goal of the workers’ movement. 

Many students have realised the importance of winning the organised working-class to their programme for free education. Indeed it has been the declaration of support from the workers in Chile’s important copper mines which has galvanised public opposition to the Conservative government of President Sebastian Pinera.

Some students have demanded the nationalisation of the copper industry to fund education – the support of copper miners and public sector workers is therefore a key step forward.

So, although western media commentators are keen to paint the Chilean protests as an imitation of the recent Spanish ‘indignados’ social movement, in the crucial task of building links and joint action with the organisations of the working class, we see that the Chilean students have gone several steps further than the Spanish youth.

The movements of unemployed youth and students in Spain failed not because of a lack of enthusiasm or support – but because 30% unemployment amongst the youth meant they did not have the economic power to challenge the bosses’ government. Without fighting for a strategy of united action alongside workers facing job losses and pay cuts, they could not hope to seriously challenge the power of the government.

While the student mobilisations in Chile have not achieved all of their demands, the entry of the working-class into the struggle has ensured significant concessions.

This is a critical lesson for young people resisting the profit-driven attacks on education all across the world.

REVOLUTION fights to organise young people as workers, students and unemployed against the ignorance, poverty and exploitation imposed by the capitalist system.

To overthrow the tyranny of one class of exploiters requires the united action of the exploited class. This is why we fight to unite the struggles of students with those of the wider working-class. We must challenge the bureaucratic, pro-capitalist leaders of the trade unions in the open – not isolate ourselves and wage a sectional struggle we cannot win.

Read more: 

Animated Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Wordpress Development Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube