Join NCAFC, fight for democratic unity

ncafc-logo-new

Following the decisions of its December conference, the National Campaign Against Fees & Cuts (NCAFC) has created membership and affiliation structures.

All students can now join NCAFC for £1, and school, college and university anti-cuts groups can affiliate. This will give activists a democratic voice in the campaign and greatly strengthen national and local co-ordination.

The student movement, like the wider anti-cuts anti-cuts movement is in desperate need of a united federation that can carry out a common strategy of resistance to Tory austerity.

The fight to defend education is far from over – as the upcoming strikes by the NUT show.

We think all the education campaigns – NCAFC, Education Activists Network, SBL and YFFJE should hold a joint conference to agree a plan of action and fuse into one federation.

This will stop the unnecessary and destructive competition which is holding us back.

We encourage all students and anti-cuts group to join NCAFC and work to build anti-cuts groups on campus and regionally which draw in representatives from as many institutions and campaigns as possible.

Only by building a strong, unified campaign based on the most effective democratic structures like general assemblies can we hope to have a chance of taking on the Tories – and winning.

Studio Schools – an attack on working class youth

After completing a stint in education, be it leaving school at 16 or staying on in further education, most of us find that we are doomed to be little more than slaves to a company. For some of us however, this could now be the case from the mere age of 14.

Enter, “Studio Schools”, a government backed scheme for 14 -19 year olds that will put the education of the said school’s students firmly in the hands of big, corporate employers. For those of you unsure what a “studio school” is (join the queue), launched back in 2010 these schools sprung up without any sort of discussion of whether they are necessary or of any actual use and are state funded however run by private sponsors. The apparent aim for studio schools is to help young people get into work by making them more employable. This is to be achieved through the students of the school being taken out of the classroom environment and learning “on the job” with each school specialising in a certain area such as catering and engineering. There are currently 15 studio schools open across the UK with that figure expected to double to 30 by September 2013 as the Government gives the all clear for another 15 to be opened.

The Studio Schools Trust claims on their website that the schools offer both academic and vocational qualifications and teaches (some of) the national curriculum stating students will work towards GCSEs in at least Maths, English and Science. These qualification will be delivered however “out of a traditional classroom setting” and instead through “Enterprise projects”.

At a first glance studio schools may not seem like a bad idea. There are plenty of young people who fail to thrive in the classroom environment and there are too plenty of subjects that offer few practical skills. These schools however will usher their students down a very narrow path with the end product being working in a specific, not necessarily specialist field. The studio school’s “CREATE Framework”, consisting of modules such as “thinking” and “understanding myself”, doesn’t sound too far away from the likes of CoPE and general studies, filler qualifications seen in mainstream education which are much less valued than core subjects. What this looks like is basically a dumbing down of education making students work towards becoming the drones for giant corporations. This of course is hardly the sort of opportunity anyone would want going to school to open up for our children.

The most alarming part of this set up is also the way in which the schools claim children will be “taught”. As previously stated, students will learn “on the job”. Yes, a hands on approach like this may be better for preparing students for a lifetime of work than sitting at a table working out algebra is ever going to. Students at these schools will however be doing a job with 9 – 5 hours and short holidays reflecting this. They will be getting prepared for the world of work, by working. Over 16 students will be paid, unsurprisingly, the minimum wage. Under 16 students will be expected to work for free. This brings in an awful scent of workfare about the set up as students are in fact working for their education. Facts such as these could also point out the reasoning for the giant corporation’s involvement may be more to do with aspects such cheap labour rather than trying to help young people cement a better future. As anyone who has ever worked for pretty much any company ever will tell you, there is only one thing people at the top actually care about.

The really sickly part about this all is that we are handing over the responsibility of educating these students to the big name companies; Sony, Ikea and Hilton Hotels to name but a few. The Studio Schools Trust website states that in the most recent employer survey 70% of employers “wanted to see the new government make the employability skills of young people its top education priority”. Yes because it doesn’t matter about opening up a range of opportunities for young people, encouraging them to do something worthwhile or to ensure just a chance of doing something they enjoy does it? As long as the education process makes them able to clean a table in a hotel, right guys?

Of course not everyone gets to follow their dream. Not everyone thrives in an academic environment. But isn’t education supposed to be about that chance that a person could? It’s certainly not about securing the next generation of employees for the corporate big boys. If a young person wants the option of dropping out of the conventional academic environment as they feel it’s not for them then no one should want to say that they can’t. But is doing this as young as 14 really the answer? Is mass involvement from the private sponsors really the right way to go about this? These are still state schools remember. They are still funded by the tax payer. If this is going to be done it needs to be done properly and with young people’s best interests at heart. The corporate giants have clicked their fingers and said “we want this out of education” and just like that with little thought or discussion on the matter, now we have studio schools. Is this really for the benefit of the students who will be attending? Or is this just the big companies muscling in on our education process? Putting young people’s lives in the hands of those who care for nothing but their wealth is a dangerous route to go down however one that our government seems to backing.

Minister Threatens Restrictions on Young Drivers

Plans for restrictions on young drivers, put forward by the Association of British Insurers (ABI), are currently been considered by the Department of Transport. Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin is said to be looking into measures including banning young drivers from carrying passengers who are not family members and restrictions on driving at night. Despite statistics from the ABI blaming young drivers for a disproportionate number of road mishaps, attacking young drivers and placing potentially life altering restrictions is no way to go about making our roads safer.

Driving at night is more than a little scarier than driving in the day, of course, especially for the inexperienced driver. However, this is something that you are going to have to do; it’s a fact of life. Especially as many jobs require you to be able to drive at night whether that is part of the job or just too and from hence banning young people from driving in the dark is putting them at a great disadvantage. Being mobile at night is very much a reason in itself for learning to drive. You’d have a job on trying to catch a bus at midnight after all. This is of course without even mentioning how hard to police this would actually be.

Of the proposed banning of non-family passengers, Mr McLoughlin has to say; “When I talk to young people who have recently passed their test, what they say sometimes is that peer pressure is put on them to go fast, to show off.” It would be wrong to suggest that there isn’t a sort of “boy racer” culture that some of us unfortunately fall into however making all young people pay the price for this isn’t the answer. Anyone under the impression it is “cool” to bomb down to Asda with urgency of a James Bond chase scene should be getting pulled up if seen by Police anyway. This meaning a new law banning passengers is hardly going to get adhered by either. Not all young people share this frame of mind and generalisations are not really something to base laws upon.

Roads nowadays are busier and more dangerous than ever making it a difficult and often scary time to learn to drive. You would only have to take to our roads for a mere twenty minutes or so to see just how much road safety is disregarded by drivers both young and old. It’s not often people stick to speed limits wherever they may be driving. Bad habit such as not indicating properly and trying to and nip through junctions at the last millisecond of amber are but a few common tendencies amongst drivers. This may suggest that dangerous ways of driving may be more set by the experienced rather than the inexperienced. Patience for new drivers is not something necessarily shared by older, more experienced drivers. Bullying on the road is too quite commonplace with a P or L plate often seeming like more of an invitation for older drivers to intimidate rather than to be patient with new drivers.

Plain stupidity may sometimes be a cause of road accidents however is not something one group of people can be made to account for. With a lot of young drivers been, obviously, new drivers it would seem that a lack of experience and lower confidence when driving may be a better explanation as to why young people are involved in a lot of accidents. Hitting young motorists with restrictions before they’ve had a chance to reverse out of their drives let alone cause a pile up is hardly going to be a confidence boost. The process of a person learning to drive does not necessarily covering driving at night, on the motorway, having more than one passenger, having an impatient older motorist lingering a centimetre behind or a range of other hazardous situations.  So perhaps it is the learning process of driving that should be looked at. Other options may lead to the learning process becoming a bit more drawn out however educating and addressing the hazard which is “new drivers” is a lot better than simply harassing the young. Road safety after all is of great importance hence better education and possible increased use of practical educational programmes such as Drive iQ would surely be of great benefit. Increased punishments for people who are actually breaking laws and driving dangerously, be it the driver themselves or a distractive passenger, may also be something that could be looked into. After all, driving dangerously does put lives at risk whatever age or level of experience you may be at.

#Demo 2012: Stop Tory attacks on education

On 21 November, thousands of students will march in London to say no to cuts, fees and privatisation.

Since the Con-Dem government came to power, education has been under constant attack. Tuition fees were tripled to £9k a year, EMA was scrapped and now schools and universities are being sold off to private companies.

On October 20th, 150, 000 workers marched in London demanding an end to cuts.

#Demo2012 on November 21st is our chance to strike back.

The trashing of Tory party HQ at Millbank, the occupations and education assemblies showed how we become stronger when we unite and fight. The victory of the Quebec students’ strike proves that militant struggle is the best way to defeat government attacks.

The student movement needs to reorganise and create the weapons necessary to win. This means uniting the different campaigns like EAN, NCAFC and YFJ into a single, democratic federation which fights for a general strike to stop the cuts.

A big demonstration on N21 will send Cameron’s toffs the message that students won’t lie down and watch our universities privatised and a generation of young people denied access to real education.

All out to defend education on N21 – Scrap fees & cuts, bring back EMA – Build a general strike to stop the cuts!

Appeal for a Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10

 

Download a pdf version of the appeal

 

November 10, 2012. Florence, Italy. Europe has been plunged into austerity and social conflict by the economic crisis. Millions say ‘enough is enough’. Florence is our chance to fight for an alternative; to build an international resistance to all attacks which make the working class and youth pay for the crisis of capitalism.

Ten years ago, radical youth sparked the call for global demonstrations against the Iraq war. Millions responded. Today, young people have again taken the lead by fighting austerity all across Europe. This is why we welcome the decision to call a new European Social Forum at a time when millions are trying to shape the struggle for an alternative.

We welcome the organisers’ pledge that:

“Florence 10+10” aims to be an inclusive and popular space, at our disposal for building alliances and concrete common initiatives: to build convergences for action on a European scale.”

We appeal to the youth of Syntagma Square and Puerta del Sol, of the occupations and the blockades, in the workplace and amongst the unemployed millions, to join us in our call for a European Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10.

We appeal also to our neighbours on other continents and above all in the lands of the Arab Spring to join us and enrich our debates with their experiences.

We want Florence 10+10 to address the key task of our movements. To succeed it must become the time and place for transforming our defensive, local struggles into Europe-wide and even worldwide action.

A Youth Assembly can be a place to debate, build networks for common action and plan an international campaign uniting all those under attack from the bankers, billionaires and their politicians in the European Union.

The EU institutions are the levers of power for an unelected class of exploiters who want to divide our resistance. Their strategy is the rise in unemployment, racism and attacks on the rights of women. Migrant workers are blamed for the lack of jobs while the unemployed and disabled are persecuted.

All who fight back confront the power of the media barons and the violence of the police, courts and fascists. But defiance alone has not been enough to throw out the austerity governments or stop the destruction of jobs, social welfare, and education.

Low-paid work, précarité and forced unpaid work is the future for millions of Europe’s young people. Education privatised, pensions demolished and training schemes abandoned. Everywhere the youth are denied a vote, economically exploited and yet made to pay for a crisis we did not cause.

We appeal the youth of the occupations, the barricades, the anti-fascist campaigns and the working class organisations everywhere to sign the appeal and join forces to build a powerful, democratic and decisive Youth Assembly at Florence 10+10.

Chilean youth resist police crackdown

Students in the Chilean capital, Santiago, have recently seen their 18 month mass movement hit by state attacks on their democratic rights.

It is mainly secondary school students protesting about a new law which would allow much stricter penalties to those on demonstrations.

The law would remove their freedom of speech and prevent them from legally protesting. It was passed in an attempt to suppress the a movement which has seen occupations, strikes and direct action in an campaign for free education in the country.

Recently students have been blockading roads and occupying public secondary schools as part of a campaign to force the government to withdraw the Hintzpeter law -  nicknamed after the country’s unpopular interior minister.

The law would replace fines with long prison sentences of up to three years for those who block traffic or occupy buildings.

It isn’t just the students who will be affected by the new law, any group from factory workers to environmentalists could risk time in jail for taking part in mass demonstrations. Without the ability to withdraw their labour power and cost the ruling money, the main weapon students have is though their self-organisation into a mass movement, acting jointly with the organisations of the working class.

The government are trying to criminalise their movement and ban the right to protest. The legislation aims to intimidate students, and follows an international trend set by the infamous Bill 78 in Quebec.  Santiago’s mayor has said that those who do not return to school by the end of this week risk having their scholarships removed.

It’s now key that students and the wider youth mobilise against this immediate attack on their democratic freedoms. To succeed with this resistance it will be necessary to draw the trade unions and working class who can use their economic and political power to defeat the government.

The US continent is engulfed in struggles of young people – from Montral to Oakland, Santiago to  Sao Paulo, the youth are resisting the attacks of an elite which is determined to sacrifice the jobs, education and future of an entire generation to pay for its mistakes.

We want to unite these struggles, drawing strength from our collective numbers and experiences; we fight for the youth of the world to defend ourselves and fight for our interests as part of an international movement against capitalism and for socialism and workers’ power.

French youth lash out against racism and unemployment

Hundreds of young people fought running battles with police in the northern French town of Amiens.

In the early hours of 14 August, police were called to disperse groups of youth, provoking a night of conflict which saw 150 police attacked with fireworks and projectiles. A school and sports centre were burned down, along with dozens of cars.

Although the ritual burning of cars and bricking cops is not unusual in the impoverished suburbs or banlieues of France’s industrial towns, it was the scale and ferocity of last night’s fighting which has made it national and even international news.

Newly elected Socialist President Francois Hollande has said security “is not a priority, but an obligation” – meaning he will deal with it no differently than Chirac did in 2005 – flooding the estates with police and the hated CRS riot squads. From September he will establish 15 ‘priority security zones’ – pouring money into tougher policing rather than investing in real jobs.

But tear gas and batons does nothing to address the underlying issues. With 50% unemployment amongst young people of Black or Arab origin, and over 20% amongst white French youth, the lack of opportunities is made worse by an intimidating police presence. Police regularly conduct sweeps of working class districts, flooding train stations and estates stopping and searching hundreds of young people at a time.

The new government came to power on a promise of ‘growing the economy’ to avoid austerity. But exactly the reverse has happened. France’s economy has flatlined, cuts have not been reversed, and French youth feel they are being made to pay for a crisis they didn’t cause.

Hollande has also failed to make a clean break with the racist policies of the last president. He has continued to round up thousands of Roma citizens, demolishing their camps and deporting them back to Eastern European countries. This is despite the fact that they are EU citizens and have every right to live in France.

Hollande is not worried about the employment or education chances for young people. He now just wants to avoid a repeat of 2005 where riots engulfed France’s major cities for more than three weeks. This is the great danger – there are now millions more youth with no future than then, millions more youth with plenty to feel angry about, and who feel they have nothing to lose by taking out their frustration on a violent and racist police force.

 

Anti-workfare tour of shame in Leeds

With the workfare scheme still forcing thousands into unpaid work placements, REVOLUTION joined up with others to organise two walks of shame to target business exploiting young unemployed.

With around 8 people on the first day, this number rose to 14 on the second. The atmosphere was lively, out of the people there; there were members from the SWP, Leeds Unemployment Action Group and members of trade union Unite. Around half of the people hadn’t been involved in action before and had got involved through receiving a leaflet the previous day.

The tour began at Asda where the staff seemed to be pro-workfare and quite happy to let their managers profit at the expense the unemployed. At the Hilton we handed workfare leaflets to the staff manager who denied the Hilton had any participation in Workfare. At the point someone got their phone out to show the manager the Hilton’s quote on the workfare website. He walked away threatening to call the police if we didn’t get off ‘his property’ – another boss who knows the police can always be called on to defend the privelege of the bosses’ private property.

Finally we went to Greggs where we handed out leaflets and collected signatures from customers.

Overall we got a good response from people and they were interested to hear about workfare and what it was doing.

We must continue this fightback and force more companies to back out of the scheme as Hollandand Barrett and Pizza Hut have recently done.

This Sunday in Leeds we are having a demonstration outside Argos on the Headrow. Spread the word and see you there!

 

No wages – outrageous!

 

Young people don’t need jobs or housing say Tory millionaires

Cameron’s £750,000 pile – got a spare bed?

The government is determined to boost tax revenues. But instead of collecting some of the £70million+ illegally dodged in taxes by the super rich every year, Cameron says young people must pay – by being denied access to jobs and houses. Of course, a government whose ministers are almost all millionaires isn’t likely to demand their rich mates pay their share.

Amid a recession and huge youth unemployment, in a speech on welfare he said that people under the age of 25 should be stripped of their housing benefits and made to remain at home until they can afford to move out with no government support.

With youth unemployment hitting 1 million, minimum wage being frozen, EMA being cut and tuition fees rising, they’ve got it bad. A lot of young people couldn’t live with their parents till the age of 25 because of personal reasons or simply because their families couldn’t afford it.

More importantly why should young people be made to live at home, we want them to become independent adults who can make their own choices in life.

These proposals will increase homelessness. By removing the housing benefits the state provides and with no jobs available people have little other way of receiving money and paying bills. While there are no jobs because of the situation our government and banks put us in, then they should be supporting individuals and families until they are able to support themselves. Low interest rates fixed by the Bank of England encourage housing speculators to keep properties empty until rents are profitable enough.

His attack particularly affects single parents or families with children. With 1 in 8 leaving a job and 1 in 5 turning down a job due to the cost of childcare it is clear these families aren’t being supported enough with free crèches and nurseries to enable their parents to work. Instead the government wants to import a crazy scheme from the USA where parents are supposed to take their children into work…

His new proposal includes benefits cuts to those families with 3 or more children ‘to stop the out-of-work being better off by having children.’ With child benefits already having been slashed having another child barely gives you enough extra money to feed them let alone any left over.

‘Consider paying some benefits “in kind” rather than in cash,’ is Cameron’s way of saying ‘all these benefit scroungers spend their money on booze and drugs.’ As this is the case in some situations, support should be given through rehab schemes. Giving ‘money’ in tokens won’t get rid of the issue and it’ll mean that some children have even less to live on.  The US already has 14 million people living on food vouchers – and this number is going up not down.

The disabled are being attacked too with Cameron saying that 2/3s of those on Disability Claimant remain on it for their whole lives. He believes these people should be forced to do full-time community work and take steps to improve their health.

During his speech Cameron clearly stated that pensions wouldn’t be affected in the next wave of reforms. ‘If you work hard all your life, you deserve dignity in retirement.’ The implication being that those young people deserve nothing because they’ve given nothing to the state yet. The youth are an easy target because with no money and living with mum and dad, it’s more difficult for them to organise.

This is another attack on the working class, this time the young and he uses this to drive a wedge between the young and old. Young people didn’t cause the crisis and our future shouldn’t be sacrificed to pay back millionaire crooks like Barclays boss Bob Diamond – who carried out a giant financial fraud and got off with £2million hush money.

It’s not even like Benefits are bankrupting the country – each year more than £15 billion worth of welfare is left unclaimed, and goes back into the pot. The politicians live in giant homes and have refused to build enough decent housing for over 20 years. The private sector isn’t taking up the slack, and why would they? It’s not the capitalists’ job to look out for ordinary people.  If we want a society with proper communities and opportunities for young people, we’ll have to fight for it.

Benefits – the Tory weapon of mass distraction

When Cameron took time off to criticise Jimmy Carr’s tax-dodging, it wasn’t long before people started to ask him about his own friendly links with “morally wrong” tax dodgers. That these people happened to be using the cash they saved to fund the Tory party is no more than an unfortunate coincidence.

All very embarassing right? So the Tories took out their frustration on – you guessed it – unemployed people. With 1 million youth not in education, training or employment, there’s enough to choose from. Cameron said he wants to end the ‘culture of entitlement’. Apparently he doesn’t mean the bosses’ entitlement to chuck thousands out of a job, offshore their factories and come to an ‘arrangement’ on taxes over a cosy dinner with a Tory minister or two.

When the Tories’ economic ignorance sends the whole country to shit, the first people they blame are the people suffering the most from their extraordinary incompetence.

Cameron reckons people under the age of 25 should be stripped of their housing benefits and made to remain at home until they can afford to move out. Presumably, this will be made into a sane policy by the setting up giant plantations of magic job trees.

Youth unemployment = 1 million+

EMA = gone

Tuition fees = £9,000 a year

Minimum wage = frozen

Schools = privatised and branded with corporate logos

The record speaks for itself. Cameron obviously never did meet anyone who lived in a normal home – if he did he wouldn’t be suggesting that its normal for young people to live with their parents til they’re 25!

Anyway why should young people be made to live at home, why shouldn’t we be given the chance to become independent adults, capable of making our own decisions?

Because that would cost money – the government would have to reverse hundreds of thousands of job cuts, invest in secure jobs, regulate agency work, equalise the minimum wage – and most importantly, build millions of new homes to address Britain’s housing crisis.

What the proposals mean

The government has already overseen the destruction of millions of jobs. Now they’re taking away housing benefit. Osborne is famous for his mathematical ignorance, but even he can work out that no job + no money = no house. Or, more people will be kicked onto the streets.

Or perhaps Cameron and his mates will open up their 10-bed mansions to those whose homes get repossed by Britain’s nationalised banks?

His attack particularly affects single parents or families with children. With 1 in 8 mothers leaving a job and 1 in 5 turning down a job due to the cost of childcare, the true cost of cutting schemes like Sure Start is to plunge working families into poverty.

His new proposal includes benefits cuts to those families with 3 or more children ‘to stop the out-of-work being better of by having children.’ With child benefits already having been slashed having another child barely gives you enough extra money to feed them let alone any left over.

‘Consider paying some benefits “in kind” rather than in cash,’ is Cameron’s way of saying ‘all these benefit scroungers spend their money on booze and drugs.’ The USA and France have had ‘food voucher’ schemes for decades – and their problems are even worse.

The disabled are being attacked too with Cameron saying that two thirds of those on Disability Claimant remain on it for their whole lives. He believes these people should be forced to do full-time community work and take steps to improve their health. It’s the great irony that the high number of Disability allowance claimants stems from Tory attempts in the 1980s and 90s to disguise the tru level of unemployment by convincing people to sign on for Disability instead of Jobseekers’.

During his speech Cameron clearly stated that pensions wouldn’t be affected in the next wave of reforms. ‘If you work hard all your life, you deserve dignity in retirement.’ The implication being that those young people deserve nothing because they’ve given nothing to the state yet. The youth are an easy target because with no money and living with mum and dad, it’s more difficult for them to organise.

The real point though, is that most young people don’t vote Tory – so why look after people who’d sooner string you up than “call you ‘Dave’”?

These proposals are savage, but are mainly the reaction of a Prime Minister who knows he has blundered from one scandal to the next, and is trying to reconnect with his Party base.

Nevertheless, it’s a glimpse of what Cameron would certainly like to do, should he ever get into power with a clear majority. All the junk about big society and ‘all in this together’ has been well and truly ditched.

The Tories are telling ordinary working people that we’re going to pay for the crisis, and if we protest, they’ll simply pass laws to stop us. Are we going to let them?

Floating Social Media Icons Powered by Acurax Blog Designing Company
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Youtube